Tag Archives: Bill Lowery

CA-41: Lewis Aide Subpoenaed

That was quick.  The new US Attorney for the Los Angeles region, Thomas O’Brien, was just sworn in a week or so ago.  He’s apparently making the Jerry Lewis investigation a priority:

A federal grand jury in Los Angeles has issued a subpoena for a House Appropriations Committee staffer as part of the ongoing probe of Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.), the ranking member of the powerful panel.

Greg Lankler, a staffer on the House Appropriations Committee’s Defense subcommittee, was recently subpoenaed by a federal grand jury looking into Lewis, according to House insiders.

The subpoena is for both documents and testimony, although it is unclear at this point whether Lankler will cooperate. The matter has been forwarded to the House general counsel’s office, which is still studying the subpoena.

There hasn’t been a subpoena in this case, which involves Lewis’ moving millions of dollars’ worth of earmarks to his friend, the ex-Congressman and lobbyist Bill Lowery, in over a year.  Investigators on the case have been running out of money.  So it is a bit of a surprise that this subpoena would emerge.  The big difference in recent weeks is the confirmation of Thomas O’Brien.

Draw your own conclusions.

Brent Wilkes Speaks

The New York Times was able to do something that federal investigators have been having trouble doing – get key Republican Congress of Corruption money man, Brent Wilkes to speak on the record. In an exclusive interview published today Wilkes tells the story of his life in the world of “transactional lobbying.”

Wilkes instructor in the ways of the Republican congress was former San Diego congressman Bill Lowery. According to Wilkes, Lowery taught him how to “grease palms” in congress. His first class with Lowery was in 1992, when Wilkes was just starting and Lowery was still a member of congress. Wilkes had a business pitch and ten envelopes each containing a check for $10,000.

Mr. Wilkes had set up separate meetings with the lawmakers hoping to win a government contract, and he planned to punctuate each pitch with a campaign donation. But his hometown congressman, Representative Bill Lowery of San Diego, a Republican, told him that presenting the checks during the sessions was not how things were done, Mr. Wilkes recalled.

Instead, Mr. Wilkes said, Mr. Lowery taught him the right way to do it: hand over the envelope in the hallway outside the suite, at least a few feet away.

Wilkes learned quickly that prominent Republican congressman were easily swayed by envelopes filled with money.

Mr. Wilkes described the appropriations process as little more than a shakedown. He said that lobbyists close to the committee members unceasingly demanded campaign contributions from entrepreneurs like him. Mr. Wilkes and his associates have given more than $706,000 to federal campaigns since 1997, according to public records, and he said he had brought in more as a fund-raiser. Since 2000, Mr. Wilkes’s principal company has received about $100 million in federal contracts.

Wilkes most publicized congressional connection was convicted Republican felon Randy “Duke” Cunningham, to whom Wilkes provided over $500,000 in bribes (not to be confused with the $706,000 noted above), but the member of congress with the most to lose in the on-going Wilkes’ investigation is Jerry Lewis (CA-41). Lewis’ relationship with Wilkes was facilitated by Bill Lowery, whose lobbying firm is virtually based on its relationship to the powerful Lewis and the earmarks he controls

  Here’s how Wilkes describes that relationship:

“Lowery would always say, ‘It is a two-part deal,’ ” he recalled. “ ‘Jerry will make the request. Jerry will carry the vote. Jerry will have plenty of time for this. If you don’t want to make the contributions, chair the fund-raising event, you will get left behind.’ ”

Lewis continues to try and distance himself from Wilkes, but Wilkes has the goods on both Lewis and Lowery.

In recent months, Mr. Lewis has said that he barely knew Mr. Wilkes and that he did not remember seeing him in nearly a decade. But Mr. Wilkes says their relationship was closer than that.

Ever since they went on a scuba-diving trip together in 1993, he said, Mr. Lewis had referred to him as his “diving buddy.” They occasionally dined together or met at political functions, Mr. Wilkes said. At a Las Vegas fund-raiser in April 2005, Mr. Wilkes said, Mr. Lewis greeted him as “Brento” and hugged him as Mr. Wilkes surprised the lawmaker with $25,000 in campaign contributions.

[…]

As he grew more confident, Mr. Wilkes said, he often considered dropping Mr. Lowery, whose fees had escalated to $25,000 a month by 2005, from $2,500. But Mr. Wilkes said Mr. Lowery threatened to block future projects if their relationship ended. Mr. Wilkes said Mr. Lowery had warned several times that doing so could prompt Mr. Lewis to cut off earmarks, saying, “You don’t want me telling those guys on the committee that you are moving on without me.” That meant, Mr. Wilkes said, “I’d be out of business.”

Brent Wilkes bought lots of members of congress. Jerry Lewis is the one with the highest profile, but Wilkes is also closely associated with John Doolittle (CA-4) and Duncan Hunter (CA-52). If Wilkes decides to break his silence with the feds, Duke Cunningham is going to have some company in jail.

The Unparalleled Corruption: Cunningham, Lewis, & Lowery

The Vanity Fair article on the Duke-Stir Affair that will appear in the next issue is an interesting summary of all that has happened in the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Cunningham/Lewis Affair.  It is becoming painfully clear that we have not heard the last of this particular scandal.  Besides Lewis, expect a lot more scrutiny on Katherine Harris (“Representative B”).  Also, Bill Lowery, the Congressman that imediately preceded Duke, will also be using a lot of legal services in the future.  Of course, this is nothing new for Lowery, who lost his seat do to his role in the House Banking Scandal; Lowery and his wife cashed over 200 hot checks.  Dusty Foggo, Porter Goss’ No. 3 man at the CIA, will also be sharing the mess hall with the Duke Stir.

On trips to Washington, Casey recalls, Wilkes was able to usher him into the presence of important members of the armed-services and appropriations committees, including, most notably, Lowery and Lowery’s closest friend on the latter, fellow California Republican Jerry Lewis, now 71. The genteel Lewis and the earthy Lowery reportedly loved to dine and even vacation together. “Everyone on the defense committee always works cooperatively,” says Casey, who realized pretty quickly that no money came his way without their support. “It was team play, and they emphasized that to me constantly.”

Wilkes also introduced Casey to Dusty Foggo, who often passed through Washington. Around 1994, during a visit to a Washington strip club, Casey says, Foggo wore a gun in a shoulder holster and flashed his identification at the club doorman. He was promptly seated by the stage. “Foggo sits there the whole night telling me how he likes to fuck girls in the ass,” Casey recalls. “He sees a girl there, he jabs you and says, ‘She’s ready to go—let’s double-team her.’ The weirdest combination of sex and domination! And Wilkes, he’s just laughing the whole time.” (Vanity Fair 7/5/06)

Haha! Yes, it’s hilarious using your CIA badge to get laid at strip clubs.  I particularly think the whole double-team comment is a priceless one, and worthy of the Washington Hall of Corruption Fame.  But that’s just me.  The more telling part is that Lewis worked very closely with Duke.  Either he was naive or he was complicit.  The latter now seems far more likely:

“Tom, let’s cut to the chase. I want you to get stock options for Bill Lowery” was how Lewis opened their conversation, Casey recalls. Specifically, Casey adds, Lewis suggested that a very large number of Audre stock options issued in Canada be given to Lowery, but put under other names. Lewis’s actual words were “I am going to give you a list of names,” says Casey, who declined to go along. That was the last time he and Lewis had a pleasant conversation, Casey says. (Through a spokesman, Lewis acknowledges that he “thinks he remembers meeting Tom Casey,” but denies the story. “What’s described sounds illegal to me,” says the spokesperson. Through his lawyer, Lowery also denies any knowledge of the proposed deal.)

Unparalleled really doesn’t do this scandal justice.  It dwarfs the Abramoff scandal.  It dwarfs Rostenkowski, or Traficant.  This will end several careers, and see the exposure of Conservatism for what it really is: Great in theory, terrible in power.

Simply put, Conservatives cannot govern.  Their loathing of government works great in opposition, but not so well in power.  When they actually gain power, we see that they have no respect for the institutions and for those that elected them.

CA-Gov: Themes of the Day: Angelides: I’m progressive, Arnold: I’m an incumbent

On the first day after the primary, the two gubenatorial candidates struck different chords.  For his part, Phil Angelides stuck to his principles that he ran on during the primary.

On his first day as the Democratic gubernatorial nominee, Phil Angelides made it clear Wednesday he wasn’t about to move to the political center in his bid to defeat Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
***
Angelides…sounded the same core Democratic ideas he used to defeat moderate Steve Westly in Tuesday’s primary. He stood by his plan to raise taxes on upper-income earners and corporations to pay for schools. He pledged to work for universal health care and cut university tuition. (SacBee 6/8/06)

So, Arnold responds with his own thoroughly considered plans for his next term.  Ok, I couldn’t keep that going.  The truth: Arnold’s response basically consisted of: I’m the incumbent, and you’re not…nany, nany, boo-boo.

“The other side is talking about the future. We are building the future,” Schwarzenegger told a crowd of 200 people on the banks of the Sacramento River at Redding’s Turtle Bay Exploration Park. “The other side is talking about solving all the problems California has. We are solving the problems.” (SacBee 6/8/06)

And when asked about health care, does he give the voters any real answers? No, he responds by saying that they will know all his plans in the next State of the State Speech, which, of course, is after the election.  That’s great Arnold.  Yeah, we don’t need to know your ideas, we’ll just trust you to think of something really wonderful after the election.  That worked really well for us last time.  I mean you came up with all those good ideas, like say…all those great special election props that went so well for you.  No thanks.

We need real answers for the very real questions facing the state, not some promises to come up with something good.