The Controller Race Continues

SF Gay Pride 2009 - State BOE Betty YeeBetty Yee holds 2nd place (barely) as counting continues

by Brian Leubitz

Counties across California are making progress on the unprocessed ballots. For most races, this isn’t really a big deal. However, in the Controller’s race, where the 2nd place result is likely to be determined by a few thousand votes at most, every vote is critical. Here’s the situation as of 10AM today:

LA Pride Mayor Villaraigosa's Garden PartySwearingen: 870,625

Yee: 758,401

Pérez: 757,328

Evans: 752,556

Evans is falling behind a little bit, which is a very comforting sign for all the Democrats out there worried about a 2 Republican race. (Like, umm, me.) But with 791,885 unprocessed ballots, including over 148K in Los Angeles County alone, there is a lot of uncertainty left. You can check the most recent unprocessed ballots report here. The most recent report at the time of writing this is from last evening.

Counties have a little less than a month to certify their results to the Secretary of State, so a bit of patience is required. Not necessarily easy though.

UPDATE: John Pérez has now taken a small lead (1123 votes) as of Wednesday morning as a big batch of LA ballots came in. The total unprocessed votes now stands at 328,576.

UPDATE 2: Yee took the 2nd place spot back this afternoon. She now leads by 2,820 over Pérez.

Primary Election a Boon for Workers, Bust for Big Corporations

By Steve Smith

The results are in. While workers are celebrating some huge victories this morning, the corporate crowd is wondering what went wrong in some key races. Last night’s California primary election presented some very clear choices to voters that are critical to the direction of our state.

The corporate political machine went all in, spending big in an effort to defeat labor champions in a number of races, and for the most part, came up empty. Union workers, who pounded the pavement in the final weeks to talk to voters face-to-face about the importance of the election, likely made the difference in a number of races.

Five reasons last night was a boon for workers (and mostly a bust for big corporations):

It was a bad night for corporate Democrats and a good night for worker-friendly candidates.

In a number of races around the state, big business spent heavily to elect corporate Democrats to do their bidding in the legislature. The most high-profile of these races was Assembly District 16, where a coalition of oil companies, tobacco firms, developers, realtors and other business interests sought to advance corporate Democrat Steve Glazer over former teacher and Dublin mayor Tim Sbranti. Sbranti easily beat out Glazer for a spot in the general election, garnering 29% of the vote to Glazer’s 22%. It was a stinging defeat for Glazer, who, backed by a gaudy $3 million in corporate cash, made attacking union workers central to his campaign.

In another important race, corporate interests spent hundreds of thousands of dollars attacking labor champion Connie Leyva in Senate District 20, only to see Leyva advance to the general election. Leyva, the president of UFCW Local 1428 and the California Labor Federation, is a lifelong advocate for working families who will be a strong voice for workers in the legislature.

Governor Jerry Brown wins BIG.

There was no doubt Gov. Brown was headed to the general election, but by running up the score on his Republican counterparts, Brown showed just how formidable he will be come November. After the masterful job he’s done in turning California around, there’s simply no credible case to be made that he doesn’t deserve another term as Governor. And while the Republican establishment was happy to avoid the party bus to crazy town, population Tim Donnelly, they may not fare much better with former Goldman Sachs executive Neel Kashkari. Like Meg Whitman before him, Kashkari is the type of Wall Street candidate that California voters have little appetite for. In fact, given Kashkari’s involvement in the bailout of big banks at the expense of taxpayers, his resume may even be less palatable than Whitman’s. And his platform of cutting taxes on big corporations and eliminating regulations that protect workers and the environment isn’t going to sit well with working people.

Pro-worker candidates advance in every statewide constitutional race.

California is poised to retain the most worker-friendly slate of constitutional officers in the country after a number of huge wins by labor-endorsed candidates in the other statewide constitutional races. But just because big corporations took a drubbing last night, don’t think they won’t reload for the fall. Look for big corporate money to come in to support anti-teacher candidate Marshall Tuck against education champion Tom Torlakson. The California GOP will also likely throw in big for their only viable statewide candidate, Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin, who likely faces off against former Speaker of the Assembly, labor champion John Perez.

Mike Honda wins big in Congressional District 17.

Honda has been a champion for workers for decades, standing with labor in many key workers’ rights battles. He received an unexpected challenge from Democrat Ro Khanna in the primary. Khanna has done some good things for working people during his career, so it was a bit of a head-scratcher as to why he’d challenge a labor stalwart like Honda. Regardless, Honda showed his support in district is rock solid by garnering a decisive 49% of the vote in last night’s primary. The two will face off again in November, and working people are likely to ensure the same result, sending Honda back to Congress for another term.

Measure to provide much-needed assistance to homeless veterans cruises to victory.

The California Labor Federation was a huge supporter of Prop 41 as part of our ongoing effort to advocate for our state’s veterans. It was great to see voters show such strong approval (65%) of a measure to support our heroes in uniform, especially given the desperate need for increased housing options for veterans. The Labor Federation and affiliate unions look forward to continuing our efforts to support veterans through our new program, Veterans and Labor – Partners in Service. Learn more at www.veteransandlabor.com

Top 2 Promotes Gamesmanship, Bad Outcomes for Voters

Election Results Leave Many Puzzled

by Brian Leubitz

Yesterday was the election, but I’m not going to give you the typical wrap up of last night’s election. There are many good places for that, the LA Times, the SF Chronicle, the Sacramento Bee, all the usual suspects. I also highly recommend Josh Richman’s Political Blotter. But today, I’m on a bit of a mission/rant, one that I started last night on twitter. And it really can’t be fully fleshed out in 140 character chunks.

This is our first real statewide primary with the so-called “jungle primary” aka Top 2. We saw same strange outcomes in 2012 with legislative and Congressional races, but those could be shrugged off as local anomalies. The 31st Congressional District is usually cited as the worst case scenario, with Pete Aguilar, the top Democratic vote getter falling two points short of making the top 2.  But in that race, Democrats only received 48.5% of the vote. Not having a Democrat was a bit silly, and could have been avoided (with a back room deal). However, the general election would still have been a tough race.

But take a look at the following scenario: Democrats split 48.4% of the vote, with a left-leaning third party candidate getting another 5.7%. In this scenario, Republicans garner only 46%. However, two Republicans move on to the general election.

Supporters of Top 2 often claim that June shouldn’t be determinative. It is a low-turnout election, so the two most popular candidates should move on. Or that the Democrats should have done a better job in organizing, or choosing candidates. They should have split that 48.4% better, or one candidate should have been stronger. But isn’t that essentially encouraging back-room deals? That is not what democracy should look like. If the good government groups that were behind the measure along with Gov. Schwarzenegger hoped they were enpowering the people, they should have known better.

This of course brings us to the Controller’s race (updated results here). Right now, the case isn’t as grim as my scenario just listed. Ashley Swearingen, the Republican Mayor of Fresno, leads all candidates with 24.4%. Former Speaker John Pérez is currently in second place with 21.7%, leading Republican David Evans by 2,436 votes and Democratic Member of the BOE Betty Yee by 5,643 votes. If those numbers hold up, Pérez would be the favorite to win in the fall.

But just who is this David Evans? He filed no campaign finance report with the Secretary of State, or at least nothing has yet appeared on Cal-Access. His website is vague and very 1998. He does have that video I posted, but there is otherwise very little information to go on. He is apparently a CPA, which I suppose is a reasonable qualification, especially when voters are none too pleased with their politicians. And his ballot designation of “Chief Financial Officer” and first ballot position are quite valuable when voters are coming into the ballot booth with very little information. But even with a good ballot designation, how exactly did he get 636,109 votes?

Because there is no campaign finance report, we don’t know how he used whatever small amount of money he had. Maybe he bought a few slate cards and hoped that his ballot designation would bring him luck. Apparently it did, although the legality of “Chief Financial Officer” seems somewhat questionable, considering adjectives aren’t normally allowed. Maybe there were some IEs for him, whether out of gamesmanship or sincere support for Mr. Evans, but I wasn’t able to track down on Cal-Access, but who knows with that website.

That being said, how could it truly be said that if Evans picks up 3,000 votes, that he and Swearingen are the strongest two candidates? Or the candidates that the voters of California want to see on the ballot. Not only does Top 2 disenfranchise lesser parties, in this case it could possibly disenfranchise the majority of the voters in the race between the two left-leaning parties.

Top 2 is fatally flawed. It is riddled with problems that promote the worst kind of gamesmanship and do nothing to promote democracy. Maybe somebody could dream up a more workable system, but it is a solution in search of a problem. And now it is a problem in search of a solution: the easiest being the complete repeal of Top-2 voting.

Election Day!

I VotedPrimary election will bring very limited answers

by Brian Leubitz

Voters across the state are heading to the polls today. Or, at least a few of them will head to the polls today, as we will see a high vote by mail total in addition to a low total turnout. But, there are precincts open across the state just waiting for some voters.

The big question today is just how many Dem-on-Dem races will we see in November. In the statewide races, Ashley Swearingen looks to be set for the Top2, but which Democrat will join her in the Controller general election is anybody’s guess. Former Speaker Perez has ramped up spending these past few weeks and is coming on strong. BOE Member Betty Yee had an early lead, and if the traditional voting patterns hold up, could maintain it. Tom Torlakson and Marshall Tuck look set for another round in November. And the race for #2 is getting interesting as Neel Kashkari and Tim Donnelly fight it out. The other races are a little bit less exciting.

But the Democratic Party is where the action is. While there aren’t party primaries per se, several legislative and Congressional races are being fought for the Democratic base. A few districts will likely feature a rematch in November: San Francisco Assembly and Ted Lieu’s Senate District. Others could very well land in that category: Sbranti v Glazer, Honda v Khanna, and a few others.

Propositions 41&42 look to be headed for victory, but you never really can tell until you get that first batch of vote totals after the polls close at 8. Most important of all is that we remind our friends and family to vote. This is going to be a low turnout election, every vote is that much more important.