Villaraigosa Takes on Prop 13

LA Mayor Takes Steps towards state politics

by Brian Leubitz

Since Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa opted out of the 2010 Governor’s race, he has been fairly quite on state level politics.  However, he stepped right up, and at the Sacramento Press Club, took on Prop 13:

He implored politicians to muster the courage to stop shying away from the third rails in California politics, including Prop. 13′s property tax on businesses and the constitutional requirement for a two-thirds vote on taxes.

And he framed it as direct challenge to Gov. Jerry Brown:

“To Governor Brown, I say, we need to have the courage to test the voltage in some of these so-called third-rail issues, beginning with Proposition 13,” Villaraigosa said. “We need to strengthen Proposition 13 and get it back to the original idea of protecting homeowners.” (Political Blotter)

Of course, these are traditional issues of import to California progressives, and critical to reestablishing democracy in California.  Even if Democrats are able to get 2/3 in the Legislature, changing the tax rules still matter.  Look at it this way, if we are working with majority rules, we can afford to lose some conservative Democratic votes.  But with the supermajority rules, the right-leaning lobbies have far more sway over a 2/3 Democratic majority as they can pick off members of the “Mod Squad.”

It is good to see Villaraigosa take on Prop 13, as the more conversation the better.  Whether anything comes of this is another question.  

4 thoughts on “Villaraigosa Takes on Prop 13”

  1. Unfortunately, the other items Villaraigosa proposed are elimination of the corporate income tax, “pension reform” (i.e., wage reductions) and reductions in the personal income tax (which needs to be progressively restructured instead of reduced).  

    We need a comprehensive progressive plan for bringing back the California dream.  We don’t need any more “grand bargains” that mix and match reactionary policies.  These result only in further destruction of the public sector, and further benefit for the wealthiest.

  2. The 2/3 rule places too much power in too few hands…

    and power – as the old saying goes – corrupts.

    Year after year, the ‘Pubs used their “superminority” power over the budget to extort votes for issues that had nothing to do with finance: environmental regs, labor laws, election rules and giveaways to out-of-state corporations.

    As few as 27 of our 80 Assembly members can prevent a revenue bill from passing. It only takes 14 of our 40 State Senators to gum up the works. That kind of power makes members of minority party tempting and easy targets for corporate lobbyists and campaign money.

    Start the conversation in terms of unearned, undeserved, corrupting power – before it slides into the swamp of “The Democrats will tax us out of our homes!”

Comments are closed.