Winograd, Party of One?

Yesterday, as thousands of Angelenos began assembling in solidarity downtown at LA City hall with the workers of Wisconsin, Marcy Winograd, the latest candidate to enter the race to fill Jane Harman’s vacated congressional seat, kicked off her campaign with friends, family and about a dozen supporters on a windy sidewalk outside a Torrance, CA drugstore.

Winograd in Torrance 01

Winograd in Torrance 02

The gathering was relatively modest compared to her campaign kickoff in 2009 against then incumbent, Jane Harman.


Yesterday at the Venice Pier, Marcy Winograd announced her campaign for Congress in front of about 75-80 supporters and friends, and many leaders of the progressive activist community in Los Angeles……

Marcy gave a short speech where she emphasized her no-holds-barred progressive values and offered a true contrast to her incumbent opponent. She called for a “new New Deal” to put America back to work, announced support for John Conyers’ HR 676, questioned the continued bailout of the banks and the use of Predator drone strikes in Pakistan, argued for rapid transit and renewable energy in the Los Angeles area, and said of her primary challenge, “this will reverberate throughout the country.”

Winograd’s choice to run for CA36 has a number of progressive activists scratching their heads. With Harman out of the picture, Winograd’s candidacy no longer has the urgency of a protest campaign. And with two well-known Democrats already contesting the open seat, including Debra Bowen, California’s popular and progressive Secretary of State, Winograd has virtually no chance of surviving the first round of voting, let alone winning the seat outright.

Even though Winograd took 41% of the vote in her last primary challenge against Harman, the dynamic is far different in this race.

Under new rules approved by voters last year, the CA36 race will be the first congressional election in California run as an “open primary”. Under this system all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, run against each other in a single contest. If no one candidate gets more than 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters advance to a second election. In this way, the election more closely mirrors a general election, since Republicans, Democrats and Independents can vote for any candidate.

So far there are three Democrats in the race and only one Republican – Mike Webb, the City Attorney of Redondo Beach. Since Republican candidates have in the past captured between 30%-40% of the CA36 vote in the general election, it’s far more likely that Webb (if he remains the only Republican in the race) would advance to the second round against either Hahn or Bowen, than it is for Winograd.

If Winograd herself is worried about splitting votes with the more liberal Debra Bowen and handing the election to a Republican, or to Hahn – Jane Harman’s preferred candidate – she’s not showing it.


Asked if she was worried about playing a spoiler role for Bowen, Winograd said she likes Bowen and would like to see her continue as Secretary of State.

“I have great respect for Debra Bowen,” she said. “I’m glad to see she is taking more of a leadership role on getting out of Afghanistan. That’s good. I think my entering the race plays a role in shaping the debate.”

However, progressive activists who supported Winograd in the past aren’t so sanguine, and are withholding both monetary support and endorsements, choosing instead to support Bowen

Another challenge for Winograd, who is accustomed to running against Harman, will be defining herself to voters. Both Hahn and Bowen are far to the left of Harman – neither are Blue Dog Democrats like the former congresswoman – so there’s very little substantive issues where the three differ.

The exception is Israel, an issue Winograd is quite passionate about, but her views aren’t widely shared or popular with voters. (Rep. Henry Waxman once said of her views, “in Marcy Winograd’s foreign policy, Israel would cease to exist.”)

Without Harman as a foil, it will remain to be seen if Winograd can make a case for herself with voters in 2011. Winograd and her supporters seem to understand this, because they’re doing everything they can to keep Harman a factor in the campaign.

A supporter close to Winograd’s campaign, trying to distinguish his candidate from Bowen, made this argument to activists on a local listserve,

“Bowen’s whole political career is a mirror image of Jane Harman’s record and her right-of-center races for the assembly and senate are there for all to see!”

Also posted at Venice For Change

29 thoughts on “Winograd, Party of One?”

  1. I’m looking forward to seeing who the Dem Clubs endorse. Any guesses about how many will go with the establishment electeds and how many will go for Bowen or Winograd? I’m hoping for (and even allowing myself to expect) a grassroots burst for Bowen.

  2. Contrary to this post, there were about forty — not a “dozen” — Winograd supporters at the kickoff in Torrance.

    As for the suggestion that this Torrance event somehow conflicted with the labor rally downtown, the gathering in Torrance began at 10 a.m., and was over in plenty of time for Winograd to arrive for the start of the labor rally, where she spoke (as Evry knows).  There is no one in this contest who has as profound and proven a commitment to the cause of organized labor as does Winograd, whose resume includes organizing for the United Farm Workers in the 1970s, as well as active membership in UTLA for the last decade and a half.  She, above Hahn and Bowen, had a right to speak on behalf of threatened public employees at that downtown rally.

    And aside from Evry’s evident animosity for this candidate (I’m her husband, btw), she offers no reason why Winograd should refrain from entering a race where she has run well before, whereas Bowen has done and could continue to do a fine job as SOS, and Hahn is already proving herself to be a cynic rather than the carrier of the kind of progressive voice and policy that the District needs and deserves.

  3. it creates an advantage to the party that can strong-arm candidates out of the race, and disadvantages those that let the voters decide. i liked the old system better.

  4. Under new rules approved by voters last year, the CA36 race will be the first congressional election in California run as an “open primary”.

    I am sorry to harp on this, but please explain these results:

    http://www.sos.ca.gov/election

    Jackie Speier’s special election on April 8, 2008 — before Prop 14 — appears to have been run as an open primary.  Since CA36 will be the first in California, how did this happen?

  5. Yeah! for the Open Primary.  Let’s hope we can get more moderate Democrats.  Democrats who understand our country and our state are broke and that business is not evil, but a necessary component to a healthy economy and low unemployment, and that 100K+ compensation packages are way to rich for an average state worker and unsustainable for our state.

Comments are closed.