This Is A Good Way to Make Prison Policy

Over at the Disaster Accountability Blog, we get another complication in the prison mess.

According to a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation press release, “there are 2,245 adult inmates and 53 Division of Juvenile Justice youth deployed to fires statewide, including Los Angeles, Riverside, and 15 other counties,” under the supervision of “187 correctional officers and supervisors.” According to Reuters, “Inmates collectively did 3.1 million hours of emergency firefighting last year at $1 an hour.” California relies heavily on this labor and many worry that a release of 27,000 or more low-risk inmates will forfeit their availability.

There is no doubt that we owe a big debt of gratitude to the pair of brave firefighters that died in the line of duty. However, to base our prison policy on our firefighting needs is sheer madness. In theory, that would tell you to, what, hold more non-violent prisoners who are capable of outside work in prison simply to fight fires?

While it is nice that our prisons can be used in this manner, and it allows the prisoners to actually gain skills and experience which will help them down the line, it is not the point of the prison system. The point is to protect Californians and to rehabilitate the prisoners back into society. Planning our prison system to meet the needs of our fire situation is pretty much the definition of ass-backwards.

3 thoughts on “This Is A Good Way to Make Prison Policy”

  1.   Solzehnitsyn describes in the Gulag Archipelago how arrest quotas were set by the need to procure labor to open up

    Siberia, so it’s not an unprecedented procedure to base

    prisoner levels on economic needs.

     Now if we can only send prisoners to fight in Afghanistan

    and Iraq.  

  2. That statement actually implicates the 13th Amendment, and it goes without saying that there hasn’t been too much 13th Amendment litigation ;p.

    I think the Fire Camps are a great idea, but if they’re so worried about losing their labor, why not – gasp – give them the opportunity to continue to do emergency services on parole for market-rate pay and leave them with an employable skill?  But I suspect that would be too logical.

Comments are closed.