Tag Archives: Mercury

How Many Insurance Executives Does It Take to Own $12 Million Worth of Homes?

If, out of some prurient curiosity, you ever wondered how an insurance executive lives, check out the house Mercury Insurance CEO Gabe Tirador bought soon after taking over the reins in 2007 (and about a year before laying off 363 employees).  Of course, CEO's houses are bubkis compared with the Chairmen.  That's where the real square footage is.  Mercury's founding Chairman lives in a Los Angeles palace, also pictured at our new StopTheSurcharge.org website, which pulls back the veil on these executives and their effort to add a new surcharge to California car insurance premiums for anyone who didn't have auto insurance at some point in the past five years.  Even if they didn't have a car!

 The site will keep updated tabs on Mercury's attempt to raise car insurance rates as well as the goings-on of these executives who are, not surprisingly, completely out of touch with what it means to be dealing with the economic realities of most Californians.  There is info on how this initiative is scrooging soliders as well as info on the front groups Mercury is deploying to pitch their scam.

And you can be sure there is more to come, since we're dealing with an insurance company described by state regulators this way:

Mercury's lengthy history of serious misconduct, and its attitude – contempt towards and/or abuse of its customers, the Commissioner, its competition, and the Superior Court – are all relevant to determining the penalty needed to best ensure the protection of the public from future violations and wrongdoing…

Among Department [of Insurance] staff, consumer attorneys, and consumer victims of its bad faith, Mercury has a deserved reputation for abusing its customers and intentionally violating the law with arrogance and indifference.*

*The statement came in a brief submitted by the Department of Insurance in February 2009 in response to a motion by Mercury to exclude evidence of the company's past conduct. See key pages from that brief here. See, particularly, page 4.

 

Mercury Insurance Submits Sigs to Raise Car Insurance Rates

Mercury Insurance is in the process of submitting its signatures to place a deceptive measure on the June or November ballot that would raise insurance premiums on California drivers. This is another one of those initiatives funded entirely by a self-serving company (all $4.5 million to the campaign come from Mercury) that will use its endless amount of money to try and trick voters into paying more for car insurance.

The measure would allow Mercury and every other insurer to penalize Californians who want car insurance but have had a lapse in coverage anytime in the past five years. The penalty, which would amount to hundreds of dollars, would be imposed whether or not the person was driving when they didn't have insurance.  (Can you even buy car insurance if you don't have a car?)

In the wake of this nasty recession, there are too many people who will face a major penalty when they try to get back on their feet and  into their car (and the insurance market), if this passes.  Some of the types of folks to face Mercury's car insurance surcharge are:

*A senior citizen who stops driving for several months after surgery would be penalized when she tries to restart insurance coverage.

*A soldier serving on base in the United States would be penalized when he returns to civilian life in California and needs auto insurance again.

*A family whose coverage was canceled after missing just one auto insurance payment would be penalized even if they tried to restart coverage immediately after they were canceled.

*Anyone who gives up driving for public transportation or to bike to work would be penalized when they need a car and insurance again.

As Iraq War veteran Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org  said: “Penalizing troops with higher rates while in service to their country is beyond the pale. I don't understand why an insurance company should be allowed to charge service members higher auto insurance premiums just because they may have decided that they didn't need a car while living on base. There’s something wrong with an initiative on the ballot that says that it’s ok to surcharge our troops and I hope Californians feel the same way.”

When millions of Californians are penalized when they try to buy auto insurance, the number of uninsured motorists on California roads will go up and everyone’s premiums will increase as a result.

In pressing for this initiative, Mercury is launching a deceptive campaign meant to hide the proposal's inherent attack on families struggling in these tough times. When the California Court of Appeal invalidated a virtually identical 2003 Mercury-sponsored law, the Court, citing the Department of Insurance's senior actuary, ruled that Mercury's proposal “would result in a surcharge equal to a 40 percent increase in premium for…policyholders who do not qualify for the 'continuous insurance' discount.”

Mercury Insurance is the Sole Funder of Initiative but is Hiding Behind a Front Group.

The proposed initiative is solely funded by Mercury Insurance, California's third largest auto insurer, which has provided $4.5 million to the campaign to date. Mercury has set up a front group, Californians for Fair Auto Insurance Rates or CAL-FAIR, in an effort to ensure that the news media have no access to Mercury's CEO Gabe Tirador and its billionaire Chairman George Joseph. (Those two guys: not so worried about the economy or their car insurance premium!) Mercury's executives cannot honestly explain their initiative without acknowledging that millions of Californians will pay higher premiums if it passes, so they have set up a firewall to deflect any questions towards their public relations consultants.

Mercury execs are also afraid of being asked about their company's long history of lying to voters, regulators and the courts.  In fact, The CA Department of Insurance described Mercury  as an abusive anti-consumer company, in an official filing made in a Department action against the company earlier this year. The Department wrote:

Mercury's lengthy history of serious misconduct, and its attitude – contempt towards and/or abuse of its customers, the Commissioner, its competition, and the Superior Court – are all relevant to determining the penalty needed to best ensure the protection of the public from future violations and wrongdoing… Among Department [of Insurance] staff, consumer attorneys, and consumer victims of its bad faith, Mercury has a deserved reputation for abusing its customers and intentionally violating the law with arrogance and indifference.

A copy of the Department filing can be found here. (See page four, in particular.)

The Campaign for Consumer Rights, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization is working with consumer groups, seniors, unions and soldiers to oppose Mercury's deceptive initiative. Campaign for Consumer Rights is the campaign affiliate of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Consumer Watchdog.

###

AP Report: Mercury Pollution in Central Valley

The Associated Press reports that abandoned mercury mines in the western hills of the Central Valley are still polluting California’s streams, lakes, the delta and the bay. Sources are widespread, located from Clear Lake in the north to the San Joaquin River in the south. Even the hills near San Jose have mines that drain to south San Francisco Bay.

Read the Story at http://tinyurl.com/mq96a6

Crap. As if we didn’t have enough to worry about. I thought this only happened in Appalachia.  

California once produced 90% of the nation’s mercury. Much of it went to the Sierras during the gold rush, where it was spilled into local waterways. Mining ceased decades ago. but there are at least 550 known mines. Some estimates put the total as high 2,000.

Everybody who eats Pacific fish is affected by this, but the impact is hardest on Native American tribes, who live on or near the old mine sites, and the Central Valley’s poor, who engage more in subsistence fishing in streams nearer to the sources.

Mercury gets into our environment from many sources: Coal burning power plants, cement kilns, discarded thermometers, rainfall tainted by air pollution from Asia. Mercury taken up and stored by plants gets released during forest fires too. California isn’t the only place where this happens. A USGS study completed in 2005 found measurable levels of mercury in fish taken from 290 streams across the U.S. One quarter of those had unsafe levels.

The headline of the current AP story is, “Government Stands by as Mercury Taints Water”. Good work fellas – wait until the Democrats are in charge before you spring this.

The cleanup of old mines depends largely on the Federal Government pressing the mine owners with legal action. Such actions dropped by 70% during the BushCo years. Here in California, so many mines have been abandoned for so long, that the only property owner left to go after is a beleaguered cattle rancher.

California Democrats put mercury on the warning labels created by Prop-65. We banned the sale of new mercury thermostats in 2006, and legislation creating a statewide recycling program (AB 2347, Ira Ruskin) was signed by the Governor last April.

The largest Superfund site in the U.S. is the Sulphur Bank mercury mine at Clear Lake. I’d like to see many more sites designated. Cleanup work might even contribute some  economic stimulus to rural California. We have got to protect our water.