Sues Courage Campaign Over Logo

Note: I’m the Public Policy Director for the Courage Campaign

UPDATE: Judge Karlton denied the TRO request and makes it sound like he is not likely to rule against us on the lawsuit either.

Original post begins here:

Since we launched last Monday, the Courage Campaign’s Prop 8 Trial Tracker has become a leading source for information about the trial in Judge Vaughn Walker’s courtroom, since got the Supreme Court to block plans to televise the trial. We’ve had over 800,000 views and over 6,400 comments since we launched, a sign of how popular our liveblogging has become.

But there’s one group out there that isn’t a fan, and that’s Last Friday they sent Courage Campaign a cease and desist letter regarding our parody of the “Yes on 8” logo that we use on the Prop 8 Trial Tracker. Late yesterday, we learned that filed suit in US district court seeking a temporary restraining order asking a federal judge to order us to take our logo down.

Our lawyers’ response: no way. As our lawyer said, our logo is a “sassy” parody of their logo.

We continue to be entertained by the Prop 8 attorneys simultaneously admitting that the two images of gay parents and straight parents are “substantially indistinguishable,” and yet failing to grasp that that the difference between the logos illuminates the core difference between their views and ours.

My colleague Julia Rosen posted the complaint and our response over at the Prop 8 Trial Tracker. We don’t know yet whether Judge Lawrence K. Karlton will grant, deny, or ask for a hearing on the TRO.

Rick Jacobs, founder and chair of the Courage Campaign, had this to say in our press release:

The Courage Campaign Institute will continue to focus our energy on this historic trial and the rights and protections at stake for loving, committed same-sex couples. can continue to expend time, energy and resources on a logo. Frankly, I think that says a lot about our respective priorities.

We thought that our response laying out the tremendous legal precedent in cases like this would be the end of this silliness. But we are more than happy to defend our case if Prop 8 supporters continue to argue that the difference between their logo and ours is “substantially indistinguishable,” given that their logo features a father and mother and our logo features two mothers.

This is yet another attempt by Prop 8 supporters to distract from the facts being brought forth at this trial that are demonstrating quite clearly both the discrimination same-sex couples face and the need and benefit to society of equal treatment under the law.

We’re confident that the law and precedent are on our side. Our logo is an obvious parody of the logo. More importantly, is essentially claiming that there isn’t a difference between a family headed by a man and a woman and a family headed by two women. Wouldn’t it be nice if they argued that in Judge Walker’s courtroom? As one of the commenters on the Prop 8 Trial Tracker argued:

I just really want to hear [Rachel Maddow] say “ is suing Courage Campaign, saying a lesbian couple is indistinguishable from a heterosexual one. In other news, continues to argue that homosexuals are too different from heterosexuals to deserve equal protection under the law.”

You can see the logos for yourself:

We’ll be sure to keep you updated as to how this turns out. We’re not going to let the opponents of equality silence us.

3 thoughts on “ Sues Courage Campaign Over Logo”

  1. is that they’re wasting time trying to get Courage to…stop using a parody logo.  Even if they were successful and after a process that would resolve itself long after Perry ends, the only thing they would accomplish is to prevent the site from using a logo.

    And in the process, all they do is create more attention for the site.

  2. I know this thread is about the logo, but what about the statement next to the logo on – “holding the right wing accountable”?

    A partisan divide on this issue may largely exist, but is it supposed to?

    Why would proponents of same sex marriage want to alienate, without any benefit, the 2nd largest party in the State and Nation?

    Many prominent ‘right-wingers’ support same sex marriage – to list a few off the top of my head, there’s Jon and Ken, Tom Campbell, there was the mayor of SD who testified in favor of same sex marriage the other day (even Dick Cheney was willing to go against Bush and say that States shouldn’t be stopped by the federal government, from allowing same sex marriage). There’s no appreciation for that?

    I would think you’d want this to be as ‘unpartisan’ of an issue as possible. Is it fun trying to get a majority of the whole pie from never-more-than-two-thirds of it?

    I really don’t think there could be anything more dumb than if same-sex marriage proponents didn’t appreciate and welcome the substantial support received from the libertarian faction of the ‘right wing’

Comments are closed.