Tag Archives: CA-11

California Blog Roundup, 5/22/06

Today’s California Blog Roundup on the flip.  Teasers:  Schwarzenegger’s steadfast commitment to saying whatever he thinks people want to hear, Westly & Angelides, immigration / mother tongues / National Guard, CA-04, CA-11, CA-50, other fun stuff.

Race for Governor

Immigration Issues

Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

15% Doolittle / CA-50

CA-50, Miscellany

California Blog Roundup 5/19/06

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. I’m pressed for time, so it ain’t as pretty as it normally is, but I’ve tried to sort things properly. No teasers, sorry.

California Blog Roundup 5/16/06

(Bumped for visibility over my long front-pager(s) – promoted by SFBrianCL)

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: November initiative preview, the race for governor (money and TV ads, same as always), the budget process, education stuff, reform stuff, 15% Doolitle, Paid-For Pombo, immigration, typical Republicans, CA-50, CA-45, urban living.

Initiative Preview

Governor’s Race

Education

  • Assembly Democrats lay out their differences with Governor Schwarzenegger with respect to, vis-a-vis, and regarding the new budget. Alberto Torrico (AD-20), chair of the Assembly Transportation Committee thinks that Schwarzenegger is shorting transportation costs.
  • Educational Justice Blog reminds us that the big chunk of education funding in Schwarzenegger’s budget is only there because ABC and the CTA browbeat the Governor into actually keeping his promise. Why is it that Schwarzenegger needed to be pursued by the very people he attacked last year in order to keep a promise he made to the children of California?
  • California Progress Report has a guest piece expressing concerns about the high school exit exam.
  • The Mad Professah has written a thoughtful (and brief) post on the high school exit exam.
  • Randy Bayne is not so impressed with Sheila Kuhl’s proposal to call out the contributions of GLBT folks in California textbooks, arguing that it perpetuates labelling. I would have agreed with Randy once, but the problem is that almost everyone assumes that people (historical or otherwise) straight unless it’s pointed out that they’re not. Not mentioning a difference like that continues the assumption that GLBT folks haven’t contributed.

Reform & Reformers

Immigration

Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

  • Apparently, Paid-For Pombo is feeling the pinch on his sacrifice of the California salmon fisheries. So, the correct response is? You guessed it: destroy marine sancturies. The guy is a one man cascade failure.
  • Paid-For Pombo is all about stifling dissent, both in committee and in his campaign.
  • It seems that the Pombo-McCloskey debate was a slugfest. Good.
  • If I lived in CA-11, I would not vote for Pete McCloskey in the general, although I don’t think he’s a bad guy. I think a Republican majority in the House is a bad thing. The Republican Party is just too corrupt and too destructive for the few remaining honest Republicans to try to rein in. Pete McCloskey is not really a modern Republican, a charge also made by Pombo’s people. McCloskey takes umbrage and responds, proving that he’s not a modern Republican.
  • Jerry McNerney on renewable energy, at Daily Kos.

15% Doolittle / CA-04

General Purpose Republican Corruption

The Rest

California Blog Roundup. 5/11/06

It’s big, it’s belated, it’s bloggy. Today’s California blog roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Republican corruption, Angelides, Westly, Schwarzenegger, 15% Doolittle, Paid-For Pombo (and CA-11 generally), CA-50, immigration, net neutrality, voting machines, auto insurance.

Republican Corruption

Governor’s Race + A Little About Bonds

Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

CA-50

15% Doolittle / CA-04

Immigration

Net Neutrality

Other

CA-11: The Ball is Rolling for McNerney

Jerry McNerney picked up the San Jose Mercury News endorsement (Hat tip to Jerry’s Blog).  The Mercury News also endorsed Pete McCloskey over Pombo in the Republican Primary.  It’s not particularly hard to see how the editorial board feels about Pombo: Any of the candidates, even Republican McCloskey is better than Pombo.

Even before he became associated with the sleaze surrounding disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, even before he was accused of taking a family vacation on the government’s dime and even before a watchdog group called him one of the 13 most corrupt members of Congress, it was clear that Richard Pombo had to go.

The conservative seven-term Republican congressman from Tracy has a record of radical anti-environmentalism that has imperiled the nation’s natural resources, is wrong for the country and is out of step with a state that’s known for its environmental leadership.
***
On the Democratic side, two good candidates have emerged as leading contenders. Neither Jerry McNerney, 54, an engineer and wind-energy consultant from Pleasanton, nor Steve Filson, 59, a United Airlines pilot and retired U.S. Navy commander from Danville, has held elected office. But both bring good ideas and have energized various Democratic Party constituencies. Of the two, we find McNerney’s message more compelling.(SJ Mercury News 5/8/06)

The editorial gives good reviews and descriptions of all three competitors to Pombo.  The choice is a bit muddled now, but we know what needs to happen.  Richard Pombo must go.

As, I’ve written here, I think McNerney will be a better candidate because of his connections to the grassroots.  The national party will support him this time if he wins the primary. They have to, they smell blood in the water all around Pombo.  McNerney will bring the assets of the grassroots to bear against Pombo.  This year it will be enough to take that seat back from the radical anti-environmentalist Richard Pombo.

And in a complete rejection to the “You’ve had your chance” line of “thinking”, the Mercury News touts the fact that McNerney has run against Pombo before:

McNerney ran against Pombo in 2004 and got 39 percent of the vote, despite receiving no support from the state or national Democratic Party and being massively outspent by Pombo. That experience should come in handy in November.

California Blog Roundup, 5/8/06

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: infrastructure bonds and the governor’s race, just the governor’s race, CA-50, CA-04, CA-11, immigration, CA-45, auto insurance, levees.

Infrastructure Bonds

Gubernatorial Race

CA-50

15% Doolittle / CA-04

Immigration

Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

The Rest

California Blog Roundup, 5/5/06

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers:Infrastructure Bonds, Governor’s Race, Immigration, 15% Doolittle, Paid-For Pombo, LA-area Assembly Races, some cynicism, Latinos as a power, labor, and some pictures.

Infrastructure Bonds

Governor’s Race

Immigration

CA-4 and CA-11

Everything Else

CA-11: When is national intervention appropriate?

Over the weekend, the CA-11 delegates at the convention endorsed Jerry McNerney over Steve Fillson:

It wasn’t only Angelides that walked out of the convention with a coveted endorsement.

So did Jerry McNerney, one of three Democrats running for the nomination in the high-profile Congressional District 11 race against incumbent Richard Pombo, R-Tracy.

McNerney scored 21 of the 28 votes cast by party delegates, an indisputable victory that produced a wide smile on the face of this serious Ph.D. engineer from Pleasanton.

It was a minor step for the Democratic Party but a giant leap for McNerney, a candidate whom national party leaders have spurned as unlikely to triumph over Pombo. McNerney, a wind energy consultant, is too liberal to win critical votes in the conservative San Joaquin County, they say, and besides, he already lost to Pombo in 2004. (CC Times 5/1/06)

I’ve written some about this, as have many others. But, as you may know, Filson has the support of many, many Congressmen, especially Tauscher.  McNerney does not.  In fact the most recognizable names on McNerney’s endoresment list is Liz Figueroa, who is running her own quixotic campaign for Lt. Governor, and Johan Klehs, who is in a dogfight of a race for SD-10. McNerney has become, almost out of necessity, a man of the grassroots.  Whether this is right or wrong is an entirely different question.  Over at Down with Tyranny, Howie has a particularly scathing (and mighty insightful) post about this particular subject:

You see, Emanuel’s DCCC has taken the extraordinary step of anointing a weak, former Republican, Steve Filson, who has nothing much to say beyond “Pombo is bad,” in the midst of a spirited Democratic primary that features an exemplary grassroots, progressive candidate, massively favored by Democrats throughout the San Joaquin Valley (CA-11), Jerry McNerney.

Emanuel and his henchmen– like Steny Hoyer and the agendaless, desperate-to-be-the-first-woman-Speaker-please-let-me-Rahm-I’ll-do-anything Nancy Pelosi– have been trying to make Filson’s candidacy seem inevitable. But, unlike in many districts where their tactics have worked, Democrats in the 11th CD are too independent and feisty for them and have only pushed back harder against the anti-grassroots, anti-progressive, Inside-the-Beltway Democratic power elite. Filson’s pathetic candidacy, despite all the big name Beltway-ites behind him, just has not taken off. McNerney just keeps getting stronger and stronger. (DownWithTyranny! 4/30/2006)

Ultimately the relevant question is when should the national party intervene in local Congressional races? 

More on the flip…

Ok, so I should disclose that my prefernce for CA-11 would be a longtime legislator for the Stockton area who has a history at winning tightly-contested races in the area.  However, that isn’t going to happen, at least this time around.

Now that I have that out of the way, I would like to focus on the reasons that this race is getting nasty.  If you look at the DCCC’s website archive, you get an idea of how Filson’s troubles with the grassroots began in a quote from kid oakland on the site:

Hi, kid oakland here.

I’ve got a couple questions. Is this an endorsement of Steve Filson by the DCCC? At what point would those of us who have supported Jerry McNerney get to have a say?

I’d also like to know what Steve Filson’s statement of being a “social moderate” means.

And the “social moderate” stuff that k/o talks about?  Well, here’s a sampling:

There is quite a bit of dissatisfaction with voters on both sides, Republicans and Democrats, Filson said. What we need is a centrist candidate to appeal to folks in the middle. (Tri-Valley Herald 9/30/05)

Oh, really, that’s what we need?  Somebody to triangulate the views of others into one completely contradictory bullshit set of ideological nothingness?  Yeah, we’ve seen how well radical moderatism has played.  It’s really brought us all three branches of government into a place where we want them.  We’ll really win people over with how much like the Republicans we are. 

So, without discussion from grassroots, Tauscher hand selects a candidate.  And, strangely enough, Pelosi follows by appearating at events and giving him $2000. They endorse him and send him out on the road with pockets full of Washington cash to challenge Pombo.

But, wait, McNerney, the 2004 Dem nominee is still running.  But, the DCCC thinks that he’s already had his shot.  Yeah?  Really?  Did anybody throw fancy soirees for McNerney with the Democrat leader?  Was 2004 really a fair fight between Pombo and McNerney?  What 2004 showed the grassroots was that McNerney fought for a cause, when most others were ignoring it.  And the grassroots has shown loyalty to McNerney.

The endorsement of the CDP is just one more black eye for the DCCC.  CA-11 is a challenging, but not an unwinnable, race.  The district has changed enough in the last 10 years that a challenge to Pombo is possible.  The DCCC needs to better utilize people on the ground in the districts.  Ask them who they want.  In districts like this, the grassroots support is imperative in the general.  GOTV efforts will be completely unsuccessful if the candidate has challenged and demoralized the base.

I’m not as harsh of a critic of the DCCC as others are.  I think it serves a vital role in winning races.  Ok, occasionally they will have to farm for candidates. But when there are popular candidates already there, they need to work with them first before they start shopping for other inexperienced candidates.

California Blog Round Up, 5/1/06

OK, here’s the California blog roundup for today. There’s no immigration in it; I’m going to save all of the immigration posts (and there are lots) for tomorrow, and combine them with those that people write in the evening. Teasers: Lots of California Democratic Party Convention, 15% Doolittle, CA-04, Paid-For Pombo, CA-11, Republican corruption, this & that.

CDP Convention

15% Doolittle / CA-04

  • From Words Have Power, 15% Doolittle pretends that the public doesn’t care how corrupt he is.
  • Apparently, 15% Doolittle is convinced that his trouble is all the fault of the Sacramento Bee. Reality does have a liberal bias. BTW, I clicked through to read the Op-Ed itself, and it’s a fascinating piece of work. 15% Doolittle made his wife part of his campaign apparatus and complains that she should be off-limits. He also repeats the lie that the commission on funds raised is a common practice. Dang.
  • And if you’re not down with that, Dump Doolittle points you to some collateral you can use if you’re in 15% Doolittle’s district.

Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

The Rest

California Blog Roundup, 4/30/06

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Longish, as it’s been a while. More regular roundups will resume shortly. Teasers: Marc Cooper on the state of the Democratic Party, the horse race (meh), PPIC exposes some “and a pony” thinking on education, 15% Doolittle, Paid-For Pombo, the impending Roach / Bilbray primary in CA-50, electoral and finance reform, and last, miscellany.

This roundup does not include any posts from yesterday, as I was at the CDP Convention. I’ll try to post a supplement and a Convention after-action later today.

  • Marc Cooper has written a great article / blog post at LA Weekly concerning the schlerotic California Democratic Party and the extent to which the primary race for the Democratic gubernatorial candidacy is determined by ridiculous endorsement races, money tracking, all aided and abetted by the punditocracy and punditeriate more interested in color commentary on the horse race than actual issues.
  • And speaking of horse race crapola, we have the Westly complaint against Angelides lodged with the Fair Political Practices Commission. I have a hard time taking seriously the Westly campaign mouth noises about positive campaigning (including Westly’s prepared speech for the CDP convention) when they’re pulling this kind of stuff.
  • Frank Russo has a pretty good thumbnail of the recent PPIC poll on the most important issue for Californians: the state of our education system. Of particular interest, most likely voters want to increase funding for education, but they don’t really want to do what’s necessary to pay for it. And of course, Phil Angelides is willing to step up and challenge this “and a pony” kind of thinking that the Republicans exploit, for which he’ll no doubt be punished. See also Bill Bradley.
  • Alliance for a Better California points us to a pair of SacBee articles comparing the recent Angelides & Westly ads.

CA-04, CA-11, CA-50

Reform

Miscellany