Endorsements are now being considered

AD-40 is up first. Blumenfield got 65% yesterday, but the cards just went up and it’s gonna be tight.

[Update by Lucas] Endorsement fails, endorsement is vacated. Art Torres is noting that a substitute candidate can come from the floor, would need 75%.

SD-03 will be coming next.  The Leno signs are out in force, not seeing the Migden troops yet.

[Update by Lucas] Migden supporters are now swarming in as well.  UFW representative speaks in favor of Migden, pitching on her union connections and support for farmworkers.  Sen. Migden reels off the endorsements.

[Update by Lucas] Speaking for non-endorsement is Speaker-Elect Karen Bass (nice!). And Mark Leno speaks next with Kamala Harris doing her best to establish her star.

[Update by Lucas] Here come the cards. The voice vote was a deafening support for “no.”  Everyone has to get back to their seats before the vote can begin.

[Update by Lucas] “No” cards just went up, it’s a stomping. It looks like the whole room.

[Update by Lucas] Final Tally: Yes 298, No 742. Wow. That’s 71.3% for No. Motion from the floor to endorse Leno- he’d need 75%. Quick speech now.

[Update by Lucas] Voting now on Leno- cards are up.

[Update by Lucas] Final Tally: 979 total votes. 591 Yes, 388 No. 60.3%, motion fails. No endorsement.

Bill Clinton speech

What follows below is a rough transcript of Bill Clinton’s speech.

Thank you very much, good morning California Democrats.  (Other thank-yous, yadda yadda.)  [juls notes that the song Bill entered to was the song that Kerry entered to at the DNC in 2004.]

This has been an unprecedented election year in terms of voters and donations.  You didn’t have to be against everyone.  This has been an amazing election year, and there’s been a reason.  The American people know that the country has to change, our position in the world is out of place and we have to restore security, peace and cooperation.  They know that and they have lifted the energy in the Democratic primary process.

What I want to get out of the way is the idea that we’re going to weaken the party in the fall.  But on June 2, 1992, when I won the Democratic primaries in New Jersey, Ohio and California, I was running behind Ross Perot and Bush.  So that’s how much you can pay attention to the polls.  Ross was first.  But then when the Democratic Convention opened, I and Gore were in first place and we never lost.  And the fact that we had a vigorous debate in the primary turned out to be a blessing in surprise.  So don’t let people tell you in [all the states that vote next] that they don’t count.  So chill out, and let everybody have their say.  Don’t forget, it was Will Rogers who said that he didn’t belong to an organized political party, he was a Democrat.

We’re organized, we’re full of energy.  I don’t know anybody, any Democrat, who believes that we should continue 4 more years of the current economic and Iraq policies.  We want to change the future of this country.

I’ve been to California 70 times because Chelsea was in schol, but there were a bunch of disasters, etc.  Hillary said  in Wyoming that she would have someone in the White House who would take care of the smaller states in teh mountain west.  What you do is governed by four things: doing what you’re trying to do.  Second is the emergencies that come in.  How you deal with it and when you deal with it.  Third is the Congressional Calendar, and the fourth is how you organize the White House.  California was better off because there was someone who was called the Secretary of California because he was responsible for everything that was on the plate, everything we did, and Hillary wants to do that in the West.

We have to campaign in every state [ed note: except the ones that are irrelevant?].  But let’s talk about where we are.  Why did all these people show up for us?  Twice as many voters and money!  We live in an independent world, and America has been absorbing too much of the bad and not enough of the good.  We’ve been facing a financial meltdown, and I think the Reserve did what they had to do to avoid a meltdown, but more than 1 million of our citizens are dealing with foreclosures, just because people were trying to keep the housing market going.  I’ve gotten several of these and read them.  and a lot of them never missed a mortgage payment.  Not a single one of these people were told that the mortgage companies were going to bottle up  their mortgage into stock making the mortgages worthless so they had to extract more from the borrowers.  Compton had teh highest rate of foreclosure in the nation, but it’s no different in the rest of the nation.

That’s because the only thing you ask yourself when you make the down payment is, can you make the monthly payment?  But whenever a home is foreclosed it costs the economy $250,000.  Now, a lot of people are waiting on these rebate checks, but if we foreclose on a million citizens, it will swamp whatever positive impact these checks are going to have and catapult this country into a crisis.  Hillary’s position is clear: moratorium for 90 days, and then we ought to guarantee a mortgage payment for five years.  That’s better economics than letting them foreclose.  If you foreclose on them, you never get your money back because you’ll never get your money back.  We’ll give you 20% and you eat the other 20%.  If this country can stop Bear Stearns behavior, we ought to be able to save a million working Americans in their homes.

In a larger sense, where are we with this economy?  After a second big bite, we realized that trickle-down economics is a failure.  And if you compare this economy with the 90s, there’s a reason we study history and it’s so that we don’t make the same mistake twice.  Most people think we’re in a recession.  And they are, but the country is not.  The country isn’t in recession, which is 6 months of negative economic growth, and the country hasn’t had that.  But people have.  The average family will pay more for food, gas and healthcare.  So since the fist time since I ran for president, I go to community meetings, and I hear people who say, have to be careful at the grocery store or I won’t be able to buy medicine.  90% of the benefits have gone to the top income earners.  Now, we Americans don’t resent people having money, but we want shared prosperity and shared responsibility.

When I entered the White House, I was the poorest first family.  But I was fortunate after leaving.  And they started throwing tax cuts at me while we had soldiers overseas and we were borrowing money from China.  And that is wrong.  So how are we going to get out of it?  Look at what the problem is: trickle-down economics is a failure.  In the 1990s, we had 22.7 million new jobs.  This decade, only 5 million.  And 5 million have fallen into poverty, most of them working full time.  In my administration the bottom 20% grew more than the top 5%.  But in this decade, median family income is $1,000 (lower?) than it was last decade.

I support Hillary because I think she has the best plan and greatest ability to turn this economy around, reclaim the future for the middle class.  And when I give a speech, I get the feeling that half the people look at me cross-eyed thinking that I won’t be able to go home at night if I don’t.  But knowning what I know about the Presidency and the condition of America around the world–I’m going to be there for here even if we hadn’t been married because I think she’s the best candidate in 40 years.  And my daughter asked me if she thought Hillary would be a better president than me, and she said yes.  And I agree with her.  If she’s fortunate enough to be elected and her plans pass, we’ll have more prosperity than we did when I was in office.  I really believe that.  But in order to do that you have to get the job machine going.

The only source of new jobs in rich countries that’s producing a rising middle class is a commiting to energy independence and green energy.  We want to put a huge number of solar panels in California Universities.

I was in Texas, and the wind was blowing 56 miles an hour.  We can have solar energy and wind energy, and all the people who say we can’t electrify America with wind energy, that’s wrong, because the Department of Energy says that we can do it just with the wind from Texas to North Dakota.

We also need to develop 100mpg vehicles.  Eventually, we’ll have no-gas vehicles too.  But we need to put more money into research to get something out of that.  This research, human genome research.  These are basically hybrids on steroids.  Instead of an electric battery operating until 25 mph, do 55mph instead.  And then we can say, charge whatever you want for oil, because we don’t care, we’ll keep our 350 billion at home.

Now we don’t have enough lithium to make the batteries to get all of them made, but that’s what a President is for, is to do that research.  And if we can be the first to the moon, we can be the first to build a better car battery.

Healthcare.  There’s a reason the AHA broke with tradition and endorsed [interrupted by a phone call.]  If you had any other country’s system, you’d be paying $700 billion less.  So if you really want affordable health care, support Hillary and she’ll give it to you.

We have to dramatically change No Child Left Behind.  And it’s not that we don’t want California’s children to compete.  We know they can.  Studies show that 98% of the people have the brain capacity to learn everythiing they need to know.  But there’s an achievement gap in America.  Kids in other countries go to school longer, they pay their teachers longer and train them harder.  They have national standards.  We have something good too: we don’t put our disabled in a closet.

But No Child Left Behind requires 5 tests every 5 years.  Every year, they teach to the test and every year our children learn less.  So it has to be changed.  The federal government should recognize that too many teachers are about to retire, and we need to concentrate on replacing them with qualified teachers.  And we need to pick a representative body from the schools that are reaching international standards, figure out what they’re doing right and implement that.

Can you believe some of our kids are paying 16% interest a year?  That needs to be stopped and Hillary will do that.  In the middle of the campaign, Hillary went back to pass a bill that allows students to convert their student debt, and with the cost of college exploding, allowing people to repay these loans is a must because we can’t afford for people not to go to college because they’re afraid of the money.

I have to make a full disclosure.  There is an issue that Hillary is more conservative than Bush on: the budget.  We paid the debt down when we didn’t have any instability in the economy.  And if you go to Hillary’s site you’ll see that every last dollar in her budget is paid for.  The point I’m making is that we can’t enforce our  trade laws because of our deficits with Japan, China, Korea, and Canada, Saudi Arabia and Mexico.  And guess who owes us in trade?  The same countries.  This is one area that Democrats should be more conservative.  It makes good sense for the future of the young people in this audience not to borrow this money.

Another thing very briefly is that Hillary will be the best commander in chief.  That also means diplomat in chief.  We have to send a very different signal to the world.  They’re made for getting out of the nuclear test ban treaty while telling others that they can’t have nuclear weapons.  How can you sell saying, “You can’t have one of what I have 1500 of and what I want to build more of?”

We want to be bound by the Geneva Convention on Human Rights regarding torture.  Having one set of rules for America is not what we’re about.  and what Hillary wants to say is that America is back in the cooperation and diplomacy business with friend and foe alike.  So what does that mean about Iraq?  She believes strongly that we need to bring our troops home.  A brigade or two a month.  Andn I hope you all agree–we owe it to the translators and the drivers to let them come home to America.  The Bush Admministration is against that–now, she would leave a small special forces group in the north where there’s no fighting in case Al-Qaeda gets out of hand.  No permanent bases, but staying there as a small stabilizing force.  We have been there longer than WWII, our army serves in 15-month deployments, longer than WWII, there are huge family problems for people who serve multiple deployments.

It is time to bring the troops home.  Because of her membership in the Armed Services Committee, she has the support of 34 retired generals who all think we need to bring the troops home.  We’re now training Navy reserves in army tactics and deploying them to the gulf.  This is unsustainable.  And the Iraqis need to decide how to share oil money and the political power.

One last thing: we can save most of the $120 billion we’re spending there.  We can’t end an unpopular war without continuing our obligations to the people who served there.  There are 200,000 homeless veterans.  One of the reasons she’s going to win Pennsylvania is that John Murtha thinks that she will be the best one to take care of veterans.

One last thing again: You have to decide what you want the next president to do.  now, not when it’s over.  She said I’d like to be able to say that the American people will be better off when I’m done than when I started.  And to do that, you need to be a change agent.  The issue isn’t the historic nature of the candidates.  I was in North Carolina, and this woman asked me to look at her girl.  And she has a lovely teenager daughter (did you really want to say that, Bill?}…

I’m sorry, I’ve lost my interest in this speech, and he’s talking too fast…

“Just Chill Out”

Picture 14I’m live blogging President Clinton’s speech to the CDP convention. The former President’s first point seems to be that he got bloodied by a long primary, and that he won nonetheless. So, just chill out people.

He went on to describe some sort of position that would focus regionally. So, there’s going to be a California “czar” or something like that. Interesting that he said that Hillary will compete everywhere. Some sort of 50-state strategy. …

… He then went on to tick off the boxes. The mortgage crisis, green jobs, …

And then there’s healthcare. Here in California, it was Republicans who were touting the individual mandate, and Democrats who were fighting it. Hillary supports the mandate with cost caps, kinda like the ABX1 plan, but, you know, different. Either way, the insurance plans get massive premiums, the question is whether they actually use them for care.

He seems to be losing the hall a bit. It’s quieter, perhaps even not as loud as Harris.

“There’s one area where Hillary is more conservative than Bush: the budget. She supports repayment of the debt…”

Nice little talk about the overstretched military and homeless veterans.

In wrapup mode now, she hopes to be a “change agent.” Who will build the best future for America.  Kinda weird, because a lot of these are applause lines, but the applause is sporadic and quiet. I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that the speech was almost an hour long, and there’s not a whole lot new here.

My Evening With Carole Migden

Last week I learned that Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer was hosting a Thrusday fundraiser for Carole Migden along the Embarcadero. It was a cheap event and, though I am a Leno supporter, decided to drop a little spare change and check it out. It was a small room that was pretty packed. Betty Yee was the most prominent official there. But what struck me was that Migden knows how towork a room when her mood is on an even keel. She was even quite funny and actually had me questionning the rationale for change. Then I read the events at the State Convention and remember why. She really is Jekyle and Hyde.

What a difference a DAY makes

Perhaps not surprising, but certainly striking nonetheless, is the explosion of press and outside-the-center activity now that Bill Clinton’s arrival is near at hand.  Where once the blogger riser was empty, now there’s no room for everyone.  Leno/Migden and Blumenfield/Healey/Waldman will apparently be kicking things off this morning- presumably catching everyone while they’re half asleep and/or hungover from last night.  Frank Russo kinda stole my headline before I could write it, but it’s a good one- Migden-Leno Endorsement Fight May Overshadow Bill Clinton Speech at California Democratic Party Convention Today.  As a few of us were discussing earlier, it’ll be a story for the ages if Carole Migden manages to steal the spotlight from Bill Clinton.

…and we’re off.

[Update by Lucas] To clarify how this vote is going down, a “Yes” vote would be for the initial winner of yesterday’s endorsement (Migden and Blumenfield) while a “No” vote would mean no endorsement of anyone.

[Update by Dave] …the Hillary visibility extras are massing on the floor.  Incidentally, I heard that Phil Donahue’s movie, which screened here last night, is uncompromising on Hillary’s war vote, and during the time when she talks about it in the film she was booed.  The reaction from the audience here to the Big Dog should be interesting.

Picture 12[Update by Dave] …Christine Pelosi is talking about the party platform.  Marriage equality is in there, which is awesome, as well as the party’s commitment to a safe and orderly withdrawal from Iraq and single payer healthcare.  That’s a good platform.  And it passed without any incident.  Fantastic.

[Update by Dave] …Inola Henry on the Resolutions Committee reports that the party endorses a no vote on 98 and yes on 99 for the June election, and endorses the recall of Jeff Denham in SD-12.  That’s great, though I hope that the party will put some muscle behind the racall.  Prop. 98 would end rent control throughout the state, and it must be stopped.  Art Torres says “that’s the easiest resolutions report we’ve ever had.”

[Update by Lucas] San Francisco DA Kamala Harris is taking the stage now, speaking on behalf of Obama.  Suddenly people have energy in the room.

[Update by Dante]Debra Bowen is talking about her review of the state’s voting systems.  Meanwhile, both Robert and Brian are looking at Debra Bowen’s Facebook page.

[Update by Lucas] Video montage of the Convention just ended. Clips of Willie Brown being awesome, candidates, Pelosi, activists, on and on. Pretty cool, if with a bit of an ‘end of summer camp’ vibe.

[Update by Brian]: And we’re killing time. This has got to be the longest secretary’s report EVER.

[Update by Lucas] Well, here comes Bill. And everyone’s gettin excited. Also, I could do without ever getting shushed by Art Torres again.

Senate Democratic leadership rally around one of their own, despite record fine by FPPC

( – promoted by Robert in Monterey)

Migden-Leno-CDP-Battle.gif

By Frank D. Russo

A bitter fight for the endorsement by the California Democratic Party between incumbent State Senator Carole Migden and challenger Assemblymember Mark Leno is shaping up to be the biggest battle at the state party convention being held in San Jose.  The picture above is typical of what delegates and other other observers have seen over the last two days as they exit the convention floor.

The Democratic Senate leadership has pulled out all the stops to get Migden endorsed as dozens of Senate staffers, along with other supporters of hers, have been holding signs in meetings and the hallways urging that the party endorse her.  Unfortunately, this is one of those incumbent protection moves, where challenges to an incumbent must be fought at all costs.  Delegates appointed by Senators who would have supported Leno, the challenger, have been replaced by those loyal to Senator Migden.

Tempers flared last night at a dinner for Take Back Red California outside the convention center, and a Migden supporter grabbed a Leno supporter’s arm and blocked the doorway in an attempt to prevent her from gathering signatures needed to get a floor vote to overturn the packed endorsing caucus.  Migden suporters were out in force to prevent signature gathering by those seeking to force a vote by the full convention.

Over the flip…

It all comes to a head today when the full convention will vote on whether to ratify an earlier decision made by an endorsing caucus yesterday evening to support Migden.  That vote and debate will take place after former President Bill Clinton is scheduled to address the convention at 9:30 a.m. and San Francisco District Attorney, a supporter of Barack Obama speak.

Supporters of the move to overturn the caucus decision turned in 600 signatures of delegates, double the 300 required, despite the lengthy time it took to count the votes from the caucus.  The results were not announced until after 7 p.m. and the rules of the party required signatures be turned in by no later than 11 p.m.-a daunting task as weary delegates who had been attending the session since 9 a.m. left the convention center for food and drink in restaurants, hotels, and bars in the area.  For blocks in any direction, hastily printed petitions were being circulated.  Restaurants were crowded with delegates-without reservations my party had to go to three locations, and at each of them signature gatherers were there with clipboards.

In the endorsement caucus, Migden received 150 votes to Leno’s 115, with one lone vote for former Assemblymember Joe Nation, who is challenging her also.

Earlier this month, we reported on a David Binder poll

from February that showed Migden trailing not one, but two challengers. Binder, arguably San Francisco’s leading pollster found that Nation led Leno 27-24% on the initial ask, with Migden trailing at 17%. When pro and con statements about the candidates were read, the Leno-Nation numbers reversed, with Migden remaining at 17%. Joe Alioto Veronese, who has since dropped out and endorsed Leno was at 7 and 10%, and nearly a quarter of the electorate was undecided.

Matters have only worsened since then as Migden agreed to pay a $350,000 fine-the largest in state history-to the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), a state agency since it was created in the wake of the Watergate scandal in the 1970’s.  Migden agreed that she had violated 89 provisions of the Political Reform Act.  She even filed suit against the FPPC for enforcing laws that she had supported when they were enacted, arguing that they were an unconstitutional infringement of her First Amendment rights after she was advised of legal problems spending $647,000 she had raised while in the state Assembly.

That last action of Migden’s brought a countersuit by the FPPC for $9 million in damages, which issued this statement, five days ago accusing her of a consistent and deliberate failure to follow California campaign laws:

“The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), the independent state agency charged with investigating violations of campaign finance laws, today filed a counterclaim in Sacramento federal court against Sen. Carole Migden seeking more than $9 million in damages for her consistent and deliberate failure to follow California’s campaign laws.

“The commission’s filings indicated that Migden’s actions hid the true nature of her campaign accounts from state regulators, potential opponents, the media and the public generally. She failed to report a number of large transactions entirely, while reporting other large transactions which simply never occurred.

“For years, Senator Migden has been deceiving the voters of California by filing inaccurate campaign statements, fabricating the elimination of committees and concealing campaign funds,” said FPPC Chairman Ross Johnson. “The sophisticated and pervasive pattern of deception by her various controlled committees has been ongoing for more than five years.”

“Earlier this month, Migden was fined $350,000 by the commission and admitted to 89 violations of the Political Reform Act. During the months-long investigation that resulted in that record fine, the enforcement division also uncovered multiple illegal transfers of approximately $1 million of surplus campaign funds that occurred over several years and were funneled through multiple committee accounts controlled by the senator. Additionally, the investigation found the filing of untrue campaign statements and a pattern of concealment through consistent misreporting of campaign information.

“The commission maintains that nearly $1 million in Migden’s 2000 Assembly re-election committee became surplus by operation of law when she left the lower house in December of 2002 and are not legally available for her to use in her current Senate re-election campaign. The surplus funds law has been on the books for nearly 30 years; however, Migden sued the FPPC arguing she should be allowed to use $647,000 of those funds that remain.

“Nothing absolves Senator Migden from her legal requirements to accurately report all of her transactions,” Johnson concluded.

“The commission’s counterclaim and the full list of violations can be found on the FPPC website at: http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.html?ID=507

It would be ironic if this convention on the same morning as it approves a platform supporting “clean money” and campaign contribution reform, endorses Migden.  This move could make her eligible for funding from the Democratic Party as such in the primary race, which she sorely needs in light of her problems with the state’s political watchdog agency.  Propping her up and keeping her in the race with this funding can only help the chances of the more moderate Joe Nation who is running for the seat.  This has become a two person race-and she is not one of them.

Under California Democratic Party rules, (Article 8, Section 2(d)(4)), the convention floor must first consider whether to ratify endorsing caucus decisions before voting on those that have not been challenged on the consent calendar.  The rules provide for the presentation of arguments for an against ratification.

If 50% of the convention fails to support ratification, the decision of the endorsement caucus is considered “vacated.”  A substitute candidate can be endorsed, but needs a 75% convention vote.

While a 75% vote for Leno is out of the question, it will be interesting to see if he can overturn the caucus vote stacked against him by Senators rallying around one of their own.

SD-33 Gary Pritchards Gets The California Democratic Party Endorsement!

It is not something we take for granted.  Even though Gary is the only Democrat running the Party’s endorsement is very important not only ideologically speaking but because we care about what other Democrats think.  

Gary is currently driving down from Fresno as I type.  He drove up Friday night and stayed with a childhood friend of his.  In the morning he drove to San Jose and worked the floor for the day.  It was a great opportunity for him to meet and talk to other Democrats.  I wish I could have been there but I was left with the grueling task of taking my five year old and our puppy to the park.  Poor me.  ðŸ™‚

Gila Jones was “invaluable” (to quote Gary) in helping him get delegates to his endorsement caucus.  Twenty delegates came and all voted in favor of endorsing him.  

So, it has been a busy week for us and this was our biggest concern.  We knew once this was done we could really take off as they say.  The website is up but content is still being worked on.  I am the “webmaster” which leaves much to be desired in terms of technical ability although I was helped out tremendously by webranding at Daily Kos.

We do have a treasurer though, which helps me since I know how important the FPPC document filings are.  They are important for a reason and we don’t take any of it lightly.  

So why the openness?  Because we promised to run our best campaign with what resources we have but I, speaking as the candidate’ wife, wants to share the process others and hopefully encourage them to take the leap in the future when the Party needs to get a “D” on the ballot.  If we don’t run then how can we win?

Gary got his business cards this week and we were helped by Geri at S&S Printers.  I can’t believe how willing people are to guide us through this overwhelming process.  I think part of the reason it is so “overwhelming” is due to the fact that both Gary and I work full time and we have our daughter, just like everyone else, finding the balance is important.

Photobucket

So our week was full of little victories and ended with a huge one.  And I’ve got to thank my puppy Sophie as well, walks with her around our neighborhood has allowed me to meet other Democrats, yes, Democrats that live just “around the corner” from us.  Everyone we talk to is excited to hear that there is not only a Democrat on the ballot but they are a neighbor of theirs.  

Next, I just have to remind Gary that it’s okay to ask for money, not only will we put it to good use but it’s going to be needed in November so we can raise the $7,000 needed to get a Statement on the Ballot.  So if you want to help?  Please donate!

Charlotte and Sophie resting…

Photobucket

Thoughts about last night, with pictures

Last night’s signature-gathering spectacle was quite the event.  During my time outside actually getting some dinner to sustain my convention activities, I saw several Leno gatherers several blocks away from the convention center hunting down delegates–and just about every single time, they were being stalked by Migden supporters.  I even heard that one Migden “stalker” followed a Leno gatherer to her hotel room, forcing her to call hotel security.

Charming.

Meanwhile, I just heard a rumor that Ted Kennedy will be coming to speak to the (superdelegates at the) convention to counter Bill Clinton’s.

On my way in here this morning, I was sniffed by a dog for the first time.

The Leno people certainly are dedicated; I got a Leno doorhanger under my hotel room at 3am last night (after I finally got back from karaoke and drinks with Robert, Todd and Lucas).

Have a couple of pictures below.



Mark Leno rallies his supporters after their parade announcing 600 signatures



Robert in Monterey talks to Fiona Ma at her karaoke bash



Here’s a copy of the leaflet that Leno’s people covered the convention hall with today

Day 3 thoughts

I’ve been focusing on talking to as many challengers and elected officials as possible.  And I get two almost contradictory opinions.  The presidential primary is great because it brings new energy and attention to the party and new voters into the process; and yet at the same time, the downballot candidates find it difficult to raise money, secure staff and get attention, because it’s all being forced upwards.  This is particularly a problem in California, where we think we run the country, sad to say, and where we get hung up on national issues.  We have to come back home and take advantage of these opportunities we have at the local level.

The encouraging factor is that we have won the budget conversation in the state legislature, and when I say we, I mean those of us who wanted a posture that finally said no to a cuts-only approach, that focused on the 2/3 requirement and the need to either overturn that legislatively or win at the ballot box.  I had the opportunity to have dinner last night with a large group including Asm. Ted Lieu (AD-53), the chair of the Rules Committee, and he was able to designate those targeted seats where we can flip districts (AD-80, AD-78, AD-15) and talk about the oil extraction tax and the yacht loophole in a very direct way.  This is the year we take back the conversation over the budget and call the Yacht Party out for their obstructionism.  That is very exciting.

Obviously there are the endorsement fights.  Outside of the Leno-Migden battle royale, let me just quickly talk about AD-40, which is near where I live: Bob Blumenfield is an associate of Rep. Howard Berman, who kind of runs Valley politics.  He reportedly told Lloyd Levine that he had to support Blumenfield to get his endorsement in Levine’s State Senate race (in my district of SD-23, against Fran Pavley).  Stuart Waldman, who is also running in AD-40, was working for Levine at the time.  So Levine fired Waldman and threw his support to Blumenfield.  So it’s all crappy machine politics of the most odious kind, and it’s not limited to Sacramento.  Our new leadership in the Senate and Assembly offers some opportunities to change that to an extent, but this is still how California is run for the most part.  You’re already seeing here the beginning of the 2009 State Party Chair race and the 2010 Governor’s race.  

That’s transactional politics, and it bores me.  I’m interested in a transformational politics that changes the conversation and inspires those who don’t attend a convention.  Getting single payer in the platform is an example.  Talking about the 2/3 majority and splitting Prop. 13 is an example.  Talking about the budget in a compassionate way, as a document that reflects our priorities, is an example.  The rest is bluster.

As I said, we’ve talked to a number of candidates, and we’ll have audio (and video) up in the next few days with Charlie Brown (CA-04), Russ Warner (CA-26), Bill Durston (CA-03) and Debbie Cook (CA-46), who we’re interviewing this morning.  But I wanted to give the line of the night that I overheard, in a conversation between Russ Warner and Rep. Diane Watson.  She was talking about David Dreier’s shameful conduct as chair of the Rules Committee under the DeLay machine, where he blocked nearly all Democratic amendments and ran the committee with an iron fist.  Watson talked about an anti-terrorism bill the Republicans wanted to pass, and she said to a Republican colleague, “You guys can’t tell me from Maxine Waters, how are you going to tell what Middle Easterner is a terrorist?”  Classic.

Manuel Perez has the Mojo at the CDP Convention

No Endorsement in the 80th AD

Manuel Perez may not have the money nor the local poohbah incumbency, but he definitely had the mojo this weekend.  I stand in awe of the union members who are my fellow delegates in Manuel’s corner.  Wizards with lists and cell phones, truly incredible.  

The endorsing caucus for the 80th AD was pretty intense, and the days preceding it packed with manuevering, accusations, threats.  Greg Pettis had put out press releases pre-announcing his endorsement after his March 13th PreEndorsement meeting victory, so he had a lot to lose here.  Greg managed to place every proxy he could, plus switching one of our votes.  But it wasn’t enough to reach 60% of the vote, as Manuel Perez also had strong support from delegates,  and Rick Gonzales found proxies for his folks, too.  So, no endorsement until the primary is over.  

The real winner is the district, as we have an abundance of Democratic  talent in this race.  Manuel Perez just won the endorsement of many more legislators, met with Karen Bass, the new speaker, won the endorsement of Alice Huffman- President of the California State Conference of the NAACP, also won the California Nurses Association (which is a huge plus), also the California Medical Association, the California Teachers Association, SEIU State Council.   I truly believe that Manuel is not only the best progressive in the race, but that he’ll win the primary and the general.  He’s a proven advocate for immigrants, students, and impoverished communities in the eastern end of the district, and a true progressive who stands up for gay rights, the environment, and a women’s right to choose, the major issues on the west end of the district.  Greg is great, so is Rick, but neither cover all the bases that Manuel does, nor do they have his charisma and passion for change.  He’s inspiring.

Here’s what David Dayen said, and I agree completely:

I continue to be very impressed with Manuel Perez; he is a transformational and not a transactional candidate, someone who doesn’t just check the boxes of the single-issue groups and vote the right way, but really changes the conversation and fights for progressive change.

I wish I were still there, but my son’s tenth birthday begins in a matter of hours, so that’s that.  It’s good to see the Calitics crew always, and particularly fun this time to talk to kid oakland and Caligirl, as I hadn’t had the chance before.

We have an exciting race ahead.