“Those Fat Cat 80-Hour-A-Week Prison Guards”

I have to say that I don’t understand the outrage generated by this story about California prison guards earning massive amounts of overtime.  I guess it ties into the conservative culture of victimhood and the belief that someone’s always scheming to steal from them.

Here’s the deal.  Prison guards are getting a lot of overtime because they’re working a ton of hours.  Overtime is DESIGNED to increase exponentially with more hours worked.  The reason they’re working so much is that, a) inmates are stuffed into common areas where they need to be watched more closely than if they were all locked away in cells, and b) there aren’t enough guards for this extra workload.  The overtime isn’t “out of control,” as the President of the astroturf-like “National Tax Limitation Committee” said in the article; the prison system is out of control.  Would you rather there be no guards?  Would you rather everyone worked 40 hours a week and there was nobody on the job in common areas at night?

more on the flip…

The director of prisons is exactly right.

While relatively few officers are required to guard inmates housed in cells, far more are needed to watch those housed in gymnasiums and other areas not meant for sleeping, said Scott Kernan, acting director of adult prisons.

“Population is the biggest driving force” in the soaring overtime, Kernan said.

Corrections officers have a difficult job, made all the more difficult by overcrowding, gang warfare, a complete lack of health care which angers the prison population, and having to work all this overtime, which wears on anyone.  This isn’t a case of lucky-duckies living off the fat of the taxpayer.  There aren’t enough corrections officers, bottom line.  And if you want to blame somebody, blame whatever idiot thought this was a good idea:

(executive vice president of the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. Chuck) Alexander said the state could reduce overtime by hiring as many as 4,000 people to fill vacancies.

He blamed the guard shortage on a decision to shut the academy for new recruits for eight months in 2004.

At that time, the prison population had dipped, and some officials believed the decline would continue.

The drop turned out to be temporary.

Attorney Don Specter, director of the Prison Law Office, which is suing the state over prison crowding, agreed that the decision to shut the academy was a “mistake.”

“They don’t have enough officers to safely man the prisons,” Specter said.

I guarantee you that the Governor’s office was responsible for that stupidity.  “Hey, the population dipped for one year, let’s close the academy down!”  Brilliant!  It cuts costs, and fits a pattern of wishes turning into policy.  If we just BELIEVE that the prison population will go down some more, surely it will, right?

Meanwhile, the LA Times article from which this all comes flat-out lied about the Governor’s new plan, saying it focuses equally on building new facilities, rehabilitation and changing sentencing guidelines, while most of the money goes to building, little to rehab, and the only sentencing guidelines that will be reviewed in the first year will be parole sentences.

Gray Davis gave a very bloated contract to the prison guards’ union in exchange for campaign support, the results of which are being felt now.  Indeed it looks clear that Governor Schwarzenegger gave in to the guards’ union on whatever they wanted in an election year, and that wasn’t even enough to earn their support.  But let’s not demonize the corrections officers themselves for having to deal with a crisis that is not of their own design.

Bring Hope to the Marianas this Holiday Season

Merry Christmas, Dailykos! For most of us, there’s only a day and a half of shopping left to do before we visit our friends and family and enjoy this special time of the year. Many of us celebrate Christmas as not only a time of holy reverence, but a time of togetherness and goodwill. Aunts and uncles, brothers and sisters, friends and even neighbors gather to give something from their hearts to the ones they love.

Here in the United States, we live lives of relative comfort. Even those of us who have substantially less than most are far better off and much more comfortable than people in African countries, Southeast Asia, and even most of Europe. That’s part of the American Dream: to live lives of comfort and ease and secure inviting accommodations for our loved ones. At least that’s what the perception is. The truth of the matter is that there are some people on American soil that are denied the American Dream. Those people live in the US Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and are living what is known as an American Nightmare.

In the tiny islands of Saipan, Tinia and Rota, the promise of the American Dream is dangled in front of the faces of immigrant workers. Most of these immigrants come from China, while others come from such impoverished nations as Bangladesh, Thailand, the Philippines and Sri Lanka. They come to the Mariana Islands in hopes of better lives. They know that the CNMI is a territory of the United States of America. They know that Americans live, by comparison, lives of luxury and comfort. They see the American Dream and are willing to risk all to get a piece of what we take for granted.

They are hard-working lower-class citizens in their home countries, and are approached by recruiters to come work in the “American Islands.” They sign the normal labor contracts a temporary worker needs to sign to be legal in the Marianas, and then the recruiters must sign a contract with their province labor ministries. In Communist China, these “Shadow Contracts” are legally enforceable, and as stated in a 1994 letter to CNMI Governor Pedro Tenorio from Tomas Camacho, the Catholic Bishop overseeing the islands:

“This contract can result in the worker being subjected to civil and criminal penalties for asserting the rights or fulfilling an obligation under the laws of the CNMI and the United States. This contract acts to deprive Chinese citizens of rights they might enjoy while resident in the CNMI. The effect of this contract is to dramatically inhibit a worker from filing a labor complaint because of fear of sanction upon return to China.”

In order to make it to the “American Islands,” migrant workers have to pay exorbitant recruitment fees, sometimes in upwards of $5,000. After paying a lifetime of savings to these recruiters, they arrive on the beautiful Marianas and find that many of the jobs they were promised never truly existed. Good construction jobs don’t exist for these immigrants. Higher paying government jobs are reserved for native islanders and white Americans. The only jobs these people can get are as household servants, “dancers” in sex clubs, or jobs in the infamous sweatshops exposed in Brian Ross’s 1998 20/20 expose. The pay is not what was agreed upon. The conditions are worse than any standard of living we would accept for ourselves here in the States. When the contracts are up and the immigrants are to go back to their home countries, there are certain fees and taxes that are burdened on these impoverished workers. With practically no money to pay the return fees, the immigrants have to take out loans to cover the taxes. If the worker cannot repay the loan, it seems that he may end up going to debtor’s prison. Being fired can mean going to jail. The situation seems hopeless.

In a 1994 press release, Bishop Camacho said the following:

“It is the teaching of the church that every human being has basic rights not because of the benevolence of the state or even because they are provided by the law. Rather, these rights flow from the essential dignity of every human being as the image and likeness of God. Several years ago, Pope John Paul II wrote in is encyclical letter, Centesimus Annus, that human rights involve the workplace as well. These rights include that of private property, the right to establish professional organizations and labor unions, as well as the right to a just wage. According to the Pope, these principles must find expression in the laws of the state which guarantee human rights in the fair enforcement of those laws and in the actions of each member of the community who looks “upon his neighbor as another self, bearing in mind above all his life and the means necessary for living it in a dignified way lest he follow the example of the rich man who ignored Lazarus, the poor man (Luke 16:19-31)…The CNMI seems to be in a situation where it may be complicit in depriving people of their rights, if it does not do everything of which it is capable to ensure that the rights of all people within its borders are fully respected. Whenever the rights of anyone living in the CNMI are in jeopardy, the rights of everyone are in jeopardy.”

The CNMI has been a territory of the United States for decades. They follow US law in almost every way, with the exceptions of labor and immigration. These seem to be the biggest problems the islands now face. Congress has had ample opportunity to fix these problems, at the urging of President Clinton during the 1990’s, Senators Frank Murkowski (R- Alaska), Daniel Akaka (D- Hawaii) and Congressman George Miller (D- California). Over 29 pieces of reform legislation have been held up or killed in committee.

As we prepare to reflect on the year and celebrate Hope with our families and friends, we need to remember that there are some people living on American soil that don’t have the luxury of celebrating Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa or any other religious holiday. They cannot celebrate family in debtor’s prison. They cannot give in a sweatshop. They cannot have the togetherness we celebrate in a sex club. There is little hope of any form for these people.

What are our excuses for allowing these abuses to continue? The effective range of our excuses is zero meters. It is up to us all to cause change. Robert F. Kennedy said “It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped.  Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope; and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”

We are two twenty-somethings trying to cause ripples in the world. We have watched our parents’ and grandparents’ generations take our world down a course that we don’t necessarily agree with. The first project we hope to work on is bringing awareness of the atrocities going on in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to public light. Ripples of Hope, started by Neil Pople and Nick Shepard, hopes to live up to Bobby Kennedy’s idea that we can affect changes that cause a chain reaction leading to bigger and better things.

If you are interested in learning more about the Marianas or our organization, please visit our website at www.ripplesofhope.org. We are in the process of getting our group official 501(c)3 status, which is the official status to make donations tax deductible. To put it simply, we cannot accept donations just yet. But what we ARE asking is that you make a pledge to Ripples of Hope, a financial commitment to helping the workers on the Mariana Islands. Saipan, Tinia and Rota are three extremely beautiful islands scarred by an ugly secret. We cannot wait for the next person to fix the problem. We need to roll up our sleeves and do something today.

2007 is going to be a year of community for us, and we wish you the best this Holiday Season.

Ellen Tauscher Weekly, V1.02

If last week was defined by Katie Merrill catapulting a primary campaign against Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, this was the week that Tauscher tried in vain to distance herself from Joe Lieberman.

The following is how the week developed…

ellen tauscherSunday, December 17, 2006 – Sunday morning began where late Saturday night had left off. Before dawn, Crooks and Liars posted with five links to the continuing fallout from Representative Tauscher’s federal staff scrubbing her official government website of “The Caress” picture.

Rain Storm said the picture was, “definitely worth a thousand words” while pointing out, “In case anyone hasn’t been paying attention, the 2008 election cycle has already begun.” A short time later, skippy the bush kangaroo said, “if you enjoyed the lamont run against lieberman, pull up a chair, grab some popcorn and feast your eyes on california district 10, where ellen tascher, aside from being terribly out of touch with her constituents, made the unfortunate gaffe of knocking blogtopia (and she didn’t even acknowledge that yes! we coined that phrase!).”

That afternoon, a front-page post on Calitics looked at Tauscher’s internet blunders and concluded, “the larger problem is that her campaign should lack the ability to hire a netroots consultant who knows better. Working for Tauscher would be a career killer for a blogosphere coordinator and while the money might be good, it would be likely to cost other clients”. A post at Left in SF agreed, “Hiring an internet consultant for the very purpose of insulating the candidate from the internet is a pretty good way to end someone’s career. You’d have to be awfully cynical about politics and pretty contemptuous of the netroots to take that job.”

Monday, December 18, 2006 – Headlining CA-10 as, “Just One Ned Lamont Away From Being The Next CT SEN”, the Hotline Blogometer reported, “Rep. Ellen Tauscher’s (D-CA) vote for the Iraq war, her perceived coziness with K Street and Pres. Bush, have already made her the netroots number one target for ’08’s primary season.”

ellen tauscher joe liebermanThe week’s bombshell came Monday afternoon at Fire Dog Lake. You see, not only did Tauscher’s congressional office scrub photos of her with George Bush, but two pics of Ellen Tauscher with Joe Lieberman were also scrubbed. FDL noted, “The days when you could hire the idiot nephew to run the netroots component of your campaign are long gone.  It should be very interesting to see who might be willing to stand in the line of fire currently being aimed at Tauscher”.

Not surprisingly, getting caught scrubbing Joementum pics was the fastest route to permanently brand Tausher as getting Liebermanned in 2008. A FDL reader set up a new home for the pics and the story hit the front page of Calitics with quotes from Tauscher on why Lieberman was rejected by primary voters during the 2004 presidential campaign. And then the story rocketed to the front page of Daily Kos, “for those who want to know the full case against Tauscher, it will be laid out over the coming year in full.” Ruck Pad suggested anyone thinking of doing netroots outreach for Tauscher, “would be well advised to think twice” and declared the fiasco, “a textbook example on how not to head off a netroots fueled primary.”

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 – The National Journal Blogometer starting things off with, “The samecircles that got such mileage out of naming Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) SOTU embrace of Pres. Bush “the kiss” have now labeled the pre-Iraq-war picture of Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) sitting with Bush’s hand on her lap “the caress.””

Josh Richman won the prize for the first reporter to ask for a comment from the Congresswoman, but he failed to pin down who in Tauscher’s office did the scrubbing or whether the Representative sanctioned the cover-up.

Calitics covered “The Caress” and posted two videos from Tauscher’s town hall meeting with Rossmoor Democrats.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006 – The Berkeley Bubble started the day off with a post headlined, “Ellen Tauscher: The Caress, the Iraq Mess, Forgetting her District’s Address?” and a short time later it was read by a house.gov I.P. address. The House Race Hotline reported, “Emboldened by their role in the Dem sweep, liberal bloggers are now targeting Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA 10), a Bay Area centrist, pro-business Dem in the mold of Joe Lieberman. Her crime? Bloggers perceive her as too cozy with Pres. Bush and big business. And as chair of the New Democratic Coalition, she’s been a proponent of free-trade agreements to the ire of the populist crowd.”

A front-page post at MyDD said, “Calitics is doing good work tracking Ellen Tauscher (including video).  She’s a real problem for Democrats, and should face a serious challenge.” A Calitics diary looked back at the type of candidate who has run against Tauscher in the tenth since redistricting.

Later that day, the San Francisco Chronicle’s Spun Cycle Blog offered a hyperlink-free post that was widely mocked and Carla Marinucci was quickly refuted at Ruck Pad.

Thursday, December 21, 2006 – A Calitics diary looked at Tauscher’s endorsement page from 2006 and notes that neither Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi nor Senator Barbara Boxer made the list.

A MyDD diary (that remained recommended for more than 48 hours) looked back of the major, public feud between Pelosi and Tauscher, “In the end, Tauscher’s two blunders ended up with Burton creating a new 10th District that would remove any fear of Tauscher losing in a general, but one that was specifically designed to allow her to lose in a primary if she kept undermining Pelosi. Tauscher wasn’t redistricted out of a seat, but was given a clear shape up or ship out choice.”

D-Day disputed the Tauscher/Lieberman link, “there’s NOBODY like Joementum when it comes to arrogance, false victimhood, dishonesty, and condescension.”

Friday, December 22, 2006 – The internet tubes were quiet on the last weekday before Christmas, but the 18 year-old high school student we mentioned last week posted his second diary on Calitics and the Rescue Rangers bumped the Pelosi/Tauscher Feud to the front-page of Daily Kos.

Saturday, December 23, 2006 – On Festivus Day, there was but one airing of grievances. A post at Calitics using the Way Back Machine to see Tauscher’s thoughts on her nomination speech for Joe Lieberman.

There should be much, much more next week in the Ellen Tauscher Weekly.

More Lieberman and Tauscher

Ellen Tauscher Joe Lieberman Tom DeLayToday’s look at Joe Lieberman and Ellent Tauscher is brought to you by a special machine that takes you way back to August 14, 2000:

“I asked Ellen to nominate me because we share the values and concerns of America’s working families and understand the real issues that affect their everyday lives. Ellen is a strong and effective leader with a vision for the future to build on the foundation of our unprecedented prosperity and use the surplus to benefit all working families,” said Senator Lieberman.

Of course, Joementum flopped in the debate, rolled over during the recount, and the surplus was spent on their war. Lieberman and Tauscher both over-compensate for their insecurity by enabling the Republican Party. The gains we made last year were in-spite of the way these two constantly seek to find the halfway point between good and stupid. If you tell them the Democratic base thinks gravity is 9.8 m/s/s, they’ll suggest we start the negotiations at 4.9 m/s/s and insist that eventually the GOP will acknowledge at least a degree of gravity. The main difference is that Tauscher won’t get a do-over.