All posts by emellon

California

PPIC Poll–54% of voters choose life without parole

5 Comments

Note by Brian: In the wake of the “execution” of Troy Davis, it is more important than ever to end the death penalty in California and across the nation.  Murder is still murder, even when it has the patina of a cover in the form of a dysfunctional justice system.  Taxpayers for Justice  and their SAFE California campaign have committed to ending the death penalty in California via the ballot box.  There are many reasons to do so, but the time for this is now.

SAFE California Campaign

A new poll released Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) showed 54% of Californians prefer life imprisonment with no possibility of parole, with only 39% preferring the death penalty.

The PPIC report shows a clear preference for life in prison with no chance of parole for all adults across the state.  Support was strongest among residents of Los Angeles (62%) and Latinos (67%), California residents under 35 and those earning less than $40,000.

“These new numbers confirm what we already know to be true: across the state and across party lines, California voters are ready to replace our dysfunctional death penalty with life in prison without parole,” said Jeanne Woodford, former warden of San Quentin and spokesperson for the SAFE California campaign. “Voters express even greater support for striking the death penalty when they have the option to choose life without parole with work and restitution to families through our victim compensation fund.”

PPIC’s most recent findings are in line with other polling data on the death penalty in California and nationwide:

• A 2011 statewide survey of likely voters conducted by David Binder Research showed 63% of likely voters support converting all current death row sentences to life imprisonment without any possibility of parole in order to save the state $1 billion dollars in five years, where the money saved would be used for public education and law enforcement. The idea was supported by voters from all political parties and from across all regions of the state.

• A 2010 national survey of registered voters conducted by Lake Research Partners revealed that a clear majority of voters nationwide (61%) would choose a punishment other than the death penalty if it were available.

• A 2009 poll of eligible California voters conducted by Professor Craig Haney from the University of California Santa Cruz found that 66% prefer life without parole with work and restitution, over the death penalty.

“Yesterday’s protests and vigils against the execution of Troy Davis in Georgia are a vivid reminder that the death penalty will always risk the execution of innocent people,” added Woodford. “More and more the public is realizing that the only way to protect the innocent is to replace the death penalty with life in prison without parole.”

“California is no different. California’s death penalty brings with it enormous costs, it saps money from the investigation of open rape and murder cases, and here too it brings the risk of executing an innocent person. That’s why we are confident that voters will replace it with life imprisonment, if given the chance to vote on the issue – 33 years and $4 Billion dollars later.”

The SAFE California campaign will start gathering signatures in October to put before the voters at the November 2012 election an initiative to replace the death penalty with life in prison without parole with work and restitution. The campaign is supported by a coalition of law enforcement leaders, murder victim family members, exonerees and advocates.

Uncategorized

Death Penalty: Tough on the Taxpayer

(This op-ed is from Sen. Loni Hancock about her work to end California’s death penalty.   – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

by Senator Loni Hancock

As a legislator, I take my responsibility to make wise budget choices seriously, especially as our state faces a deepening fiscal crisis. This year, as in several recent years, the budget is an exercise in attempting to minimize cuts to vital services like schools and public safety. That means that I am always looking for places to cut risk and waste. And that is why I introduced SB 490 to replace the death penalty with life in prison without the possibility of parole. SB 490 is being heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee this Thursday (7/7) morning.

Since 1978, California has spent about $4 billion dollars on death penalty costs and has executed 13 people, according to a new study. That’s $308 million per condemned inmate.  By 2030, when the population of San Quentin’s death row is projected to reach 1,000, the tab for maintaining the death penalty will reach $9 billion.

We’re not being tough on crime: we’re being tough on the taxpayer.

Those stunning figures come from a study released earlier this week by U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon and Loyola Law School Professor Paula M. Mitchell. Their neutral analysis (she is opposed to the death penalty, he is not) confirmed similar findings from advocacy groups including the ACLU of Northern California and Death Penalty Focus, which estimate the state could save $1 Billion every five years by replacing the death penalty with life in prison without parole.

It might seem counterintuitive that sentencing people to death is more costly than life in prison without parole. However, death penalty cases require extra attention and review, they involve taxpayer-funded appeals, and they demand heightened security and lengthy capital trials. To house these 714 death row inmates and put them through the lengthy process instead of converting their sentences to life without parole, costs Californian taxpayers $184 million every year. A death penalty trial can cost as much as 20 times more than sentencing an inmate to life without parole. Death row inmates are exempt from work and get single-cell housing. It is more likely for a death row prisoner in California to die of illness or old age than execution.

That is an unconscionable investment in a failed policy for a handful of people. As a lawmaker I cannot justify this kind of expense. Not when we are asking families to tighten their belts and to accept deep cuts to police on the street and public education for their children.  And certainly not with the knowledge that, today, nearly half of all murders in California go unsolved.

Imagine if we were to use those funds to make our communities safer. How many more officers would $4 billion put on the streets? What if we paid cops and investigators who protect all of us? How many more students could we send to college on full scholarship if even just $1 billion of the $4 billion saved, were put towards funding public education?

My bill would also eliminate the risk of wrongful execution. At least 138 people across the country have been released from death row after new evidence came to light, proving they were wrongfully charged.

Some suggest that public support for the death penalty is strong in California.  However, as in many areas of life, a new consensus is emerging. A 2011 poll released by David Binder Research found that 63% of likely California voters would support replacing the death penalty with permanent imprisonment without the chance of parole. The study showed that this is not a partisan issue. A majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents would vote to convert all death row sentences to life without the possibility of parole. It seems that voters have had enough.

Now is the time. Eliminating the death penalty will save the state hundreds of millions of dollars every year and is the right thing to do. Our state is in desperate need of these savings. This failed policy is a drain on Californian taxpayers, a false promise to victims’ families and puts us all at risk. Governor Brown and my fellow California legislators need to listen to the voters and reassess the excessive funds that are dedicated to this broken and dysfunctional system.

Senator Loni Hancock

California District 9