Tag Archives: Taxes

California Blog Roundup, 4/16/06

California Blog Roundup for this rainy Easter Sunday. Teasers: Prop 82 con and con, Field Poll results and spin, 15% Doolittle, CA-11, rabid Republicans, some news in the campaign for Governor, some global warming, some sound principles for infrastructure, and some miscellany.

Prop 82

  • Governor Schwarzenegger swings from appearing moderate by backing Proposition 82 to appeasing his corporate backers by opposing. Again, I wonder what big business doesn’t like about a tax which falls solely on high-earning individuals… What could it be? What could it be?
  • Bill Bradley reports that John Burton, liberal firebrand, comes out against Prop 82 because the guarantee of universal preschool subsidizes people who don’t need the subsidy. I’m sympathetic to this criticism — you put the money where it’s needed — but one of the things we’ve learned in the United States is that once you make something into a program for the least fortunate among us, it turns into a target for the least generous among us.

Field Poll Fun

  • ABC has the headlines from the big 3 NorCal papers’ Field Poll articles on Schwarzenegger. I think they can be summed up as “lukewarm”. Also, here’s the Schwarzenegger vs. Angelides / Westly summary.
  • ABC again on the lead that Steve Westly has purchased himself. They note that Mark DiCamillo thinks the lead is surprisingly large. I’m not surprised by DiCamillo’s spin on that; I’ve read some comments by DiCamillo in the past suggesting strongly that DiCamillo is not politically neutral, at least in his commentary.
  • Frank Russo of the California Progress Report notes that the same Field Poll suggests that the anti-immigrant nativists are a definite minority in California.

Doolittle / CA-04

Pombo / CA-11

  • Progressive 11th notes that Richard Pombo will be receiving an award from Exxon on April 25, thanking him for his service.
  • Say No To Pombo has a bit more information on the FEC filings of the major Dem candidates. For some fun inside baseball, make sure to read the comments. Apparently Filson’s financial director has been less than forthcoming about his relationship to the Filson campaign.

Campaign for Governor

Environment

This ‘n’ That

California News Roundup, 3/31/06

California News Roundup is on the flip. It’s brief — quarter-end is a drag. Teasers: Shwarzenegger team campaign finance violations, blogs in CA-50, solar power, salmon, Filson interviewed, Pombo too extreme for other Republicans, anti-government group loses in court, research to be done on CA schools. There’s immigration news, but nothing all that new, so not in the roundup today.

Angelides: Cleaner Energy, Less Sprawl

I like the way Phil
Angelides is thinking
:

Vowing to be “pro-business and pro-environment,”
Democratic
gubernatorial hopeful Phil Angelides unveiled a “Clean California” plan
Thursday that seeks to cut the state’s oil consumption by 25 percent
over 10 years.

Angelides said that if he is elected governor, he will introduce
legislation to mandate all new vehicles sold in the state be flexible
fuel cars, capable of running on any mix of gasoline and bio-fuels,
such as ethanol.

He said he would also require major oil companies to supply
bio-fuels
at filling stations to match the number of flexible fuel vehicles on
the road.

In addition, Angelides said he would require state and local
governments to purchase vehicles that use alternative fuels, or to buy
efficient vehicles, such as hybrids, when replacing or expanding their
fleets.

Angelides also said he would:

* Seek to shorten commutes and pollution through
smart-growth plans
that place housing near work and transit. He said he would use state
grants, loans and bonds to rebuild and improve neighborhoods in hopes
of avoiding more sprawl. And he would urge the adoption of laws
requiring regional and local general plans that limit sprawl.

* Propose changing sales tax collections to discourage the
practice of
approving large shopping malls and other tax-producing developments to
help cities and towns pay their bills. Angelides said he would seek to
collect and share sales taxes regionally to eliminate competition
between adjoining cities for development and tax revenues.

* Increase partnerships and investments to encourage the
creation of
clean fuels and technology. He said he would provide incentives to
encourage fuel-efficient choices by business and consumers.

California is a huge market for any business, including the
automotive industry.  They can’t afford to ignore the
California market, so changes in the kinds of vehicles they can sell in
California will also change the vehicles they sell throughout the rest
of the United States.

A statewide emphasis on smart development and public-private
development partnerships would be great, and the change in the tax
distribution model is genius.  One of the perverse outcomes of
Proposition 13 is that every locality wants businesses because they
generate tax revenue for the local governments.  Residential
development, by contrast, is a dead-weight loss — under Proposition
13, it’s almost impossible to pay for the services (schools, police,
fire, roads, water, etc.) that residential development needs.

Some market fundamentalists will protest the state’s intervention in the market. They are of course missing two important issues:

1. The state has already intervened in the market by building roads with tax dollars and encouraging sprawl with its development policies. There’s no inherent reason that further policymaking is inappropriate.

2. Sometimes the market is stupid. In particular, the market is impatient, and wants to externalize as many costs as possible. In the case of energy, it’s not obvious that the market will respond to the long-term needs of the American people, as long as the costs of supplying the market (like the military, pollution, and carbon dioxide) can be externalized to the population at large.