May 27 Open Thread

To the news:

• Just because it’s cool: OC Progressive asks John Wesley Harding 5 questions.

• More celebrities: Pierce Brosnan is hosting a fundraiser for AD-35 candidate Susan Jordan. Jordan is an environmentalist, and is also married to the current Assembly member, Pedro Nava. There’s going to be an interesting primary in the race. The seat is a safe Dem seat.

CalBuzz takes a look at the Prop 8 Ruling and the Guv race. Meg Whitman once again sounds ridiculous by hailing the decision in terms of grand freedoms. What a joke. Dan Walters kind of echoes eMeg. Walters completely fails to understand how completely flawed our initiative system is. It has never worked, and the system needs overhauling.

• Speaking of eMeg. She’s about to get McCain’s endorsement. Oooh, yippee. That’s sure to be worth a ton here.

Former Assemblyman Paul Koretz has claimed victory in the 5th City Council District in Los Angeles over neighborhood activist David Vahedi.

• Sign of the times: Nearly 1 million Californians seek medical care in Mexico annually.  And of course, if we destroy the health care social safety net for low-income Californians and push 2 million more off of insurance, that number will rise.  Our health care system is completely broken.

CalSTRS needs more money, lots of it.  They will be asking for several billion more. Teriffic, that’s what we need to hear right now.

• The pundit class, such as Tim Herdt is following the grassroots. They’re seeing the fact that the system is in need of reform.  

• As for the SF Bay Guardian, they’re looking into the background of the notion of splitting the state. While there would be some positives, notably that the Coastal, populous counties would produce some of the nation’s finest schools and services, it creates a whole slew of problems as well. Beyond the politics, it’s not clear if a Central Valley based state has the tax base to sustain itself. And there are the water issues, which would be massive.  

15 thoughts on “May 27 Open Thread”

  1. I just got a truly weird email.  It smells of astroturf after a horse race, and I’m wondering if anyone can tell me WTF these people are:


    Trouble viewing this message? View as a web page.

    Sign the petition!

    Say “No” to the Wrench Police – Contact Your Legislator Today and Protect Private Property Rights!

    Dear Friend,

    Sacramento politicians are about to violate your private property rights. A new bill (AB 1366) is being pushed in Sacramento that empowers local governments to remove your water softener from your home.

    AB 1366 would grant government sweeping power to remove an appliance from a private residence. This would be an unprecedented standard of government violating the sanctity of a private residence.

    To add insult to injury, owners of water softeners are not guaranteed to receive a fair compensation for their removal.

    Please email your legislators TODAY and tell them to stop meddling with your right to own a water softener for your home.  There are other priorities in the state that need their attention.

    Email your legislator now!

    As my representative in Sacramento, I urge you to vote NO on AB 1366.

    AB 1366 would grant government sweeping power to remove an appliance from a private residence. The state of California and my local community should not restrict my ability to purchase a water softener for my home. If passed, this bill would allow the government to intrude into a private residence and remove an appliance that was purchased in good faith.

    Please protect my property rights and rights as an individual to purchase and own a water softener.  California has more important problems to solve than creating a new “wrench police” to take appliances out of my home.

    Please vote NO on AB 1366.

    Email your legislator now!

    The site is http://www.SaveMySoftener.com, which I suspect has to do with water softeners, rather than some other product like, say, exlax or similar.

    Anybody know who these clowns are, and what exactly they are trying to pull over on the public?

  2. else gets how it’s cool!  Wes is amazingly approachable and was kind enough to answers these questions in the middle of a tour, etc.  Thanks so much for linking to it!

  3. when prop 2 passed up and down the central valley, in liberal bastions such as fresno and redding. i suspect coastal papers give them credence because it feeds into this myth that inland californians are all reactionary farmers, when the reality is that they’re mostly urbanites and suburbanites, and more of a swing area than a base.

  4. In the rare event that California does split up, especially on a coastal-inland divide, I would force myself to move to the bay area or somewhere around CSU Monterey Bay. I can imagine Inland California as one of the worst states in the union.

  5. I don’t think most people realize just how much infrastructure links north to south, the coast to the inland. I’m also unconvinced that a supposedly liberal coast can hold off the downward pressure on taxes that would come from just over the Coast Ranges (the proximity of Sacramento, Fresno, Bakersfield and Riverside to the coastal “state” is totally different than Nevada or Arizona).

    The problem really is the 2/3 rule and our broken constitution. Fix that and there’s no need to split a damn thing.

  6. But really, California is California.  A better idea would be, as described, to recognize that California is a nation within a nation and provide regional governance (Massachusetts does so, effectively abolishing counties, but obviously Massachusetts is much smaller).  Furthermore, any proposal for division that splits Orange County and Los Angeles shows a preference for numbers over facts on the ground.  Yes, Orange County is a conservative county overall, but it is inalienably part of the Los Angeles area.

    It’s important to note that this is not a magical solution to everyone’s problems.  Prop 2 (the animal rights one) passed in agricultural counties as well, and Prop 8 passed in Los Angeles by a small margin.  It’s more complicated than that.  Large states are not inherently ungovernable – New York gets by, despite even stronger tensions between the City and Everyone Else.  But large states require appropriate systems of governance, which California lacks presently.  Populism might work in Vermont, but in a large state like California it just creates chaos.

Comments are closed.