Offshore Drilling: Coming to a Coast Near You?

PhotobucketCalifornia was, once upon a time, the leader in offshore drilling. In fact, the first submerged oil wells was in the Santa Barbara Channel. Public acceptance can change rapidly when you spill 200,000 gallons of crude oil into the ocean. And change it did.

In many ways, that day in 1969 was the time when the environmental movement came of age.  It had a real, tangible event to show the world of how quickly we can turn a once beautiful strip of coast into a toxic mess.  And since that spill, we have cleared our coast of offshore drilling. But in the heat of the “Drill, Baby, Drill” McCain candidacy, George W Bush revoked the executive order putting a moratorium on offshore oil drilling. States across the South have invited oil companies to explore their coastlines.

But the Pacific Coast had held the line against offshore drilling.  During the Drill, Baby, Drill heydays, Arnold Schwarzenegger swam against the tide of his own party, calling for the continued moratorium on off-shore drilling.

America is so addicted to oil that it will take years to ween ourselves from it. To look for new ways to feed our addiction is not the answer. Anyone who tells you this would bring down gas prices anytime soon is blowing smoke.

But with Arnold, any principle can be sacrificed for the all-mighty dollar. So when it became apparent the May 19 election was going to fail, he turned his attention to the Tranquillion Ridge Project. The Project claimed that it would bring $1.8 Billion into the general fund. Each step of the way, John Garamendi fought him from his post on the State Lands Commission.

Despite a setback from that commission, Arnold still included the project in his proposals for the budget. Today, the LA Times called the plan out and provided a better method of attaining revenues:

Admittedly, the state could use the money. But that’s not a good enough reason to subvert the authority of the Lands Commission, sell California’s coastline in exchange for empty promises, ignore the wishes of Santa Barbara residents and dismiss the outcome of a long process of analysis and public hearings. The Lands Commission, in fact, was created in 1938 to bring more transparency to the awarding of oil leases after a scandal involving the Department of Finance.

If the governor really wants more oil money, there’s a better way: He could resurrect a plan he introduced last year calling for a 9.9% tax on crude oil extracted in the state. California is the only state in the union that doesn’t collect such an extraction tax, and Schwarzenegger estimated in November that it would bring in roughly $1.2 billion in the next fiscal year — dwarfing the $100 million that would be generated by the Plains Exploration project. (LAT 6/8/09)

A resolution advocating for oil severance made it through the CDP resolutions process, and such a proposal is now official Democratic Party policy.  If the Governor is serious about fixing the budget, that is where he would be pushing the Legislative Republicans. 70% of Californians support an oil extraction tax of some sort, yet the Republicans are still blocking the will of the people.

Drill, Baby, Drill is a recipe for disaster in both good and bad economic times. We should not be coompromising our goals of a clean and sustainable energy future for a few hundred million dollars.  I’ll be working to provide more depth on this issue, but in the mean time, consider emailing your legislator or joining John Garamendi’s facebook group to support the State Lands Commission’s position against drilling. We simply cannot afford another to turn our backs on 1969, the devastating consequences of a spill are just not worth the price.

4 thoughts on “Offshore Drilling: Coming to a Coast Near You?”

  1. 1,800 million, or 1.8 billion is not a few hundred million.

    As well, I’m sure oil companies have cleaned up their act a hell of a lot since 1969. Oil spills mean major losses to the companies that run those rigs.

    Stop using the fear of our coast being turned into a black waste to push your cause. Until we have a CHEAP, viable way to get off of oil, we need cheap viable ways to get it to the pump.

    It’s movements like this that keep the poor….well, poor. The oil companies line their pockets due to articles like this. Especially the ones that tell us that we’re running out of oil. That fear tactic only helps them to raise prices at the pump. Which makes the price of everything else go up. I wouldn’t be surprised if the person writing this column, or the people that are funded by this are linked to oil companies, probably middle-eastern ones too.

    Actually to me that makes perfect since. We say we’re gonna drill baby drill, and bam OPEC start the war against American oil drilling. Why? Well, because a “drill baby drill” campaign in America declares war on OPEC’s bottom line. Russia, or the great USSR, is affected as well, so i wouldn’t count them out either in this war on American drilling.

    Our bottom line here is to do what is in the best interests of ALL Americans, not the rich, not the middle class, not the poor, ALL Americans. Don’t be swayed by fear of mistakes that COULD happen, because mistakes DO happen, it’s life, we clean up, figure out what went wrong, fix it(NOT COMPLETE ERASE AN INDUSTRY), and move forward.

  2. Obviously the person who wrote it isn’t a regular at Calitics because they don’t have a clue about Brian.

    And I agree that the answer is NEVER to sacrifice our coastlines for the almighty dollar.  That’s a huge reason why this state pulls in so much tourist money….because of those beautiful pristine coastlines.

  3. lets just wipe ourselves off the face of the earth, it’s gonna be habitable for another 2.3 billion years, why not kill us all off and let it regenerate another species that will destroy it?

    or

    we could stop complaining about shit that could happen on our coasts, and start using the resources that are there. the tranquillien platform is there, gonna stay there, unless we let them drill for the next 14 years, at which time they say they will remove the platform, something that the people down there have said is like a miracle because platforms never get removed.

    But, some marine biologists say that the existing rigs have been used as an artificial shelf that houses a plethora of fish species. Oh, but NOAA needs more money to research that themselves.

    So i guess its a double-edged sword, drill baby drill, make some freakin mulla, which is also a rare source of income in California, and then get rid of the platform, or just leave it out there indefinitely and let the little fishies and aminals use it as a fort.

Comments are closed.