Tag Archives: CT-SEN

DC Insiders Notice CA-10 Primary

From today’s House Race Hotline:

Emboldened by their role in the Dem sweep, liberal bloggers are now targeting Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA 10), a Bay Area centrist, pro-business Dem in the mold of Joe Lieberman.

When Berkeley Bubble wrote on Tauscher, guess who showed up?

And  MyDD’s Matt Stoller gave us a shout out:

Calitics is doing good work tracking Ellen Tauscher (including video).  She’s a real problem for Democrats, and should face a serious challenge.

UPDATE: While DC seems to get it, this is stoopid talking:

But defenders of Tauscher note that Kos and some others in the blogosphere sharply targeted the moderate Lieberman — and got credit for getting him defeated in the Democratic primary — only to find their influence was viewed as profoundly weakened when he was handily re-elected as an independent in the mid-term elections.

Tauscher can’t run as an independent once she loses and it was the same blogs that BEAT LIEBERMAN that also put Tester and Webb over the top. I don’t know who views flipping the senate as “profoundly weakened”  influence, but Marinucci should stop listening to them.

UPDATE II: Ruck Pad goes in-depth on Carla Marinucci

Ellen Tauscher and Joe Lieberman

Considering the fact that Ellen Tauscher is Joe Lieberman’s BFF in congress, it isn’t surprising that Ellen Tauscher is scrubbing Joe Lieberman pics from her website. While this an acknowledgment she is running scared, for some reason Ellen Tauscher is failing to realize why Lieberman was rejected by Democrats in each of the last two cycles.

While the internets have slammed Counterproductive Katie for suggesting the successful primary campaign against Lieberman was misguided, it is Ellen Tauscher herself who has the money quote on Joe Lieberman’s rejection.

From the SF Chronicle, 2-4-2004:

“Joe just couldn’t compete,” said Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Walnut Creek, an early Lieberman supporter.

“I think this is not a rejection of Joe. This is more about satisfying the Democratic desire to have somebody who is going to go out and beat George Bush. He’s just a very, very good man, but he’s not what it’s going to take this time in the voters’ opinions,” Tauscher said.

While Tauscher tries to spin it as an electability issue, there was more to the result than that (and it won’t be an issue facing Tauscher in a safe district).

Because of that campaign, Lieberman was considered a formidable, front- running candidate when he entered the 2004 presidential race late in 2002.

But Lieberman’s presidential candidacy never caught fire, largely because he had been a loyal vote for the war in Iraq and President Bush’s policies on terrorism and homeland security.[…]

In his withdrawal speech, Lieberman acknowledged that his centrist positions may have cost him in the campaign.

Ellen Tauscher can scrub her website all she wants and all it will do is create a backlash. The question is, “Which side of the fence are you on?”

Robin Swanson Derides Netroots

(She’s the Mike McCurry of California. – promoted by SFBrianCL)

From the San Jose Mercury News:

Swanson derided supporters’ glee over the Internet wave washing over the ad.

“Sixteen thousand hits? That’s a drop in the bucket compared to the 4 to 5 million people they’ll need to convince,” Swanson said. “Everyone heralded the netroots as the next great thing, and you saw it propel Howard Dean initially. But when it came to translating it to votes, it didn’t happen.”

The irony is that this story is about an ad from Bill Hillsman and talks about the Lamont campaign, which translated enough votes to win, beating a sitting US Senator.

It really isn’t surprising that Swanson, who is the shill for big insurance and big oil, would bash the netroots.

However, the idea of integrating youtube into campaigns to get exposure is something that is going far beyond politics.

For example, tonight on PBS, Bill Moyers is devoting Now to the topic of public financing of elections. So PBS put a preview on youtube.

The TV insider publication Broadcasting and Cable took notice:

PBS is getting serious about getting more bang for it promotional buck–or make that no buck–via the Internet.

It has set up a “directors account” on YouTube–allowing for longer clips and some other perks–and begun showcasing promos, with a link to the PBS homepage and the show’s site.

PBS President Paula Kerger has said from the get-go that the noncom service needed to be on the cutting edge of getting its programming to where the eyeballs are, and CPB President Patricia Harrison said just this week that programmers “can no longer broadcast to an audience where you last saw them.”

The PBS clips–14 of them so far–include tune-in information, like “check your local listings.”  Kevin Dando, director of education and online communication, for PBS, says it is helping to promote the shows to a huge audience–100 million views a day to all of YouTube. And you can’t beat the price of the screen time: free.

“It’s a great way to get in front of a broad variety of audiences,” Dando says. He points out that the clip promoting a NOW program on “clean elections” is now among the top-50 most viewed recent video posts to the site with 13,600 views to date.

“It’s where the market is headed,” he says.

To increase the chances of getting noticed, PBS loads the clip with tags so that it will come up on a variety of searches–for the NOW show, the tags were “NOW,” “PBS,” “votes,””sale campaigns,” “democracy,” “clean elections,” “election,” “proposition 89,” “vote voting.”

Indeed, it is where the market is headed. Which makes Robin Swanson look extremely out of touch when she bashes us.

The Merc News story quoting Swanson also had some other quotes, from people who actually understand politics:

“I don’t know if we’ll pull this off,” said Bill Hillsman, who created the ad and is the media consultant for Connecticut senatorial candidate Ned Lamont’s insurgent campaign against Sen. Joe Lieberman, “but if the spot goes out enough, people will say this is how I feel, and if for no other reason but this, I’ll go out and vote.”

Joe Trippi, the San Jose State University graduate who helped revolutionize the convergence of politics and the Internet as former presidential candidate Howard Dean’s campaign manager in 2004, said the ad “really captures” the mood of the voter.

“It’s the perfect spot,” said Trippi, a consultant to the Proposition 89 campaign. “It helps create the echo chamber between the Internet and TV that it will need to make that big move. This is getting moved around pretty virally right now.” […]

“We’ve learned from working with underdog and insurgency campaigns that if you do an ad that people are watching (on the Internet),” Hillsman said, “you get a multiplier effect that makes it three to five times worth the amount you paid for it.”

Hillsman’s ad campaign for Lamont was the first political effort to tap into the YouTube phenomenon. YouTube, which was recently acquired by Google, is one of the largest and fastest-growing free video sharing Web sites.

If you haven’t yet, check out the ad and use our tools to email it to your friends.

And check out the youtube promo for tonight’s PBS special on public financing (which I recommend watching).

Bringing the CT-SEN Spin to CA.

(More Lamont spin…this time from the GOP – promoted by SFBrianCL)

It didn’t take long for the Lamont spin to make its way into California politics.  Let’s take a look at what they’re saying. (in the Contra Costa Times.

…on the flip.

If Democrats want ultraliberals to speak for their party, “they risk the (presidential) election of 2008,” said California GOP spokesman Patrick Dorinson. “A slice of Democratic voters in a blue state like Connecticut bought it, but I don’t think that message sells across America.”

It’s just too bad Dorinson is a California GOP spokesman and not one from Utah, one of the few remaining states where Bush has a positive net approval rating.

First of all, this is typiacl of any spin: they hide the premises so that when they make their conclusions sound reasonable.

If ultraliberals were in fact taking over the Democratic party, it would be a concern for 2008.  Lamont isn’t an “ultraliberal.”  There’s problem number one.  Second, Lamont’s position on the war agrees with 60% of Americans, something pointed out in the article.

And the war is not popular in California, and neither is Bush. 

“…the state’s GOP described the outcome as symptom of a party out of touch with middle America.”

Again, unfortunately, this is the Left Coast, not middle America.  Maybe they should worry about how it plays here!

I don’t give Angelides much chance in this election.  If he’s going to make a run at it, he’ll need to confuse Arnold and Bush, which shouldn’t be that hard.  Part of doing that would be to reverse this spin.

P.S. Send an email to Lisa Vorderbrueggen complimenting her on that article.  She actually consulted experts (ie REPORTED) instead of just copying down the he said she said.