Tag Archives: austerity

Our Austere Future: CA Democratic Congressional Delegation Challenges Transportation Bill

35W Bridge Collapse Pictures, Images and PhotosProposed legislation would stymie important upgrades to our transportation network.

by Brian Leubitz

In a letter delivered to the Chair of the House Transportation Committee, California Democrats strongly objected to proposed cuts in transportation funding:

We are writing today to express our concerns about the recently released Republican proposal for the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act that cuts almost 1/3 of current level funding for highways and mass transit.  Specifically, we urge you to reconsider the overall proposed funding level, which would further adversely affect the fragile economy in California and the nation.

In order to compete in the global market, we must invest in our infrastructure as our biggest competitor already does.  China spends 9 percent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) annually on infrastructure, while the U.S. spends less than 2 percent.  More startling is the fact that the U.S. spends 40 percent less than it needs every year to improve the outdated backbone of our country.

Equally concerning is the recently released study by the American Society of Civil Engineers.  The report shows that if we do not properly invest in our nation’s infrastructure, we could lose more than 870,000 jobs, and suppress the growth of the country’s GDP by $3.1 trillion by 2020. The report also showed that in 2010, deficiencies in America’s roads, bridges, and transit systems cost American households and businesses more than $129 billion, including $32 billion in delays in travel time and $590 million in environmental costs.

In a time when the nation is clearly desperate for jobs, why are we embarking on a prolonged period of austerity? These transportation cuts would put people out of work right away, adding to our unemployment roles, and putting us on the wrong direction for the economy.

There are a great many ways that we should be spending money.  While we seem to have limitless funds for three wars, and the rich can party like it is 2006, how is it that we can’t manage to ensure that our bridges don’t collapse and that we have safe highways?

Find the full letter over the flip.

The Honorable John L. Mica

Chairman

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

2165 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC

Dear Chairman Mica,

We are writing today to express our concerns about the recently released Republican proposal for the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act that cuts almost 1/3 of current level funding for highways and mass transit.  Specifically, we urge you to reconsider the overall proposed funding level, which would further adversely affect the fragile economy in California and the nation.

In order to compete in the global market, we must invest in our infrastructure as our biggest competitor already does.  China spends 9 percent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) annually on infrastructure, while the U.S. spends less than 2 percent.  More startling is the fact that the U.S. spends 40 percent less than it needs every year to improve the outdated backbone of our country.

Equally concerning is the recently released study by the American Society of Civil Engineers.  The report shows that if we do not properly invest in our nation’s infrastructure, we could lose more than 870,000 jobs, and suppress the growth of the country’s GDP by $3.1 trillion by 2020. The report also showed that in 2010, deficiencies in America’s roads, bridges, and transit systems cost American households and businesses more than $129 billion, including $32 billion in delays in travel time and $590 million in environmental costs.

The proposal to reduce funding in the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act will have lasting and negative effects on the California economy.  In fact, the state would lose $468 million in public transportation funds and more than $1.25 billion in highway infrastructure investments.  This means a loss of 61,054 jobs in California.

We do commend you for including an expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA Program).  This federal loan program provides direct loans, loan guarantees and lines of credit to finance transportation projects of national and regional significance. In California, this would up project delivery by allowing projects to receive low-cost federal loans or bonds up front that would be paid back with dedicated tax revenue.

We urge you to reconsider the overall funding level for the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act.  Our national infrastructure is failing and we cannot afford to cut funding if the cost is the success of our commerce and economic growth.  We look forward to working with you to address our country’s infrastructure needs.

Sincerely,

Joe Baca

Karen Bass

Xavier Becerra

Howard Berman

Lois Capps

Dennis Cardoza

Jim Costa

Judy Chu

Susan Davis

Anna Eshoo

Sam Farr

Bob Filner

John Garamendi

Janice Hahn

Mike Honda

Barbara Lee

Zoe Lofgren

Doris Matsui

Jerry McNerney

George Miller

Grace Napolitano

Laura Richardson

Lucille Roybal-Allard

Linda Sanchez

Adam Schiff

Brad Sherman

Jackie Speier

Pete Stark

Mike Thompson

Maxine Waters

Henry Waxman

Lynn Woolsey

Trickle-Down Austerity

Federal cuts will impact California

by Brian Leubitz

When the big stimulus came out, we complained about the relative paucity of aid to states.  When state budget deficits ballooned across the country, we complained about the lack of state aid.  Heck, even the Economist said that there should be more aid to states.  But, another round of state aid was never to come to pass.  And as a consequence, public sector job cuts are now a big part of the looming (and possibly already occurring) double-dip recession:

Photobucket

This is what austerity feels like. In another setback for the economy, the unemployment rate in June rose to 9.2 percent, its highest level since December 2010, the Labor Department reported. A measly 18,000 jobs were added in June, carried by an increase of 57,000 jobs in the private sector but dulled by losses of 39,000 jobs in the public sector. As government stimulus winds down and states move to close massive budget gaps, public sector cuts should continue to grow, labor market experts say.

*** **** ***

While the overall picture painted in the report is gloomy, the bigger story may lie in cuts on the government front. In June, local governments reported job losses of 18,000, and the federal government shed 14,000 jobs. Nearly 100,000 local government employees have lost their jobs so far this year, and 464,000 have found themselves jobless since local government employment peaked in September 2008. Meanwhile, private sector employers, who cut jobs at a more rapid pace earlier in the recovery, have slowly added jobs. Since March 2010, when private sector employment rose for the first time in more than two years, private employers have added about two million employees to their payrolls.(US News)

And since the Tea Party held the nation hostage, only to mostly vote against the debt ceiling legislation that was essentially a Democratic cave, cuts will trickle down.  Across the intertubes, reports speculating about how each state will fare in the cuts are appearing.  Here in California, Dan Walters took a look at the impact of federal spending on the state budget, as did the TV folks at KCRA.

According to state Department of Finance records, federal funding accounts for about $76.7 billion, or nearly 38 percent, of total state spending in California.  California Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said before the debt deal was announced Sunday night he was concerned about cuts to entitlement programs, especially if they reduce payments to the states for Medicaid, which provide health care for the poor and disabled. The state’s version is known as Medi-Cal and covers 7.5 million people.

*** **** ***

“I think it was a tragic decision to completely balance it on the back of discretionary programs,” Rick Mockler, executive director of the California Head Start Association, told KCRA 3. “There was a big conversation for weeks about taking a balanced approach, meaning that there would be some cuts, but there would also be some new revenue. To us, that made a lot more sense.” (KCRA)

Of course revenue would have made a lot more sense, but when you are negotiating with a zombie death cult, logic isn’t even part of the discussion.  Good public policy goes out the window for the sake of one policy goal, and one goal only: the lowering of taxes.  The Zombies from Planet No hardly concern themselves with the issue of actually stimulating the economy, instead relentlessly hewing to an ideology that would even scare Reagan.

And yet with the deal we made this week, we can all be assured that more cuts will be heading to Sacramento on a budget that is already had more chunks taken out of it than a member of the Donner Party.  It is an austerity that simply shouldn’t be permitted in a nation that is still, by far, the wealthiest in the world.

Unlock the Puerta

Photobucketby Brian Leubitz

You may have noticed that I’ve been pretty quiet around here.  I apologize for that, but I’ve had the opportunity to be in Spain as the nation emerges into its own, fighting the impending austerity coming from the “Socialist” government.  The irony is really thick, as the outgoing Socialist Prime Minister, Jose L.R. Zapatero, has said that if he were younger, he would be out protesting as well.

But these aren’t just protests.  When I was in Barcelona, over hundred thousand protesters came out to call out the nations leaders.  To be honest, they know how to throw a protest.  As I was walking around, the thousands of outraged Spainards made noise, every kind of noise, keys jangling, the beating of pots and pans, and just plain yelling.  With no amplification at all, you could hear the protests for blocks with a deafening roar that no politician could ignore.  It really was a spine tingling moment as I just strolled amongst them.  There were reports of unconfirmed police brutality, but for the most part, the Barcelona government helped the protest proceed.

And today I am in Madrid, where a tent city has grown up in Puerta del Sol.  It is a community in every sense of the word.  It has a kitchen serving up free food, a library, and a legal aid booth.  Madrid gets blisteringly hot in the summer, so how long they can last is in question, but they seem determined to stay as long as it takes them to wedge the government into fighting austerity.

In other words, the people are forcing the hands of the left.  They are demanding action from the nominal leaders of the left, or at least the ones that were elected.  And by action, I mean something besides enabling austerity.

The parallels to both California and the nation are easy to spot.  In California, it was a Democratic victory in 2010 that enabled massive cuts.  And we’ve been seeing small scale rallies demanding that our leaders stand up to austerity, but with over $14 bn. in cuts, that horse has left the barn, and Democratic leaders can only halfheartedly chase after them.  Just today, the Bay Citizen has a great report on another of the painful cuts, adult education.  It isn’t that the community college and school districts want to cut these services, but ultimately, they have to prioritize.  And yet, Democratic leaders can only shout after the horse.

On the other hand,  Spanish anger is actually spilling out on the streets.  The people are mad, the youth are in a desperate situation as unemployment is staggeringly high, and they are letting the world know.  But in California, our displays are limited to symbolic , hour long protests at the Capitol.  When do we occupy the Capitol lawn? When doe the streets ofSF or LA look like those of Barcelona or Madrid?  It will take a serious committed movement to pressure both the nominal left in the state, but also to make the Right fear for their own hardline positions.  The media acts as if austerity is simply a given.  It is not, nor should it be.

But we have to let them know.