Tag Archives: Bob Filner

Progressive Punch: Jerry McNerney ranks 195th of 232

Woohoo! Jerry did it! Jerry McNerney has managed to become the most un-progressive Democrat of the entire California congressional delegation. For those keeping score at home, Jerry’s 82.45 was about a half point lower than the next CA Dem, Jim Costa, that progressive stalwart, at 82.97. And for all the talk of Harman changing her ways, she’s still worse than even Joe Baca, almost 7 points worse from a very safe Dem seat.

For all of you CA-45 fans, “moderate” Mary Bono came in with a stellar 4.42 Chips are Down score. So, for all the bluster of the SCHIP vote, she’s still dancing the same jig as the rest of her party.

On thing must be said, the Speaker has done an excellent job at preserving unity amongst the caucus. Whether that means she’s being too incremental and/or ineffective, or just laying down the law is the big question. The reason her approval rating, and the Congress in general, is down has a whole lot to do with the fact that little has changed on the Iraq front. So, would it be better to have a speaker who is more willing to take risks? Perhaps, but the impediment of the president always lingers over her head, veto pen in hand. So, whether the unity is really there, is an open question. Full data over the flip.








































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Rank Name 07-08 All-time ChipsAreDown Party State
1 Pelosi, Nancy 100.00 93.58 100.00 D CA
3 Sánchez, Linda T. 98.97 96.45 98.43 D CA
6 Lee, Barbara 98.45 96.99 97.18 D CA
9 Capps, Lois 98.28 88.95 97.49 D CA
13 Solis, Hilda L. 97.94 95.77 96.24 D CA
18 Richardson, Laura 97.83 97.83 96.43 D CA
23 Woolsey, Lynn C. 97.57 94.69 95.92 D CA
24 Filner, Bob 97.55 94.02 95.91 D CA
25 Matsui, Doris O. 97.42 94.46 95.30 D CA
26 Becerra, Xavier 97.33 92.41 95.19 D CA
37 Farr, Sam 96.72 90.66 94.98 D CA
39 Honda, Michael M. 96.63 94.39 94.67 D CA
51 Roybal-Allard, Lucille 96.39 92.79 94.03 D CA
55 Lofgren, Zoe 96.34 87.42 94.65 D CA
56 Tauscher, Ellen O. 96.23 83.14 93.10 D CA
58 Napolitano, Grace F. 96.17 90.68 93.42 D CA
63 Schiff, Adam B. 95.88 86.79 92.45 D CA
68 Waters, Maxine 95.77 93.38 93.31 D CA
71 Miller, George 95.72 93.67 93.20 D CA
73 Davis, Susan A. 95.70 87.53 93.10 D CA
77 Eshoo, Anna G. 95.64 88.63 93.38 D CA
82 Sherman, Brad 95.52 84.99 92.79 D CA
88 Berman, Howard L. 95.28 87.56 92.38 D CA
88 Watson, Diane E. 95.28 92.71 91.80 D CA
97 Thompson, Mike 95.01 85.33 93.42 D CA
102 Lantos, Tom 94.74 87.73 90.51 D CA
104 Sanchez, Loretta 94.49 84.58 90.19 D CA
114 Baca, Joe 94.16 82.91 90.28 D CA
127 Waxman, Henry A. 93.63 91.96 89.49 D CA
153 Stark, Fortney Pete 92.02 93.12 87.74 D CA
178 Cardoza, Dennis A. 90.09 77.80 84.86 D CA
179 Harman, Jane 89.82 76.91 83.86 D CA
187 Costa, Jim 89.22 78.46 82.97 D CA
195 McNerney, Jerry 87.63 87.63 82.45 D CA
274 Lewis, Jerry 18.40 10.68 4.73 R CA
283 Bono, Mary 16.01 11.32 4.42 R CA
295 Doolittle, John T. 12.72 4.44 1.57 R CA
313 Calvert, Ken 10.39 5.41 0.95 R CA
322 Hunter, Duncan 8.85 5.38 1.32 R CA
330 Gallegly, Elton 7.60 5.89 1.89 R CA
342 Rohrabacher, Dana 6.67 7.73 4.08 R CA
346 Dreier, David 6.38 5.19 2.51 R CA
352 Bilbray, Brian P. 6.07 13.85 3.77 R CA
356 McKeon, Howard P. “Buck” 5.91 3.87 1.27 R CA
370 Herger, Wally 4.92 3.30 0.95 R CA
373 Lungren, Daniel E. 4.81 4.43 1.25 R CA
376 Radanovich, George 4.60 3.65 1.27 R CA
378 Issa, Darrell E. 4.36 4.52 1.27 R CA
380 Miller, Gary G. 4.18 2.45 1.25 R CA
384 Nunes, Devin 4.01 3.30 0.31 R CA
385 McCarthy, Kevin 3.97 3.97 0.63 R CA
388 Royce, Edward R. 3.49 6.55 1.26 R CA
394 Campbell, John 3.12 3.77 2.85 R CA

Chips are down scorecard

(I was working on a similar post, but I’ll still post my own, with all CA data and some other miscellany. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

The problem with most scorecards is that they are written by lobbyists concerned with always getting the votes of potential supporters. Thus, there is an equal weighting while in the real world not all votes are equal. In fact, regardless of everything else, some votes are dealbreakers and when they show up on scorecards as one of 12 votes or something, it looks silly. However, Progressive Punch has a new “when the chips are down” scorecard. After the flip is the ratings of CA’s congressional delegation, in descending order.

Senate:

92.86 Boxer, Barbara
90.45 Feinstein, Dianne

House:

100.00 Pelosi, Nancy
98.43 Sánchez, Linda T.
97.49 Capps, Lois
97.18 Lee, Barbara
96.43 Richardson, Laura
96.24 Solis, Hilda L.
95.92 Woolsey, Lynn C.
95.91 Filner, Bob
95.30 Matsui, Doris O.
95.19 Becerra, Xavier
94.98 Farr, Sam
94.67 Honda, Michael M.
94.65 Lofgren, Zoe
94.03 Roybal-Allard, Lucille
93.42 Napolitano, Grace F.
93.42 Thompson, Mike
93.38 Eshoo, Anna G.
93.31 Waters, Maxine
93.20 Miller, George
93.10 Davis, Susan A.
93.10 Tauscher, Ellen O.
92.79 Sherman, Brad
92.45 Schiff, Adam B.
92.38 Berman, Howard L.
91.80 Watson, Diane E.
90.51 Lantos, Tom
90.28 Baca, Joe
90.19 Sanchez, Loretta
89.49 Waxman, Henry A.
87.74 Stark, Fortney Pete
84.86 Cardoza, Dennis A.
83.86 Harman, Jane
82.97 Costa, Jim
82.45 McNerney, Jerry

Vote to Condemn MoveOn Splits California’s DC Democrats in Half

I’m guessing that at tonight’s Calitics’ Actblue Celebrations there will be a lot of discussion about the votes to condemn MoveOn. The CA delegation split 50-50 in the senate and 16 yea and 17 nay in the house — wedged successfully by the GOP in half. After the flip is the scorecard.

Senate
Yea
Diane Feinstein

Nay
Barbara Boxer

House
Yea
Joe Baca (CA-43)
Dennis Cardoza (CA-18)
Jim Costa (CA-20)
Susan Davis (CA-53)
Anna Eshoo (CA-14)
Sam Farr (CA-17)
Jane Harman (CA-36)
Tom Lantos (CA-12)
Jerry McNerney (CA-11)
Grace Napolitano (CA-38)
Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Loretta Sanchez (CA-47)
Adam Schiff (CA-29)
Ellen Tauscher (CA-10)
Mike Thompson (CA-1)

Nay
Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Howard Berman (CA-28)
Lois Capps (CA-23)
Bob Filner (CA-51)
Mike Honda (CA-15)
Barbara Lee (CA-9)
Zoe Lofgren (CA-16)
Doris Matsui (CA-5)
George Miller (CA-7)
Linda Sanchez (CA-39)
Brad Sherman (CA-27)
Hilda Solis (CA-32)
Pete Stark (CA-13)
Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Diane Watson (CA-33)
Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Lynn Woolsey (CA-6)

Susan Davis Condemns MoveOn, Protest, Free Speech

(worth being frontpaged. Also, Jerry McNerney, Jane Harman, Adam Schiff, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Jim Costa, Laura Richardson, Joe Baca, Loretta Sanchez, Mike Thompson, Tom Lantos, Dennis Cardoza, Anna Eshoo, Sam Farr, Ellen Tauscher, and Grace Napolitano voted to tell the progressive movement to STFU. So replace Davis’ name with any of them. – promoted by David Dayen)

In a direct slap in the face to anyone who’s ever felt that free speech or the right to protest the government are, you know, Constitutional imperatives, Susan Davis voted today to condemn the Petraeus/Betray us MoveOn ad.  That’s what your congress is doing.  Not ending a war.  Not passing a law that will make people healthier, wealthier, wiser, or safer.  Spitting on free speech.  Thank you to Bob Filner and the 79 Democrats who stood with him for getting this vote right, and no thanks to the 195 Republicans and the 145 other Democrats in the House who joined Susan Davis in telling the nation to sit down, shut up, and leave governance to the grownups without passionate public input.  If you think MoveOn was disrespectful to the troops by running an ad in the New York Times Ms. Davis, where exactly does paying for the troops to get shot at rank?

It’s time to get angry. Congress is telling people what they’re supposed to say and not say.  I don’t remember learning about that congressional duty in government class.

Cross posted from San Diego Politico

CA-51: Bob Filner (D) charged with assault & battery

(Cross-posted at DailyKos)

Uh-oh.  MSNBC’s First Read

Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA) was involved in an altercation last night at Dulles Airport. He was allegedly angered by the amount of time it was taking to get his luggage and tried to push his way through the United Airlines baggage claim office.

….

The individual allegedly attempted to enter an area authorized for airline employees only, pushed aside the employee’s outstretched arm and refused to leave the area when asked by an airline employee. When MWAA officers arrived a few minutes later, the man had left the office and was waiting in the area of a bag carousel. … The airline employee appeared before a Loudoun County Magistrate later that evening and a summons was obtained charging Robert Filner (DOB 09/04/1942) with assault and battery, a class 1 misdemeanor.

ABC has more on his temper in a past incident too.

Filner, an eight-term incumbent who chairs the Veterans Affairs Committee, has displayed flashes of temper in the past.

About a year ago, he hurled obscenities at two Veterans Affairs officials after a briefing about the burglary of a laptop with military personnel information. The VA officials termed the briefing a “publicity stunt,” which angered Filner.

Now, Filner’s office has issued a statement.

**** UPDATE **** NBC’s Ken Strickland has the response from Filner’s press office in a written statement: “Congressman Bob Filner is on his way to Iraq, visiting our troops, and will have a full statement when he returns. Suffice it to say now, that the story that has appeared in the press is factually incorrect – and the charges are ridiculous.”

I’m really hoping they clarify ASAP what is factually incorrect, because as it stands, the story does not look good.

This could potentially hurt the Democrats even more than you think.  Bob Filner has been a champion for progressive causes.  He’s about as good as you can get on the environment (92% LCV rating in 2006), and as the chairman on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, has held key hearings on PTSD and traumatic brain injuries from Iraq.

He also:

* is a co-sponsor of H.R. 333 to begin impeachment proceedings against Dick Cheney.

* voted against the 2002 AUMF that let Bush invade Iraq.

* was one of the first co-sponsors of John Conyers’ H.R. 676 for universal health care.

And UTBriancl has praised Filner for helping brand the Democratic Party at a time when others seem embarrassed to mention that they belong to the party.

Bottom line, Filner is a guy I think the netroots would be proud to support.  If he’s forced out because of this, we lose a champion in the House.  And who would replace him?  Well, it seems there’s been a bitter rivalry between him and Juan Vargas, who keeps challenging Filner in the Democratic primary.  His main reasoning is that the Hispanic majority district should have a Hispanic representing them.  After what we went through with Laura Richardson saying similar things in CA-26, and similar things being said against Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) of Memphis, I don’t think there’s a place for that kind of talk.  I can already sense problems if Filner is replaced by Vargas.

I know, this may be very premature to talk about.  But you have to consider all the possibilities.  I hope he responds sooner than later to clear up what happened here.  Because right now, it doesn’t look good.

Building the Brand: Democratic Congress Critter Edition

Now Cross-posted at D-Kos and OpenLeft

One of the things that Republicans learned to do really well in the early 90s was branding.  In the modern era of marketing, the impact is really hard to overemphasize. People are increasingly relying on branding information where they were once using real data. That stinks, but it's the way the marketing game is played these days. So, we either play it or get steamrolled by it.  I bring this up to point out our own failings within the state to build the “Democratic” Brand. So, I poked around a few Congressional (electoral websites) for some good practices and some bad practices. 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketI’ll start with one of my favorite Congress critter, Rep. Barbara Lee. Barbara Lee really does speak for me, in many ways. Unfortunately, she doesn’t speak for the Democratic Party very well. There are few mentions of the party on the site, and she hardly mentions that she is a Democrat. The website, overall, isn’t bad. It’s fairly well organized, but more could be done in terms of activating her great base.  But, as I said, she could be doing much more to increase the Democratic Brand to her fans.  All that being said, Rep. Lee’s district is overwhelmingly Democratic, and so the greatest way for her to boost Democratic fortunes is for her to just turn out the vote.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketNext, let’s take a look at Loretta Sanchez.  Her Orange County District is D+5, and she’s been relatively safe for quite a few years. In terms of politics, her Progressive Punch Score of 84.53 puts her pretty much in the  middle (#143 in terms of progressiveness) of Democrats in the House. Her election website hasn’t changed since the 2006 election, but we can still take a look for its branding.  The word “Democrat” does appear in the metatags of the site, and in reference to a few of her initiatives on secondary pages.  However, the name of her party does not appear anywhere on the front page.  While some would argue that in her relatively swing district that this could damage her.  However, I would argue that the point of this exercise is to build the Democratic brand to the point that the fact that you are a Democrat is a strength, not some sort of weakness (perceived or otherwise).  So, particularly in a district that could conceivably be called “swing”, we should make sure our more prominent Democrats help other Democrats in the area by promoting the brand. If Loretta Sanchez is the ideal Democrat for Orange County, then she should be using herself as the poster child for the Party.  I’m not sure why she has chosen not to do so in the past, but if a truly great Democratic leader understands the need to foster other Democratic leaders in the Region, even if that possibly causes a few voters to think “Eww, she’s a Democrat, like that Darn Pelosi”. 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketNow to a few who are good. And, unfortunately, really good examples were pretty hard to come by in the California Democratic Congressional Delegation.  I’ll start with Bob Filner (D-San Diego/Imperial County).  While the Page doesn’t say in big letters “Bob Filner, Democrat for Congress” like I would like to see, the home page does have a really great little message about why Democrats are great:

The Democrats have taken back control of the House and Senate and now we can get our country headed back in the right direction!  We will refocus on what’s most important to working men and women; bringing our troops home, creating jobs that pay living wages, ensuring quality education and health care for all, and protecting our environment.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketThat’s pretty cool.  All Dems should have a similar message about why Dems are better than Reeps.  Now, unfortunately for more good examples, I was pressed into looking at Reeps. Now, I’m not saying that I looked at all of our Representative’s websites (of those that even have them), so if people know of more good examples, point them out.  However, probably the best example of branding was from a California Republican, and I thought it should be pointed out.  It is the homepage of Rep. David Dreier (R-Glendora).  The site has your normal mish-mash of great quotes about him.  (For some reason, I don’t see anything about “family values” on there…I wonder why that is, Rep. Dreier?)  But what he does well? Well, he takes a swing at the Dems while glorifying Republicans.  More Democrats should be doing the opposite.

Congress has been run by the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi for more than six months and approval is at an all-time low. That’s because they have blatantly broken virtually every promise that they made in last year’s campaign and have, true to form, pushed for more spending, higher taxes, increased regulation and capitulation in our effort to achieve victory and bring our troops home from Iraq.

We are fighting hard to win the War on Terror, secure the border, grow the economy by reducing the tax and regulatory burden, pursue energy alternatives and encourage individual initiative and responsibility. That’s our positive vision.

As Republicans continue to work hard to earn back our Majority, I welcome your thoughts and ideas.

I welcome your comments on this one. If you know of good (or bad) Congress Critter sites, post them here.  This is something that we need to talk about if it is to get better.

Thanks to 12 California House Democrats

…who just signed on to a letter to the President vowing not to appropriate any more money to the Iraq debacle for anything other than a fully funded withdrawal.  Kudos to these 12:

Lynn Woolsey
Barbara Lee
Maxine Waters
Ellen Tauscher
Diane Watson
Bob Filner
Hilda Solis
Grace Napolitano
Linda Sanchez
Mike Honda
Pete Stark
Lois Capps

Reward good behavior.  Letter on the flip.

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing to inform you that we will only support appropriating additional funds for U.S. military operations in Iraq during Fiscal Year 2008 and beyond for the protection and safe redeployment of all our troops out of Iraq before you leave office.

More than 3,600 of our brave soldiers have died in Iraq. More than 26,000 have been seriously wounded. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed or injured in the hostilities and more than 4 million have been displaced from their homes. Furthermore, this conflict has degenerated into a sectarian civil war and U.S. taxpayers have paid more than $500 billion, despite assurances that you and your key advisors gave our nation at the time you ordered the invasion in March, 2003 that this military intervention would cost far less and be paid from Iraqi oil revenues.

We agree with a clear and growing majority of the American people who are opposed to continued, open-ended U.S. military operations in Iraq, and believe it is unwise and unacceptable for you to continue to unilaterally impose these staggering costs and the soaring debt on Americans currently and for generations to come.

Sincerely,

Rep. Lynn Woolsey (CA); Rep. Barbara Lee (CA); Rep. Maxine Waters (CA); Rep. Ellen Tauscher (CA); Rep. Rush Holt (NJ); Rep. Maurice Hinchey (NY); Rep. Diane Watson (CA); Rep. Ed Pastor (AZ); Rep. Barney Frank (MA); Rep. Danny Davis (IL); Rep. John Conyers (MI); Rep. John Hall (NY); Rep. Bob Filner (CA); Rep. Nydia Velazquez (NY); Rep. Bobby Rush (IL); Rep. Charles Rangel (NY); Rep. Ed Towns (NY); Rep. Paul Hodes (NH); Rep. William Lacy Clay (MO); Rep. Earl Blumenauer (OR); Rep. Albert Wynn (MD); Rep. Bill Delahunt (MA); Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC); Rep. G. K. Butterfield (NC); Rep. Hilda Solis (CA); Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY); Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY); Rep. Michael Honda (CA); Rep. Steve Cohen (TN); Rep. Phil Hare (IL); Rep. Grace Flores Napolitano (CA); Rep. Alcee Hastings (FL); Rep. James McGovern (MA); Rep. Marcy Kaptur (OH); Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL); Rep. Julia Carson (IN); Rep. Linda Sanchez (CA); Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ); Rep. John Olver (MA); Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX); Rep. Jim McDermott (WA); Rep. Ed Markey (MA); Rep. Chaka Fattah (PA); Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (NJ); Rep. Rubin Hinojosa (TX); Rep. Pete Stark (CA); Rep. Bobby Scott (VA); Rep. Jim Moran (VA); Rep. Betty McCollum (MN); Rep. Jim Oberstar (MN); Rep. Diana DeGette (CO); Rep. Stephen Lynch (MA); Rep. Artur Davis (AL); Rep. Hank Johnson (GA); Rep. Donald Payne (NJ); Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (MO); Rep. John Lewis (GA); Rep. Yvette Clarke (NY); Rep. Neil Abercrombie (HI); Rep. Gwen Moore (WI); Rep. Keith Ellison (MN); Rep. Tammy Baldwin (WI); Rep. Donna Christensen (USVI); Rep. David Scott (GA); Rep. Luis Gutierrez (IL); Lois Capps (CA); Steve Rothman (NJ); Elijah Cummings (MD); and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX).

CA-51: Filner’s battle with identity politics

District 51In another primary battle involving a seven-term incumbent, Bob Filner is facing a challenge from two Latino Congressional hopefuls.  Juan Vargas currently represents the 79th AD and is termed out this year.  Thus, this is another term limits inspired fight.  Danny Ramirez is a perennial candidate in this race, and shouldn’t be much of a factor this year with a serious Latino candidate in the race.

Filner has been one of the more liberal voices in Congress.  On immigration he received an “F-” from the Americans for Better Immigration (that’s a good thing). He received an “A” From the NAACP, 95% by the League of Conservation Voters, 100% by NARAL, and a 100 from the HRC.

Hispanics, many of them recent arrivals to California, make up just more than half of the 51st District’s population. So while many Americans favor building a tall wall to slow the influx of illegal immigrants, not many of them live in the California district that would be most affected.

The demographics of the 51st District are, however, at the very heart of the primary challenge to Filner. Primary voters are being asked — and not for the first time — whether Filner’s good relations with his Hispanic constituency and strongly liberal voting record justifies his re-election, or if the fact that Filner is a non-Hispanic white makes him an impediment to Latino empowerment. (CQ Politics 6/1/06)

Vargas has run against Filner for this seat before.  In 1992, when Filner first won, Vargas was a San Diego City Councilman, but lost his Congressional bid.  So now Vargas is attempting to see if the gains in Hispanic voters in the district will be sufficient to win the seat.  Filner is managing to get most of the endorsements from Latino organizations, and the split in any identity voters caused by Ramirez’s presence on the ballot should propel Filner to a comfortable victory.  However, Vargas has run a decent campaign and he has a history in the district.