Fighting and the Home-front

One of the main arguments in favor of the War in Iraq is that we need to fight terrorists over there so we are safe back at home.  This week proves the fallacy of such an argument on two fronts.  The terrorists are still here.  Thankfully, law enforcement did its job and they were caught in time.  Then came the heated discussion over National Guard preparedness.

Kansas Gov. Sebelius took the President to task over the slow and limited response to the deadly tornado.  Now two wildfires in California have prompted legitimate fears that it could happen here too.  Our National Guard is stretched to the limit and only has half of the equipment it needs.  We are missing about $1 billion worth of trucks, generators, GPS units and other crucial equipment for disaster response.  If we get a major disaster we will be in real trouble.

Chron:

In California, half of the equipment the National Guard needs is not in the state, either because it is deployed in Iraq or other parts of the world or because it hasn’t been funded, according to Lt. Col. John Siepmann. While the Guard is in good shape to handle small-scale incidents, “our concern is a catastrophic event,” he said.

“You would see a less effective response (to a major incident),” he said.

The drought this year has increased the risk of fire, something that became very apparent when Griffith Park and Catalina caught on fire.  We are due for another major Bay Area earthquake any time now.  It is not a question of if, but when the next one will strike.  We are gambling that it will not happen while the Guard is under-equipped.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger also acknowledged the National Guard’s equipment woes and attributed them to the war. National Guard policy has required that much of the equipment that goes with units to Iraq stays there.

“A lot of equipment has gone to Iraq, and it doesn’t come back when the troops come back,” Schwarzenegger said Thursday at a news conference in Sacramento, where he was asked about the National Guard. “So this is one thing we have been talking about, how do we get this equipment back as quickly as possible in case we need it, and we also need it for training.”

It’s not like Arnold has not known the problem existed before this week.  This should have been addressed a long time ago, when we first started sending the Guard overseas.  But no, it takes until we are on the precipice of a crisis for them to get their rears in gear.  The amount of missing gear is tremendous.  Lives could be lost because of their absence, in the event of a serious emergency.

The California National Guard is missing about $1 billion worth of equipment of all types, according to a Guard listing provided to The Chronicle. Much of the equipment would be useful in handling events like electricity blackouts, earthquakes or other emergencies.

For example, guidelines suggest the Guard should have 39 diesel generators on hand, but it has none. Guidelines suggest having 1,410 of a certain type of Global Positioning Satellite device; the Guard has none of those.

Some of the equipment is in Iraq, Afghanistan or other parts of the world — 209 vehicles, including 110 humvees and 63 military trucks that could be used to transport troops or supplies, are out of the state. The Guard has only 62 percent of the vehicles it believes it needs in California.

Other equipment has not been funded by the federal government, which provides virtually all of the National Guard’s budget.

Gear is getting worn down quickly in Iraq and they have been cannibalizing stocks at home to make up for it, making the situation even worse.  They cannot magically make the gear appear.  Replacing it will take time, especially the heavy vehicles.  Generators and GPS units should come quicker.  That is, if Schwarzenegger can get Bush to do something about the situation.  I am not holding my breath.

CA-45: Mary Bono’s misgivings fail to turn into action

Mary Bono likes to talk the talk. I mean she’s hoodwinked the Human Rights Campaign into believing that she supports LGBT rights, and her consitituents into believing that she’s some sort of “maverick.” She doesn’t and she’s not.

Mary Bono claims some misgivings over Iraq, or at least she says so:

I would like to make clear that I have grave reservations regarding the current situation in Iraq. For too long, circumstances have limited our ability to reduce the sectarian violence plaguing this region, especially in Baghdad. It is critical that we see a greater commitment from the Iraqi government and the citizens of Iraq to help quell the insurgency. I question whether or not this increased level of force will accomplish the desired goal but I also respect the need to explore all options to stabilize the situation in this troubled country. My hope is that General Petraeus, given his extensive direct experience in training our troops on the ground, will have a strong sense of what can be achieved on the ground given the challenges of the future.  (Floor Speech 2/16/07)

Well, give me her misgivings and a pile of pocket lint will get you a firestarter.  And that’s about it.  She knows how to say the right things, but simply never delivers on her promises to actually change the course of, well anything.  She’s a lockstep Republican.  On Progressive Punch, she gets a stellar 10.57, that puts her a smidge more progressive than James Sensenbrenner, but less progressive than Brian Bilbray (14.87) and far less progressive than the most progressive Republican Chris Shays (31.27).

And what do you know, she walked lockstep with the Republican party in rejecting the McGovern Amendement.  Ms. Bono is no John Duncan, Jr, who joined the Dems in demanding a redeployment. Ms. Bono is selling us a bill of goods.

AD 71: Cry Me a River, Todd Spitzer

Poor Mr. Republican Insider Jubal. His good friend Todd Spitzer has been asked to move from his current office into a smaller office, since other Assembly Members are in need for larger offices to house larger staff. However, good ol’ Jubal won’t take the simple and logical explanation… No, this whole damn thing is one big, evil conspiracy of Fabian Nunez to punish poor Todd Spitzer for not “coddling to criminals” like all the evil left-wing extremists who control the Capitol!

You just have to see Matt/Jubal’s wild rant at Red County/OC Blog to believe it.

OC Register’s Brian Joseph has a series of posts about whether or not Assemblyman Todd Spitzer is being punished by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez — here, here, here and here.

Spitzer was moved from a 758-square foot office to one that is 391-square feet (known as “the doghouse” and “the closet”, but Nunez’s office denies Spitzer is being punished and but claim the move is to accommodate other lawmakers who want bigger offices.

Yeah.

I’ll bet the latter is an excuse to engage in the former.

Oh, please. I think Chris Prevatt does a better job of putting things into perspective at The Liberal OC.

Red County’s all a buzz, and Jubal’s panties are all in a bunch, over Assemblymember Spitzer’s assignment of new quarters. It seems that Speaker Nunez needed to assign larger quarters to a member with a larger staff than Spitzer. So to that end, Spitzer was downsized to smaller quarters.

The Republicans are screaming that Spitzer is being punished, for opposing the Speaker on some legislative issues. If that were the case, I think the move would have occurred long ago. Speaking out against Democrats and the Speaker is nothing new for Spitzer, and last I checked there was no recent power shift in the Assembly.

Anyway, I cannot understand all the fuss. I thought Republicans endorsed the downsizing of government. I guess that theory doesn’t hold true in when it is applied to one of their own.

Yes, what’s so bad about downsizing? I thought that Republicans love the idea of shrinking government. Oh wait, they don’t anymore? I guess that’s why they’re so angry about Todd Spitzer’s leaner, meaner, more efficient, and less wasteful office. ; )

Old and Evil Takes a Hit – Republicans Eat Their Young

In a message to the media today, Chula Vista City Councilman Steve Castaneda accused new Chula Vista Mayor Cheryl Cox, San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis, and the entire old guard of the San Diego Republican Party (including Mayor Cox’s husband, Board of Supervisors member Greg Cox) of conspiring to run him out of office and/or destroy his life.

I guess maybe Democrats aren’t the only ones who chafe when the fresh blood doesn’t get a fair shot huh?

Castaneda was a candidate in last year’s primary for Chula Vista mayor to unseat incumbent Steve Padilla (who came out while mayor to notable fanfare and scorn).  The primary, and the runoff general election, was eventually won by Cheryl Cox.

Now Castaneda is coming out angry.  He’s been investigated for three different matters since last March and subpoenaed three times to appear before a grand jury.  In his statement, Castaneda said “I’m up for re-election in 2008 and I’m sure that the Coxes and their political allies would like nothing better than for me to run with a cloud over my head or flat-out resign.”

Among other interesting tidbits is the way he ties the old-school power network of San Diego County together, not entirely unlike his mailer last year depicting Cheryl Cox as a spider in the center of a web of consultant fees:

Castaneda said that Dumanis is part of the county’s “old power structure” that also includes Cheryl Cox’s husband, County Supervisor Greg Cox – who has budget authority over the District Attorney’s Office, he said.

Finally, the intrigue goes still deeper as Castaneda tries to retract “privileged” information:

In a subsequent e-mail, he retracted the sentence stating that O’Toole threatened to charge him with a felony if he didn’t resign.

“The mistake was not made by Steve Castaneda, but rather the assistant that prepared the release not knowing that information may be deemed privileged,” the e-mail stated.

Obviously, there’s a lot more than meets the eye going on in San Diego County, and not a lot of it would surprise the folks of Calitics.  But there’s not nearly enough light being shone on all the backroom deals and string-pulling from both parties in this county to keep a lid on messaging and ensure that they get the candidates and the issues they prefer.  I don’t know how much truth there is to this personal vendetta against Councilman Castaneda, but I know that any discussion about the way politics happens in San Diego is good.  I hope this pisses some people off.

From the comments: McNerney Town Hall

UPDATE: As pointed out in the comments, this is a “Congressman at your corner” event. So more meet and greet than town hall. But, still good times.

You know, I wrote a big long parable with a bunch of metaphors, but then decided to pull back from it.  The hazards of blogging sometimes.  Nonetheless, I’m still trying to sort out my feelings on this whole McGovern Bill.  But, perhaps one way to deal with it, at least for those who live in the Bay Area, is to talk with the Congressman about it.  This Saturday, he’ll be having a town hall meeting, so perhaps this is your chance to talk about it.

Mountain House
Saturday, May 12
Mountain House Fire Department Station #98
911 Tradition Way
Mountain House, CA 95391
2 p.m. to 3 p.m.

As ErinSikorsky pointed out in the comments, he cosponsored the Lee/Woolsey bill.  So, there’s a lot left to talk about.

CA-46: Crazy Dana & the Taliban

(Photo courtesy of OC Weekly)

Yes, you heard me right: Dana Rohrabacher has had a VERY LONG HISTORY of being a little too close to Islamist extremists in the Middle East. Now why should this worry us? Perhaps because Dana Rohrabacher can’t really determine who are our real friends and who are our enemies? Perhaps because Dana Rohrabacher shouldn’t be making important foreign policy decisions on our behalf in Washington if he can’t even tell right from wrong?

Don’t believe me? Follow me after the flip for the whole sorted story…

(Cross-posted at Ditch Crazy Dana)

Here’s an oldie-but-goodie from the November/December 1996 issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs:

The potential rise to power of the Taliban does not alarm Rohrabacher, because the Taliban could provide stability in an area where chaos was creating a real threat to the U.S. Rohrabacher says that under the previous situation Afghanistan was becoming a major source of drugs and a haven for terrorists “an anarchistic state of narco-terrorism.” In contrast, the Taliban leaders have already shown that they intend to establish a disciplined, moral society.

Rohrabacher calls the sensational media reporting of the “harsh” imposition of strict Islamic behavior, with the underlying implication that this somehow threatens the West, “nonsense.” He says the Taliban are devout traditionalists, not terrorists or revolutionaries, and, in contrast to the Iranians, they do not seem intent on exporting their beliefs. Rohrabacher would have preferred to see a negotiated compromise among the various factions (but with no role for Gulbuddin Hekmatyar) rather than a bloody confrontation. But in the absence of such a compromise, he believes a Taliban takeover would be a positive development.

Still don’t believe me? Crazy Dana probably violated the law to meet with Taliban officials in Qatar in 2001. Here’s an oldie-but-REALLY-goodie from Talking Points Memo from August 2002:

[…] In April 2001, Rohrabacher travelled to Doha, Qatar to attend a conference on “Free Markets and Democracy.” While there, he met with a Taliban delegation led by Muttawakil. Al Jazeera reported that the two discussed Osama bin Laden, the situation of women and civil liberties. Rohrabacher told Agence France Presse that the conversation was “frank and open.” And he told the Associated Press that Muttawakil’s response to his plan was “thoughtful and inquisitive.”

Now the Logan Act prohibits private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. But that’s a rather technical matter. So let’s pass over that for the moment.

It turns out there’s more. The Muttawakil meeting was attended by several members of the United States Congress, according to AP and AFP reports. Who those other members of Congress were is not clear. They don’t seem to be jumping forward. Who are they? I’d like to know.

Still more interesting are the two groups who sponsored Rohrabacher’s trip: the Egypt International Forum and the Islamic Institute. Those who follow Republican politics will recognize the Islamic Institute as the group Republican power broker Grover Norquist established to help corral American Muslims into the Republican party. Norquist has been a close friend and political ally of Karl Rove for a couple decades and he is now a close advisor to President Bush.

OK, so you still don’t believe me? Check out this scary story from OC Weekly. And what makes this so scary is that it’s all true.

As a speechwriter and special assistant to President Ronald Reagan, Rohrabacher played a key role in the late 1980s getting money and arms, including U.S.-made Stinger missiles, to Afghan holy warriors, then at war with the Soviet Union. He once bragged of being “certainly a major player” in a coalition inside the White House that supported anyone “opposing Communist domination around the world.” In November 1988, he even visited the Afghan front lines during a five-day hike with an armed mujahideen patrol in eastern Afghanistan. Among those fighters he encountered, he later recalled, were “Saudi Arabians under a crazy commander named bin Laden.” […]

A veteran U.S. foreign-policy expert told the Weekly, “If Dana’s right-wing fans knew the truth about his actual, working relationship with the Taliban and its representatives in the Middle East and in the United States, they wouldn’t be so happy.” […]

Evidence of Rohrabacher’s attempts to conduct his own foreign policy became public on April 10, 2001, not in the U.S., but in the Middle East. On that day, ignoring his own lack of official authority, Rohrabacher opened negotiations with the Taliban at the Sheraton Hotel in Doha, Qatar, ostensibly for a “Free Markets and Democracy” conference. There, Rohrabacher secretly met with Taliban Foreign Minister Mullah Wakil Ahmed Muttawakil, an advisor to Mullah Omar. Diplomatic sources claim Muttawakil sought the congressman’s assistance in increasing U.S. aid-already more than $100 million annually-to Afghanistan and indicated that the Taliban would not hand over bin Laden, wanted by the Clinton administration for the fatal bombings of two American embassies in Africa and the USS Cole. For his part, Rohrabacher handed Muttawakil his unsolicited plans for war-torn Afghanistan. “We examined a peace plan,” he laconically told reporters in Qatar.

To this day, the congressman has refused to divulge the contents of his plan. However, several diplomatic sources say it’s likely he asked the extremists to let former Afghan King Zahir Shah return as the figurehead of a new coalition government. In numerous speeches before and after Sept. 11, Rohrabacher has claimed the move would help stabilize Afghanistan for an important purpose: the construction of an oil pipeline there. In return, the plan would reportedly have allowed the Taliban to maintain power until “free” elections could be called.

The idea was outlandish and even provocative. Though he is a member of the same ethnic tribe as the Taliban leadership, the 87-year-old exiled former king-who lost his throne in 1973-is known not for his appreciation of democracy, but for his coziness to Western corporate interests. With good reason, he was considered a U.S. puppet by the Taliban.

Actually, why should ANY OF US be happy with the fact that our member of Congress has had such a close working relationship with CRAZED TERRORISTS?! Why should any of us be happy with the fact that Crazy Dana Rohrabacher would agree to give more aid to a government harboring known terrorists? Why should any of us be happy with the fact that Crazy Dana was once comfortable with the Taliban continuing to hide Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan? Why should we be happy with the fact that Crazy Dana had once felt all that sympathy for the Taliban for so long, yet he now simply tries to deny that any of this ever happened?

This should trouble all of us. Dana Rohrabacher tried to unilaterally alter US foreign policy in order to make a deal with a government known to harbor terrorists. Dana Rohrabacher just could not give up his own old sympathies for his old mujahideen buddies, even after everyone else had realized that they were never really the “freedom fighters” that they had claimed to be. And if Dana Rohrabacher still can’t deal with this mistake now, then how can we expect him to learn from other grave mistakes?

Shouldn’t we be at least a little concerned about Crazy Dana and his very scary friends?

Second Verse, Same As The First

You may remember that John Doolittle stepped down from his seat on the House Appropriations Committee because of the ongoing scandal into his ties with convicted felon Jack Abramoff.

The GOP leadership, sensing that there’s an almost unlimited well of corrupt California Republicans who can replace Doolittle, decided to call up one from the minors.

Yesterday, the House Republican Steering Committee voted to seat Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) on the Appropriations Committee, “filling the vacancy left by embattled Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA),” who is under investigation by the FBI for his longstanding ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Named one of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington’s “20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress,” Calvert has a history of abusing his power just as much as Doolittle.

This is part of the Law of Conservation of Conservative Californians – corrupt GOP Congressmen from this state can neither be created or destroyed, always remaining in equilibrium.  Until we retire them.

Calvert’s rap sheet on the flip…

Made huge personal profits off his own earmark. Calvert pushed through an earmark to secure over $9 million for freeway and commercial development near property he owned in California. After the development of the area, Calvert sold his property for a 79 percent profit.

Personal firm received commission from earmark. “In another deal, a group of investors bought property a few blocks from the site of a proposed interchange, for $975,000. Within six months, after the earmark for the interchange was appropriated, the parcel of land sold for $1.45 million. Rep. Calvert’s firm received a commission on the sale.”

Rewarded K Street firm under investigation with pork projects. The Copeland Lowery lobbying firm is currently “enmeshed in a federal investigation of Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA).” “Rep. Calvert has helped pass through at least 13 earmarks sought by Copeland Lowery in 2005, adding up to over $91 million.” The lobbying firm has been Calvert’s largest campaign contributor.

Traveled to Saudi Arabia with convicted Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-CA) in 2004. They were accompanied by Thomas Kontogiannis, an alleged co-conspirator in the Cunningham controversy.

And Calvert is rewarded for this sterling record by getting his hands closer to the earmark cookie jar, on Appropriations.  I’m guessing he won’t be able to help himself.

Avalon Saved from the Flames

As mentioned last night, the island of Catalina is burning, and reports this morning speak of “ash falling like snow.”  It sounds like this was really an impressive showing of firefighting capacity, as this fire was raging out of control yesterday:

At least 160 firefighters, aided by four water-dropping helicopters and three retardant-dropping air tankers, battled flames through most of Thursday. The helicopters flew into the night and were expected to be back in the air at dawn Friday.

Dozens of fire engines arrived through the night from as far away as Fresno, carried by giant military hovercraft from the Marine Corps’ Camp Pendleton.

Also of note in the article is that Catalina has gotten 2 inches of rain since January. TWO.  Gotta love that drought.  Enjoy photographic fiery goodness here

Rep. McNerney, Wake Me Up, When September Ends

I’ve made my voice very clear why I’m disappointed that Congressman McNerney voted against ending the war. And even if you don’t agree with me, I think you’ll find the debate over his his vote, the call for an explanation, and McNerney’s response to all have great comments from the very insightful community that is growing at Calitics.

When I was waiting for a response from McNerney I went for a walk to clear my mind. Tonight, the local recruiting station had nine kids out front and only one was white. That sucks, but so does the war for every family affected. Now that people are doing late night video, I ask you to join me over the flip for a video that is all the more relevant this year since Rep. McNerney won’t vote to end the war. It is one of my favorites and I loved meeting the band a while back. I’m shocked that McNerney will fall into the trap of those who want to wait until September, but there is a great response to that policy nonsense.