Tag Archives: progressive infrastructure

We Need To Tell The Public, Too

Dave Johnson, Speak Out California

Here is something that you and I know to be true: progressive values and policies are better for people than conservative values and policies.

Progressives believe that we’re all in this together and the community taking care of each other ends up working out better for everyone.  History also shows that this is how it turns out, every time.  Conservatives believe people should be on their own, in constant dog-eat-dog competition, with everyone looking out for themselves and only themselves.  History shows that this approach leads to disaster, every time.

You and I know this.  But the pubic-at-large doesn’t know our side of this argument, because we aren’t telling them.  While conservatives market their philosophy through every conceivable information channel there is very little outreach explaining the progressive side.  When you turn on the radio or the TV or read the newspapers you just don’t see or hear about the benefits of a progressive approach.  So the public-at-large is only hearing one side of the story — the conservative side — and they are hearing that side loudly and often.  

It so happens that marketing works, and polls show that the conservative marketing campaign brings results.  A 2007 Rasmussen poll, for example found that “41% of the voters think of themselves as conservative when it comes to the issues of taxes, government spending and the regulation of private business while 41% consider themselves to be moderates and 12% say they are liberal.”  A 2008 Battleground poll found that 59% of Americans consider themselves to be somewhat or very conservative and 36% say they are somewhat or very liberal.

So how do we reach the public?  We have to identify target audiences, build the channels that reach them, and talking the cultural language of each target group.  Yes, this is marketing talk.  And to accomplish this we need to build organizations that do this work.  Marketing works, and marketing science has evolved to become very effective.  Companies understand this and do it.  Conservatives understand this and do it.  Progressives need to understand this and do it.

Here is a key, key point and I want to stress it: This is not about election-oriented organizations.  This is about a long-term effort to change underlying public understanding and appreciation of progressive values.  This requires a different kind of approach and a different kind of organizational structure than winning each next election.  Election outcomes will certainly result from such an effort.  In fact, with a public that is pre-disposed to be want progressive candidates and policies instead of conservative ones, elections will be dramatically and lastingly affected.  This is why conservatives have built up a network of think tanks and advocacy organizations — hundreds of them — designed to change underlying public attitudes.  And this is why those polls I cites show they have had such great success.

At my personal blog I wrote a July, 2007 post titled, While Progressives Talk To Each Other, Conservatives Talk To The Public. That post ended with,

Progressives need to start reaching the general public with the truth as well as each other. We need to start working together to fund and build the organizational infrastructure to develop and test messaging, then coordinate the use of messaging, train speakers, employ pundits, develop media channels, etc.

Now, two years later we’re still largely talking to each other, especially here in California.  But there are some improvements nationally.  An organizational “progressive infrastructure” is growing up a bit, with the Center for American Progress, Media Matters and other organizations starting to show some strength.

But in California very little is getting done along these lines.  The Courage Campaign (go sign up) is one great organization and is gaining strength, boasting an email list of 400-700,000.  But even this is only about 2% of our population, and their netroots audience is predisposed to support progressive policies.  What they are doing is hugely important and a huge start.  But it is one organization when we need dozens, all funded and operating as different components of a cohesive progressive infrastructure. We need think tanks employing scores of experts to conduct the necessary research and come up with and test and refine the policies, wording and strategies to take the progressive message to the rest of the state.  We need to develop communication channels that reach into every single geographic and cultural community.  We need to train hundreds of public speakers that talk to every single group.  We need to develop relationships with interest organizations including hunting, sporting, creative arts, technology, and other kinds of clubs.  We need to get the writers reaching out of the blogs and into the newspapers and magazines and on television and radio.

California Progress Report is a site that rounds up California political news, from a progressive perspective. Frank Russo left to take a staff position in the Assembly, and the site is now operated by the Consumer Federation of California Foundation.  This is an important component of infrastructure, but CFC is looking for funding to maintain and expand it.

Calitics is California’s premier progressive community blog — and you should get an account there, join the community and add your two cents.   And you should take note of that “Donate” button in its right column.  

And, speaking of donating, please sign up for Speak Out California’s e-mail list.  And click here to donate and help us stay online.  It is your donations that keep us and all of these organizations in operation to help reach out and work to bring progressive policies to California!

Leave a comment and let me know which organizations, etc. I missed.

California is a big, big state and changing public attitudes is a big, big job.  Conservatives launched their persuasion effort almost 40 years ago.  Isn’t it time we got started?  

Click through to Speak Out California

Progressive Infrastructure To Renew The California Dream

Dave Johnson, Speak Out California

Markos, in a post today about the state of progressive infrastructure compared to the right’s, Building machines,

[. . .] But that battle is no longer one-sided. Their machine may be bigger, but we have something. And that’s all we ever needed — a hint of a partisan progressive media machine, fed by research and investigative reporting from the likes of ThinkProgress and Talking Points Memo, to begin delivering our message in the face of their vast media machine, as well as ineffective CW[conventional wisdom]-meisters like Maureen Dowd, Mark Halperin, and David Broder.

Look what we have been able to get done in this country with only the smallest, minimally-funded hint at an infrastructure of organizations and media outlets working to counter the right that has been built up since we started this fight.  We fought back against the conservative machine and got the Democrats to start fighting back themselves.  We took the Presidency, increased our numbers in the House and maybe, just maybe took  enough senate seats to stop the filibusters.

Now, imagine what we could do if we actually started funding serious progressive infrastructure organizations and building an ecosystem in which our writers and advocates could actually make a living, sell enough books to start receiving advances, get paid reasonably to write articles, receive speaking fees from organizations and some of the things right-wing advocates take for granted…  Imagine tens of thousands of young activists being trained every year.  Imagine progressive non-profits having the budgets to pay people more than minimum wage and provide benefits and get things done.  Sheesh.

Imagine what we could get done in California if we put together solid organizations that could reach out to all of the public and explain the benefits of progressive values and policies.  I mean progressive policies like good, well-funded public schools and low-cost universities, a health care system that works for the people, help with child care, a transportation infrastructure that gets people where they want to go in a timely manner, energy alternatives that cost less and do not pollute and employment rules that bring us reasonable wages and benefits in good jobs that also give us time to have fulfillment in our lives.  These are all possibilities, in fact these are all things that we were within reach of obtaining in California not too long ago.  These are things thaqt we can dream about again.

Barack Obama was able to raise millions of dollars in small donations, and this has helped the country to start to restore democracy.  We can do this in California, by sending $10 or $100 or more to help organizations like Speak Out California and others, and doing this as often as you can.

It is time for us to begin to renew the California Dream.

Click through to Speak Out California.

Rockridge Closing — Why Building Progressive Infrastructure Matters So Much

Dave Johnson, Speak Out California

On the same day that Barack Obama raised one million dollars in one minute for his campaign George Lakoff’s Rockridge Institute announced that they will be closing their doors.

In the comments at the OpenLeft blog post, The Rockridge Era Ends, Paul Rosenberg wrote,

As If We Needed Any More Proof That Democrats STILL Don’t Get It!

This is really terrible news–not just because of the loss of Rockridge, as if that wasn’t bad enough, but because it shows so clearly that there is NO recognition of the need to build progressive infrastructure.

Just look at how many millions have been raised by the Presidential campaigns this cycle.  And just a tiny fraction of it could have not just kept Rockridge afloat, but DOUBLED it in size.  …

I want to say this about that:

Donating a dollar to a progressive infrastructure organization like Speak Out California today is like giving ten dollars to EACH progressive candidate in every local, state and nation race this November, two years later, and every election following.

Let me explain what I mean.  Progressive infrastructure organizations like Speak Out California and Commonweal Institute and information outlets like California Progress Report and Calitics are working to help the public understand and appreciate what progressives are about.  By explaining the benefits of a progressive approach they help build public acceptance of and demand for progressive policies and candidates — across the board.  As more people understand why progressive solutions benefit them more than conservative proposals, they develop a lasting positive identification with the progressive “brand.”  Then later, during the election cycle, they vote for progressive candidates — across the board.

This is how the conservatives have been so successful.  They work year-round to convince people to identify as conservatives.  (You’ve probably complained or heard people complain that that have managed to turn “liberal” into a bad word in people’s minds.)  When election time comes around it’s as though all that their candidates have to do is point at the opponent and shout “liberal” to win.  They ride a wave of nationally-advanced propaganda convincing people to support “tort reform” or “tax relief.”  This has been going on for years, so at election time everything is laid out for them on a silver platter, with the public prepared and primed.

Progressive candidates, on the other hand, are generally on their own, starting from scratch for each election.  Their general campaign begins in the late summer or fall, they have to decide what “issues” to run on, they have to develop a message from scratch, by themselves, and then they have to reach their voters from scratch.  And they have to do all of this on their own in just a few months.  No wonder conservatives, even with their awful “you’re on your own” philosophy, have managed to do so well and gain so much traction.

This is why building up a national progressive advocacy infrastructure would leverage all of those campaign donations and help us build a sustainable progressive majority.  A few dollars to progressive advocacy organizations on any given TODAY builds long-term support for every progressive candidate on any given TOMORROW.  It provides leverage — lowering the need for massive election-cycle funding.

The demise of Rockridge Institute demonstrates that the Democratic Party donor base hasn’t yet gotten that message.  Instead, masses of money have to be raised for candidates at the very last minute — for example a million dollars in one minute, the day before the big Pennsylvania primary.  And almost all of that money will just literally go up in the air to pay for TV ads that leave nothing behind to show for the money.  They don’t build the brand, they don’t tell people about the benefits of progressive ideas, they don’t help other candidates…  But almost nothing for the Rockridges and Speak Out California’s and Commonweal Institutes.

Please think about donating to help build a solid progressive infrastructure of organizations that will work year-round to help the public understand why progressive policies and candidate are better for them than the conservative solutions.  This will help build a sustainable progressive majority in America.  Please help these organizations grow.  It’s about building a progressive ecosystem that benefits all of us.

Click through to Speak Out California

Dean in Palm Springs: On Progressive Action in California

This is a nice write-up of a private fundraising stop by the DNC Chair in Palm Springs, and the connection between his message and the message we present almost every day on this site is striking.

Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, says his party will need more outreach than money to win California in 2008.

The former presidential candidate and Vermont governor was in Palm Springs Saturday for a private fund raiser, as reported on thedesertsun.com Saturday.

“The strategy in California is not to spend $30 million on television,” said Dean, who addressed the media outside.

“People want to be contacted door to door, and they want to be contacted on the Internet, and they want their opinions to matter,” he said.

“If we don’t start doing grassroots politics in California, we’re not going to be able to count on California in the foreseeable future.”

A-frickin-men.  over…

Taking this state for granted the past 16 years has led to an apathetic voter class, a Republican governor, and a general weakening of the state Democratic Party.  There’s no cohesion because there’s no outreach beyond the big urban centers.  The fact that Dean made this pitch in Palm Springs is in itself significant.

Kevin Corcoran, a sales and marketing consultant, said he hosted Dean’s reception in his Palm Springs home “to begin the conversation for 2008.”

Too often, he said, candidates bypass the valley and head to Los Angeles for outreach and fund-raising efforts.

“It’s a great opportunity for the people in our community – the access to Dean to learn about what he’s doing, what the party’s doing and start to develop a point of view,” Corcoran said.

We need a 58-county strategy in California for the future of the party.  The demographic shifts are tremendous and we need to go where the people are going; namely, to the interior counties that offer the best chance for party growth.

Fortunately, the burgeoning of the state progressive blogosphere and other outreach developments have given Democrats across the state the opportunity to band together and offer a real alternative.  But this is only a beginning.

I hope Gov. Dean attends the CDP convention and makes it just as clear there how we need to mimic his “Be everywhere” strategy for this state, which is a message that Art Torres and everyone in the Party must internalize.