Jerry Brown as Jacob Marley

In case the education forum didn’t provide enough signs of this, Sen. Alan Lowenthal gave his take on the Governor-Elect’s objective with his budget plans.

Like many observers, Lowenthal predicts Brown will propose a dire budget in January, then push voters to approve a tax increase to preserve services that would otherwise be cut.

“My guess is he will present an austerity budget,” Lowenthal said. “And I think then he will go to the public and say, ‘This is your choice.'”(SacBee)

As Robert posed earlier, it looks increasingly likely that Jerry Brown plans on shocking the California electorate into action. With a budget deficit that is going to be somewhere between 25 and 30 billion dollars, and Brown planning to present a “clean” budget, that is, free of any budget gimmickry or other one-time fixes, any budget that he presents will be truly awful.  CalWorks and CalGrants both probably gone.  The possibility of the elimination of all funding for higher education could also be in the cards, along with sweeping cuts to K-12. You would imagine there would also be continued cuts to transportation and social services.  In-home support and possibly even full-time nursing homes on the chopping block.

In other words, the proposed budget might actually propose a future with the mentally and physically handicapped forced on to the streets, our children lacking on all but the most bare educational resources, and our parks shut.  It’s not really a future that you would think that most Californians would support, but it just might be on the ballot come 2011.

The election will be in the summer, but it might be that Jerry Brown is our Jacob Marley, in that he is offering us a chance of hope. Showing the sins of our past, explaining our budget present, and offering us a way out to build a California for the future.

16 thoughts on “Jerry Brown as Jacob Marley”

  1. won’t the vote on this either have to repeal prop 13 in part or pass by 2/3ds to win to raise taxes?

  2. That the Gimmicks and such were tossed overboard, Preferably tied to an anvil. As something for nearly nothing clearly does not work, You get what You pay for.

  3. Sorry

    But isn’t it time to look a welfare ?

    If we have 12% of the nation’s population and 32% of the welfare cases…

    Something has got to give

    My duaghters are out of primary school and in public colleges

    But, we still need a strong primary educational system

    I’d rather spend my money on education than on welfare

    This is the only thing that Meg Whitman said that made any sense

  4. I know it’s politically incorrect

    But California has 12% of the national population and 32% of the welfare load

    Doesn’t that seem out of kilter ?

    I’m not saying throw them to the wolves

    But, we should do something to reduce this load

    It does put a major dent in the budget

Comments are closed.