Time for CA to Invest in Renewable Energy Infrastructure

As the LA Times reports today, we may be looking at blackouts in So Cal this summer as energy demand outstrips the power capacity of the grid. And as anyone who was around for the great west coast blackout in the summer of ’96, what starts cascading in So Cal doesn’t necessarily stay there, especially on those hot July/August scorchers that cook us all the way up the Valley. The state’s grid manager put it in terms of lacking adequate production:

The state will have 489 megawatts of new generation in time for peak demand in July or August, some of that replacing a 122-megawatt plant that’s being retired. Southern California will need to rely on imports from Arizona, Nevada and Mexico, as well as conservation, to avoid blackouts.

Demand probably will increase by 1,000 megawatts this year over last year, Cal-ISO Chief Executive Yakout Mansour said during a conference call. Power demand peaked at 48,615 megawatts in 2007.

And yet this only looks at one side of energy load problems, that of supply. While it’s not reasonable to ask people to turn off their AC in a real heat wave – although the degree to which one cools is definitely somewhere that people can make up some slack – energy efficiency elsewhere in the state can squeeze enough energy to keep things from tipping over into blackout. In fact, when we were at a similar point of crisis last year, because some of the So Cal wildfires were burning up transmission lines, voluntary energy reduction was what kept things running. Ditto for the Enron-masterminded 2001 energy shortages. Conservation is a big part of any solution.

But over the long term, how do we get the Golden State out of this trap of summer grid overload without going to more fossil fuel-powered peak load generators that pump more carbon into the atmosphere (making our summer heat waves that much worse in the years to come)?

Wind, solar, passive solar building design, urban trees and especially thermal solar.

As North American natural gas starts to hit its peak production, wind and solar have gotten progressively more economically viable for private investors. But the predictable annual crisis of the CA heat wave really cries out for public funding. Every brownout or blackout brings economic activity to a grinding halt, and the spot prices hit a lot of businesses pretty hard as the tipping point is reached. It would make a good deal of sense not to just wait for PG&E to build the power plants of the future, but rather to get the state involved in funding a bunch of capacity right now. European wind design has far outstripped the wind technolology that California pioneered in the 70s, all we need to do is start putting wind farms up, along the Delta and offshore.

Likewise, given the correlation between summer heat waves and an overstressed grid, building thermal solar down the valley and in inland So Cal, the very places where the peak usage occurs, would seem to be a complete no-brainer. As the mercury rises, so would the production of electricity. Combine this with a statewide and urban subsidy for solar panels on roofs (and perhaps grants for the construction of solar panels covering parking lots, would help to decentralize the production of electricity and reduce net demand, and in so doing take some of the stress off the transmission lines.

If the free market was going to provide this critical infrastructure in time to avoid crisis, we wouldn’t have this problem. But they haven’t, so we do. It is time for the state and local governments to step up and nudge things in the right direction. In the long run, we ought to think about trying to reduce our total consumption by pushing for planting more urban tree cover, and more efficient housing and appliance design (and yes, personal changes in wasteful behavior), but if we want to avoid blackouts in the short run, it’s going to take more seed money from the state.

Of course, in the really long run, shifting our energy production away from carbon-producing fossil fuels will be the only way that we can avoid devastating heat waves and resulting blackouts. That the short term solution also works for the long run should be a reminder that both virtuous and vicious cycles tend to feed upon themselves. And it should be noted that just as with building the High Speed Rail line, sponsoring the construction of a bunch of thermal solar power plants down the valley, and wind in the Delta and along the coast would provide sorely needed jobs to communities already mired in endemic underemployment that are reeling from the collapse of the housing bubble.

And how to pay for it all? Well, a royalty tax on oil pumped in California, as is done everywhere else in the country, would seem a rather elegant solution.

originally at surf putah

Two Data Points That Will Change California Permanently

One is national, the other state-specific.  Both of them explain why we’re starting to see traces of jelly in the knees of Republicans as they try to figure out how they’re ever going to win an election again.

Nationally, the new party identification numbers by age group are out from the Pew Center.  These are incredible.

Democrats now hold a 25 POINT advantage among voters aged 18-29.  It is generally assumed that partisan identification hardens with each passing election, and by the time you get someone to vote with a party for the third time in a row, you’ve got them for life.  Over the next five to ten years, we could get that advantage for an entire generation.  This is the chickens coming home to roost (if I can use a phrase so intimately involved with Rev. Wright without accusations of being an angry black liberation theologist) for 30 years of failed Republican policies, and nowhere is that as acute than in California, where Republicans are on the wrong side of the environment, the economy and health care.

The local set of numbers is even more striking.

Forty-nine percent of California’s children between 12 and 17 have at least one immigrant parent, a phenomenon that could dramatically change the composition of the state’s electorate within several years, according to a report released Tuesday.

Of these 1.2 million kids, 84 percent are U.S. citizens, either because they were born here or were naturalized, said Rob Paral, a Chicago-based demographic researcher who prepared the report, “Integration Potential of California’s Immigrants and their Children.”

The report predicts that as these children turn 18, they could help fuel a rise in immigrant voters by 2012.

The combination of these two numbers spell total doom for Republicans.  Young voters are moving rapidly to the Democrats, and millions of California children are reaching voting age, mindful of Republican demonizing on immigration issues and the pain they’ve delivered to their families.  Now think about potentially 30% of the electorate being made up of these children and their legal immigrant families.

The wave is coming, my friends, the wave is coming.

Another Chapter in “WTF is up with SEIU?”

( – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

UPDATE: From Shane Goldmacher at the Bee’s Capitol Alert:

“The lawsuit and the PR circus around it are a hoax perpetrated on you, the press, and our members in order to smear us and shut down the Stern team’s political opposition,” Rosselli said in an interview Tuesday.

He said the suit is part of a pattern of “constant threat and retaliation” from Stern for UHW-West seeking changes to how SEIU national operates to become – in Rosselli’s terms – “more democratic.”

***

“UHW-W has scrambled at the last minute to do damage control,” said SEIU spokesman Andrew McDonald. “While it is good that UHW-W now understands the serious problems with their actions, it is very troubling they were willing to perpetuate unlawful actions until those actions were exposed.”

Rosselli called the suit “frivolous.” “The remedy they are seeking from the lawsuit was decided last week,” he said.

I’m guessing right now that the amount of money spent on this lawsuit and the accompanying hubbub approach the amount of money involved in the lawsuit. I’m hoping that money starts going back to where it’s needed like paying for this ad that’s running in Ohio against John McCain rather than into legal costs.

Original post over the flip…

I’m an early riser. So, the fact that I happened to be up in time to catch an email that advertised a 9AM EST conference call is no real surprise. While I get lots of invitations to conference calls that I ignore, this one seemed to good to miss, even at 6AM. The invite was shrouded in mystery. It was sent at 3:35 PST, and offered only very limited details. The vagueness of the invitation left me too curious to miss it.

SEIU International said they were holding the call to discuss a local union, but I had a hunch which one it was: SEIU-UHW. “The purpose is to announce the findings of our investigation into financial improprieties by the leaders of a local union.  We?ll also announce our next steps.” Oh sure, it could have been to discuss the an article in the Las Vegas Sun about an improper transfer of funds between two unions in violation of labor law. But that involved Stern-confidante and SEIU 1199 chief Dave Regan, and considering that I was getting this invite, I knew it was UHW.

The call began with a mention of a previous call like this, where they went after another “gotcha” moment. This time it seems the International didn’t like the way that UHW was organizing its various non-profit 501 containers. So, they’re suing.  The complaint is here.

It is not clear to me that any thing that SEIU was alleging was a)illegal b) against the SEIU constitution or c) a bad thing. A NYT reporter asked a question on the call about what was the meat of this complaint, and I, even as a lawyer, didn’t see much “there there”.  

UHW, when contacted for comment, indicated that the fund in question was given about $225,000 to educate members and the public about healthcare issues. The International claimed that much of this money was spent to run an internal straw poll on whether their long-term care members wanted to stay in UHW (the members said yes). In fact, that poll was run with UHW general funds. About $50K of the fund was used to send mailers to members and publicize the poll, but that seems at least tangentially educational.

But, in the end, this seems more like a game of gotcha than a discussion of union democracy. Here’s hoping for that actual discussion that both sides say they want actually comes to fruition.

Meet Linda Harris-Forster — AD-52

As the founder of the CALIFORNIA LIST helping women get elected is my mission and my privilege. I’m always on the look out for that special candidate who believes in her community, sees what needs to be done, and sets her mind to getting things done in the California legislature.  About a year ago, I received a call from one of my members inviting me to meet Linda Harris-Forster.  Linda is running for State Assembly in District 52 that includes the cities of Compton and Paramount.  I knew that this was a tough race as there are 4 Democratic women vying for this seat, but I also knew District 52 covered one of the toughest areas of Los Angeles.

Los Angeles is the only major city that has yet to renovate its public housing projects.  Crime, drugs and gangs are on the forefront and this is a District in need of dedicated leadership that can address those difficult problems facing the people in this District.  From the moment I meet her, I knew Linda Harris-Forster was the perfect candidate.

Linda grew up in District 52 in Watts and she is one candidate who can truly boast a grassroots campaign. Her experiences as a young woman have bestowed her with empathy for the struggles of the residents living in her District. Linda possesses a compassion and drive born of personal connection to her community. Linda is the daughter of renowned community activist “Sweet” Alice Harris. She and four of her sisters worked hand in hand to help their mother found the Parents of Watts Working with Youth and Adults Multi-Purpose Community Crisis Center in the early eighties. After graduating college, Linda served as the Director for the Diane Feinstein Home for Young Mothers located in Watts.  This was a residential facility for pregnant young adults who were homeless.

Initially when CALIFORNIA LIST looked at her race, she seemed like the underdog. There were rumors of backroom deals and favors being shuffled under the table. However, at the moment her campaign is the best organized and she is consistently raising more money that all the other candidates.

Linda is living proof that a grassroots campaign is viable.  No one knows this better than Linda. “I was at an event and a man came up to me and said, your mom bought me a new pair of shoes.  I’m going to help you win!”  Her candidacy is fueled by the spirit of those helped by her family and that support has proved to be potent.

CALIFORNIA LIST is proud to include Linda Harris-Forster as one of our endorsed candidates for the June 3rd California primary.  I urge you to visit the CALIFORNIA LIST website and please donate to her campaign or one of the other candidates highlighted on our candidate page.  A win for Linda is a win for Assembly District 52.

Bettina Duval is the founder of the California List, a political fundraising network that helps elect Democratic women to all branches of California state government.

With Republican Support, State Senate Passes Mortgage Relief Bill

Yesterday I noted that even Dan Walters was coming around on budget solutions that addressed the revenue problem.  Today there’s news that Republicans in the State Senate crossed party lines to pass a mortgage relief bill.

SB 1137 would give notice to property residents that the foreclosure process has begun, provide tenants additional time to move from a foreclosed property, and mandate maintenance of foreclosed properties to diminish the impact on the value of neighboring homes.

A previous version of this bill, SB 926, failed on the Senate floor in January when it fell one vote short of passage and faced opposition from the financial services industry. Since then, Senator Perata has addressed industry concerns and produced a more workable bill that has broad support and no known opposition.

One of those Senator who voted for the bill?  Senator Scared as a Chicken in a Fox Cage Jeff Denham.  He actually spoke on the Senate floor in favor of the bill.  That’s no accident: two of the worst-hit counties in terms of foreclosures are in his district (Stanislaus and Merced).  Cox, Maldonado and Wyland joined the majority as well.  The final vote was 28-10.

This is a compromise bill, to be sure (only loans from January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 are included), but would provide more transparency and the ability for homeowners to get help before foreclosure, as well as increased notification for renters whose property heads into foreclosure, which is an increasing problem.

What’s notable here is the Republican support, which suggests that they’re starting to feel pressure on issues like the mortgage crisis from their constituents.  The old saw in California politics is that these Republicans are so gerrymandered into their seats that they can’t be moved by public outcry.  I’m not sure that’s true anymore, and it’s something to be recognized as we head into the budget fight.

As for Denham, I think he’s got a bigger problem with his racist campaign manager, but clearly he’s trying to radically backtrack his Senate history and come off as a nice moderate.  Since this week is the deadline for bills to move from the Senate to the Assembly, we’re going to see him tested on a lot of votes in the coming days.

Mobilize with Mark: Donuts, Coffee and Precinct Walking

Mobilize for Mark LenoDisclosure: I do some work for the Mark Leno Campaign.

I’ll admit that I’m always a bit reluctant about getting up early to do precinct walking, or well, to do precinct walking at all. Mostly it’s the hills in my neighborhood. That makes for some exhausting work with a big ol’ sack of lit on your back. I mean, I do it, but I kinda prefer phonebanking and that kind of thing. I hope I don’t get my grassroots card torn away. 😉

So, the lure of a donut helps to motivate me. And having a great candidate like Mark Leno. And balloons! Last Saturday, the Leno campaign held a little party for the opening of the second campaign office in SF’s Castro District.  There was a great attendance from community members and local leaders.  SF Assessor-Recorder (and possible mayoral candidate in 2011) Phil Ting made an appearance, as did SF Democratic Party chair Scott Wiener. Scott and SF Young Dems President Luke Klipp, who was also there, are both running for election to the San Francisco DCCC. And both are endorsed by me!

The conversation was good, and the donuts tasty. Check the flip (or my Flickr set) for a photo slideshow from the event.

UPDATE: Check out the op-ed in the Marin IJ by two Marin women expressing support for Leno and Obama.

Two new endorsements for Mary Pallant in CA-24!

Those of you who follow House races closely know that CA-24 is one of the under-the-radar races to watch this year.  Though it’s not getting a lot of attention in the national media, this district is one that could end up surprising a lot of people who aren’t watching the trends on the ground.

The race features Mary Pallant, the progressive Democrat, going up against Elton Gallegly, a do-nothing rubberstamp Republican, in an already purple district that is turning increasingly blue and is filled with abnormally large numbers of independent voters.  Pallant is also being challenged in the primary by Jill Martinez; however, given that Martinez is still over $93,000 in debt from her previous campaign, it is unclear how vigorous a challenge she will be able to mount to either Pallant or Gallegly.  

Full disclosure: I serve as the volunteer Netroots Coordinator for the Mary Pallant campaign

I have explained before how competitive this district may be in the fall due to changes in the electorate that bode well for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot here.  With enough money and momentum, there is no good reason for this district to remain in Republican hands.

On the money side, Mary’s campaign is in the black and raising money at a steady clip.

And on the momentum side, Mary Pallant has received two more another boosts to her campaign–this time from well-respected progressive activists.

The first endorsement comes from David Swanson, co-founder of the pro-impeachment blog After Downing Street.  From the as-yet unpublished press release:

David Swanson, co-founder of AfterDowningStreet.org and Washington Director of Democrats.com, endorses Mary Pallant for the United States House of Representatives.

David said, “We should support the campaign of Mary Pallant in California’s 24th district, a pro-impeachment Democrat challenging Elton Gallegly.”

Mary supports the rule of law and our constitution above partisan politics. She believes we should hold hearings concerning the actions of this administration and let the evidence speak for itself.

The other media endorsement this week came from Norman Solomon, nationally syndicated columnist and author of Made Love, Got War, War Made Easy (later turned into a documentary narrated by Sean Penn), and Target Iraq.

Mr. Solomon will be traveling to the 24th District to support Mary’s campaign with a fundraiser on May 4th in Simi Valley (feel free to email me for more info if you are interested in attending).

If you don’t know yet why you should be interested in this race, here’s a snippet from my previous post on the campaign for the 24th:

Why should you help Mary?  Because she can win.  Seriously.  California’s 24th district has long been in the hands of the Republican party, largely because of its suburban and exurban demographics, as well as because of the presence of strongly conservative Simi Valley.  But the district has been changing for a long time now–and it’s poised to flip Blue this year.  As David Dayen noted in his House Races Roundup over at Calitics, the 24th district is now on the map for Democrats as it should be.  This beautiful district that lies between Henry Waxman’s solidly Democratic district in Los Angeles’ westside and Lois Kapp’s solidly Democratic district in Santa Barbara should by all rights be in Democratic hands this year–and with your help we can make that happen.

Turnout numbers in this district are off the charts as voters get increasingly sick of Republican rule.  This R+5 district saw Democratic voters outnumber Republicans by almost 4,000 votes earlier this year, partly due to the historic primary race.  Nor is there any indication that the Democratic turnout will do anything but increase in November as we approach this historic general election.  I was quoted extensively in the local paper the Ventura County Reporter in its story on Ventura County’s flip from red to blue in overall voter registration–one of the major reasons for Tom McClintock’s departure to the supposedly friendlier climes of CA-04 to take on Charlie Brown.

Republican Elton Gallegly, meanwhile, is a do-nothing, nearly invisible Rubberstamp Republican who has essentially ignored the needs of the district for years while supporting the unpopular Occupation of Iraq, Bush’s unpopular tax cuts for the wealthy.

This is a race we can win, and Mary has the sort of progressive credentials we can all get excited about.  If you can, please help Mary with a donation so that we can finally flip this district from rubberstamp Red to progressive Blue!

Anne Krueger, San Diego Union-Tribune Stenographer

Anne Krueger, San Diego Union-Tribune, April 22, 2008:

Blackwater abandoned the East County site because gunfire tests there showed the noise exceeded county standards.

Anne Krueger, San Diego Union-Tribune, April 23, 2008:

On March 7, Blackwater dropped plans to build on the 824-acre Potrero site after noise tests showed gunfire shots exceeded county standards.

Anne Krueger, San Diego Union-Tribune, April 28, 2008:

The company scuttled its previous plans to build a training center in the East County community of Potrero after noise tests showed gunfire at the site exceeded county standards.

I know the “oldest business in San Diego” has a reputation of thinking that if you repeat something enough it will be accepted, but those days are gone. Nowadays, such crap just makes the reporter look like a hack stenographer.  

Calitics Show at 3:30 Today with Lloyd Levine and Fran Pavley

Just a quick final reminder of the Calitics Show. You can stream it live on the Radio show home page or listen to a podcast there or at iTunes.

Assembly member Lloyd Levine and former Assembly member Fran Pavley will join us to talk about a number of California policy issues. I figure they might also mention the fact that they are both running for SD-23 as well.