Tag Archives: Los Angeles County

Riverside County to sue Chiang, state for Money for Social Services

The situation is getting desperate for counties across the state.  Yesterday, the Riverside Board of Supes voted to sue the state for the millions of dollars that are being withheld due to the, well, fact that they don’t exist. And, this being Riverside County, if they can’t get the money, they’ll also just drop the services.

Riverside County supervisors voted Tuesday to sue the state to compel it to pay billions of dollars in funding for county-run social services, payments the state began delaying this week to conserve cash.

Supervisors also voted to take legal action to relieve the county of the responsibility to provide those state-mandated services, such as welfare, assistance for disabled people and mental health services, if the state does not fund them.

“The action was taken despite grave concerns about the effect on the programs that serve the county’s most needy and vulnerable residents,” county counsel Pamela Walls said at Tuesday’s supervisors’ meeting in Riverside. “However, the county cannot bear the overwhelming costs of taking on responsibility for programs that the state is obligated to fund.” Riverside P-E 2/4/09

Of course, this is the expected outcome of denying the flow of money. Counties simply don’t have the money to continue to pay for the programs the state mandates.  While counties like San Francisco have a reasonable shot at raising taxes on a special election, it’s just not all that practical in Riverside.  Even if the Riverside Supes put some sort of revenue measure on the ballot, getting 2/3 to support it seems unlikely.

Welcome to your new state, it’s in freefall, and the safety net is gone.

UPDATE by Dave:  It gets worse.  The Board of Supervisors in Los Angeles County, which houses over 1/4 of the state’s residents and collects substantial tax revenue, is threatening to withhold it to pay for health care and social services.  This is the opposite of Riverside County’s gambit – instead of suing the state for money, they’re just threatening to keep it for themselves.  This is in reaction to the state delaying health and human services payments to the counties.  The treasuries of counties and local governments are routinely illegally raided every year as part of budget deals, but this is the first time I’ve seen the reverse.

“We’re declaring our own Boston Tea Party,” Supervisor Gloria Molina said during Tuesday’s board meeting, adding that refusing to turn over the money to state lawmakers “will make their pain more acute.”

But it may not be legal, or, for that matter, practical.

“It’s a delicious idea,” said Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky. “It may be deliciously illegal, but I think the state’s action may also be illegal.”

Two wrongs making a right – welcome to California 2009.

Voters Eager to Have A Stake in Historical Election: Early Voting Predicts Strong Turnout Tuesday

Cross-posted at Project Vote’s blog, Voting Matters

Weekly Voting Rights News Update

By Erin Ferns

In the last two weeks voter registration and early voting has shown that voters are geared up and ready to take part in what has been called a “historical event” on November 4.

Last week, voters scrambled to register at drive-thru election office windows in Southern California, busy street corners in Wichita, Kansas, and post-naturalization ceremonies in Los Angeles County. These efforts to meet the Oct. 20 registration deadlines in some states are seen as evidence of a surge in voter registration among historically underrepresented communities, including newly naturalized Latino and Asian citizens, and Black voters as well as formerly disenfranchised ex-felons.

This week, early vote turnout gave a sneak peek at what voters and election officials can expect at the polls on Tuesday, and it’s “going to be busy as heck” said one official in Orange County, Calif., where registration rates went up 15 percent since 2004. To accommodate the high turnout, which is expected to exceed “the recent high-water mark in voter participation set in 2004,” some states are taking precautionary measures, adding new machines and even extending early voting.

Experts predict “huge turnout” of as much as 132 million people, or 60.4 to 62.9 percent of eligible voters this year, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. The last presidential election brought 60.7 percent of eligible voters to the polls, “the highest since 1968, when 61.9 percent cast ballots.” Election officials in many states, including Ohio, Arizona, New Mexico, and Minnesota, have predicted turnout as high as 80 percent.

“We are going to have long lines,” with some states expecting voting machine shortages, according to Curtis Gans, director of the Center for the Study of the American Electorate. “But long lines in this election, as in 2004, are not going to deter people from voting, because of the emotional context of this election. They didn’t deter people in 1992 or in 2004, and they’re not going to deter people now.”

Managing long lines has already been a point of contention in key states. In Georgia, voters waited four to five hours to cast early ballots on Wednesday, in spite of last minute changes Tuesday to reduce the eight hour waits voters encountered on Monday, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution. A combination of “high turnout, staff and equipment shortages and state computer problems slowed the process.”

Like Gans predicted, however, these issues are not stopping voters from showing up at the polls bright and early.

“It’s a historical event and I want to be part of it,” said Hampton, Ga. voter, Dara Christian, who arrived at her precinct to be second in line shortly after 5 a.m. on Wednesday. According to a Tuesday AJC report, a million ballots had already been cast during more limited voting in the last few weeks. And about 125,095 of those were cast as of Tuesday night.

While officials in various counties addressed some of the problems by supplying extra equipment and staff, according Tuesday’s AJC report, the Democratic Party and election officials are still pleading with Secretary of State Karen Handel to extend early voting in order to support high turnout, including state Democratic Party chairwoman Jane Kidd and DelKalb County Commissioner Lee May.

“It is not my intention to lay blame on any particular, person or body of government,” May wrote in a letter to Handel and Ga. Governor Sonny Perdue. “It is my desire that we don’t inadvertently squelch the desire of so many Georgians to participate in the political process.”

“Handel said Tuesday that Georgia law doesn’t include a mechanism to allow her or Perdue to extend early voting,” according to AJC. Handel said that even if she could allow the extension, it would be a “logistical disaster,” dismissing Kidd’s plea an “orchestrated effort of that political party across the country.”

In Florida, on the other hand, after record turnout Monday,Governor Charlie Crist listened to similar concerns and signed an order to extend early voting hours  to 12 hours a day, over the objections of Secretary of State Kurt Browning, according to the Miami Herald.

“It’s not a political decision,” said Crist, a Republican. “It’s a people decision.”

In Broward and Miami-Dade counties alone, more than 43,000 people cast their votes Monday, “roughly 5,000 more than on any other previous day.”

Other efforts to help ensure Election Day runs smoothly for voters are underway, including the National Campaign for Fair Elections’ hotline, 1-866-OURVote. The line has already received up to 4,000 calls a day, according to New York Times blog, The Caucus. The group plans to have 20 call centers set up around the country by Tuesday with a capacity of handling 100,000 calls on Election Day.

“The notion behind the non-partisan National Campaign phone line is that if problems erupt at polling places on Election Day, the group will have lawyers at the ready to respond to the complaints,” the Times reports.

“So far, most calls have been from voters experiencing problems with their registration along with those trying to locate their polling place, according to Ken Smukler, president of InfoVoter Technologies, the Bala Cynwyd, Pa.company that which manages the call system.”

Among those who will benefit from the voter protection hotline and other precautions learned are the large numbers of new voters around the country. Since 2004, voter registration rose 15 percent in Orange County, Calif. where citizens were allowed to register at a drive-thru elections office window last week, according to the Associated Press. Alabama has 76,000 new voters since 2004, two thirds of whom are African-American, according to the Mobile Register-Press. Last week, two thousand voters registered on a street corner in Kansas, about a quarter of whom were ex-felons who until then thought they were ineligible to vote, according to MSNBC. Newly naturalized Latino and Asian citizens in Los Angeles County doubled last year’s registration rate with 64,000 new voters this year, according to the Los Angeles Times. Up until last week, community groups were “walking precincts, conducting phone banks, holding forums, and distributing multilingual voter guides” to help new citizens become a part of the democratic process.

Historically, Latino, Asian, and African-American citizens have registered and voted at alarmingly lower rates than their White counterparts. In 2006, just 41 percent of African-Americans and 32 percent of Asians and Latinos, respectively, voted in the midterm election compared to 52 percent of Whites, according to Project Vote report, Representational Bias of the 2006 Electorate.  But that may just be changing this year.

“We want people to know we’re here and our next generation is going to be very important in the process,” said recently naturalized citizen, Carlos Romero in the Los Angeles Times.

In Other News:

In Ohio, Wary Eyes On Election Process: Fears of Fraud and Blocked Votes – Washington Post

CLEVELAND — With Ohio still up for grabs in next week’s presidential election, the conversation here has expanded from who will carry the state to how — the nitty-gritty of registration lists, voting machines, court challenges and whether it all will play out fairly.

Provisional Ballots Get Uneven Treatment – Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON — Provisional ballots, one of the fixes the government implemented following the disputed 2000 election, are often proving to be a poor substitute for the real thing.

Erin Ferns is a Research and Policy Analyst with Project Vote.

Half-cent sales tax poised to be on ballot in L.A. County

Yesterday, the L.A. County Metro Board voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisors place on the ballot a half-cent sales tax increase to fund transportation projects.  The vote was nearly unanimous, with only Antonovitch and Fasana opposed.  Gloria Molina abstained, but was unhappy with the project specifications because it didn’t contain “equity” language guaranteeing that expenditures would be based on population.

Of course, nothing will come of it unless AB2321 gets through Senate Appropriations.

But assuming that happens, this means that L.A. County voters will get the chance to get freeway expansion, a subway to the Westside, a Gold Line extension to Claremont, light rail along Exposition Blvd, expansion of the Green Line to LAX, and a whole host of other expansions, all for an extra $1 of sales tax on every $200 worth of purchases.

I have a couple of observations on this below the fold.

First, the busriders union says they’ve going to do everything they can to defeat the measure.  All well and good.  I expected that, because they would likely oppose anything that doesn’t say that 100% of the money is going to buying more buses.

In my view, the “equity” language is a pile of crock, and I’m glad it got defeated.  Trying to base distribution of sales tax revenues by population percentage, rather than by need, is ludicrous.  As Supervisor Yaroslavsky pointed out, there are a lot of ways you can calculate equity.  The major hangup about equity, of course, is that the “rich Westsiders” are getting a larger percentage of the sales tax than their population would warrant, and Molina is none too happy about it.

Well, I have one question: have you seen the morning and evening commute along the 10?  It goes West in the morning, and East in the evening.  That’s because everyone is going to work on the Westside, and there’s no real public transportation infrastructure besides the 720 bus along Wilshire Blvd to actually get people to and fro.  That’s why we need to finally have a Westside subway extension that can hit mid-Wilshire, Beverly Hills, Century City and Santa Monica–the places where people want and need to go.

While I agree with the goals and ambitions of those who are promoting bike and ped paths, I don’t share these groups’ antipathy to freeway construction.  A lot of these groups were making the case that we shouldn’t be doing freeway construction because it allows for more pollution from cars.  I disagree with that.  There will come a day sooner rather than later when gars are green and run on fuel cells or electricity.  And when that day arrives, there will still be a need for arteries for those cars to get around.

So all in all, I will enthusiastically vote for this sales tax increase, and do everything I can to help it pass.  It’s a first step toward actually having a respectable public transportation system in Los Angeles County.

LA Health Care–Waste $$ Here, Close another Hospital over there…

Well, the depth of LA’s Hospital mess keeps getting clearer–now the LA Times is reporting that the construction of the new County-USC Medical Center is exploding, and will now be 22% over the original estimates.  Oh yeah, the project is now 1 year overdue and the clock keeps ticking.  (http://www.latimes.c…)

The sadest part of this is that this hospital is not really what LA needs: the county has long had too many hospital beds and not enough local clinics to meet pressing community needs.  Most recently, the Board of Supervisors and the mis-managed County government allowed the vital resource that is (was!) King-Drew Medical Center to die.  Or rather, they lynched it through years of incompetence–with the effect that thousands of residents in the most impacted communities of LA will now not have health care resources they need. 

Why would the Supervisors back such a nonsensical policy?  Because they see Hospitals as Politically beneficial–lots of union votes and contributions to support their uncontested elections, and the opportunity to grandstand around big buildings, rather than doing the tawdry work needed to actually lead or even just manage the nation’s largest local government. 

Equally important, not all Supevisors are created equally.  While Yvonne Burke snoozes in her Brentwood Hills condo, Gloria Molina, Mike Antonovich and Don Knabe have grabbed all the loot they think they can for their districts.  And Zev Yaroslavsky just waves his arms around, like “what can I do about it?”.  What a mess!

What is the solution?  Not only do we need to through these bums out, we need to change the way LA County is run.  We need a single, clearly accountable County Executive, balanced by a large, part-time County Legislature.  Until then, the self-serving Supes will just keep rolling over the same terrible decisions.