Tag Archives: Measure R

Mayor Villaraigosa wants commuter rail now, not decades from now

The heart of Los Angeles is a square bounded by freeways–the 101 to the North, the 110 to the East, the 10 to the South, and the 405 to the West.  I live right in the middle of that square.  And I envision a day where I can get to Sacramento, San Francisco, or San Diego not by driving 20 minutes to the appropriate freeway and then several more hours on that freeway, but rather by stepping outside my front door, walking to the nearest subway station, and taking it to Union Station where I connect with the HSR line right downtown to my destination.

And while the high-speed rail authority is trying to make sure that the long half of the project gets completed while I’m still alive, the City of Los Angeles has been waiting for someone to show that type of initiative.  In November 2008, voters in Los Angeles County overwhelmingly passed Measure R, an additional half-cent sales tax levy to fund a wide variety of transportation projects, but especially a subway to the sea that will serve the Wilshire Corridor commuter lane for all those that live in the East and work in the West.

So what’s the problem?  It’s supposed to take 30 years.  According to the current schedule, I’ll be approaching my 60s by the time I would finally get a chance to hop on a subway here in midtown.  Who knows–maybe they’ll have invented personal teleportation technology by then.

Fortunately, Mayor Villaraigosa doesn’t think that’s acceptable:

The mayor today will unveil an ambitious but politically risky transportation plan that fast-tracks several high-profile rail projects to be completed within the next decade. That’s a big speed-up, because officials have generally been talking about completing them within 30 years.

Villaraigosa has made building more rail a priority of his administration, though he’s the first to admit it’s going to take more than speeches and good intentions to get it done.

“Yes, this is a stretch goal. Yes, this is going to be tough, but I think by now folks shouldn’t count me out,” Villaraigosa said in an interview. “The fact is that this is the most important thing that we can do to alleviate congestion and gridlock, to improve the quality of our air and to really vindicate the people’s will for the need to address transportation.”

Accelerating light rail projects in the City would be one of the best things we could do.  It would create jobs more quickly, it would alleviate traffic, and it would mitigate air pollution.  The problem?  We would need about $10 billion.  But I’ll tell you this much: if there’s a second round of stimulus coming, I can’t think of better ways to spend it than development of light rail in Los Angeles.  The timing is also good because construction costs are lower in bad economic times–if we wait until the economy improves, construction will become concomitantly more expensive.

Of course, I may be just a little biased.

Voters say YES to transit

Among the few bright spots for California races tonight is the fact that tonight, voters said yes to more public transportation.  It was close, but it seems likely.

With 86.4% reporting statewide, Proposition 1A appears headed for passage, with 52.3% in favor.  While the vast bulk of the uncounted areas of the state are in the Inland Empire, which is currently opposing 1A, it just doesn’t seem like there are enough votes out there to reverse the 400,000+ vote advantage that 1A currently enjoys.  Congratulations, California, on taking the next big step toward a high-speed, high-tech transportation future.

Meanwhile, in Los Angeles County, voters seem to have barely approved Measure R, which would raise the sales tax in my county by .5% (one dollar out of every 200 spent) to fund transportation projects, including a subway to the sea and a whole host of other projects.  With 97% reporting, Measure R has 67.35%.  A two-thirds majority is required to pass any tax increase, so R has a cushion of less than one percent.

Eventually, I’ll be able to get from my neighborhood to downtown San Francisco using just two trains: the Purple Line to Union Station, and the HSR.  That’s what I would call pretty cool.

MTA Cutbacks At Precisely The Wrong Moment

Measure R on the Los Angeles ballot would impose a 1/2 cent sales tax on county residents to pay for increased transit lines and services.  This couldn’t come at a more crucial time, as the MTA is poised to become a casualty of the financial crisis:

The next potential victims of the nation’s credit crunch: nearly 1.5 million people who ride buses and trains each weekday in Los Angeles County. Transit officials say riders could soon be facing serious service cuts.

That’s because the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority might have to quickly come up with hundreds of millions of dollars to pay investors under terms of deals it made involving American International Group, the troubled financial and insurance giant.

“I’ve lost a lot of sleep over this,” said Terry Matsumoto, the chief financial service officer and treasurer for the MTA. He said it was “absolutely” certain the agency would have to cut service if the deals sour.

The state is already cutting transit funding in the budget, and sales tax revenues, which already partially fund the MTA, are seizing up, as the economy slows and job loss increases (fortunately unemployment flattened out in September, albeit at 7.7%).

This is not the time for cutbacks in service at the MTA.  Ridership is at record highs, as people both avoid still-high gas prices (historically speaking) and more attention is paid individually to greenhouse gas emissions.  The Air Resources Board just released their final draft for compliance with AB32, and I can’t see how they could possibly reach their goals for greenhouse gas emission cuts without an increase in transit.  That includes passing high-speed rail, of course, but obviously the existing transit structures, can’t be pulled back at this important time.

Speaker Bass has been calling for the Governor to prioritize a federal stimulus package and has also been making noises about a state-based stimulus as well.  That has to include protections for transit concerns like the MTA, and increased funding flowing to them as well.  It’s a job creation engine, an economic sustainability engine, and an engine to a better environment.

We can all do our part in Los Angeles County by passing Measure R as well.