Mythbusters: High Tax Rates Don’t Cause Wealth Flight

Last week I took Jerry Brown to task for repeating the right-wing canard that tax increases will cause jobs and the wealthy to flee the state. Here’s what he told the Chronicle’s Carla Marinucci:

Still, “I would not be advocating new taxes, I’ll tell you that,” he said. Already, California is “one of the highest tax states around,” he said. “So we’ve got to be competitive. We can’t drive all the jobs out and tax the few people who stay.”

A similar debate has been playing out in New York State, where progressives have been arguing for higher income taxes on the wealthy to close that state’s budget gap. Governor David Paterson and Mayor Michael Bloomberg – himself one of New York’s wealthiest individuals – have argued as Jerry Brown has, spouting the conventional wisdom that taxing the wealthy will simply cause them to go Galt and leave the state to avoid the tax.

But as the New York Times reports today, there’s no evidence for that myth:

Yet there is surprisingly little evidence to support the proposition that rich New Yorkers would bolt if forced to pay higher income taxes. Though tracking the movement of wealthy taxpayers from state to state is difficult, experts on public finance and migration say they have yet to document a substantial “rich drain” in states that have raised income taxes in recent years.

“At the level we’re talking about, there’s no quantitative evidence that it affects the mobility decisions of affluent taxpayers,” said Douglas S. Massey, a demographer at Princeton University and president of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

The NYT points to California, where Prop 63 levied a 1% income tax surcharge on millionaires to pay for mental health programs (which Prop 1E on the May 19 ballot would gut). Jean Ross of the California Budget Project is quoted to explain how that tax did not cause Beverly Hills to become a ghost town:

While those departures cost the state about $38 million a year in revenue, the study estimates, the higher taxes levied on those who stayed have brought in an average of $895 million a year. Also in 2004, California voters approved a 1 percent income tax surcharge on personal income over $1 million, and Silicon Valley and Beverly Hills appear to remain well populated with the wealthy. From 2004 to 2007, according to a study by the California Budget Project, a left-leaning research organization, the number of millionaire taxpayers rose by close to 50 percent, well outpacing the 8.6 percent growth in the total number of those paying personal income tax.

The article also cites New Jersey, where Governor Jon Corzine also instituted a wealth tax several years ago that did not cause the wealthy to flee – even though it’s easier to move to a different state back east and still keep much of your life and work rooted in the same spot.

Here in California, however, it’s virtually impossible to become a tax refugee without uprooting yourself from the state entirely. Sure, Nevada has no income tax, but neither Reno nor Las Vegas are exactly close in proximity to SF and LA. It’s not like moving to Connecticut while you keep the rest of your life in Manhattan.

Of course, the CBP has also demonstrated that tax increases are preferable to spending cuts in a recession.

The wingnut anti-tax rhetoric is not based in reality – so why are Democratic gubernatorial candidates repeating it so frequently? Let’s hope Jerry Brown sees this NYT article, and stops repeating myths that have already been busted.

My Afternoon with President Obama – The OC Town Hall Meeting

Crossposted at the OC Progressive

We waited, many waited a lot longer than I did and I was lucky to be there in line, waiting and waiting.  It gave us a lot of time to talk, I’m sure the overnighter on Monday was difficult and still enjoyable, except for those who didn’t get tickets.

As I sat and President Obama came in and people chanted, “Obama, Obama, Obama” we knew it, we knew that Orange County was hungry, not for just change but for Democrats to be heard and seen in our County and for our values to be taken seriously by the media.  That 500,000 plus Democrats in “The OC” are not an anomaly but a force to be reckoned with.  And that we had found a voice for those values, a voice that was clear and proud of those values.  Orange County had arrived and was not longer just “red” anymore.

It was a long afternoon for me but worth it, worth the sunburn and the blisters on my feet.  It was worth feeling stinky and a bit sad that I wasn’t closer.  But it didn’t matter really, I was there.

I had a chance to say hi to Loretta Sanchez and she graciously allowed me to have a photo with her.  She always does, I’ve never heard her say no.  She just seems to love it.  I did not take a chance to chat with her because EVERYONE wanted their photo with her.

And a bonus?  

I got my photo taken with Debra Bowen, our amazing Secretary of State.  She’s a proud “nerd” as she put and so glad that our nerdiness was somehow okay under President Obama.  The Wonks had returned and policy issues and complex questions were okay again.

I have to admit, I follow her on facebook, she’s a tiny thing, which she admitted and she’s lovely.  I just adore when people who represent us in Government are warm and open and willing to talk to me.  Someone is willing to hear me.  It’s a nice change.

My partner in crime Gus was a godsend, I have to admit I wouldn’t have been there without him and he was kind enough to pick me up and take me, buy me lunch and give me bottled water.  Gus is a good guy and you could tell he was just overjoyed at every turn.  

President Obama didn’t disappoint, that was the best part.  Sure, I’d heard a lot of the same things I’d heard before but hell, I heard them in person.  It meant something to me to be there and hear him address all the issues we’re currently facing.  You see, Obama said that if others weren’t willing to take responsibility, he would.  He’s President, that’s what you do.

Of course some of the best things he said were important because they are so very true.  We have a President who can “Walk and Chew gum at the same time” and he does have to multi-task.  

Obama talked about how we can’t decide what issues to focus on, right?  I can’t just say, hey, I’ve got something I have to take care of and just miss a week of work?  You know, I can’t pay my mortgage this month, I’ve got other things to take care of, that okay?  It’s so true, we have to tackle all these issues together and it’s because they are so very closely intertwined.

A lot of the afternoon I thought of a friend, I thought of someone I know who’s husband is sick, he’s probably going to get laid off and they are struggling to keep up with his medical bills.  This friend works in an industry that’s struggling, will she keep her job?  I just kept thinking about her and about how she’s going to make it through this.  So much going on for her as she worked long days and struggles to keep things together.  

But I know that I’m not the only one thinking of her, so is President Obama.  I do feel that.  Obama understands that our health care system is strangling those already gasping for air.  

That we cannot fix immigration without fixing the whole thing, from employers who hire undocumented workers, borders that actually work and a humane way of dealing with all those people who are already here and have made roots in our Country.  

One questioner was a teacher who had worked in Santa Ana for 25 years and she had received her pink slip, along with a teacher of the year.  Obama promised that the bulk of the stimulus money that was allocated for education was to save teacher’s jobs.  The main purpose was to be sure that as few teachers were laid off in those States facing massive budget shortfalls just as we are in California.

Someone asked if he would run again in four years.  Yes, but President Obama had a brilliant response.  He said that if he had fixed everything he’d set out to do in the next four years, if he accomplished everything he wanted to, he would have no reason to run.  I highly doubt that will be the case, but I believed his sincerity.  

It was just a good afternoon to hear this amazing man speak to us, to those lost out here in the wilderness of Orange County.  I’m sorry to say but so many of us do feel lost.  And here was President Obama speaking to me, reaffirming my values and my priorities and representing so many dreams that won’t come true unless we do everything possible to change the path of our Country.

What was wrong with asking those making over $250,000 to pay what they paid under Clinton?  Isn’t that a good question, one that Obama was clear to ask.  They were still rich then, weren’t they?  Of course and he has no qualms about raising that 36% to 39% to pay for health care reform and all those other things that have been sorely neglected over the last eight years.

President Obama gets it and even as his Administration makes mistakes, he still gets that those mistakes are part of the learning process.  So, um, yeah, they forgot to invite Dana Rohrabacher, oops.  (Our Republican Congressman who represents Costa Mesa, where the event was held) and had Loretta Sanchez there instead.  I’m not sure if it was completely something that was an oversight or a purposeful slight.  Part of me doesn’t care.

So that was it, there were a lot of other questions and Gary and Charlotte watched it via CSPAN, no Mommy though.  I was there, I was there for sure and it’s something I shall never forget.

Lots of photos to follow. Just click on them to make them bigger 🙂

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Clarification On The End To Medical Marijuana Raids

When the Administration announced an end to medical marijuana raids by the DEA, they abruptly took back the statement a few hours later.  There was a bit of confusion about the new policy.  Eric Holder put an end to that.

Attorney General Eric Holder signaled a change on medical marijuana policy Wednesday, saying federal agents will target marijuana distributors only when they violate both federal and state law.

That would be a departure from the policy of the Bush administration, which targeted medical marijuana dispensaries in California even if they complied with that state’s law.

“The policy is to go after those people who violate both federal and state law,” Holder said in a question-and-answer session with reporters at the Justice Department.

Good.  There is little justification to waste Justice Department resources harassing Californians and Americans in 12 other states engaging in perfectly legal activity.  Holder must follow the law but he also has discretion in setting priorities, and it’s good to see him recognize that arresting local businessmen and their patients makes no sense.  There remain questions about outstanding medical marijuana federal court cases with over two dozen dispensaries, and hopefully the solution will be to drop the charges.

In a related story, Maxine Waters wants to end mandatory minimum sentencing for federal drug offenses, and the bill has 15 co-sponsors.  The Bureau of Prisons budget has increased 25-fold since mandatory minimums were introduced.  Small drug cases belong in state courts, where offenders could be given treatment instead of jail.  Furthermore, these kind of drug cases disproportionately impact minority communities.

H.R. 1466, the Major Drug Trafficking Prosecution Act of 2009, seeks to repeal mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders and to give courts the ability to determine sentences based on all the facts, not just drug weight. It would also refocus federal resources on major drug traffickers instead of low-level offenders. There is currently no companion bill in the Senate.

Sen. Boxer, your office phone is ringing.

Fannie Mae Executives Who Accept Bonuses Should Be Fired

(Move over, AIG, this is the next outrage. – promoted by David Dayen)

Fool us once, shame on you.  Fool us twice, shame on us.  Given the intense public backlash against the shameful AIG bonuses, it is unthinkable that Fannie Mae would now award million dollar bonuses to four of its top executives.  According to recent news reports, Executive Vice Presidents Kenneth Bacon, David Hisey, Michael Williams, and Thomas Lund will each receive over $1 million in bonuses.  This is unacceptable.

Let’s not forget that Fannie Mae failed last year.  At least $15 billion of precious taxpayer dollars have been injected into Fannie Mae to keep it afloat, and hundreds of billions more are being used to guarantee their loans.  We fire executives for bad judgment.  It is beyond bad judgment for any of Fannie Mae’s executives to accept their million dollar bonuses.  There are many Wall Street executives without a job right now who will happily take top positions at Fannie Mae without the need for million-dollar bonuses.

Fannie Mae executives should already be on thin ice for coming out with guidelines that reward speculators and investors.  The Fannie Mae guidelines issued on March 4, 2009 allow speculators with second homes and investment properties to take advantage of the refinancing component of President Obama’s Making Home Affordable plan.  This directly contradicts President Obama’s repeated statements that his plan will not reward speculators.  Fannie Mae needs to follow the President’s public statements and revise the guidelines immediatley.

We need to clean house on Wall Street.  We need a cultural change where taxpayer interests are placed above corporate greed; where homeowners’ interests are placed above speculators’ interests; and where common sense prevails over utter stupidity.  

I call on Fannie Mae executives to return any bonuses they receive while their company is being propped up by taxpayer dollars.  If they do not, they should be fired.

Ted W. Lieu (D-Torrance) is Chair of the Assembly Rules Committee and former Chair of the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee.  He is the author of the landmark California Foreclosure Prevention Act, which was signed into law last month.

21st Century Bull Connor: Shameless Intransigence

This is from the “Have They No Shame?” department. For the past couple of months I’ve been talking about the abuses going on in Maricopa County, Arizona  (that’s where the fine city of Phoenix is located) at the hands of the local sheriff there, Joe Arpaio.  

Arpaio’s officers have arrested people who disagree with his policies just for clapping. In the face of Sheriff Arpaio’s abuses, including police brutality, forced family separation, racial profiling, slow emergency response times, unjustified arrests, inmate abuses and more, ACORN members and allied community groups recently delivered a petition to Congress asking for an investigation of Arpaio, and then we sent petitions to the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Find out Arpaio’s response on the flip.

Congress has responded.  So has the Justice Department.

So what was his response? To take a long hard look at these policies and perhaps focus on reducing crime rather than deciding who is and who isn’t an American based on their skin color or first language?

Nope.

It was intransigence. He sent around a press release stating that he is “even more determined even as criticism mounts.” This is from a sheriff facing more than 2,700 lawsuits, many citing civil rights violations.  

Arizona ACORN members have been protesting his brutal police tactics, most shockingly his recent publicity stunt of separating out 200 inmates from the county jail who are undocumented immigrants and marching them in chains to a separate “tent city” surrounded by an electric fence.

But, on March 10, Acting Assistant Atty. Gen. Loretta King sent a letter to Sheriff Arpaio informing him that the Justice Department was initiating an investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO).  

The very next day, U.S. House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), along with three other members of the House Judiciary Committee – Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Immigration; Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Rights; and Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security – announced that they will conduct a Congressional hearing into Sheriff Arpaio’s alleged civil rights abuses.

These four representatives also have sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, asking that her office investigate Arpaio’s actions too. Secretary Napolitano’s office has yet to call for an investigation.  

That’s where you come in.

We need to ask her to take a stand, the same way that Attorney General Eric Holder has and the Congressfolk listed above have.

This is why she has juice here: Sheriff Arpaio’s office boasts the largest “287(g)” agreement with DHS. This agreement outsources enforcement of federal immigration laws to local policing organizations. Sheriff Arpaio has 160 officers on the project but none chasing the 70,000+ outstanding warrants in the County.

Under this agreement, Sheriff Arpaio and his officers may demand to see the papers of anyone they apprehend for any violation, even something as small as a broken tail light.    

If you don’t have the right papers with you, you can be arrested and detained without charge for up to 10 days, even if you are a US citizen. I mean, who carries their birth certificate with them to the store?

Join us in writing to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano asking that DHS:

1.  Stop the raids in Maricopa County.

2.  Suspend Sheriff Arpaio’s 287(g) agreement.

Thousands of immigrant families are living in terror under Sheriff Arpaio’s reign.  We can’t let his racist policing continue. Please take action!  

Wednesday Open Thread

Lots going on in the past 48 hours, here’s a roundup.

• After yesterday’s public meeting between Mike Genest and Bill Lockyer, I am convinced that the trigger which would reduce budget cuts and taxes will not be pulled.  While it is conceivable that $10 billion dollars can be gleaned from the federal stimulus package to the General Fund, I don’t think either of these two have any interest in doing it, so they are content to fake the numbers, which are really unknowable at this point and subject to interpretation.  Their position is that pulling the trigger today would make the eventual budget gap down the road worse, even though that’s not necessarily true (more money for the General Fund would fill that gap).  Even if Lockyer could be convinced, in the event of a deadlock the trigger would not be pulled, and the Governor has no problem cutting health care for the truly needy, so this game is over.  The results will be tragic.

• Despite not having a working knowledge of the ins and outs of state government (and it’s hard to expect him to), President Obama and his staff did work up this handy backgrounder on the economic situation here.  We all know this intimately from covering it for so long, but it’s amazing to see in print.  Meanwhile, there is a state-based version of recovery.gov available now to track the stimulus spending, at Recovery.CA.gov.  One of the first projects is the launching of a state Green Corps to put at-risk young people into green jobs.

• It’s not just foreclosures – California’s Central Valley saw an 83% rise in personal bankruptcies, the second-highest in the nation – behind only LA County and Southern California.

• Verizon has helpfully pointed out to the state how they can save millions of dollars in phone service messages to unemployment call centers.  Another way would be “buying an answering machine for $20” or “allowing a busy signal,” but for some reason Verizon didn’t offer that advice.

• Former Symbionese Liberation Army member Sara Jane Olson is out of jail and has been returned to Minnesota after serving seven years in prison.  Because she’ll be on the parole system in Minnesota and not California, she is far less likely to actually return to jail.

• Planning meetings for the Westside Extension, also known as the Subway to the Sea in Los Angeles, are moving forward, and there would be no greater transit outcome maybe in the country than to finally see this become a reality.

• Dan Walters mentioned Calitics in his column the other day, but instead of quoting us, he quoted us quoting other people.  Walters has yet to figure out the mystery of the blockquote.