From a Nurse Who’s Stumped by the AFL-CIO’s Silence on Ohio

It is particularly troubling that President John Sweeney has only now issued a statement about the growing tension between CNA and SEIU. While Sweeney is quick to accuse the SEIU of wrongdoing at the recent Labor Notes conference, where was his public statement condemning the grotesque behavior of CNA in Ohio?

Unlike the Labor Notes gathering where the facts remain highly disputed, CNA actions in Ohio are without disagreement or debate. There is no question that their union-busting actions prevented as many of 8,000 nurses and other healthcare workers from getting a voice on job!  That remains the true injustice and has yet to prompt a public condemnation from President Sweeney and the AFL-CIO. It is ridiculous to suggest that the CNA leadership and their gangs are the victims in this battle. If an apology is due, it must come from Rose Ann DeMoro and the CNA to the thousands of workers that have been silenced by these repulsive union-busting campaigns.

–statement of Norma Amsterdam, RN, SEIU United Healthcare Workers-East Vice President, RN Division

Tax Cuts Make Us Poor

Dave Johnson, Speak Out California

Some years ago the corporate-funded anti-tax, anti-government advocates paid their way to become the dominant voice in our civil discourse.  They said there was a magic, simple formula that would lead to shared prosperity.  All we had to do was cut taxes, and everyone would have more money.

Everyone wants to have more money so this sounded wonderful.  It is always a seductive argument to tell people that you have a magic formula that can make things better for them.  One example is machines that create as much energy as they use — or more.  A common myth is that doctors are conspiring to hide the cure for cancer because it would put them out of business.  Another is that there is a formula that turns water into gasoline — or lead into gold.

“Just cut taxes, and we will all have more money.”  “Taxes take money out of the economy.”  “It’s your money and you should decide how to spend it.”

“But,” some people asked, “where will the money come from to pay for our roads and schools and all the things that have made us so prosperous?”  The seductive response from the tax-cutters was that government is an anonymous, incompetent, inefficient “them” that spends too much money that we could all have in our pockets, and if we just cut out waste everything would be all right.  Just cut the waste.

The thing was, whenever one tried to pin them down on specifics of this waste they would never really explain where all that fat really was that they were going to cut — at least not in quantities sufficient to match their tax cuts.  Don’t worry, put us in power, cut the taxes, and it will all sort itself out.

So eventually we fell for it and cut taxes and put the anti-government people in power.  When we noticed that their tax cuts went mostly for corporations and the very rich, they said don’t worry, the money would trickle down to the rest of us.  So we quieted down and waited for the magic to happen.  When we noticed that the corporations and wealthy were getting richer and richer while we were losing our pensions and health insurance and jobs, they said don’t worry, tax cuts make us richer.  We still didn’t understand that you and I and the regular people of California were not part of their “us” that would get richer.

The fact is the public officials that We, the People had elected had done competent jobs and there just wasn’t really much waste to cut.  Why would there be?  The people that we had elected had been good managers of our money.  Democracy and accountability require open, transparent processes that the corporate anti-government, anti-tax advocates labeled as “inefficient bureaucracy.”  That was the waste they had been talking about – the oversight and transparency of good government!  Our elected officials had put these systems in place and they had made sure there was no waste — it was a myth.  

Our government had been humming along, paving the roads, educating our children and investing in projects that led to modern wonders like the Internet.  And we had been enjoying the resulting prosperity.  California had the best public schools, colleges and universities in the country.  We had the best roads, courts, parks, libraries, health care system, water projects and most innovative and open government and this investment had led to a thriving economic ecosystem.  

So instead of cutting imaginary waste we started cutting out this engine of prosperity.  We cut the schools and the road maintenance and everything else.  The education system started getting worse and the roads and other infrastructure started deteriorating.   California fell from first to near the bottom on many scales.  Companies started leaving the state because of the deteriorating infrastructure and lower education levels.

Then when cutting our own services wasn’t enough we borrowed money to cover those tax cuts and pay for what government was left.  We borrowed and borrowed and borrowed.  We were just like the homeowner who refinanced every year as prices went up it seemed like the gravy train would run forever.

Today the borrowing is catching up with us.  As so many homeowners are learning to their dismay: borrowing means payments.  And borrowing more means larger payments.  In California the payments on our borrowing just happen to be pretty close to the amount of our budget shortfall.  The same is true of the federal government.

Now we approach a day of reckoning for our tax cuts.  The bill has to be paid, and the people who received the big tax cuts are pointing the finger at you and me.  We can continue to cut out government and lay people off.  We can continue to cram more and more children into classrooms with fewer and fewer teachers.  We can have longer and longer lines at the DMV.  We can close parks.  We can have fewer police patrols and fire stations and ambulances and health and safety inspectors.  We can just get poorer and poorer.

Or, we can start to close loopholes like the one that lets wealthy people avoid sales taxes on yachts and private jets while the rest of us pay sales taxes on everything we purchase.  We can start to close loopholes like the one that lets oil companies pump our oil out of the ground without paying us and then sell our oil to us.  We can start to raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations who prosper because of the roads and financial and legal system we built, and whose taxes were cut leading to this mess.  They need to stop simply taking and start paying their fair share.  We can do these things and start to restore the thriving economic ecosystem we once had.

Click through to Speak Out California

SEIU International v. CNA Battle Escalates to Court and Threatens Political Campaigns

This diary is not an enjoyable one to write.  However, it would be neglectful if we let this issue, which is now in the mainstream news, and all over the ads you see to the right, slide by without a mention on the front page.  CNA and SEIU are fighting over organizing the same workers, which has lead to physical confrontations and now a restraining order.  Andy Stern has been ordered to appear in a Alameda Court room.  LAT

The California Nurses Assn. on Wednesday secured a temporary restraining order against the Service Employees International Union, accusing it of harassing the board members of the Oakland-based group.

The two influential nationwide unions have a long, acrimonious rivalry that reached a new height in March after they publicly battled over whether the SEIU should represent more than 8,000 nurses and other healthcare workers in Ohio. [snip]…

The restraining order requires SEIU President Andy Stern to appear at a hearing at Alameda County Superior Court on May 1. It orders SEIU members and staff to stay at least 100 yards from all staff with the California Nurses Assn. and its national arm, the National Nurses Organizing Committee.

CNA and SEIU have been battling for years, but the tone and aggressiveness right now is at a fever pitch.  Over the past few years the blogosphere and the new power brokers in the progressive left have built up relationships with both sides and it is painful to see them attack each other with such ferocity.  Unfortunately, it appears that the dispute may have a devastating impact on our ability to accomplish our mutual political goals during this crucial election year.

In retaliation, Andy Stern has ordered locals to withhold money from labor councils. (flip it)

Shane has the story in the Bee and man is it depressing to read.

A deepening divide between two of the nation’s largest labor groups – prompted by a maverick California nurses union – has labor leaders worried the rift could “devastate” the movement’s election-year priorities.

Service Employees International Union, with 1.7 million members, has instructed local chapters across America to withhold funding from state and local labor federations to protest what they call union-poaching activity by the California Nurses Association.

We are talking about millions of dollars here that should be going right into political activities.  This better be some serious saber rattling.  Actually following through would hurt the International as much as CNA.  After all, CNA is not directly benefitting from money coming into the labor councils from SEIU locals.  Instead he is using this as a leverage point to engage other unions in the battle.  What happens if it doesn’t work to Stern’s satisfaction?

The move could cost labor central committees – the backbone of labor’s sophisticated political and get-out-the-vote operation – millions of dollars on the eve of June 3 legislative primaries in California and the Nov. 4 presidential contest.

It could prevent labor federations in California from fully flexing their muscles in contested Democratic primaries for the state Legislature. Labor also has made electing a Democratic president a top priority in 2008.

“It would devastate the labor council,” said John Borsos, president of the Sacramento Central Labor Council. The move, he said, would deprive the group “of the funds necessary to sustain a political campaign.

The longer this drags out, the more damaging this will be to the overall progressive political movement.  I would much rather we be focusing our fire on the Republicans than see to partners go to court for restraining orders, withholding political organizing money and attack each other via blog ads.  While the money is good for this site, the destruction caused by this bitter battle is exponentially worse.

While there are legitimate grievances and significant ideological splits between the two, they are risking causing a lot more damage to the broader movement by continuing along this nasty path.

Arnold’s Attack on Higher Education

California higher education has not been having a good decade. When Arnold first took office a series of major cuts were made to the UC, CSU, and community college budgets. In 2004 a compact was agreed to between the UC and CSU leaders and Arnold, guaranteeing a stable, if low, level of funding. That agreement has been heavily criticized for having accepted a lower standard of state support – and that criticism looks to be merited, as Arnold now proposes to violate that agreement with his 10% cut of higher ed funding.

As a new study by the Campaign for College Opportunity shows, the proposed cuts would have the effect of severely curtailing enrollment by as much as 27,000 over the next two years, which is the size of an average UC or CSU undergraduate campus enrollment. And a study by the UC Academic Senate  found that “to maintain educational quality” student fees would have to rise from $7,500 to $10,500 – a staggering increase from an already high level.

“The Schwarzenegger revision accelerates the redefinition of the University of California away from a public university and toward a ‘public-private partnership,’ ” the UC study said. “The university becomes dependent on high student fees for delivering its core educational mission. . . . The university becomes quasi-private or poor — or perhaps both at once.”

UC has been suffering for years from what the Academic Senate study called a “hollowing out” because of lack of money. “From a distance, all appears normal; once one goes inside, the damage is clear,” it said. Leaky roofs go unrepaired; valuable faculty leave for better-paying universities…

The problem of “faculty brain drain” from public to private institutions is a serious one across the country but is hitting UC and CSU the hardest, as their funding has been the most dramatically impacted.

The study and the cuts were the subject of an article in today’s LA Times which contained some quotes from higher ed leaders about the impact of these cuts:

Diane Woodruff, chancellor of the California Community Colleges, said the governor’s proposed cut would mean those campuses would not be able to provide classes for more than 50,000 students. An additional 18,500 would not receive financial aid.

The cutbacks would most affect low-income, first-generation and nonwhite students, who generally depend more on university services, she said…

“By 2025. if we continue on this same course of cumulative budget cuts on a cyclical basis, the California workforce will be 3 million short and California will not be competitive,” Cal State Chancellor [Charles] Reed said.

In other words, Arnold’s proposed 10% cut of higher education would have a crippling effect on California’s economy. The student fees increases would squeeze middle-class families even more dramatically, and would be difficult for young students to pay – especially as student loan availability is shrinking due to the credit cruch – even the notorious Sallie Mae claimed “we’re at the cusp of peak lending.”

But this is sadly part of a larger pattern for Arnold and his Republican allies. Don’t let their occasional bickering and infighting fool you – they stand shoulder to shoulder when it comes to this state’s future. They all agree that our economy and the middle- and working-classes should be sacrificed for the sake of a few wealthy Californians who don’t want to pay more taxes. They agree that to save voters $150 a year in vehicle license fees, public education – from kindergarten to undergraduate – should be destroyed.

The article notes that “Despite the dire situation the universities and community colleges find themselves in, education leaders have been reluctant to challenge the governor.” It looks like that task is going to fall to the students who, abandoned by their schools’ administrators, are launching a statewide protest on Monday, April 21 to oppose these cuts.

Word from the Future: ABC News Destroys All Credibility

All reports indicate that when the ABC News Democratic Party Debate airs in the Pacific Time zone at 8 PM that you are better off doing pretty much anything other than watching it. There are reviews are already in and there seems to be a clear consensus on Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos and ABC News and the parent company Disney.

“Looking around other sites, I guess I’m not the only one that thought this debate was unmitigated travesty,” Josh Marshall noted. “Maybe the embargo on debate rebroadcast was a pro-human rights stand.”

The debate is over, and I feel like I need a shower. […] The crowd here is starting to boo Gibson. Like, a lot. Hilarious and well-deserved.

Chris Bowers

No Charlie. It hasn’t been a “fascinating debate.” It’s been genuinely awful.

Josh Marshall

What matters to this network is money, and that is where we need to go.  Starting tomorrow, my spare time, meager as it is, will be dedicated to revealing the advertisers of this network, for the purpose of organized boycotts.

Dartagnan (top Recommended Diary on Dailykos)

Light’Em Up

Complain about this atrocity.

Main ABC switchboard: 212-456-7777

…complain here.


Atrios

My friend Dan McQuade calls this the lowest moment in American history — I think he’s giving it too much credit, frankly.

Will Bunch

George and Charlie were just rumor-mongering right wingers. Charlie thought it was “fascinating.” Wrong. It was just very pathetic and disturbing. If you ever question the sad state of affairs in the American political dialogue, tonight’s debate was Exhibit A.

Joe Sudbay

This debate was just horrible. Too much time wasted on useless nonsense. From a media perspective, I am not sure why Stephanopoulos was in the mix at all. He didn’t add much, and if anything, his history with the Clintons had the potential to take something away. I thought Gibson was especially rough on Obama, and I think ABC did not do themselves any good with this debate. If I weren’t liveblogging, I would have switched to AI.

Jacki Schechner

This is the most disgraceful and dispiriting debate of all time.

BooMan

In perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate this year, ABC News hosts Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolous focused mainly on trivial issues as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama faced off in Philadelphia.

Editor and Publisher

Reflecting what seemed to be the main consensus of the night – that ABC botched this debate, big time – Charlie Gibson tells the crowd there will be one more, superfluous commercial break of the night and is subsequently jeered. “OH…” he declares, hands raised in defense. “The crowd is turning on me, the crowd is turning on me.”

Huffington Post

I feel sorry for both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

NYT and WSJ Cover SEIU’s Violence at Labor Notes

The New York Times and Wall St. Journal both cover the incredible events at Saturday’s Labor Notes conference in Michigan, where Andy Stern of SEIU International sent busload of male staffers to chase and harass RNs from the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, in retaliation for CNA/NNOC defeating them in a controversial “company union” vote last month in Ohio.  Fortunately the targeted RNs were able to escape out a back door, but other conference-goers were not so lucky, with one woman sent to the hospital, and others punched, kicked, slapped, and shoved

This is obviously a dark day for the labor movement.  Andy Stern needs to learn that this kind of harassment of women is NEVER okay. And it is NEVER, EVER okay to orchestrate an action that is so stressful that members have a heart attack and die.

RNs will never forget this day, nor is it now likely that any RN in the country will want to organize with SEIU after this kind of display.

As a first step, Andy Stern needs to apologize to all involved, pay the hospital bills of the injured woman, and promise to never use violence again.  Instead, shamefully, SEIU is going back and forth between denying the violence and attempting to justify it.  You can watch first-person accounts from some of the RNs targeted for harassment.

You really need to go look at the picture, but The New York Times writes:

       “The A.F.L.-C.I.O. president, John J. Sweeney, denounced on Tuesday what he said was “a violent attack orchestrated” by the Service Employees International Union against members of other unions at a conference on Saturday in Michigan.

The service employees’ union sent busloads of members from Ohio to the labor conference in Dearborn to confront leaders and members of the California Nurses Association. The service employees say the nurses sabotaged a major service employees’ unionizing drive last month.

Others at the conference said the fighting began when service employee members and officials tried to barge into the conference in a hotel banquet hall. Chris Kutalik, editor of Labor Notes, a magazine sponsoring the conference, said a retired member of the United Automobile Workers was pushed, banged her head against a table and was taken to a hospital for a head wound.

“There is no justification, none, for the violent attack orchestrated by S.E.I.U.,” Mr. Sweeney said in a statement. “Violence in attacking freedom of speech must be strongly condemned.”

Today’s Wall St. Journal takes their own look, at SEIU’s attack (reg. req’d)

       “On Saturday, a scuffle broke out between members of the SEIU and participants in a labor solidarity conference in Detroit at which the executive director of the California Nurses Association was scheduled to speak. One attendee was sent to the hospital after cutting her head on a table, according to Chris Kutalik, editor of the magazine Labor Notes, which organized the conference.

Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the 66,000-member nurses’ association, decided not to appear at the conference because of tensions between the unions. “Our folks are extremely upset about what happened,” she said. “This is a nasty campaign.”

Mr. Sweeney condemned the confrontation. “There is no justification — none — for the violent attack orchestrated by SEIU,” he said in a statement. Mr. Sweeney called on leaders of both unions to meet to resolve their differences.”

Andy Stern attempted to destroy the labor movement n 2005 by splitting the AFL-CIO, he is undermining the progressive labor movement with series of corporate partnerships you can learn more about here, and now his actions threaten to hurt the reputation of every labor union.  Here’s why Andy needs to apologize and make restitution.

       “More significantly, such fighting could tarnish the image of unions, which have been trying to stem the decline in membership and attract more workers, say labor experts.”

Andy Stern must apologize and make things right.