Angelides in SF

(Cross posted at Happening-Here)

Democratic party heavy hitters came to my ‘hood this morning to launch the local subset of the fall California campaign. This doesn’t happen a lot. I live in San Francisco’s Latino district; the rally site at 16th and Mission is not only day laborer terrain, but also drug dealer crossroads and leftist land. It’s much more gritty than pretty. (Note the pigeon in the picture.)

Alerted by Calitics, I charged off at 9:30 to what was billed as a 9:30-11am rally. Not surprisingly, I was more than on time. Just to be clear I should say I’ll be voting for Angelides and probably walk a few precincts, but I don’t have a huge attachment to this race (my political work this cycle will be outside California.)

The crowd, not counting TV cameras and reporters, was very sparse, about 100 people, mostly from organized labor, SEIU, UFCW, a few UFW, Bricklayers. The only identifiable community organization that had sent folks was ACORN.

My little neighborhood sure got the full alignment of big wigs. Pictures below the fold.

1chavez,-anderson,-villarai
left to right: Cindy Chavez (Democratic candidate for mayor of San Jose), Irma Anderson(mayor of Richmond), Antonio Villaraigosa (Los Angeles)

angelides,newsom,bates,farg
Phil Angelides, Gavin Newsom (San Francisco), Tom Bates (Berkeley), and Heather Fargo (Sacramento)

Gotta give it to these folks, they all were disciplined enough so that no one droned on. They spoke, endorsed and gave up the mic. Villaraigosa repeated part of his endorsement in Spanish, appropriately given the ethnicity of the few onlookers.

3onlookers

Angelides made a passable speech. Running for governor has taught him to be less of stick than I remember him being. He came off as a decent policy wonk who aims to represent the interests of ordinary Californians better than Gov. Arnold. Not inspiring, but certainly he’d be an improvement.

Some thoughts on the event from my perspective as a political organizer:

  • Can we ever build a Democratic party that ordinary people care about by relying on TV coverage? Clearly no on-the-ground organization tried very hard to do turnout for this rather high-powered event. Either relying on the media to report it was acceptable to the campaign or somebody screwed up. That was a lot of big shots to make show up for a 15 second evening news photo op.
  • Given the location, this event was presumably designed to attract low income Latino voters. If so, how could I have spent the day yesterday at the immigrant Labor Day march and seen not one flier announcing it? Flyering wouldn’t have greatly improved turnout (it seldom does) but it would have signaled to an energized constituency that Phil Angelides wants to speak to them. Labor (not the big wigs — workers and staffers) did turn out for the immigrant march; they could have made this happen.
  • The most effective political animal on the stage was clearly Gavin Newsom (and I have never been a Newsom supporter.) Why? Because he is tall and has a deep voice. In reality, Villaraigosa is probably the future leader of this lot, but he has much to overcome because he’s really short. One of Angelides’ downsides as candidate is that he’s something of a pipsqueak.
  • Judging from the stage set up, Angelides is running on the slogan “A Governor We Can Count On.” I smell less than artful polling and a cautious consultant there. Who is “we”? Why can we count on this aspiring governor? This slogan probably resonated last year when the unions had tagged Schwarzenegger as a liar who thieved money from the schools. But now that Arnold has remade himself as a “moderate,” Angelides has to present himself as more than “not Arnold” or even “not Bush”. (There was a vague whiff of this potent message.) If he can’t inspire the state, he is not going to trump the star-power of the Terminator.

For all my complaints, it was a pleasant, expeditious event in what must be a core area — I’ll do what I can to elect Angelides.
4angelidesslogan

Proposition 89 ends Call-Time

Cross-posted at Daily Kos

With the passing of Labor Day, we have entered the traditional campaign season: a time for politicians to go meet voters. Yet the reality is that — even as you are reading this — many candidates are locked in a small room as part of the daily ritual known as call time. Somewhere along the line, it became conventional wisdom that money equals ads which equals votes, with call-time seen as the most effective way to raise money and thus win elections.

An entire generation of politicians have been evaluated not by their leadership or ideas, but by their discipline when it comes to spending hours on end begging for big checks, one call after another after another after another. It is commitment to call-time that positions a politician as a contender during the primaries, it decides if a candidate is seen as viable in the general election, and it plays a major role in whether a legislator will rise through the ranks into “leadership”. In short, call-time is seen as one of the most critical attributes in every stage of politics.

Wouldn’t it be nice if politicians could spend the next two months listening to voters instead of talking at donors? The answer is public financing, it is working in other states, and this is the year when it can start working in California.

How it Works
Proposition 89 is the Clean Money and Fair Elections Act on this fall’s ballot in California. The initiative would relegate call-time to history and fundamentally reform the political economy in the most populous state by making public financing of campaigns a reality. Prop 89 levels the playing field so new candidates can win on their ideas, not because of the money they raise.

  * Candidates who agree to spending limits and to take no private contributions qualify for public funding
  * $5 contributions from voters required to prove viability
  * Clean candidates receive enough to run competitive campaigns. They can’t raise money beyond public funds

Why Special Interests are Terrified
Prop 89 makes elections about ideas, not about money. Campaigns are measured by people, not dollars. That’s why trusted groups representing your interests —  like the League of Women Voters of California, California Common Cause, the Consumer Federation of California, and the California Clean Money Campaign — support Prop 89. And why lobbyists and special interests —  like big oil, drug companies, insurance firms, HMOs and some unions — don’t.

Just the other day, KQED Forum became a blogger bash (video here) because blogs threaten the ability of “very vested interests in Sacramento” to come together and oppose Proposition 89.

Bill Whalen, a Hoover Fellow and media consultant for the likes of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill Jones, Tom Campbell and Richard Riordan said (transcript via Kid Oakland):

I don’t worry so much as a Republican, but as a citizen, and there’s one word: “the blogosphere”  That’s what scares me.  There are angry people on the left and angry people on the right.  And I’m not sure if I want to see that anger harnessed in reforming our government.  I like the firewall, if you will. … Among the leaders opposing [Prop 89] are the California Teachers Association and the California Chamber of Commerce.  Why?  They are very vested interests in Sacramento, they don’t want the rules changed.  But Direct Democracy, to me we have it in effect in the initiative process and I’d kind of like to keep it harnessed.

What You Can Do
Until Proposition 89 passes, politicians will stay hidden away doing call-time and elections will be about money. The “very vested interests” in Sacramento will spend literally tens of million of dollars to preserve their stranglehold over California.

They may have more money, but reform can happen because we have more people. So take a quick minute and sign up for email updates.

—–
For daily updates, bookmark the Proposition 89 Blog.

CA-Gov: And they’re off…

Labor Day traditionally marks the day that most Californians begin to pay attention to the electioneering going on all around them.  This year is no different.  Both Phil Angelides and Arnold Schwarzenegger raced around the state yesterday, and will do so again today.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides, aiming to energize union members and party activists on Labor Day, charged that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is a “first-class fraud” whose moderate stands on issues like global warming and a minimum wage increase will disappear if he is re-elected.
[snip]
Schwarzenegger visited campaign offices in Carlsbad before appearing at a noncampaign event — the Muscle Beach bodybuilding finals in Venice Beach, where Schwarzenegger himself became a celebrity in the bodybuilding world. (SF Chron 9/5/06)

So Angelides goes to talk to the hard-working citizens of the state at labor events, and Schwarzenegger goes to Muscle Beach and his own campaign facilities?  So, which do we really want as a our governor, The Champion of Bodybuilding or the The Champion of Ordinary Californians?

Villaraigosa & Newsom with Phil in SF this morning

Sorry for not posting this earlier! But Phil Angelides will be making an appearance with LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa in San Francisco at the 16th Street BART station in the Mission. Angelides Link here

Also, remember that anybody can post an event to the event calendar.  So, if you know of an event anywhere in the state would be of interest, go ahead and post it.

Join SF Mayor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa for a
RALLY TO KICK OFF THE CAMPAIGN SEASON AND ELECT OUR NEXT GOVERNOR

Phil Angelides

Tuesday, September 5th 9:30am – 11:00am
16th and Mission BART Station in San Francisco

Happy Labor Day.

Invariably these days, Labor Day is occasion for progressive intellectuals all over the country to show up on community radio talk shows, academic symposia, and newspaper op-ed pages to ponder the question: Whither labor?

With union density what it is (13% overall, less in the private sector), it’s a discussion worth having, and having often.  Happily however, here in California, we have as muscular a labor movement as ever (or maybe not ever, but in living memory).  If I could post pictures here, I would put up a nice one from this morning’s L.A. Labor Fed breakfast at the Cathedral of Our Lady of Angels, where just about every Southern California Democratic officeholder above dog catcher showed up to honor the organizations that fight for what we now apparently refer to as the “middle class,” and that we once knew better as the working class.  With that kind of political juice, breakfasters were safe to table the discussion of Labor’s Future in favor of that of what unions need to get done between now and November to get a new governor in Sacramento.

The big news of the night: the California Teachers Association has worked out an agreement allowing it to affiliate with the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor.

That may sound less than earth-shattering to those who have other interests than the political machinations of union bureaucrats, but it is actually quite significant.  The 335,000-member CTA is an unaffiliated union, meaning that it does not belong to the California Federation of Labor, the state’s governing body of the AFL-CIO, and by extension, nor to the L.A. Fed, the county’s AFL-CIO governing body.  Yet the teachers union is, arguably, the single most powerful campaigning and lobbying organization in the state.  And the L.A. County Labor Fed is not just another Central Labor Council — it is a legendarily capable labor council.  It has helped launch the careers of many California political stars, including Antonio Villaraigosa.  Fabian Nunez was the L.A. Fed’s political director before winning his seat in Sacramento.  The combination of these two formidable outfits is promising indeed.

So, some good news for Labor Day in California, an occasion usually devoted in progressive circles only to nostalgia and hand-wringing.

Rep. Rohrabacher Yells At Parents of Soldiers Outside His Home

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

(cross-posted at The California Courage Campaign)

Military Families Speak Out’s Operation House Call came to California last week to pay a visit to Republican CA-46 Congressman Dana “Warbacker” Rohrabacher. The last thing they expected was to get into a shouting match with him, but that’s exactly what happened on Saturday outside his home in Huntington Beach.

First a little background.

MFSO, which describes itself as “an organization of people opposed to the war in Iraq who have relatives or loved ones in the military,” launched the summer-long action on June 22 to protest Congress’s June 15 vote to “stay the course” in Iraq. June 15th was also the day that saw the 2500th US soldier die in Iraq. Their goal? To demand that Congress “End the occupation, bring our troops home now and take care of them when they get here.”

More over the flip.

The D.C.-based protest ran through August 7, when Congress left on recess, and consisted of daily vigils, speaking events and a display of combat boots representing US soldiers slain since the “stay the course” vote.

On June 22, the display reflected 11 pairs of combat boots and shoes representing the deaths of 141 Iraqis. As of August 1st, the display has grown to include 78 pairs of combat boots and shoes representing the deaths of 1,594 Iraqi children, women and men.

But that was just phase one of the protest. When members of Congress dispersed to their respective districts in August, MFSO took Operation House Call on the road.

The second phase of Operation House Call follows members of Congress and Senators to their home states, as MFSO's 26 local chapters and over 3,000 military families prepare to meet their Senators and Members of Congress and demand an answer to the question: "Whose names are you willing to add to the growing list of casualties?"

Having gotten nowhere with Rohrabacher in Washington, MFSO decided to protest outside his home district office in hopes of getting a meeting. Pat Alviso, proud mother of a Marine and one of the leaders of the protest, told me that about 50 of them, including several with sons in Iraq, gathered outside Rohrabacher’s office to read the names, ages and hometowns of local soldiers (from Orange County and Long Beach) who’ve died in Iraq. As with the DC protest, they displayed combat boots representing the soldiers whose names they read off and as people passed by, the protesters would hand them daisies to place inside the boots as they sang Where Have All The Flowers Gone?

While there was some media present, the protest drew no reaction from the Congressman’s office, so they decided to head up to his office to make sure they knew they were there. A receptionist informed them that she had indeed been watching (“you’re doing a great job!” ) but that Rep. Rohrabacher was busy at speaking engagements. Where? “I can’t give out that information.” Will he meet with us? “I’m afraid he’s booked until he heads back to Washington on Tuesday.” The group then asked if someone would call them if he could spare just a half hour to meet. The clueless wonder proceeded to take the names and numbers of all of Rohrabacher’s constituents in the group and they left.

Having not heard from his office throughout the remainder of the week (shock!), Alviso and the rest of her MFSO crew, decided to gather at a park near Rohrabacher’s home and pay a more literal house call to the Congressman. Leaving a few folks behind to watch the boots, about 35 of them walked the block and a half to the Congressman’s home and gathered on the sidewalk outside it, some carrying signs saying “No More War For Oil!”

Rohrabacher’s front door and garage were open but no one answered when they knocked. At one point, they could see a shadow of someone they figured was Rohrabacher just inside the house. They decided to knock again but once again got no response. They retreated back to the park to get the combat boots and returned with reinforcements: a Tammy Faye Bakker look-alike and Monopoly’s money man there to hand the Congressman a gigantic replica of a blank check representing the blank check he’s given Bush for a war without end.

They knocked again, and again got no response so they left the check on his front porch, gathered just off his property, arranged the combat boots on the ground and began to chant

“Bring Them Home Now!”

“Bring Them Home Now!”

“Bring Them Home Now!”

It was at this point that Rohrabacher bolted out of his house…barefoot and started yelling at the protesters.

From The Orange County Register:

"You just woke my damn babies!" Rohrabacher said.

He and his wife, Rhonda, have 2-year-old triplets. Rohrabacher said he was on his back porch when he heard crying over a baby monitor.

"I am going to get all of you arrested if you don't leave right now."

"My son is in Iraq!" responded Tim Kahlor, 48, whose son is on his second tour of duty in Iraq until January 2007. "And he does not get much sleep!"

"Did he volunteer?" Rohrabacher yelled back.

Alviso told me that he yelled this at them several times, displaying not only great insensitivity but also a lack of imagination. “Is that all he has to say to us?”

Rohrabacher continued yelling.

"Wait a minute, man, you are standing on my property. You are violating my rights… And you are violating my family's rights!"

Pat Alviso, a teacher whose 30-year-old Marine son will deploy in Iraq for his second tour of duty next week, said the activists tried to visit the congressman in his office last Wednesday, but were told that his calendar was full.

"Did somebody call my office ahead of time?" Rohrabacher asked. "I met with people all last week, I talked to them about the war…. But unlike you, they were courteous, they were not arrogant."

So this is what they mean by compassionate conservatism. Alviso informed me that they left shortly after he’d retreated back toward his house threatening to call the cops. When they got back to the park, they were approached by a policeman who told them that as far as he was concerned, they had acted fully within the bounds of the law. “He must be a Democrat,” she laughed.

As for the protest, Alviso hopes that it makes Rohrabacher think twice next time there's a vote on the war. "He should remember what happened to Lieberman in Connecticut," she said.

The activists said they felt their 50-minute protest was a success.

"We came here out of desperation. Now, we hope, the congressman has something to take back with him to Washington," said Alviso, who organized the "house call" with her husband, Jeff Merrick, 59, an Air Force retiree who served in Vietnam…

"We are protesting because our sons in the military cannot. We are doing it for them."