The last week of a campaign, as our mailbox fills to overflowing with glossy brochures extolling the virtues of competing candidates, we often find ourselves donning black, rending our garments, and contemplating the death of a million innocent trees.
The campaign to replace Jane Harman in CA-36 is no different.
Spread out on my coffee table right now are a couple of mailers from Debra Bowen, one from Marcy Winograd that a volunteer stuffed under our welcome mat, one from Mike Gin, and even one from Tea Party candidate Craig Huey. However, none of these candidates holds a candle to Janice Hahn and her supporters, who sent out a thirteenth full-color mailer today.
According to the FEC, Hahn leads all candidates but Craig Huey in cash-on-hand (money left in the bank after expenses), and that’s enabled her to fund this juggernaut-in-wood-pulp with over $300,000 in donations and independent expenditures from business interests and lobbyists connected with LA City Hall, real estate developers,the nuclear industry,health insurance PACs, and even rent control opponents.
Combing though the latest FEC reports, I found a number of interesting nuggets, but one recent donation worth noting in particular was from Tim Larkin, CEO of Warren Resources.
Why this donation? Because Warren Resources, a New York City-based oil company with considerable ties to the Wilmington and Harbor area oil fields, was a vocal critic of Measure O,the oil extraction tax Hahn opposed putting on the ballot after initially supporting it. In the end, Hahn was the only LA City council member to vote against bringing the measure to voters, saying at the time,”I’ve reconsidered this and I have heard from various business groups who do feel like this might be the wrong climate to put this on the ballot.”
In addition, The Cooperative of American Physicians IE Committee, a PAC which represents medical malpractice insurers, has upped it’s investment in Janice Hahn to over $75,000. A year ago, this same PAC partnered with oil, tobacco and other special interests to go after 53D Assemblymember Betsy Butler in the June 2010 primary.
Butler has endorsed Debra Bowen in this congressional race.
According to FEC reports, Janice Hahn is the only candidate so far to benefit from independent expenditures.
It’s likely to get worse before it gets better. I’ve heard rumors CAPC is planning to send out a negative hit-piece against Bowen this week, just as they did Butler, and that Hahn will be taking a page out of the Meg Whitman campaign, sending out yet another 20-30 page full-color brochure to voters for the general election.
But hey, there’s good news too. According to the Sierra Club (who’ve endorsed Debra Bowen), it turns out all those mailers are recyclable.
I live in the district. To date I have received six (6) pieces of mail from Councilwoman Hahn and three (3) pieces of mail from SOS Bowen.
For Bowen to cry foul is just too much stomach, especially from this perrenial Bowen apologist who has selective memory when it comes to the facts, especially Bowen’s support of WAL-MART, “three strikes,” and the death penalty as if it never happened!
But what difference does it make, they’re both lying anyway?
Bowen has the nerve to to state she is “always standing up tot he oil and ebergy companies as Chair of the Senate Energy & Utilities Committee.”
That’s a falsehood and a lie!
Bowen accepted tens of thousands of dollars from these same companies she pretended to monitor in her capacity as chair of this oversight committee. More importantly she accepted $14,000 from Enron, a company responsible for the rolling blackouts that occured on Bowen’s watch!
These same companies are the same companies that spent large sums of money to ironically defeat one of Bowen’s biggest supporters just last year – Assemblymember Betsy Butler!
But more importantly, when is Bowen going to come clean on her 14-year support of “three strikes” and the death penalty as a member of both the assembly and state senate?
Some manufactured interview with a supporter doesn’t pass the sniff test Debra.
While you’re at it, maybe you can tell us why Bowen wouldn’t sign Ron Kovic’s pledge to end supplemental funding of these wars?
What’s the excuse for that?
A dog ate her pen?
Profiles in courage?
You must be joking.
I live in San Mateo county where the recently had a county supervisor election, all by-mail. I made my decision about 2 weeks before the deadline, so any flyers after that were wasted. It would have been nice to be able to say, “I’ve voted, don’t waste your time, money, and trees on me.”
Timber is a renewable cash crop and vital economic driver for significant parts of California and the Northwest. But I gotta agree with you about how tiresome those mailers are.