Field Poll: 82 Shifting down, Speier Up

The down-ballot Field poll was released this morning. So, I’ll run down the numbers, starting with the Constitutional offices.

Lt.Gov

Jackie Speier has moved into a small lead over John Garamendi, apparently all those billboards aren’t paying off for him like he would have hoped.  Liz Figueroa has continued to slide into oblivion.  Currently, Speier has 30%, Garamendi 25%, and Figueroa 8% with 37% undecided. It was thought by some that Figueroa would act as a spoiler for Speier, but that doesn’t seem to be playing out.  Figueroa has only 7% of women and only 5% in Speier’s and Figueroa’s home region of Northern California.  She is a bit stronger in Southern California at 10%, but this is probably just due to Latino identity politics.  Speier’s large lead amongst women might push her over the top in a primary that is dominated by women.  She currently leads 33-21-7 on that figure.  On the GOP Side, Tom McClintock is running unopposed.

Attorney General

Jerry Brown‘s name recognition, (and a Time Magazine feature story didn’t hurt on that account), without much in the way of campaign spending, has allowed him to retain his large lead over Rocky Delgadillo.  Currently Brown has 51%, Delgadillo 24%, and 25% are undecided.  I would go deeper into the numbers, but Brown seems to be dominant in all the crosstabs.  On the GOP side, Poochigian is running without siginificant opposition.

Controller

This race has flown under the radar, with a huge 63% undecided.  Joe Dunn is clinging to the slimmest of leads with 19 points, while John Chiang has 18.  Unsuprisingly, Dunn is doing better in Southern California (21-14) and Chiang better in Northern California (25-15).  This one will probably get a lot fewer people voting on it that the gov race, and name recognition just might push a state senator over a BOE member.  But, at this point, it’s too close to call.  And on the plus side, both campaigns in this race have run great campaigns.  I’m excited to see either man win.  On the GOP side, Strickland has a 43-32 lead over Maldanado.

Treasurer

Bill Lockyer is running unopposed.  On the GOP side, Keith Richman is leading small government loon and current BOE member Claude Parrish at 18-17 with 65 undecided.

Secretary Of State

Deborah Ortiz narrowly leads Debra Bowen at 25-19.  However, this might be merely identity politics as 65% is undecidided.  Ortiz seems to be holding her home region of Sacramento and NorCal (28-15), but with undecideds so high, it’s hard to glean much from the poll.  And another thing, am I totally missing something, or does Ortiz not have a campaign website?  That would be pretty crazy, and if so I would definitely have to publicly give my support to Bowen.  C’mon folks, technology is a big part of that job, get with the 21st century.  McPherson is running unopposed for the GOP nomination.

Prop 82

Prop 82 has been crashing in support recently.  And the news today is not good either.  Currently it’s losing by a margin of 41 Yes to 46 No.  The scare tactics used by the No on 82 folks seem to be working.  And I must admit, I’ve heard several very progressive people admit that they are a bit nervous about voting for the program.  I think at some level people just don’t like instituting such a large program via direct democracy.  Also, part of this is the additional taxes.  Those on the right jsut hate government, those on the left seem to want to use those taxes for other purposes.  However, I think it’s going to be a close race for 82.  The SacBee notes that:

Despite the new poll numbers, supporters say they believe they will win. They expect to do well among Democrats, who will be more likely to go to the polls to vote in the gubernatorial primary and other hotly contested Democratic races, said Nathan James, a spokesman for the Yes on 82 campaign.

“We always knew this election was going to come down to the wire,” James said. “We have a number of advantages going into this election.”

But opponents of Proposition 82, including the California Chamber of Commerce, have been pushing the arguments that the program would be too costly and would potentially drive private preschools out of business.

Pamela Zell Rigg, president of the California Montessori Council, said opponents were hoping voters would turn against the measure as they learned more about it. (SacBee 6/3/06)

So, obviously turnout will be key in all these races. But for Prop 82, where both parties get to vote and Ds are skewed in favor of 82(53-33) and Rs are skewed against 82 (25-65), the “who” of turnout will be key.  If many Republicans stay away from what is an otherwise uninteresting primary election for them, it might allow 82 to pass.

CA-50 Turnout Is Key For Busby

(Bumped for visibility – promoted by SFBrianCL)

The most recent SurveyUSA poll in the 50th CD race isn’t good news for the Busby campaign. In a poll of 448 “likely voters,” 47% indicated that they would prefer Republican lobbyist Brian Bilbray, while 45% indicated a preference for Democrat Francine Busby. Here is the SurveyUSA summary:

In a special election in California‘s 50th Congressional District today, 6/2/06, 96 hours till polls open, Republican Brian Bilbray and Democrat Francine Busby are locked in a fierce firefight that could go either way, according to a SurveyUSA poll of 448 Likely Voters, conducted exclusively for KGTV-TV San Diego. 4 days until the 6/6/06 Special Election, Republican Bilbray gets 47%, Democrat Busby gets 45%. Bilbray’s 2-point advantage is within the poll’s margin of sampling error. Voter turnout will decide whether this critical House seat remains in Republican hands, or becomes a Democrat pick-up. Since an identical SurveyUSA KGTV-TV poll released 5/10/06, Bilbray is up 2 points, from 45% to 47%; Busby is unchanged. Bilbray wins 6:1 among Republicans. Busby wins 9:1 among Democrats. Among Independents, Busby had led by 35 points, now leads by 25 points. Bilbray’s support among Independents is up from 19% to 31% in past 3 weeks. SurveyUSA’s turnout model assumes 49% of Likely Voters are Republican, 34% of likely voters are Democrat, and 17% are Independent.

Can Busby Win?  Check the rest.

Bilbray’s 2% advantage is not statistically significant, but what is significant is the fact that Busby’s numbers remain the same in poll after poll. And, the poll numbers are consistent with her 44% actual vote count in the April special election. Busby’s performance in this heavily Republican district is nothing short of phenomenal, but as polling and voting seem to indicate, somewhere around 45% is the peak level of voter support she can enjoy.


For Busby to win on Tuesday, she needs a real reversal in turnout numbers from the traditional voting pattern. According to SurveyUSA, Busby’s chances depend upon getting the under 35 demographic out, while Bilbray needs to get the over 65 crowd to cast their ballots. Busby’s success depends on a consistently underperforming group of voters, while Bilbray’s depends on getting the most reliable group of voters to do their jobs. That does not bode well for Busby.

Bilbray leads by 14 points among voters age 65 plus; Busby leads by 20 points among voters younger than 35. The two candidates are effectively tied among voters 35 to 64. Should younger voters, historically unreliable, vote in unexpectedly large numbers: advantage Busby. Should older voters vote in disproportionately large numbers: advantage Bilbray.


There is one final notation in this equation. Busby’s support has been very consistent from the special election through every poll and survey. Busby’s supporters voted in the special election and will, most likely vote on Tuesday, if they haven’t already sent in an absentee ballot. Bilbray on the other hand has to depend on a turnout of voters, who despite the contentious nature of the April special election, were too busy to cast a ballot then.

By SurveyUSA’s calculation, 20% of “today’s” Likely Voters did not vote in the 4/11/06 Primary. Among these “new” voters, Bilbray leads by 11 points, 49% to 38%.


It comes down to this for Busby, she needs a big turnout of younger voters, while seniors stay home. She needs the potential voters who sat out the special election to stay on the sidelines.

Ultimately, she needs every registered Republican and independent voter to pause before casting their vote and reflect upon the message that they will send to the nation if they ultimately choose Brian Bilbray, a career political hack turned lobbyist, who has never lived in the 50th CD and whose permanent residence is in the state of Virginia, to replace convicted Republican felon Randy “Duke” Cunningham.

more repubbblican family values

the san diego union tribune did an actual journalistic investigation (remember those?), found that repubbb congressional candidate jim galley is another one of those “do as i say, not as i marry or refuse to support my children”:

republican jim galley, who is running for congress as a “pro-traditional family” candidate, was married to two women at the same time, defaulted on his child support payments and has been accused of abuse by one of his ex-wives…

galley married his second wife, beth, in 1982 when, unbeknownst to her, he was still married to his first wife, terry. beth and galley divorced in 1990 after she sought a restraining order alleging abuse.

the child support was owed to his first wife.

= more =

of course, the repubbb has some excuses…he didn’t know he was still married to his first wife when he married his second wife, the child support was only in arrears for a few months (!) and the abuse accusations were only made to get him out of the house.

but wait, there’s more! more lies, that is…

during interviews, galley has touted his military service as an advantage over other candidates in the congressional race, saying he was drafted by the navy during the vietnam war. his web site states, “i was drafted it (sic) to the navy, serviced my time,” and then later joined the army.

galley’s military records, obtained by the union-tribune through a freedom of information act request, show he started his navy service april 29, 1974, and was discharged less than six weeks later, while in “recruit training.”

navy spokesman lt. william marks said the navy stopped the draft July 1, 1973, nine months before galley started his navy service…

after serving in the navy, galley’s web site states, he went to work for general motors, and then “because of massive layoffs in the ’70s i enlisted into the army.” his records show he did not enter the army until rebruary 1981. he left the army in december 1984.

his explanation for this discrepancy: “i got the dates wrong.”

yeah, that’s the ticket! and he’s married to morgan fairchild, too.
Example

bonus “the name says it all” sentence, found in the same story:

dan “frodo” litwin, a san diego software project manager, is the sole libertarian in the race.

yessss, precious, we likes the software…

CA-GOV: Unity on June 07

(Cross-posted on Daily Kos)

In 1994, Michigan Senator Don Reigle announced his retirement in the wake of his role in the Keating 5 Scandal. The two leading candidates for the Democratic nomination to replace him were moderate Congressman Bob Carr and the progressive State Senator from Ann Arbor, Lana Pollack. Like many voters across the country, I was fed up with the arrogance of power that had been displayed in recent years by the House Democratic leadership, and my political instincts told me there was no way an incumbent Democrat Congressman was going to be elected to the Senate in this environment. So, with these matters in mind, I decided to back State Senator Pollack. Boy, was I in for a political education.

Carr had the backing of the state party establishment, union leadership and his colleagues in the Congress, including my former Congressman, John Dingell. With Congressman Dingell’s endorsement, went the support of the District Party leadership and most of its activists. Carr eventually won the primary in a very close vote, but I sucked it up and, for the sake of the party, backed Carr and the rest of the ticket. Carr lost the November election to Spence Abraham. My concerns about nominating a member of Congress were borne out, but it didn’t matter because I became persona-non-grata for supporting Pollack for Senate and Debbie Stabenow for Governor during the primary season, even among people I thought were friends.

That was the point I nearly quit politics, but instead, I quit working within the party establishment structure, opting to pick and choose candidates to support and work for. And Debbie gave me a little sweet revenge by getting elected to the senate six years leader while no one ever again heard from Bob Carr and Howard Wolpe (the ’94 nominee for Governor). But a bitter taste remained in my mouth. It felt like all I was good for to the party was my labor and my money. “Make those phone calls and keep your mouth shut”. No wonder the party was such a shambles after 1994.

Why am I talking about this? Because now I live in California and we have this close, nasty primary for Governor and so many bad things can happen on Wednesday as a result. I’m asking all those who are passionately involved to take a deep breathe Wednesday morning (or evening depending on how close it is) and avoid doing anything rash. To those who backed the winning candidate, don’t gloat. Don’t rub your victory in the losers’ faces. For those who lose, don’t walk away. The race isn’t over and we still have Schwarzenegger to kick out in November and it’s going to take every ounce of strength to do it. If you’re part of the establishment backing Phil Angelides, don’t seek revenge on Steve Westly and his supporters. And to the Westly people, if your guy wins, reach out to everyone who supported Angelides.

Most importantly, on Wednesday, relax, buy each other a beer and listen to what the other has to say. Whether you win or lose, you all have something valuable to add and you all want a better California. Good luck, vote on Tuesday and I’ll see you all on Wedneday and November 7!

CA-50: A collection of the NRCC and Bilbray’s ludicrous ads

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

I wanted to consolidate some of the ridiculous ads, and the Busby rebuttals.  Most of the links are from FactCheck.org, where you can find lots of info debunking NRCC ads against Busby.  If you can volunteer, donate, or VOTE!  The flip has some info for GOTV Volunteering.

1) Immigration:

NRCC ad(WMV): Bubsy wants amnesty.

Busby ad (WMV): Busby supports McCain (R-AZ) Immigration Plan

2) Gas Tax

NRCC ad (WMV): Busby wants to increase the gas tax

Truth: Busby backed off her support for an increase in the gas tax.

Busby ad: Bilbray took money from Big Oil.

3) Busby on Child Porn Teacher

NRCC ad: Busby praised a teacher arrested for kiddie porn and excercise poor judgement as a school board member.  Here  is the mailer version of that ad.

Truth: Busby expressed shock when that teacher was arrested.

Busby ad: He never taught again after being arrested.

http://www.swingstateproject.com/2006/06/ca50_getoutthev.php

  GOTV June 3rd-6th

  Saturday June 3rd, Sunday June 4th & Monday June 5th

  Door Hangers 10am-8pm
  (Shifts beginning at 10am, 1pm & 4pm)

  Election Day June 6th

  Precinct Poll Checks
  6:00am-9am Door Hangers
  9:30am-8pm Precinct Poll Walks
  (Shifts beginning at 9:30am, 12pm & 4pm)

  Canvass Locations:

  Coastal Canvass
  Headline Graphics Parking Lot
  131 Aberdeen Drive
  Cardiff By The Sea, Ca 92007
  (760) 436-0133

  Southern Canvass
  Carpenter’s Hall
  8595 Miralani Drive, Suite A
  San Diego, Ca 92123

  Northern Canvass
  CWA Escondido Union Hall
  1525 Simpson Way
  Escondido, Ca 92029

  Phone Bank Locations:

  Coastal Phone Bank:
  Busby Cardiff Office
  2121 Newcastle Avenue
  Cardiff By The Sea, Ca 92007
  (760) 479-0114

  Northern Phone Banks:
  CWA Escondido Union Hall
  1525 Simpson Way
  Escondido, Ca 92029

  Nava Residence
  858 Calle Montera
  Escondido, Ca 9202

  RSVP to [email protected]
  Or call (760) 479-0114

CA-11: McNerney for Congress

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

I’m not generally going to endorse one Democrat over another, but I feel compelled to in this instance.  Also, for this, I speak only for myself.  However, I feel that this race is important enough to the netroots that I should weigh in.  I’ve written a lot about this race, particularly here and here.  You can find great interviews with both candidates at MyDD (Jerry and Steve)

And really, it’s not that I don’t think Steve Filson would be a particularly bad Congressman.  But Filson, a longtime Republican, chose to bash the “progressives” of the Democratic Party.  Click here for the audio of this quote made available from the Progressive 11th Blog.:

“We need members of congress… who do not get endorsements from places in Marin County and Sonoma, from extreme and progressive sections of the party.”

Personally, I think there is nothing wrong with the good people from Marin and Sonoma Counties.  This attack resulted from some local DFA Chapters endorsing McNerney.  The attack was unnecessary and divisive.  A candidate should not burn bridges, even with organizations that don’t endorse them.  If Filson wins, he will need the support of DFA groups to win the general election against the real target: Richard Pombo.

I just don’t think that the netroots should support a candidate who has come into the race thinking that he is owed the nomination.  Recently, Filson has resorted to buying his way onto “Astroturf” — phony grassroots — mailers, giving the false impression that he has the support of the grassroots.  He does not.  McNerney will have the support of the netroots and the grassroots through both elections.  It is for this reason, I think Jerry McNerney should be the Democratic Nominee for CA-11.

Low Turnout Expected

Make sure you get your vote in, or vote on election day.  Bruce McPhereson predicted a low turnout:

Secretary of State Bruce McPherson on Friday predicted only 38 percent of registered voters will cast ballots in Tuesday’s election, placing this one among the lower turnouts for a gubernatorial primary.

Over the past 20 years, the lowest voter turnouts for gubernatorial primaries came in 1994, when 35.05 percent of registered voters cast their ballots, and in 2002, when turnout was 34.59 percent.(SacBee 6/2/06)

Apparently our votes are going to matter this year. In addition to the low turnout, the race is also to close to call in the gubenatorial primary.  I’m awaiting some fun next week! Wow…i’m such a dork.