“But” Watch is when you see Republican junior propagandists write letters to the editor, call radio stations, etc. and begin them with, “I’m a Democrat, but…”
I’m a Democrat, but I appreciate that we have an opponent party. It’s too bad that both parties cannot work more harmoniously together. Bi-partisan is a funny word the way it’s usually interpreted…when one party is in the majority, it says that bi-partisanship is for the other to roll over dead.
If it were not for the Republicans, we would be in a worse financial mess than we are with “pork” gong hog wild.Of course, they did not to a very good job of balancing the budget when they were in power under Bush.
More and more “pork” comes to the surface everyday. E.g., BART wants billions to build a not-needed train to the Oakland airport. Or, Fremont wants $385,000 federal dollars to study how to use the about-to-be empty NUMMI plant. If the city fathers and city staff are not capable of doing that, then they should be voted out of office or fired.
It’s interesting the liberal media don’t use the word “pork” anymore; they use the cleaner word: “earmarks;” or , more recently “stimulus.” In any case, it’s all “pork.”
This is from a “Democrat”? Seriously, how many Democrats talk about “the liberal media?”
And considering that Republican deregulation caused the financial crisis this line is astonishing: “If it were not for the Republicans, we would be in a worse financial mess than we are.”
After decades of anti-government speeches claiming that government holds back business, government takes money out of the economy and government is less efficient than corporations, people came to believe that, as Ronald Reagan famously said, “Government is the problem, not the solution.” This led to deregulation and budget cutbacks in all areas including education and infrastructure.
If you think about it, government really is what We, the People want it to be. In a democracy we jointly make decisions about the best way to manage our affairs. So saying that corporations do things better is really an anti-democracy message. What they are saying is that organizations run by a few wealthy elites telling everyone else what to do, with the benefits of everyone’s work mostly going to those few at the top, is a better way to manage society than to have everyone making the decisions and sharing in the results.
As the financial crisis hits, and the fabric of that pro-big business philosophy is shredding the fabric of our society, we can see clearly just how foolish and destructive the right-wing machine has been to our economic, social and political values. (Not to mention cutting off peanut processing plant regulation and inspection, leading to the current situation of 9 dead and hundreds seriously ill across the country. This is just ONE more example of the consequences of right-wing policies.)
Alone those lines, here is an interesting video, making fun of some of the anti-government propaganda we have heard over the last few decades:
Sometime next week California is going to begin running out of money, and instead of sending checks that to people that are owed tax rebates, financial aid, or other forms of state assistance, they will either have their payment delayed or receive an IOU. This will make our recession even worse, and will make it more difficult for the state to begin economic recovery.
The budget crisis has many fathers, but one in particular stands out – Arnold Schwarzengger. For five years he railed against taxes and government spending, and because he failed to lead the state toward a stable budget, California is going broke. Yet the media persists in speaking of Arnold as a strong post-partisan leader. They don’t tell Californians that he is a failure, that he is more responsible than anyone for the IOUs – particularly since he vetoed the Democratic majority vote budget plan that would have finally neutralized the 2/3 rule.
Progressive Californians need to engage in many forms of activism to respond to this crisis – and one of those forms is good old fashioned agitprop. And that’s what the Courage Campaign has done with Arnoldbucks. – our term for the IOUs that are almost inevitably going to be sent soon to Californians.
We made a video that answers the question of “what happens when Californians actually try to use an Arnoldbuck?” The result is frustrating and humorous, and hopefully it can help show Californians that this crisis literally has Arnold’s name all over it. And we also created our own version of the Arnoldbucks for Californians to download, print, and give to their friends.
Obviously the impact of Arnoldbucks, if and when they are actually sent to Californians instead of the payments they are owed, will not always be funny. Disabled families, health care clinics, and schools will be hit extremely hard by the state’s inability to meet its financial obligations. That will require a multifaceted response – including an effort to educate the public as to who is responsible for this mess. Our video campaign is one attempt to do exactly that.
So have a look at our Arnoldbucks video and share it with your friends – and help us push back against a media that refuses to hold Arnold accountable.
Below is the text of the email we sent to our members:
Dear Robert,
Just when you thought it couldn’t get much worse…
California faces financial “Armageddon,” as Arnold Schwarzenegger bluntly stated a few weeks ago. And yet Arnold and his fellow Republicans rejected compromises by Democrats to rescue our state from a catastrophic budget crisis, unparalleled in the history of California.
Because of the ridiculous 2/3rds budget rule — the super-majority required to pass a budget in the California state legislature — and Arnold’s failure to deliver even one vote from a small cabal of obstructionist Republicans, Californians may be getting IOUs in the mail next week instead of financial aid checks or tax refunds.
Many Californians are so overwhelmed by this paralyzing crisis that they’ve just tuned it out. As a result, Arnold is not being held accountable for his failure to lead.
That’s why we decided to try something a bit unorthodox — raise awareness by using humor to highlight the absurdity of these IOU’s, or what we are calling “Arnoldbucks.”
We asked one of our members to see what would happen if he tried to use “Arnoldbucks” as legal tender at a few businesses in the area. You won’t believe what happened. It’s all caught on camera — even a few security cams.
Know a friend who might need a laugh? Share this video with them, download your own Arnoldbucks, then tell us your ideas. We’d love to know what you plan to do with your Arnoldbucks:
