GOP is in danger of falling below 30%
by Brian Leubitz
Party | Feb 1999 | January 2008 | January 2012 |
Democratic | 46.72% | 42.71% | 43.63% |
Republican | 35.27% | 33.45% | 30.36% |
NPP | 12.89% | 19.38% | 21.24% |
It is no surprise that the GOP is rapidly losing adherents, what with the far right extreme becoming dominant within the Party of Reagan (née Lincoln). But with district maps that require Republicans to compete for the middle, the question is whether they really can do that. These numbers certainly don’t bode well for that.
Don’t worry
With ‘Leaders’ like Nude GinGrinch, Willard Romney and Simple Sarah, Goopers will continue to shrink
You can only describe Nude GinGrinch as an ‘Evildoer’
I heard his ‘concession speech’ last night
He wants to END regulation on the big banks !!
WOW !!
That’ll really help !! so will that moon colony/State
The trick is for Democrats to come up with Good candidates
(NOT Gores and Liebermans and Clintons and Gavin Newsomes!!)
BRING BACK the REAL Democrats, the Phil Burtons and the Sherrod Browns and the real populists)
Is that the Republican plus independent number is still over 50%. Considering Republicans have higher turnout than Democrats, the “lower taxes” voters (which the vast majority of independents I’ve ever met are) are in a very good position.
As I’ve said before the redistricting, while bad for the GOP, is good for the taxpayer. Without the benefit of blaming the Republicans a Democratic majority that passes increased spending will have members in marginal districts held accountable at the polls.
I don’t think a representative in a district that just went Democrat by a sliver will want to cast a deciding vote in favor of higher taxes when a “moderate” Republican is waiting in the wings to run against him.
The dogmatic ideologues (on both sides) are in for some electoral surprises.