Tag Archives: employee free choice act

Friday Afternoon Odds And Ends

There are a bunch of things that I wanted to post about that I might as well highlight in one post, kind of like when Asia recruited members of Yes, King Crimson, and Uriah Heep to create a “supergroup”:

• BeDevine notes that yet another gender-neutral marriage bill has passed the Legislature, and once again Arnold Schwarzenegger has vowed to veto it because “the people have already spoken on that issue.”  Apparently the people don’t vote for their own representatives in the state legislature.  And at what point does the statute of limitations run out on referring to a ballot measure from 2000?

• Senator Loewenthal has pulled back the container fee bill that would have charged importers a $30 fee on each cargo container to go towards fighting pollution at the ports.  This will go into negotiation and probably be passed in some form in 2008.  Hopefully it’ll be a form that will still have some teeth.

• Dan Weintraub makes the fallacious argument that the United Farm Workers are somehow betraying their principles by asking for the ability to form a union after a majority of employees sign cards endorsing it.  He thinks that there’s no intimidation in a secret ballot election, apparently ignoring decades of union busting, threats, and workplace closures that have arisen from attempts to unionize.

• As mentioned in the Quickies, the CA Hospital Association has agreed to a tax in themselves… sort of.  In exchange, they would receive money back to them based on how many poor people they treat.  Most hospitals would actually make money on the deal.  It’s also hard to see how this would do anything to fix our state’s strained emergency rooms, which presumably is where these poor people would be encouraged to go for treatment.

• Also in the Quickies is some good news on the enviroment, as new CARB chief Mary Nichols has set some pretty strong targets for emissions cuts.  They’re first steps but they presage positive developments in the future.

• Finally, the Teamsters waged a successful protest at the California-Mexico border against the Bush Administration effort to allow 100 Mexican trucking companies to deliver goods anywhere in the United States.  This will not only damage our environment and public safety by opening up the roads to unsafe Mexican trucks, it undermines American job security for one of the few good union industries left to our working class.  The goal is to marginalize unionized truckers, pure and simple.  Matt Stoller thinks this could be the next “Dubai ports deal” if the word gets out about it.

Employee Free Choice Act Passes House

(Cross-posted from Working Californians)

It is one step forward, one step back today on the labor front.  On a more positive note, the House of Representatives just passed the Employee Free Choice Act 241-185.  It faces a tough slog in the Senate and certain veto by Bush.  However, the people’s house just voted overwhelmingly to protect workers against harassment and intimidation.

California’s own Rep. George Miller makes us proud with his closing remarks today. (h/t to the Gavel)

Like Nancy Scola says over at MyDD, this comes down to picking sides: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers or the workers?  They have made it clear that they want win with fear and destroy collective bargaining.

History and recent events leave no doubt that there are those among us who really don’t like unions. There are national interests committed to ripping the heart out of the labor movement. They want to, in the words of Grover Norquist, “to crush labor as a political entity” and eliminate unions. That’s all that this debate is about. That’s it. There are anti-union interest groups, union-busting law firms, there’s an industry in this country of trying to cut the legs out from the labor movement. It’s an undeniable part of the American political landscape. It has been as long as there have been unions.

There is a thriving industry designed to deny workers the ability to advocate for better working conditions.  The Employee Free Choice Act would stop them in their tracks and create a much more open and accountable process.

And as Speaker Nancy Pelosi said during the debate:

The Employee Free Choice Act is the most important labor law reform legislation of this generation.  But this legislation is about more than labor law: it is about basic labor rights, about the rule of the majority free from intimidation, and about protecting jobs.

It is a guarantee – when a majority of workers say they want a union, they will get a union.

Now the Senate will have to decide if they will support the workers or those who want to crush them.  Free choice or threats and illegal firings?  Do we respect worker’s choices or show them contempt?