Tag Archives: Proposition 89

Props to FTCR for Prop 89 Creativity

California voters who want to clean up the mess in Sacramento are facing an uphill task in passing Proposition 89 – the California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act. The big money, special interests who dominate the current system are planning a massive campaign against Prop. 89 and it is going to take creativity and a lot of hard work to pass Prop 89.

The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights deserves serious credit this week for highlighting the obscene financial shakedown of lobbyist contributions that occurs in Sacramento when lawmakers are finalizing bills.

On Tuesday, FTCR President Jamie Court had a powerful Op-Ed column in the LA Times on the August fundraising ‘orgy’:

Today is the height of the dollar derby, with at least 20 fundraisers scheduled. It almost makes you feel sorry for the special-interest groups. “For the month of August, we don’t see our family,” a lobbyist told the Capitol Weekly. “Under the current system, they have to ask, and we have to contribute.”

Despite politicians’ protestations that campaign contributions do not influence them, big money makes a big difference in the legislative frenzy. Is it any coincidence that big-money lobbies win and consumers lose? […]

This could be the last August for the cash dash. Proposition 89 on the November ballot would establish public financing of campaigns, paid for with a tiny increase — 0.2% — in the corporate profits tax. So candidates who kick the fundraising habit would not have to prostitute themselves for private financing. Few politicians would opt out of accepting public money if their publicly funded opponents could match them dollar for dollar.

The same special interests and lobbyists nibbling, sipping and twisting arms this week will be putting up big money to stop Proposition 89. Their ads will rev up fake outrage that any tax would pay for politicians’ campaigns. What they won’t mention is how the price of our gasoline, healthcare, housing and telephone bills is a lot higher when lobbyists do the paying.

But FTCR didn’t stop with there. Yesterday, they sponsored a Dash for Cash contest, brought their camcorders, and uploaded the video on Youtube.

The Ventura County Star reported:

All across town, it’s Christmas in August for Sacramento restaurants, hotels, social clubs and caterers. The end of the legislative session is approaching, and lawmakers are literally working overtime to raise campaign money — at breakfast before work, during their lunch break, or over dinner after the day’s final committee meeting has been gaveled to a close.

Wednesday may have set an unofficial record: 22 fundraisers in a single day. One lobbyist, checking his appointment book, advised that the record could fall next week.

Who was documenting everything?

To call attention to all the money-changing, Heller’s group staged a guerilla-style protest Wednesday, dispatching unwelcome guests to each of the 22 events. It was a bipartisan day for passing the hat: 13 Democrats and 9 Republicans held events.

Volunteers sought free admission, and the one who successfully crashed the most events would win dinner and pair of tickets to a Sacramento Kings basketball game. Double points were awarded if a volunteer could get the elected official to pose for a picture.

In addition, camera crews for the group’s online video site, Channel89.org, filmed and attempted to interview lobbyists as they came and went.

The foundation is promoting Proposition 89 on the Nov. 7 ballot, an initiative sponsored by the California Nurses Association that would create a system of voluntary public financing for campaigns for state offices. Under its terms, candidates who agreed to foreswear private contributions could qualify for public financing of their campaigns by first raising a threshold number of $5 contributions to prove their earnestness.

Proposition 89 will clean up the system:

Proponents argue that candidates and elected officials, if freed from the constant demands of fundraising, would be able to devote their time to meeting with constituents and taking care of public business.

“If Proposition 89 passes, we won’t have the Dash for Cash in August,” Heller said. “Instead, we’ll have a race for the best ideas.”

You can see the video at www.Channel89.org

California Blog Roundup for August 16, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-11, CA-04, John Doolittle, Richard Pombo, Republican corruption, Proposition 87, Proposition 89, redistricting, term limits, health care.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Other Republican Paragons

Health Care

Propositions

Goo-Goo Stuff

  • OK, here’s the deal. Redistricting lives for now, but won’t be combined with term limit reform.
  • The Mad Professah on the 2001 redistricting deal and reforming it. Have a read, but remind yourself that anything involving spending requires a 2/3 majority, so a gerrymander into a simple majority is nice, but not ideal.
  • Cathy Feng from Common Cause on redistricting. If people want to redistrict the state in some nonpartisan way, that’s fine (subject to endless caveats about the way it’s done), but for California to redistrict Congressional districts that way when Texas doesn’t is just stupid unilateral disarmament.
  • Oh, and term limits? Basically useless for anything except putting control of government in the hands of staff and lobbyists.

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for August 11, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-11, CA-04, Bill Durston, Charlie Brown, John Doolittle, Richard Pombo, Dan Lundgren, Republican corruption, Proposition 90, Proposition 89, Proposition 87, health care, global warming.

Bloggers on GovernorPhil.com

As I’m sure you know, a group of independent California bloggers (including our own sfbriancl) launched Governor Phil yesterday, to track the race and tell folks how they felt about Governor Phil (good, they feel good). Here are some bloggy reactions, in no particular order:

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Health Care

Propositions

The Rest

Proposition 89 – Teachers, where do you stand on clean money?

(I posted much of this on DailyKos yesterday, but what with Lieberman, 100K users and terror, it’s probably better to share with more of a California-oriented audience!)

Riding on the wave of energy stemming from YearlyKos, I’ve been enjoying my involvement in the California Clean Money Campaign.  The more I learn about this effort, the more I believe in it and its promise. Is it perfect? No. But Californians have a historic opportunity to enact real reform, one we might not get again soon. And clean money proponents are aware of some shortcomings and already looking to the review process to remedy them should it pass.

I was therefore disappointed to read this press release from the California Teachers Association stating their opposition to Proposition 89, the California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act. I’m apparently not alone. In fact, in volunteering I’ve met several CTA members who have expressed concern about the union’s stance. 

So here’s a question for California teachers — what are you hearing?  And do you agree with the CTA? If you listen to the CTA, you are certainly not hearing the whole story. In the release, we hear several one-sided arguments:

It does nothing to enforce current campaign contribution limits or to limit how much the wealthiest citizens can spend on their own campaigns, while limiting the participation of small businesses, labor unions and non-profit organizations in the political process,” said Barbara E. Kerr, President of the California Teachers Association.

It may not limit what wealthy citizens can spend, but she neglects to note that it does have a provision so that their opponents receive matching funds to level the playing field.  And it’s interesting that she leaves large corporations of her list of organiziations that would be regulated.  As it is, the individual voter is the one whose participation is most limited without Proposition 89. 

“California faces many public finance challenges,” said Larry McCarthy of Cal Tax. “Our roads need fixing, our schools need help, and our health care system is in trouble. What we don’t need is to spend precious tax dollars on political campaigns by candidates and elected officials.”

What we DO need is to see our precious tax dollars spent efficiently and on projects that benefit Californians. When money controls the process, this can’t happen – we are instead faced with a litany of abuses. The amount set aside for Prop 89 amounts to about 0.1% of the California budget. Doesn’t it seem like a worthwhile investment to help make sure the other 99.9% is wisely spent?

Significant portions of similar measures in other states have been declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ah, and so that means that the crafters of this initiative haven’t learned from those measures?  Give them some credit. Adam B did a great job of explaining some of the differences when the Vermont campaign finance laws were invalidated.

It’s ironic that the CTA calls the initiative “deceptive” when their press release seems to deceive the membership through selective withholding of key facts. And what a sad shame that an organization that rallied along with the nurses against Arnold for denouncing them as “special interests” are now living up to that designation.  Teachers, I hope you’ll learn more on your own about the initiative and then join the nurses and individually  support Prop 89 for real election campaign reform. Just remember the words of our own Governator:

“Special interests have a stranglehold on Sacramento. Here’s how it works: Money goes in. Favors go out. The people lose. We need to send a message: Game over.”

California Blog Roundup, August 9, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-11, CA-04, John Doolittle, Republican corruption, Proposition 89, Proposition 85, Jerry Brown, health care.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Propositions

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for August 7, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry McNerney, Charlie Brown, John Doolittle, Brent Wilkes, Republican corruption, Proposition 89, minimum wage, prisons, environment, redistricting reform.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

    Randy Bayne attended the opening of Jerry McNerney’s Stockton office and reports back.

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Other Republican Paragons (Brent Wilkes Edition)

  • California Republican taught Brent Wilkes how to bribe. Awwww… isn’t that sweet?
  • Ah, the top tier of Wilkes “transactional lobbying” recipients (purty euphemism for “bribery”, ain’t it — lots of California Republicans. Makes one proud.
  • Down With Tyranny: You simply can’t walk away from the [article] without wondering why Randy “Duke” Cunningham is the only Republican in prison for the widespread corruption that virtually defines the GOP political culture of the last half dozen years in Washington, from lowlife slimeball congressmen to a lowlife slimeball president and vice president (yes, Wilkes gave BushCheney hundreds of thousands of dollars in quasi-legal bribes too).
  • Apparently, corruption is what you get when you put Republicans in positions of power. Of course, since they don’t believe in government, they probably don’t think they did anything wrong.

Propositions

Prisons

  • Politics in the Zeros: Take control of the prisons away from the Schwarzeneggers and prison guards, and force reform.
  • Don Perata: what we’re doing with the prisons isn’t working. Time to try some actual rehabilitation.
  • Schwarzenegger’s last-minute election year stunt, calling a special session to deal with the prison crisis he’s known about for years, is pretty much guaranteed to fail. No matter what the Bush Republicans say, you don’t just whip up a solution to problems of this size, just in time for an election.

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for August 4, 2006

Just in time for the weekend, today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry McNerney, Paid-For Pombo, 15% Doolittle, Dan Lungren, Republican corruption, Proposition 89, Proposition 90, minimum wage, infrastructure bonds, prisons, global warming.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Other Republican Paragons

Propositions

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for July 31, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-04, CA-11, Jerry McNerney, Richard Pombo, John Doolittle, Republican corruption, Proposition 90, Proposition 89, Proposition 87, voting, prisons, health care, immigration.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

15% Doolittle / CA-04

Other Republican Paragons

Propositions

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for July 27, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-04, CA-11, Richard Pombo, John Doolittle, Proposition 89, Proposition 87, health care, telecom.

Governor’s Race — Poll Stuff

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

15% Doolittle / CA-04

Propositions

The Rest

California Blog Roundup for July 21, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Arnold Schwarzenegger, CA-04, CA-11, CA-41, Jerry Lewis, John Doolittle, Republican corruption, clean money, voting, lots of other stuff.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

    SNTP has a rumination on the McNerney / Filson fundraising dead heat. Filson was the Democratic institutional “moderate” candidate who was supposed to be able to really get funded, but McNerney picked up the grassroots support and ran even with Filson. Now if only McNerney could get a little institutional help, maybe we could narrow the gap with Paid-For Pombo. You’d think there’d be a lesson here for the institutional committees.

15% Doolittle / CA-04

  • 15% Doolittle cuts through red tape for folks, if (purely by coincidence) they’re paying his wife a lot of money for services she didn’t actually provide.
  • California is a community property state. That means that half of every dollar that someone pays 15% Doolittle’s wife actually belongs to 15% Doolittle. So in Q2 2006, 15% Doolittle personally took in more than $17,500 from campaign contributors.
  • One MIL-yon Dollars! That’s what 15% Doolittle spent on his primary bid alone. If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance… Seriously, think about this. There are fewer than 650,000 people in CA-04, and the most expensive media market is Sacramento. And 15% Doolittle spent a cool million to defend himself against a Republican challenger.

Other Republican Paragons

The Rest