Tag Archives: myths

Public Sector Employment in California: Myths and Facts

As part of an on-going dialog with a right-wing, anti-government acquaintance, I recently wrote this collection of myths and facts about California public sector employment from information in two recent Sacramento columns, both cited at the end.  I assume reporting was accurate.  

California Public Employment:  Myths vs. Facts

Submitted by Walt Schafer

Myth:  State government costs have ballooned in recent years relative to the state’s total economy.

Facts:  In 1977 state government consumed 6.6% of the state’s economy.  In 2010 that figure is 5.6%.

Myth:  The number of state employees has grown out of control over time and compared with other states.

Facts: 4o years ago, there were 9.1 state employees per 1000 state residents.  30 years ago, that figure was 9.5.  In the coming year, there will be 8.9 state employees for every 1000 state residents.   In 2008, California ranked fourth lowest among all states in the ratio of state employees to state population (28% below national average)

Myth:  State spending is at an all-time high relative to residents’ earnings.  

Facts: For each $100 Californians earn, the state spends $7.44.  That spending number has been this low only four times in the past three decades.  The cost of general fund programs (e.g., public schools, health, social services) hasn’t been as low as now ($5.19 for each $100 Californians earn) since 1973.

Myth: Public schools and higher education take an ever-growing share of state taxes.

Facts: Now public schools take only slightly more of the state budget (43.6%) as in 1998 (42.7%).   Public universities’ share of the state budget is slightly lower now (7.5%) than in 1998 (8.6%).  Meanwhile, state prisons ‘ share of the state budget has grown from 7% in 1998 to 11% now.

Myth: Welfare is eating up more and more of the state budget.

Facts: Welfare consumed 3% of the state budget in 1998.  That figure now is 2.4%.

Myth: The number of California public employees continues to grow at a faster rate than population growth.

Facts:  Between March 2008 and October 2009, the number of local and state employees declined by 70,000 while population increased by approximately 600,000.

Myth: State employees are not sacrificing like private sector employees.

Facts: Take-home pay for the same job classifications has declined by 44% over the past 15 years for California state employees (adjusting for inflation) as a result of pay cuts, increased medical insurance costs for employees, and furloughs.  Excluding furloughs, the decline has still been 30%.

Myth: State employees in California are no more educated than private sector employees and, hence, should be paid no more than private sector workers.

Facts: Public employees in California are more than twice as likely to hold a college degree or more compared with private sector employees (48% vs. 23%).

Myth: Public employees in California get way more total benefit packages, including pay, than private sector employees.  

Facts: California state and local employees earn less than private sector counterparts even when including retirement, health care, and other benefits.  Specifically, total compensation for public employees is 6.8% lower than for comparable private sector employees.

(Sources:  Dan Morain, Sacramento Bee, 5/13/2010, p. A13. and Peter Brand, Sacramento Bee, 7/06/2010. P. A9))

Tracking Republican Myth That Business Are Leaving Because Of Taxes

This post originally appeared at Speak Out California.

I looked around and found that “businesses are leaving the state because of taxes” is one of those drumbeats that the corporate conservatives are using.  (Also, FYI the wealthy are leaving, too, parking their yachts in Salt Lake I guess.)

I wrote about this myth the other day, basically you pay taxes on profits and you certainly don’t pack up and leave profits behind.  I wrote,

Oh, one more thing for the slower-thinking Republicans out there: profits are a good thing, not a bad thing.  And when you are making a profit the last thing you do is pack up your business and leave behind the circumstances that enabled making that profit.

So I looked around for “businesses are leaving the state” articles.  Here are a few:

A Republican member of the Assembly writes, Governmental Restrictions, High Taxes Driving Businesses & Jobs Out Of California.

Oops, the example company didn’t leave, it started in Nevada, and it wasn’t because of taxes it was because they wanted “freedom” to dump toxins into the environment.

Businesses and wealthy individuals flee state because of taxes.

Oops this is another company that started in Nevada.  This time it was an income tax avoidance scheme where Californians set up the company in Nevada – but still live here.  So it’s a PO box, not employees, etc.

This one quotes a Republican Party official,

“The high cost of living that continues to force Californians out of state should serve as a powerful reminder of the effect high taxes are having on our society,” said Ron Nehring, the Republican state party chairman.

But doesn’t give any examples, and in fact shows how California has very favorable business conditions, credits, and is the only state that doesn’t ask oil companies to pay for the oil they take.

California’s High Taxes and Burdensome Regulations Drive People and Businesses Away — scary title, lots of scary words, but no examples of businesses actually leaving the state.

Another Company Leaving California because of High Taxes, Regulations  – Oops, this one is leaving the state because they want to pollute the air, not because of taxes.  Nice title, though. Scary.

We went through a flurry of this a few years ago, too.  Did any leave then? Let’s see what we can find.

Companies Can’t Leave CA Fast Enough – A title insurer left the state.  The 2003 article doesn’t explain why but mentions retail energy rates.  Remember Enron, Bush, all that?

California proves too costly for departing businesses,

Coast Converters is spending $800,000 to move to Las Vegas, but the Los Angeles plastic bag manufacturer will save enough on workers’ compensation, electricity and other costs to recover that in less than a year, CEO Mitchell Greif says.

“It’s really an unfair business practice to allow companies to move to Nevada and sell into California,” Greif says. “But I’m doing it.”

Nope, not taxes.  And how do you like living in the desert, Mitchell?  Another 2003 electricity-costs thing.  You want deregulation?  Deregulating energy costs worked out great, no?

Nation’s Business.  Oops, the headlines are misleading, they are leaving because of costs.  Yes, it costs more to live here because people are coming here, not leaving.  Also,

… 10 percent of the 90 Southern California companies responding said they

“definitely” plan to move some or all operations from California within a year, and an additional 13 percent said they would “probably” do so.

OOPS, this one is from 1993, before the huge business boom.  Sorry.  I guess all the businesses left California.  Oh, wait…

Wait, here are some more articles:

New York’s Taxes Send People and Businesses Out Of State — Maybe they’re coming here.

Are Millionaires Leaving Maryland to Escape Higher Taxes? — Maybe they are passing California’s millionaires going the other way.

Leaving Oregon, and its taxes, behind

Executives say firms may leave state if computer services levy is not repealed (Maryland)

Poll shows many mull leaving state (Buffalo)

NY’s High Taxes Drive Small Business Away, Too

I guess all the businesses are leaving ALL the states!

Click through to Speak Out California

Republican Myth: Businesses Leave CA Because Of Taxes

This post originally appeared at Speak Out California

Republicans like to claim that businesses leave California because of having to pay taxes.

I used to own and run a business, and I have some news for Republicans:  Businesses only pay taxes on profits.  You don’t pay taxes unless you are making a profit.  Paying taxes means you are making a profit.  Making a profit is a good thing, and California businesses pay a small percentage of the profits to the state to help cover the expenses that enabled you to make that profit.

I’m not sure how many different ways I can say it.  You pay taxes after you make a profit.  At the end of the year you add up your revenue and you subtract your expenses and other deductions and then you know what your profit is.

Oh, one more thing for the slower-thinking Republicans out there: profits are a good thing, not a bad thing.  And when you are making a profit the last thing you do is pack up your business and leave behind the circumstances that enabled making that profit.

I understand that Republicans hate government and are enraged by the idea of actually giving something back to the community to help pay for the roads, bridges, courts, police and fire protection, educated citizenry and the other parts of the state’s infrastructure that created the environment that led to the ability to make a profit.  Yes, they hate that.  I understand.

But the fact is that businesses do not pack up and leave when they are making profits.  So if Republicans want to trick people into supporting tax cuts for the big companies that shelled out so much cash put them in office they really do need to come up with better stories than trying to claim that businesses pack up and leave the state because they are making too much profit.

Click through to Speak Out California