Today Is The Day For Leadership To Shine Through On Prison Reform

Sentencing reform is one of the many bills on the docket today, which looks to be the last day for the California Legislature, though that’s subject to change.  In my view this is the signature issue the legislature faces: will they step up and respond to an crisis, or will they cower in the face of having to be “tough on crime” and reject anything but building our way out of the prison problem.  Frank Russo defines the terms here.  Basically there are two bills, each of which has passed their respective chamber.  SB 110 (by Sen. Gloria Romero) calls for an independent sentencing commission without restrictions on what sentences they can look at; AB 160 appears to restrict anything passed through the initiative process, which shields three strikes.  Apparently there’s a third bill in the mix:

• Both SB 110 (Romero), which failed on the Assembly floor 34 to 38 and which can be brought up under reconsideration, and AB 160 (Lieber), which had been holed up in the Senate Rules Committee and has been sprung to the Senate floor, can be voted on. If Romero’s bill advances, there is a play with AB 1708 (Swanson) on the Senate floor that could amend SB 110, clean it up, and perhaps make it more acceptable to the Assembly. Both houses of the legislature have passed fairly similar sentencing commission bills, although with heated debates and opposition from Republicans.

Whether it’s intra-legislative jealousy between the chambers or a desire to look tough to voters, if nothing moves on sentencing today, our representatives will have a lot to answer for.  This is worth a phone call to your Assemblymember and Senator today.

Read the Bill—or how I got through 700 bills in 7 days

(I’ve been wanting to write something about this for a long time, but here’s an informed opinion from a former legislator. In my view, this bottleneck is designed to vest power in the leadership – if they wanted more time for the process, maybe the Assembly wouldn’t have taken a month off just a month ago! – and ought to be a part of any reform agenda to make California even moderately governable. – promoted by David Dayen)

This article written by: Former Assemblymember, Hannah- Beth Jackson of Speak Out California

There is little doubt that watching legislation work its way through the process is much like watching sausage being made. The bottom line is: You don’t want to watch. Although theoretically it is interesting, informative and exciting to see the democratic process of law-making take form, in reality there is so much push-and-pull, give-and-take and last minute backroom dealing that it’s impossible to follow. It’s often impossible to understand.

So when the Speaker of the Assembly asks his members to “read the bill” when debating the frenetically altered and re-altered health care reform measure, AB8, it’s asking for a logical response to an impossible situation. How can one read a bill that comes to your desk literally “hot off the press”, so hot that you can warm your hands on the paper? How can you understand what’s there when it deals with a convoluted system in a convoluted way—with no opportunity to vet the latest in a series of compromises, re-writes and reformulated policy?

Granted, the efforts are the result of hard-fought and truly late-night negotiations, but there has been little time to analyze the possible impacts and “unintended consequences” of legislating at the 11th hour, with dozens of special interest groups hovering over the negotiations and dozens of people trying to craft language that fits the proverbial square peg into a round hole. That’s exactly what the end of session looks like on a good day. But here we’ve got what is billed as a major overhaul of the healthcare system in California, a measure that will lead the nation in healthcare reform. Really? Has anyone read the entire bill in its final form? Highly unlikely.

Having been there at the end of each of six legislative years, my bet’s on the fact that even the authors of AB 8 haven’t read it in its final form. How many pages is it? How many hours have people been up without sufficient sleep so they can even think straight? How do the final amendments affect earlier amendments? Does this create a seamless system or one with glitches, omissions, administrative nightmares, unexpected costs? Is it like some of the old American cities that were built piecemeal, like my hometown of Boston where the old joke goes,”You want to go three blocks down the street?….Well, you can’t get there from here.”

Much credit must be given to those dozens of staffers, stakeholders and legislators who have worked hard to put together this compromise mishmash of who pays for what, who’s covered by whom and when and how. This is a compromise bill for a system that needs an overhaul that takes the real villain out of the process entirely–the health insurance industry. But the Governor won’t hear of it–after all, the insurance industry is among his biggest supporters-and they give lots of money to both sides as well. And we have a governor who has vetoed the best chance at real reform and real coverage of all Californians when he vetoed Senator Sheila Kuehl’s SB840 last year. Her bill is the true reform, providing universal health coverage-similar to the Medicare system that has worked so well in this country for decades. But no matter, AB8 deals with the reality that we have a Republican governor who will hear nothing of removing profit from our health care delivery system. So AB8 is the compromise effort.

But with the clock ticking down, nerves fraying and concentration fading with exhaustion, the legislature is whirling through hundreds of bills, many of which have been totally “gutted” and rewritten with entirely new issues and language. This is an ugly time of year to watch the legislative process in action. And we’ve been very lucky over the years that so few mistakes have been made as a result. Of course, when they have, the mistakes can be enormous–remember the energy deregulation plan that was approved at midnight on the last night of session many years ago? I suspect no one read the bill then. As a result of the rush-to-judgment mentality that year, billions of dollars were extorted from Californians by companies like Enron among many others, a governor was recalled and rate-payers today continue to pay for that debacle.

It is hard to watch the goings-on in these last, crazy days, let alone be part of it. The most important part of legislating, I was told when I first arrived in Sacramento as a new Assemblymember, was to “do no harm.” I hope that this message was passed along to all the membership and that at the end of this year, they will not have done any as well. In the meantime, we can only hold our collective breath and hope.

SB 275, Hospital Dumping, passes out of the legislature

Well, it’s the season of legislative accomplishments. I can’t possibly point out all of them as the sheer volume would be rather oppressive for a blog format. But I do want to point out a couple of bills here and there.  Specifically, SB 275 and SB 2, both from Senator Gil Cedillo.

SB 275 creates civil penalties for dumping the homeless against their will.  Initially, as drafted by Cedillo and LA City Atty Rocky Delgadillo, the bill was supposed to have a criminal charge associated. However, the criminal charges were stripped under pressure from the hospital lobby. However, the bill will prohibit a hospital from transporting a patient to a location other than their residence without written consent and make such offenses subject to civil penalties of $150,000 on second offense and $300,000 on a third offense. These penalties are large enough to attract attorneys to file on behalf of the dumping victims. I do not yet know if an attorney’s fees provision is included, but that would certainly also be helpful.

SB 2, the Fair Share Zoning bill would require cities and counties to include an inventory of sites suitable for emergency shelters, supportive housing, transitional housing and residential rental developments in the housing element of their general plan. SB 2 includes provisions allowing these facilities as permitted use rather than conditional use or other discretionary permits.

Ideals into Action: SF Coastal Cleanup Saturday

(I’m going to try to make it to this one. It’s a great way to help the community. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

Democrats Work puts volunteers on the ground to help communities across America. We do all sorts of service work; we clean graffiti, work food banks, plant trees, and serve in many other ways that keep volunteers visible and active.

Jason Carter, grandson of Jimmy Carter and one of our founders, had a piece in the Huffington Post recently about what we are doing to forward a ‘politics of service’ in our neighborhoods.

On Saturday, we will be hosting a project at the India Basin Open Space along with the SF Young Dems and the Potrero Hill Democratic Club. Click here to learn more.

This is a great way to get out and active and bring people into motion who normally might shy away from the political scene.

If you want to get more involved, get info about events near you, or suggest a new event, get in touch

And if you are a bloggy type, hit an event and blog it! Send us links to your stories and get DW up on all the calendars.

September 11, 2007 Blog Roundup

Today’s Blog Roundup is on the flip. Let me know what I missed.

To subscribe by email, click
here and do what comes naturally
.

Things to Read Today

Health Care (AB 8)

Environment &
Energy

Reform Efforts and
“Reform” Efforts

Education

Republicans

Homes

Electoral Politics
Generally

All the Rest

Immigrants Rights Vigil in McArthur Park, LA @ 6:30pm Sept 12

*Payer March
– Echo Park Methodist Church @ 4pm – 1226 N. Alverado
St., Los Angeles

*Vigil
– McArthur Park @ 6:30

These are the people who organized the 1 million
strong March 25, 2006 demonstrations here in Los
Angeles.  They also represent, among other, labor
groups, interfaith groups, immigrant rights groups,
student groups and other local political groups.

They are calling for immigrants to show their economic
power:
– No spending of money on Wednesday, Sept. 102
– Stop the “No Match” SSA letters
– Immediate moratorium on raids and deportations!
– Legalization Now! No fifteen-year wait for the Green
Card!

We should join them!  They are part of our community
and their interests are our own.  While some of them
cannot vote, many of them can and they can all tell
friends and families in their communities to get out
and vote or become politically active.

For additional information also see:

www.latinoscontralaguerra.org
www.march25coalition.org
www.fightbacknews.org
www.chirla.org

Possible respite for King-Harbor Medical Center

King-Harbor Medical Center in South Central Los Angeles is back in the news this week. As you may remember, King-Harbor’s, formerly known as King Drew Medical Center, funding was pulled at the end of June, when the hospital failed it’s final review.

King-Harbor had been under scrutiny for quite a long time for sub standard care, but it was the reporting of the death of Edith Isabel Rodriguez at the hospital that appeared to be the straw that broke the camel’s back with regards to the survival of the Medical center. The Los Angeles Times documented the travails of King harbor in a Pulitzer winning series of articles.

This past Saturday a community meeting was held at the hospital to discuss the possible fate of the hospital. The meeting had been called for by Rep. Laura Richardson and Rep. Maxine Waters. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors member Yvonne B. Burke made some interesting comments, including a statement that the Board of Supervisors might have kept the hospital open, despite the loss of funding had it not been for the revelation of death of Ms. Rodriguez. Along with another incident, which she refused to elaborate upon.

She told the crowd of hospital supporters that there had been an array people doing their best to make sure the hospital closed.

“It was almost like it was a conspiracy,” Burke said.

Burke told the crowd that in October the County would would try to find a private entity to run the hospital, who would then turn around and petition the County to run the facility.

King-Harbor served over 40,000 patients annually in South-Central Los Angeles every year. The majority poor and uninsured. And, unfortunately, many of those residents are currently facing a situation where they will be receiving no health care at all. Hopefully there is some truth in the story about the reopening of the hospital.

California Media

When a CA bill passes out of the other chamber, it has 30 days on the Governor’s desk.

Considering the crap-ass reporting on what Petraeus told to Congress to carry water for the embattled Bush Administration, what are your thoughts on how the CA press will handle the Governor’s signing — or not — of critical legislation.

AB 8, healthcare reform, heads to the Governor

By margins of 22-17 in the Senate and 45-31 in the Assembly, AB 8, the health care reform package co-authored by Speaker Nunez and Senator Perata, has passed out of the Legislature. The governor’s recent statements seem to indicate that he will veto the bill, but that is yet to be seen.

First off, I do not love this bill. I will not be satisfied until we have single payer healthcare. The bill gives more power to insurance companies that favor bottom lines over Californian’s lives. That’s the market, and no system will remedy that other than single payer. That being said, this is an important step that has been made today. It brings healthcare reform one step closer to fruition.

So, what does AB 8 do? It builds on the (crumbling) employer based healthcare system, and that is certainly a major problem. However, it requires all employers to either provide health care equal to 7.5% of payroll or to pay that amount into a state fund.

But whatever else can be said about AB 8, that it is not a valiant effort should not be said.  The bill “expands access to Medi-Cal/Healthy Families, broadening eligibility to include both parents and children with incomes between 133% and 300% of the federal poverty level.” That is a really big deal for the people of California. There’s something in this bill for everybody to like, and, unfortunately, for everybody to hate.

Look, the underlying issues cannot be resolved in the Legislature as current constituted. That’s nothing against the current legislators, it’s just that single payer would need 2/3, and that seems unlikely to happen. So, we either A) get 2/3 majorities and a great progressive as Governor or b) take single payer to the ballot at some point. I don’t take lightly the efforts of the Speaker and Senator Perata. They were important, but we must be totally cognizant of the fact that this is going to be a long, bloody battle on the road to single payer.

Press release over the flip.

SACRAMENTO – Historic health care reform legislation extending coverage to millions of California’s uninsured, including all children, was approved by the state Senate and Assembly today by votes of 22-17 and 45-31, respectively.

Assembly Bill 8, co-authored by Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez (D-Los Angeles) and Senate President pro Tem Don Perata (D-Oakland), now heads to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s desk for consideration.

“I believe today is an historic opportunity for California to put itself on the map once again, to send a loud and clear message to Washington, D.C. that the inaction of Congress and our President to deliver on health care reform is falling on California and the state legislature,” Speaker Núñez said on the Assembly floor. “This year we will lead the nation in real comprehensive health care reform.”

“This bill is not perfect, but it’s the best we could come up with this year and better than anything produced by any other state in the nation so far,” Perata said. “We’ve taken a giant, important step here by coming up with a practical, workable plan to make sure every working Californian has access to affordable health care.”

“The Governor should sign this,” Perata added. “However, if the Governor rejects this, we will pick up ourselves and go at it again. I am committed to fixing California’s broken health care system, and if we need to do it in a special session, so be it.”

“AB 8 is based on the principal that health care shouldn’t just be available for those that can afford it, but that it should be a right for each and every Californian,” Speaker Nunez added. “This bill represents more than a year and a half of work on the part of Democrats in both the Assembly and Senate to come around to a comprehensive health care reform package for California.”

AB 8 would extend health insurance to more than two-thirds of the 5 million Californians now uninsured. AB 8 would also insure all children, take steps to rein in spiraling medical costs and guarantee coverage for people who have pre-existing medical conditions.

The legislation does this through a system of shared responsibility in which employers, employees and government each pays a portion of the costs.

AB 8 is backed by a diverse array of labor groups, children’s health advocates, and others, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), California Labor Federation, AARP, Health Access, 100% Campaign, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), California Teachers Association (CTA), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

AB 8 is the product of close to two years of negotiation and engagement with health care providers, businesses, labor, hospitals, doctors, children’s health advocates, and others interested in promoting comprehensive health care in California. AB 8:

ü  Builds on the employer-based system in which most Californians already get their health care;

ü  Promotes shared responsibility from employers, employees, and where necessary the state;

ü  Mandates that most employers must meet a minimum spending threshold of 7.5% of payroll on insurance, contributing that fee into a statewide fund or spending it directly on their employees;

ü  Allows all employees whose employers pay a fee to get coverage through a statewide purchasing pool that will negotiate for discounted prices with health insurers;

ü  Encourages employees to use pretax income to pay for health insurance premiums;

ü  Provides prorated subsidies for families below 300% of the federal poverty level so working people can afford to pay their insurance premiums;

ü  Mandates that insurance companies must use 85 cents out of every premium dollar to go to health care, not administration;

ü  Ends cherry picking by insurers, ensuring that most people will have to be offered coverage by insurance companies at a competitive rate;

ü  Establishes the new California Health Care Cost and Quality Transparency Commission and requires the commission to develop, implement and update a health care quality and cost containment plan to help improve health outcomes for Californians and keep health care costs affordable;

ü  Expands access to Medi-Cal/Healthy Families, broadening eligibility to include both parents and children with incomes between 133% and 300% of the federal poverty level;

ü  Promotes prevention and management of chronic disease such as asthma and diabetes;

ü  Assists with personal health and wellness management; and

ü  Simplifies benefit choices in the insurance market so that everyone can make real world, apples to apples comparisons when they are choosing a health plan.

Dark Day for CA Patients–Politicians Sell Out

1000 Registered Nurses storming the Capitol and clogging its halls in one of the most dramatic and militant protests in recent history was not enough to stop Sacramento politicians from selling out patients and rewarding their insurance industry donors with a major financial boon, in the latest step of a complex healthcare dance orchestrated by and for Governor Schwarzenegger

We’ll take a look at what it means for the drive for guaranteed healthcare nationally over the flip, but first take a look at these pictures from inside the Capitol this morning. 

…cross-posted at the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association’s Breakroom Blog, as we organize to make 2007 the Year of GUARANTEED healthcare on the single-payer model.

The inside-the-Capitol rally was amazing.  While the Democratic leaders of the Assembly and the Senate voted to keep the health insurance companies in the business of profiting from care, a beautiful sea of hands-on caregivers chanted in the hallways, their pleas bouncing off the walls and permeating the entire building.  “Don’t sell out our patients! Single-payer now!”

But for today it wasn’t enough.  Here’s the deal: because they had to do “something” the California Senate just voted to send Governor Arnold a pro-insurance faux healthcare reform bill that nurses and healthcare activists have been trying hard to kill. 

Arnold will veto it–despite the fact that it is based on and basically similar to his own proposal.  Each bill will send more patients to the insurance industry, giving them more revenue and influence over medical decisions…meaning each bill will expose more patients to runaway costs, and force them to beg for healthcare from corporations that make money by denying it.

Here’s the good news: After vetoing the Senate’s bad bill, Arnold will call a special session to push his own bad bill, the next step in the process he’s choreographing.  This will give nurses and patients one more chance to convince politicians to do the right thing…and fix the healthcare crisis by getting rid of the insurance companies

Healthcare hero Sheila Kuehl explained her opposition to both versions of the insurance-centered bill:

Senator Kuehl’s statement in opposing AB 8 was generous in her praise for those who had worked on the bill and their improvements to it. But in the end, she told the Senate that she had learned of the problems caused by any approach that retains insurance. She said that, “For those of you who vote for the bill, I understand you are voting your hopes, knowing it will be vetoed by the Governor.”
Using the analogy of the Titanic for the current health care system, she said she had criticized some measures as rearranging the deck chairs, but that there has been a real attempt in AB 8 to “turn the direction of the ship.” But she said the Titanic was sunk because the ship had tried to turn rather than “facing the iceberg head on” which would have at least kept it afloat longer and saved more lives. I have no idea of the facts about the Titanic, but she made her point.

A former legislator-turned-progressive activist, Hannah-Beth Jackson, summarized the problems with both the Schwarzenegger and legislature’s approaches:

Schwarzenegger is insisting that everyone have health insurance. This is NOT universal healthcare, it is universal insurance- whether people can afford it or not. This deference to the insurance industry is maddening for those who realize the private companies are a major part of the problem and need to come out of the equation completely.

What does it mean nationally?  If the insurance industry can write the rules for healthcare reform in California, they can in many other states around the country as well.  We have to block it here.

Just for fun, here’s an article from this morning calling the California Nurses Association, the “darlings of the national labor movement.”

To join the fight for guaranteed healthcare (with a “Medicare for All” or SinglePayer financing), visit GuaranteedHealthcare.org, a project of the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association.