I don’t often use one blog to hype another. Tonight, I will make an exception. I posted a longer item at California Greening today that considers just what is failing to happen regarding water in this state. While, as you might guess, I see the current legislature incapable to taking the action necessary to fix our problems and really see this as an opportunity for Greens, or at least Green ideas on ecology.
The whole post is below the fold.
California’s water systems are broken. In some cases, it is the physical system such as the long delayed upgrade and seismic retrofit of the Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct or the many miles of threatened levees in the Sacramento – San Joaquin River Delta. But mostly, it is the bureaucratic process by which water is governed, metered out, charged for and frequently fought over.
California’s Little Hoover Commission has previously issued reports on water. The most recent, in January 2009 was Clearer Structure, Cleaner Water: Improving Performance and Outcomes at the State Water Boards. It’s conclusions start with the recognition that California has an outdated system for dealing with a raft of threats to clean water, a crumbling infrastructure and a growing demand. Their solution involved a total re-structuring of the system of State and Regional Water Control Boards making them appointed by and responsible to the Governor.
Following that, the Commission has taken on the challenge to change the total governance of water in California beginning with a new hearing that was held April 23, 2009 in Sacramento. At that hearing, Phil Issenberg, Chairman of the Delta Vision Foundation, testified that the sum total of documented water rights in California is 8.4 times the average water flow through the Delta.
Even if the State Legislature were willing to undertake the task of reforming water governance, no matter what they decide to do, someone will challenge it in court. California’s bureaucracies have some 200 different agencies and boards involved in the process of managing our water resources.
Much of the power over water use is devolved into a long list of local water districts, each with it’s own set of directors and regulations. As far as I know, there are only four greens on any of these water district boards in the State of California. If there is any office that may be attainable, and which might have a long lasting effect on life in California, it is that of Director of a Water District.
The Green Party of the United States recently passed a resolution (#380) that outlines a new process of dealing with water issues. While Resolution authorizes action by the EcoAction Committee, GPUS, this will not happen without Greens everywhere becoming involved. We must all become active participants in solving California’s problems.
We have seen that the California State Legislature is incapable of coming to any hard decision regarding anything of importance. If they can not enact a budget on time, how will they be able to deal with the restructuring of priorities between Central Valley Agriculture and Southern California urban users.
The problems associated with water, it’s management and it’s governance in California cry our for Green solutions. California needs the active involvement of Greens who will take bioregional approaches to the management of water sheds, who will involve the public in the decision making rather than relying on entrenched bureaucracies and special interests to determine our future.
Join the GPCA and the GPUS EcoAction Committee in creating fundamental change. EcoAction is setting up The Green Party Water Works, a public blog where we will focus attention on bioregional solutions and water governance.
That is one place to start. Another is to contact local Green Party councils and to tell them that you are willing to help protect California’s future. It is clear that neither major political party is going to do that.
Wes Rolley – CoChair: EcoAction Committee Green Party US
