Tag Archives: guns

Sen. Feinstein Isn’t Giving Up on Assault Weapons Ban

Assault weapons ban only garnered 40 votes, but Sen. Feinstein will continue her work on the issue

by Brian Leubitz

Sen. Dianne Feinstein doesn’t always get a lot of love from the progressive community, and some of her good work tends to get lost. But on the issue of gun safety, there aren’t many leaders on par with our senior Senator.

Sen. Feinstein was the primary proponent of the assault weapons ban in 1994, and has been working on reinstating it since it lapsed in 2004. And, unfortunately, she just has not been able to muster up the votes, and even now, post-Newtown, the NRA proved too powerful.

A ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines fell well short of the votes needed to pass the Senate Wednesday, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., vowed to continue her long fight for such legislation.

“I’m disappointed by today’s vote, but I always knew this was an uphill battle,” Feinstein said in a statement after her amendment garnered only 40 votes. “I believe the American people are far ahead of their elected officials on this issue, and I will continue to fight for a renewed ban on assault weapons.”(SacBee)

While some senators were posting tasteless photos on facebook, Sen. Feinstein was continuing her work on gun safety. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, vast majorities of the nation want universal background checks and other provisions of the law. But few leaders have Sen. Feinstein’s tenacity on this issue, or any issue, and that alone is worthy of high praise.

Californians want to reduce gun violence

Field Poll shows string majority want additional gun control measures

By Brian Leubitz

The Field  poll has begun to release their latest data cache, today they focused on gun control. And resoundingly, Californians want to see gun violence reduced. The top line figure is stark: 61% favor stricter gun control, while only 34% want to “protect the rights of gun owners.”

The demographics of support are kind of what you would expect:

A little more than half the state’s male voters support tighter gun control, but the numbers soar to nearly seven of every 10 female voters, according to a Field Poll released today. .

This year’s nearly 2-to-1 support for gun control hides a deep partisan split. Eighty percent of Democrats and 63 percent of independent voters want tighter laws, but 65 percent of Republicans say no. (SacBee)

The California legislature is currently considering several measures but the most major restrictions must come in through the federal government.  And, unfortunately, the Congress seems to be dysfunctional and Republicans are not particularly interested in acting on this issue. Perhaps Congress will hear some of their constituents, but for the time being Sacramento can make a start.

Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

In Brian Leubitz' article “Gun Control and Making Tucson Shooting Even
Scarier” of Tue Jan 25, 2011 at 10:30:00 AM PST , he commented that
Senator Feinstein is considering again advocating limits on magzine sizes.
That's needed.  But that and every other effort from Congress on gun control
are like straws in the wind when we need sledgehammers.  Nobody seems to have
the guts to step up to what is needed: repealing the Right to Keep and Bear
Arms.  A resolution and legislation like the following is needed:
– – –

Phase 1 – The Resolution, Format is from H.J.RES. 438, 102nd Congress::

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States repealing the right to keep and bear arms.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States at any time after the date of its submission for ratification:

'Article–

1. Any right to keep and bear arms, whether under the Second Amendment to this Constitution, or under some pre-existing doctrine of natural law or common law or otherwise, or under Constitution or laws of any State, is repealed.

2. The privilege to keep and bear arms throughout the United States shall be under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.'

Phase 2 – A Tax; Following adoption of the constitutional amendment, a bill to tax:

1. There is imposed an annual tax on each and every firearm in any household as follows:

a. first firearm, $10
b. second firearm, $20
c. third firearm, $30
d. fourth through ninth firearms, $100 each
e. firearms in excess of the ninth, $1,000 each.

2. This tax is assessed and payable on each April 15 for firearms held by a household at the end of the preceding year, to be paid with a schedule listing firearm type, manufacturer and serial number, the schedule submitted along with the tax return of such member of the household as the members of the household may choose, with other members attaching a copy of that schedule to their tax returns as well indicating by which member the tax will be paid. Where firearms are owned by a partnership, if there is only one general partner the arms shall be included with the schedule of that general partner; where there is more than one general partner, the partners shall choose which partner will report the firearms. Where firearms are owned by a corporation, the corporation shall report and pay tax as if it were a household. Where fiscal years do not coincide with calendar years, reporting shall be as of the end of the previous fiscal year. Where firearms are owned by a legitimate museum, the museum shall report the ownership annually as if it were a household, but shall be exempt from the tax except for the penalties in section 4 below.

3. This tax may be avoided by selling the firearm to a licensed gun dealer or by turning the firearm over to an official firearm collection location before December 31 of the prior year. Once a month such collection locations shall turn collected firearms over to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for destruction, except that the Bureau may withhold from destruction such firearms as are of historical interest for later donation to an appropriate museum.

4. Any firearm lost or stolen will incur a $1,000 penalty in the reporting year it was lost or stolen. For any such lost or stolen firearm that is subsequently recovered by the owner that $1,000 penalty shall be rescinded and refunded, except if the firearm has been used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony an additional $1,000 penalty will be imposed.

5. For each firearm sold by a licensed firearm dealer that is subsequently used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony a $1,000 penalty will be imposed against that dealer for each such year in which that firearm was used in such a crime.

6. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Internal Revenue Service shall jointly promulgate regulations for administering this Act.

– – –
In recent years voices have arisen calling for this action: I've been
accumulating links to web articles and lead comments advocating repeal of
the Second Amendment at http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm .

Best wishes, –Mike , Candidate for Congress

October 15, 2007 Blog Roundup

Today’s Blog Roundup is on the flip. Let me know what I missed.

To subscribe by email, click
here and do what comes naturally
.

How a Bill Becomes a Law
(or not)

Ba-Da-Bang!


Other Statewide

Local

Federales

The Rest