Category Archives: Arnold Schwarzenegger

Water Construction Should Be Paid by the User

On Sunday, Robert took a look at Arnold’s water demands:

John Laird gives a truly excellent overview that explains that the only other dam built by state government, the Oroville Dam which is a key part of the State Water Project, had 97% of its cost paid for by the actual users of the system, with the other 3% coming from taxpayers in the form of financial support (low-interest loans, for example). Yet the current demand is that taxpayers pay as much as 50% of the cost of a new dam, despite the fact that many Californians will never see any benefit from that dam, a dam which likely won’t be built for a decade or more and which will, because it is likely to be built at low elevation, will not catch much water and will essentially be useless.

This point cannot be overstated.  For decades, the Western Central Valley has gotten subsidized water. It’s built the Westlands Water District area into the fruit and vegetable capitol of the country. It produces all this produce (haha!) in a region that needs irrigated water. Because while the topsoil is fertile, the under-layer of clay sucks up water.  And during all of this, while the cities along the coast pay top dollar for their water, the Westlands gets a cut rate for agreeing to be the first to be cut off.

But that doesn’t stop them from bitching when they do get cut off.

The contradictions involved in all of this are striking.  For those who claim to support Adam Smith’s invisible hand of the market, it makes for a remarkable statement.  They are arguing that water should be subsidized in order to interfere with the market.  So, the money is transferred from the pockets of Californians and into the pockets of agribusiness and out of state consumers.

Any water deal must retain the balance of payment that we’ve seen in the past. At most 5-10% of the payments should come from bonds or other general fund payments, the rest should come from revenue bonds. Those who use the water should pay for it. Yes, this will make produce more expensive, which is a regrettable consequence.  But it is the only equitable way to share the costs.

All of that said, even with all of this construction, there is no additional water. We are just playing shell games with what we have. At some point we have to look at sustainability giving the coming risk of climate change.

Hey You, Are You an Elected State Official? You Suck!

Big news, California hates its elected leaders:

The downward trend in voter appraisals of the job performance of both Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state legislature continues.

The most recent Field Poll completed last week finds that just 27% of this state’s voters approve of the governor’s performance, the first time in his nearly six-year tenure that his job ratings have dropped below 30%.  The governor’s disapproval rating has also reached a new high – 65%.

Voter appraisal of the state legislature is even lower, with just 13% of voters approving and 78% disapproving, the lowest rating The Field Poll has ever obtained for that institution. (Field Poll 10/13/09 (PDF))

This is the biggest surprise since the Raiders lost on Sunday.

California Eagerly Awaits November 2010 Recall Election

Six years ago this month, California voters threw out an unpopular governor amidst a recession and a severe budget crisis, replacing him with a Hollywood action star who promised to fundamentally change the way the state does business.

Instead the people of California got a governor who actually is as a bad as Gray Davis was incorrectly assumed to be. And finally, the public realizes just how bad he is. The latest Field Poll shows a state that is fed up with the failure currently occupying the governor’s office:




















Approval Disapproval April 09 (app/dis)
Arnold: 27 65 (33/55)
Legislature: 13 78 (14/74)

The lowest approval rating Gray Davis ever sustained was 22% in August 2003, 2 months before he was recalled. And that remains the lowest approval any CA governor has sustained since at least 1958 (Field Poll doesn’t offer stats before that year). Arnold Schwarzenegger is now in Davis territory.

This will likely spark more talk in the comments of a recall of Schwarzenegger. But in fact, such a recall is scheduled, just 385 days from now. The November 2010 election will be California’s chance to decide whether they want to continue Arnold Schwarzenegger’s policies in the form of either Meg Whitman, Steve Poizner or Tom Campbell.

It would be nice if the Democratic candidates offered a meaningful change away from Arnold’s policies of “cut for cuts’ sake, no matter the damage it does to our economy” and his overall right-wing approach to governance. Jerry Brown might have signed AB 98 but he has stated his preference to continue the totally failed Schwarzenegger “no new taxes” policy that is wrecking our state’s finances and our economy. Gavin Newsom has made some interesting statements about the need for structural reform, but he has yet to offer a specific solution to the economic and financial crisis.

Which is unfortunate, because Californians clearly, desperately, want change. The candidate that offers a different and better path than the failed legacy of Arnold Schwarzenegger will be the one to sweep into the governor’s office in January 2011 with a mandate for change.

We’ll see if there is any such candidate willing to step up and play that role.

Ending the Charade: Arnold is Green Like Money, Not Like Trees

As I try to keep up with all the signings and vetoes, one thing is clear: Arnold ain’t Green in the way that Time magazine pimps out to be, as much as the way Hollywood pimps him out to be. That is, he’s a bankable star, all luster, no substance.

This year’s environmental veto crop is no different. He vetoed the real renewable power standard legislation that would have actually brought green jobs to the state, and then decidied that it is cool to have the Tostitos State Park and Viagra State Beach when he vetoed legislation that would limit the over-development of our state parks with commercial investments.  To top it off, he vetoed a bill that would have made clean, affordable water a human right in California.

Arnold talks a big game, and took a big step forward by signing AB 32. Yet, since that day in 2006, he’s been backtracking and picking at AB 32’s real impact.  It’d be nice if the national media could take a notice of what really goes on out here instead of their sweet little lovenotes that they send out here proclaiming Arnold as the protector of all that is living, while they don’t bother to look more than an inch deep to find his truly atrocious environmental record.

I’ve tucked in a press release from the CA League of Conservation Voters over the flip.

Governor Schwarzenegger Retreats From Environmental Promises

Governor Rejects Opportunities to Protect Natural Resources and Create Green Jobs by Vetoing Majority of Environmental Community’s Priorities

OAKLAND, Calif.  (Oct. 12, 2009) – The California League of Conservation Voters (CLCV) – the non-partisan political arm of the environmental movement in California – today decried this year’s dismal performance of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on environmental legislation this year. Schwarzenegger vetoed the vast majority of the important environmental bills that reached his desk.

“Rather than seize the opportunity to lead by protecting our natural resources and creating clean energy jobs, Governor Schwarzenegger rejected the vast majority of the bold and rational environmental legislation that arrived on his desk.  This is an unfortunate retreat from the leadership that the Governor once provided,” said Warner Chabot, CLCV’s Chief Executive Officer.

California is in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.  Yet the legislature, supported by the environmental community, provided the governor many opportunities to provide environmental leadership while strengthening our state’s economy. Instead, Governor Schwarzenegger’s performance on the environment in this legislative session will likely be his worst ever.

“Governor Schwarzenegger’s record this year demonstrates that environmental voters must work together to build a ‘greener’ governor in 2010 – a governor who will establish California’s position as an environmental leader in the nation and the world,” said Chabot.

“CLCV and the entire environmental community worked together all year to pass through the legislature bold yet responsible legislation to help create clean energy and green job opportunities, protect our state’s natural resources and the public’s health, and help solve the global warming crisis,” continued Chabot. “But with the irresponsible use of his veto pen, the governor failed to lead California toward a strong sustainable economic future built on California’s technological and environmental leadership.”

Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed thoughtful, broadly-supported bills that would have protected state parks from overdevelopment by corporate interests; bills that would have expanded our state’s creation and use of renewable and clean energy; bills that would have improved local land use planning and greenhouse gas emissions reduction; and bills that would have protected communities from pesticides and our natural resources from fire danger. He even vetoed a bill that would have made clean, affordable water a human right in California.

Specific Outcomes of Legislative Session:

   * The governor vetoed priority legislation to protect state parks (SB 372, SB 679); to speed up our commitment to renewable energy (AB 14, SB 64); to improve access to clean water (AB 1242); and to limit out-of-state exemptions to global warming emissions reductions (AB 1404).  And he signed legislation (SB 827)-opposed by CLCV- that allows new power plants to be built in southern California without offsetting their additional air pollution, in violation of an existing court order.

   * On the positive side, the governor signed legislation to improve energy efficiency in existing buildings (AB 758); to ban lead wheel weights in cars (SB 757); to allow payments to users of renewable energy who put power back into the grid (AB 920); and to clean up the water in the Southern California city of Maywood (AB 890).

   * But the governor rejected approximately two important environmental bills for every one that he signed.

In the next few weeks, CLCV will examine all of the votes and results and report back with the official scores how the legislature and the governor performed on the environment in the 2009 edition of the California Environmental Scorecard. CLCV will also launch GreenGov2010.org – a campaign Web site where participants will contribute content, find critical information about the candidates and their positions and participate in building a greener governor for California.

“California must lead the nation and the world in solving both the economic and environmental challenges of our generation,” said Chabot.  “I am confident that California will elect a greener governor in 2010-a governor who will work on behalf of every Californian to create a healthy environment and a thriving clean energy economy.”

Arnold’s Pettiness & The Revenge of Poochigian

I feel like I can’t help but get really, really shrill with Arnold Schwarzenegger.  See, the thing is that he’s now shown himself to be a petty, vindictive political animal. Nothing new, nothing post-partisan. He’s a politician who carries a grudge.

Case in point, Arnold vetoed the rather standard reauthorization of funding for the California State Bar. Basically, the State Bar is a quasi-governmental organization. Funding comes entirely from the dues of licensed attorneys.  And while you can find plenty of attorneys (this one included) that moan about the dues, it’s not like there are any tea parties organizing.

Yet, it is clear that this veto has little to do with the fees, and a whole lot more to do with an unqualified judge: one former state Sen. Chuck Poochigian.  If you’ve been reading Calitics over the past few months, you’ll have read about his nomination and subsequent confirmation as a judge on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal.  Thing is that the Bar rated him as “not qualified.”  But the part that really got them in trouble was the fact that the score got leaked to the press before the confirmation hearing.

Of course, I suppose it doesn’t matter that Chuck Poochigian isn’t qualified for the job. He was never a high-flying litigator with a vast record of trials. And he never served as a judge.  Ron George, the Chief Justice, for his part, castigated the bar for not considering his political experience (although they actually did).  The fact is that Poochigian really just doesn’t have the experience that you typically see for a judge. And the time in the Legislature? No, that’s really not the same thing.

This brings us back to Arnold vetoing the bill.  He was simply pissed that the Bar didn’t play along with his little game for Poochigian, and basically stated that:

In his veto message, Schwarzenegger cited a recent audit critical of the bar and questioned the group’s “impartiality in considering judicial appointments.” The July audit found rising costs at the bar and poor internal controls, which allowed a former employee to embezzle nearly $676,000.

“The conduct of the State Bar itself must be above reproach,” Schwarzenegger wrote in his veto. “Regrettably, it is not.” (LAT 10/120/09)

Interesting that Arnold didn’t mind letting the Chiropractic Commission or the body that licenses nurses fester as they failed to do their jobs, jobs that affect the very health of millions of Californians. Yet, you mess with his political agenda, and you’ll get the horns.

Post-partisan, huh?

How Can Arnold Expect to Retain Any Credibility?

Last week, Arnold threatened to veto every bill. Just like every other statement he has ever uttered, you have no idea whether it is just a line he is delivering, or if it actually means something. As Robert pointed out, he “released some of the hostages” yesterday morning, however, he has since decided that the whole vetoing everything was a waste of $@#^ing time.

Although he failed to win bipartisan accord on a sweeping, multibillion-dollar plan to address the state’s water problems, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Sunday night backed down on his threat to veto hundreds of bills as punishment for legislative leaders’ inability to reach a deal.

As the midnight deadline for signing or rejecting 704 bills approached, Schwarzenegger said sufficient progress had been made in the water talks, and he planned to act on all of the bills. As negotiations concluded late Sunday, the governor had signed into law 230 bills and vetoed 221.(LAT 10/12/09)

But Torey Van Oot at CapAlert has the best catch. Last year, Arnold made fun of bills in the Legislature, including one that would ban the practice of tail docking of dairy cows. Yeah, you guessed it: he signed the bill.

“Well, it’s obviously very sad that we are in the biggest financial crisis and we are way overdue to get the budget done and we face a $26 billion deficit and I ask over and over and over the legislators upstairs to just focus on the budget and here they are, they’re debating over the definition of honey. And a week ago they debated over cow tails and, a few weeks before that, they debated over should we have a Blueberry Commission in the state of California and all those kinds of things,” he said at the time.

Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear pointed out that the criticisms came in the midst of the budget negotiations — when the “the Legislature should focus on the budget above all else.”

“At the time he wanted them to focus on the budget, he thought that the budget was the most important issue,” he said. “Obviously, the budget is done, and he believes these bills are worth signing.” (CapAlert 10/12/09)

Yeah, he signed the bill to regulate honey labeling too. These are both good bills, but the real point is these ridiculous games of brinksmanship. It is like he simply can’t resist pushing deadlines to the last possible minute, can’t resist using them for every possible tactical advantage. He is using them to the detriment of the state and of all Californians, no matter the political stripes.

The words that emerge from his mouth might as well be totally ignored. You can’t trust his words and you can’t trust him.  

Hostage Crisis At Capitol; Governor Executes Several Hostages

Crossposted to Daily Kos

Think that headline is over the top? Think again. Arnold Schwarzenegger has decided to turn the normal legislative process, intended at one point in our state’s apparently distant past to be a deliberative process aimed at producing legislation for the public good, into a hostage crisis. The governor has demanded that either he gets a water bill by the end of the day today, or he’s going to just randomly start vetoing bills, even bills designed to do things like help pregnant women get health care.

Credit E.J. Schultz and John Myers for introducing the “hostage” frame into the coverage of the political crisis in Sacramento. Apparently Arnold has decided about 500 bills are to be held hostage, but already about 100 bills have been vetoed. 100 more are going to be signed, in what Myers calls a “let a few hostages go” move apparently designed to show the sane people outside the barricaded room (which would include all 36 million of us as well as the legislators who have so far rightly refused to accept a craptacular water deal) that the governor really is willing to deal.

Do we need any greater sign of how totally state government has collapsed? Our governor, who usually plays the Hollywood hero who rescues the hostages from the bad guys, has now himself become one of the bad guys holding the people of this state hostage to his wild demands.

What are those demands? It’s difficult to tell exactly, but the overall scope appears to be a demand that the people of California take water from those who already have rights to it (Delta farmers, fishermen, wildlife, SF Bay) and give it to those whose water rights are “junior” (i.e. they’re last in line) – and that taxpayers must hand over money to pay for new dams and potentially a Peripheral Canal to benefit a small handful of users (primarily growers in Kern County and new suburbs in the LA Metropolitan Water District’s domain, the aforementioned “junior” water rights holders).

John Laird gives a truly excellent overview that explains that the only other dam built by state government, the Oroville Dam which is a key part of the State Water Project, had 97% of its cost paid for by the actual users of the system, with the other 3% coming from taxpayers in the form of financial support (low-interest loans, for example). Yet the current demand is that taxpayers pay as much as 50% of the cost of a new dam, despite the fact that many Californians will never see any benefit from that dam, a dam which likely won’t be built for a decade or more and which will, because it is likely to be built at low elevation, will not catch much water and will essentially be useless.

Other aspects of the water standoff include the Delta counties, who want to ensure that their water rights are not stolen, and that any deal impacting the Delta should pay for the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) and help repair the earthquake-prone Delta levees that have been described as a possible California version of Hurricane Katrina should they fail.

The counties wrote a letter to Sen. Darrell Steinberg voicing their concern that Delta reps have been shut out of the process and that they are about to be sold out, along with the rest of the state, to benefit a small number of politically connected water users who want to cut in line, and hand everyone the bill, to continue unsustainable water uses.

As the hostage standoff continues, let’s hope there’s a California legislative version of John McClane holed up in the Capitol looking to save everyone from the bad guys who, despite all their bluster, are really just after our money.

UPDATE by Robert: See the full list of 94 vetoed bills. Among the dead hostages includes the aforementioned AB 98, putting California’s governor on record as endorsing discrimination against women. His veto message:

Maternity coverage is offered and available in today’s individual insurance market. Consumers can choose whether they want to purchase this type of coverage, and the pricing is reflective of that choice. While the perfect world would allow for all health conditions to be covered, including maternity, I cannot allow the perfect to become the enemy of the good.

This is, as I noted back in March, is untrue:

When Wendy Root Askew of Monterey started looking for a doctor she hoped would be her gynecologist as well as deliver her future children, she was shocked to discover her health insurance policy didn’t include a single OB/GYN in her county.

The 31-year-old considered changing health plans. But then she learned that while 85 percent of the plans available in Monterey County offered maternity coverage five years ago, just 15 percent offer it now.

She found only two individual policies that included maternity, but they were three to five times as much as the policy she already had and came with annual deductibles of up to $15,000.

Wendy is a very good friend of mine. And now she, like women across the state, have fallen victim to Arnold Schwarzenegger’s misogyny and greed. Someone needs to let him know we elected him to govern the state, not to play Hans Gruber.

Contempt? Seems about right

Let’s sum up the prison situation as it stands as quickly as possible. A federal court panel of three judges has ruled that the state must reduce its prison population by 44,000. The Governor’s current plan gets nowhere near that goal, and the deadline has passed.

Generally, courts don’t take well to being blown off. And attorneys for the inmates know these sorts of things:

The inmates have said prison overcrowding violates their rights to adequate medical and mental health care. Their lawyers told the federal judges that the state had shown “utter contempt” for the judges’ orders. They said state prison officials “are no more above the law than those in their custody,” and should not be allowed to choose which laws and court orders to follow and which to “simply ignore.” (LA Times 10/09/09)

The judges should hold the entire Republican party in contempt, and truthfully, many of the Democratic legislators who were too scared of the CCPOA to do anything should be included in that list too.

I Will Shoot This Baby to Get Rid of this Bath Water

So remember the last legislative year? Well, if Arnold follows through on his latest threat, you might as well forget it.  He’s threatening to veto every bill on his desk if he doesn’t get a water deal by, um, tomorrow.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger  today affirmed a looming threat to veto a large bulk of the bills that have been sent to his desk unless lawmakers can strike a deal on a package of water bills.

“I made it very clear to the legislators and to the leaders that if this does not get done then I will veto a lot of their legislation, a lot of their bills, so that should inspire them to go and get the job done,” he said at the end of remarks to the Association of Community College Trustees’ Leadership Congress, which is meeting in San Francisco today. (CapAlert 10/08/2009)

We’ve mentioned the water issue for a long time, but there is no way to overemphasize one critical point: No matter how many projects you build, you do not get any additional water. The rush about getting water for the West Central Valley is toxic to the state government and to the environment.

The West Central Valley is a relatively dry area. The soil is fairly fertile, but right underneath it lies a layer of clay that sucks water away from the topsoil.  That means lots of tilling and lots of water.  But in order for these farmers, most of which are big corporate operations, to make any real money, water has to be very, very cheap. Unnaturally cheap.

This, of course, is why there wasn’t much agriculture done in the area by the native peoples. It was too inefficient to bring water there. But once we built a slew of pumps, it could be done. The problem is that pumps are expensive, and the farmers of the Western Central Valley don’t want to pay for it.

The Westlands Water District has been getting cheap water for a long time, but they are the bottom rung on the water priority list. They are trying to use the crisis in Sacramento and the drought to get around the contracts that they signed last year putting them at a lower priority in exchange for a lower price.

And Arnold is trying to help them to do just that by threatening, intimidating, and generally being a jerk.  And of course, Susan Kennedy, his “Democratic” Chief of Staff, is right there with him.  Putting a gun to the head of not only the legislature, but some very important measures.

This is no way to govern.  Arnold, You Lie!

UPDATE by Dave: I just want to add to the chorus of how appalling this is.  We’re talking about legislative blackmail.

And incredibly, Arnold has an ally in palace courtier George Skelton:

It’s ugly. But it’s an available political tool that the governor would be derelict not to use when an issue as critical as water is at stake.

This isn’t about some narrow scheme important only to a narrow interest. Nor is it merely about a governor’s pet project — other than his legacy-building, which should be encouraged as long as it helps the state. It’s about finally resolving an acute, decades-old problem that is worsening and affects practically all Californians.

Here’s another old white man with health insurance who could give a crap if women get maternity care in their health insurance plans, to just pick one bill at random.  Or who could care less if people who have insurance get dropped from it when they want to use it, to pick another.  George Skelton would actively make the lives of Californians worse because he thinks it’s sporting to see the Governor “use his power.”  That the power is illegal is of no consequence.

Then there’s this whopper:

These and other arguments — such as details of a new governing system for the delta — have raged for years. Schwarzenegger apparently doesn’t much care what the Legislature decides. He just wants it to compromise and send him a bill.

Yeah, he doesn’t care at all.  He actually invented the Latino Water Coalition, the fake-grassroots group pushing all the Republican solutions in water negotiations, but he’s really just an innocent bystander.  An innocent bystander who would destroy women’s health and allow insurance companies to kill people for profit and a host of other things, all with an asshole like George Skelton cheering him on.

“You Lie” The California Edition

PhotobucketAssembly Member Tom Ammiano is a San Francisco Treasure. Always has been and always will be. But Tom Ammiano is special. He’s hilarious. He’s passionate. He’s progressive. He’s just Tom Ammiano.

And this brings me to the San Francisco Democratic Party annual gala, or the nerd prom as my friend Beth Spotswood likes to call it. All was going well, a smidge boring, but Former Assembly Speaker/Da Mayor Willie Brown got up on stage to really take it up a notch.  Brown let the crowd know that he had another offer on the same night for the President’s Cup dinner, a PGA event, that featured Tiger Woods, Bill Clinton and the Governor. The event just so happened to be in the same hotel.

The remark about the Governor being in the building brought a smattering of boos, as you might expect from a Democratic audience.  But the event continued on as expected, dinner was served. And as people were just finishing dinner, we began to notice something of a commotion.

And there he was, the Governator.  On our turf. In the San Francisco Democratic Party event. This wasn’t the Assembly Chamber. This was a raucous Democratic Party event.

He was talking with Willie Brown and his entourage for a while. And then, former SF Board of Supes President Aaron Peskin brought him up on the stage.  As he began to talk, Asm. Ammiano yelled out “You LIE.”

The Governor began to say a few words about how he heard that the Democratic Party event was in the same hotel as a chorus of boos and other random hissing noises rained down upon him.  I, of course, was taking pictures with my cell phone.  Apparently the Governor felt that he should visit the Democratic event because he “sleeps with one every night.”  And then proceeded to tell the room that he was “post-partisan” and that he didn’t care whether you were a Republican or a Democrat.

And as he continued, Asm. Ammiano still couldn’t believe this man was up on the stage at a Democratic event.  The San Francisco Assembly Member yelled something to the effect of “kiss my gay ass” as he left the room.

But the more interesting part was when Tom Ammiano accepted an award, the SF DCCC Trailblazer Award, from Willie Brown. Ammiano began by praising Brown’s excellent record on LGBT issues. And then continued by hinting at their differences in the past.  And then he proceeded to bludgeon the Governor’s record. He questioned why he was holding bills hostage to get a bad water deal. He questioned why a Governor who has vetoed the Harvey Milk Day bill would stand up in front of a room that was at least 25% LGBT. He politely asked Mayor Brown to send a message to the governor to sign the bills already.

And finally, Senator Mark Leno closed the proceedings for the evening.  Leno took a different tack than Ammiano’s passion. He simply stated the facts. He said that the events of this evening were all funny and stuff, but the fact is that this Governor had cut state workers salaries by 15% with the furloughs. This Governor wanted to cut IHSS salaries to minimum wage. This Governor illegally used the line item veto to slash funding for domestic violence shelters. And that he, and the Senate Democrats, were going to fight him tooth and nail.

And to a loud applause, Leno stepped off the stage and the crowd began to thin.  And everybody was saying, “um, wow.”

I’m still trying to collect my thoughts from the evening, so I apologize if the order is slightly skewed or I missed an important point. Feel free to add anything in the comments if you were there.