(Written by Jenesse Miller and cross-posted from Groundswell, the California League of Conservation Voters blog.)
Listen up, candidates for office in California: Independent voters care about the environment.
A groundbreaking new statewide poll of California voters who decline-to-state (DTS) an affiliation with any political party reveals the strong environmental and other progressive values of this poorly-understood but growing bloc of voters. The poll was commissioned by the California League of Conservation Voters Education Fund (CLCV Education Fund), CLCV's sister organization and the non-partisan voter engagement arm of the environmental movement in California. The research was conducted by widely-respected polling firm Tulchin Research.
This in-depth survey is the first of its kind to explore in detail DTS (or independent) voters' opinions on many of today’s most controversial issues and that is being shared with the broader public.
With DTS voters increasing from 15 to 20 percent of California’s electorate just since 2006, the purpose of the public opinion survey was to better understand this influential swing and rapidly growing voter group and its attitudes toward environmental issues and other timely topics.
Capitol Weekly was one of the first to cover the results of this groundbreaking poll:
Two out of three of California’s decline-to-state voters consider themselves conservationists, believe climate change is a growing problem that needs to be addressed and say environmental regulations provide critical protections for air, land and water, according to a new survey.
The statewide survey commissioned by the California League of Conservation Voters Education Fund is “the first of its kind to explore in detail DTS voters’ opinions on many of today’s most controversial issues and that is being shared with the broader public,” the group said in releasing the results.
The survey found that DTS voters are solidly pro-environment and support a wide range of conservation policies:
- Two-thirds (65 percent) consider themselves to be “conservationists”.
- Notably, DTS voters agree climate change is occurring and is a major problem that needs to be addressed by a 2-to-1 margin (63 percent).
- When DTS voters were asked about their opinions on environmental regulations made by our lawmakers, an overwhelming 69 percent believe environmental regulations provide an important benefit to our society and help to protect our air, land and water. In contrast, just 1-in 5 DTS voters (21 percent) believe environmental regulations do more harm than good.
Warner Chabot, CEO of CLCV Education Fund (and CEO of CLCV), stated in a press conference today that candidates for office in California ignore the results of this poll “at their peril,” noting that in the last decade decline-to-state voters have doubled in size, comprise the majority of swing voters, and are the fastest-growing voter bloc in California.
Considering the new dynamics of California elections, including redistricting and the new top-two primary where independent voters could swing the results one way or another, many political experts believe there are more state Assembly and Senate districts up for grabs in the 2012 elections than in any year in the past two decades. According to the most recent report from the secretary of state, about 3.5 million California voters declined to state a political preference. “This nonpartisan group of voters now holds considerable electoral power,” said Warner.
Pollster and Tulchin Research President Ben Tulchin stated:
“I was impressed with just how consistent and intense DTS voters in California were in their pro-environment and progressive values. These survey results clearly indicate to any candidate running for office in California today that strongly supporting tough laws to protect our air, land and water is a very effective way to win over DTS voters.”
CLCV Education Fund Vice-President Dr. H. Eric Schockman added:
“The progressive and pro-environment values exhibited by this influential and growing segment of our state’s electorate will have profound implications for the future of environmental protections and public health in California in 2012 and beyond.”
Survey Methodology
From October 27 – November 2, 2011, Tulchin Research conducted a telephone survey among 600 likely Decline-to-State voters in California using live, professional interviewers. The margin of error for this survey is +/- 4.0 percentage points.
About the California League of Conservation Voters Education Fund
CLCVEF’s mission is to protect California's natural resources and to improve the health of our communities. Its strategy is three-fold: increase the impact of organizations in the conservation, public health and environmental justice communities; conduct public education campaigns that connect voters’ environmental values to the democratic process; and promote nonpartisan civic engagement efforts to increase the participation of conservation voters in underrepresented communities. Find out more at www.clcvedfund.org.
The entire publicly-available results of the poll can be viewed here.
What an absolutely ridiculous poll. “Are you an environmentalist”? …majority says “YES”!
Are you a nice person…majority says YES!
Do you want good schools….majority says YES!
What the hell do you expect? people to say they don’t like the environment and would rather live in a toxicv pig sty that a nice clean safe situation?
This is completely bogus and self serving. Ask the real question…what are you willing to pay for a clean safe environment…higher taxes? 15% unemployment? more government regulation? less consumer choice? higher prices for everything you purchase? as the real questions and see where the majority of people fall.
“Are you an environmentalist”? No, I’m against the environment. BULLPUCKEY!
I just listened to Michael Krasny on KQED host a debate abouty Hetch Hetchy and Dan Lungren is now a self described environmentalist.
I rest my case. If he’s an environmentalist, so are the Koch brothers.