Is this a deal for real this time?

While this isn’t yet confirmed, I have it on pretty good authority that Sen. Cox has agreed to vote in favor of the budget deal. The negotiations went right up until 10 pm, and the senators are now in  Caucus.  Cox has used this opportunity to get a few “sweeteners” for his district.  Rumored to be amongst the changes is some additional money for Cal Expo, setting aside part of the additional revenue from the gas tax for surface street repairs and an acceleration of Prop 1B funds.

I’ll get back to you when I get more details.

If a tree falls after 10pm, does anybody hear it?

The Senate is supposed to resume session at 10pm, about a half hour from now. With Sen. Steinberg advising of the necessity of a toothbrush, it seems that at the least he’s going to drag this out.  And Sen. Correa comes prepared with his own sleeping bag and everything.

There’s a general consensus that nobody really has a clue how Maldo and Cox are going to vote. It’s like a high speed game of chicken with the state standing smack dab in between the cars. Watch the twitter feeds to see what’s going on, they are the best source of information, after CalChannel that is. The flash interface seems to be down, but the old Windows media interface is still working. Here are the best twitter feeds I’ve found:

KQED_CapNotes (John Myers)

aewright, Anthony Write of HealthAccessCA

ccleague – Community college League

If I hear anything, I’ll tweet it as well. You’ll find the #calitics feed below. Any guesses as to who bends?

#calitics - Twitter Feed

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Tuesday Open Thread

Other things happening around the state

• Who said Republicans never lifted a finger to save anybody from a burning car? Well, not me.  Asm. Curt Hagman(R-Chino HIlls) apparently saved two people from their burning car right outside of his apartment.

• The Meg Whitman for Governor campaign is getting a ton of attention from the media. And why not? She has so much experience lowering costs by outsourcing jobs and employing slave labor that she would certainly be able to build barbie dolls for our kids to hold while they aren’t attending public schools. As for fixing the state’s structural problems, well, I peg her chances somewhere between those of Gary Coleman and the Ask a Ninja guy. I take that back. Gary Coleman might be able to get us a payday loan, that’s probably better than Whitman could do.

There is a video on the SF Chronicle’s site. It’s almost funny how she tries to use the Arnold post-partisan rhetoric while at the same time trying to woo the crazy wingers that are in the GOP primary.  How exactly do you say that you would never vote to raise taxes at the same time that you are arguing that the legislators can’t see past their narrow ideological barriers.  The logic, or lack there of, of it all is just staggering.

• There could be another problem for Whitman: she’s not the typical GOP candidate, ie a white dude. The obstacles to her getting the GOP nomination are really quite staggering.  Honestly, if I were her, I would just say screw the GOP, I can win this without them.

• At least the stimulus will help out with the HSR plans.

CapAlert’s story about how Chuck DeVore tried and failed to remove Mike Villines from power, based apparently on a email between the two Republicans leaked to the John and Ken show that forced DeVore’s hand, is really symptomatic of Yacht Party politics and how the game is played.  It’s really like a junior-high playground over there, not a political party.  

• The idea that filmmaker Roman Polanski is seeking to get his child sex charges dismissed based on a separate filmmaker’s documentary about the case folds life and art on their collective heads in interesting ways such that the whole story becomes a kind of Moebius Strip… UPDATED the judge denied the motion for dismissal but suggested that he only did it because of Polanski’s fugitive status, and that there is credible evidence to dismiss the case.

• The funny caption contests are usually fun, but I have to say I find the selection of Schwarzenegger’s Finance Director Mike Genest’s caption of a picture with DiFi and CIA chief Leon Panetta sort of offensive, and clearly a partisan stab at our junior senator.  The caption? “As long as you’ll be working on Intelligence, can you do something for Senator Boxer’s?”

• This really isn’t anything new, but I wanted to once again commend John Myers of KQED for his tremendous Twitter feed.I think Myers is, if not revolutionizing, certainly evolving the journalistic use of twitter to cover a news-worthy event.  Last night I was at Drinking Liberally, but I was able to quickly pull up my twitter feed, and there was the latest budget news, in 140 character bites. Twitter allows real-time publishing that even puts blogs to shame. He has poured an incredible amount of time into these tweets, basically supplementing his additional workload.  If you can, please think about supporting the nation’s most listened to public radio station, KQED. I just renewed my membership. Please note your support for John Myers in the “comments” section. I forgot when I renewed, but I want to make sure he gets the credit he so richly deserves.

Is Cox Back in Play? UPDATE: Senate recessed until 10

After allegedly breaking a handshake deal with Sen. Steinberg, Sen Dave Cox (R-Fair Oaks) had slipped to the background. It seems that he’s pack in the picture.  According to a tweet from the Community College League, Cox has been in “productive” talks with leadership in both parties.

The 71-year old former Assembly Minority Leader has always been an anti-tax crusader, yet there are reasons to believe that if anybody fits the bill of “likely final vote” it is Dave Cox.  As far as I know, he has no further political ambitions once his term ends in 2012. He doesn’t have to be concerned about a primary challenge, and a recall seems very unlikely to even qualify, let alone succeed. In other words, the vote carries little political risk for him. The stumbling block appears to be his fear of being called bad names, and his reflexive anti-tax notions.

The Senate is out of session until 6, but that could be bumped back until 8.

UPDATE: Per another tweet, the Senate is in recess until 10 pm.  As Sen. Steinberg said, “Bring your toothbrush.”

Sully, Save Us!

PhotobucketAs I had the California Channel on mute after the HR 5 committee hearing, I almost missed the moment that Capt. Chesly “Sully” Sullenberger graced our fair capitol.  But thankfully I got my tweets from John Myers heralding the arrival of our savior.

[Schwarzenegger] said California legislators struggling to pass a $42 billion budget-balancing plan that includes $14.4 billion in tax increases could use Sullenberger as an example.

“The Legislature upstairs needs a great hero in the state Capitol,” he said.

The governor presented Sullenberger with a black jacket with a state seal on the front, a California flag that had flown over the Capitol and a license plate with the words “California Hero” on it. (SD U-T 2/17/09)

After his Schwarzenegger press event and a visit to the Assembly (pictured, with Asm. Joan Buchanan, D-Alamo), he strolled into the Senate Chamber to a rapturous applause. I don’t know if they’ve noticed they have some kind of important work to do.  Nonetheless, Sully gets a slew of speeches in his honor. Sen. DeSaulnier introduces him, and then Maldanado gets up and tells a speech about his pilot experience. Sen. Romero thanks him for “being you”.

But why stick to just praising him for his landing? Why not just hand over the reigns to this guy. Surely the same skills that are required to get people out of a watery plane transfer perfectly over to “State Dictator.” I can’t think of anything that could go wrong with that.

While I kid, a similar notion isn’t really that out of the realm of possibility.  It’s been mentioned around here before: the concept of some sort of reciever should the state actually become fiscally insolvent. Now, there is no provision for a state itself to go into bankruptcy, but it is kind of a conservative’s dream.  It is really the same logic that has been applied to the car companies. The conservatives want a way to end worker rights and cut services through a process that is done completely in the dark.

So why not let the state collapse? The conservatives get to whip them dern liberals in California (despite the reality of a Republican caused crisis), and they get a better outcome than they would have got any other way.  So what’s in it for the Republicans to vote yes on the budget?  Perhaps we should ask Sully.