The Decimated Ranks of Reporter Bloggers and the Budget

There have been some complaints here and elsewhere that the press has not been focusing much on the budget.  The argument is that the press is partially to blame for the length of this impasse.  Well, they are probably right, but it isn’t really the press’s fault.  There just isn’t very many of them these days to actually write on the topic.  The Sacramento press corps has been pretty well thrashed over the past few months.  John Howard over at the Capitol Weekly did a good job covering the actual departures.  What I want to focus on is the utter decimation in the quality stable of reporter bloggers we once had covering state politics.

In the course of a few months we have lost Dan Weintraub, the first reporter blogger in the country behind a pay-wall at the SacBee.  He was joined by Shane Goldmacher, behind the same wall.  When Shane moved to the Bee from the Cap Weekly he gave up his blogger blog that had gained a respectable following.  The Mercury News blog On Politcs has been on hiatus since late January.  Kate Fulmar used to be the main voice over there, but she was recently let go by the Merc.  Heck the url doesn’t even work any more.  Last but not least is Bob Salladay.  He promised us that Political Muscle would be back after a brief hiatus, but it has been almost two months.  I still have Political Muscle and On Politics in my RSS reader, waiting for the day when they come back to life.  It increasingly looks like that day will not come.

Why does this matter?  Well, the negotiations around the budget have been fast and furious.  The reporter bloggers tend to be the best source for breaking news.  It has been almost impossible to track what is going on until the next day’s paper comes out.  By then it is already outdated.  John Meyers has been a great resource and just maybe we will see a post out of the Chron blog, especially if it is salacious.  Frank is doing an amazing job over at the California Progress Report, especially with his interns.  However, I still miss the broader based coverage we used to have a short time ago.  I am not one of those bloggers who gleefully watches the press’s fiscal troubles.  We need them to do a lot of the real reporting and leave us to run commentary.  Either that or our independent folks need to be better funded and we need more of them.

Gary Miller’s lack of judgment

It seems that Rep. Gary Miller (R-CA) not only has judgment problems when it comes to his ethics, but also in the way he dresses on the Hill. On Monday, he apparently wore slippers and a Hawaiian shirt in the Captiol while conducting business.

 Granted, it is summer, when dress codes tend to get a little looser in the face of Washington's starched-shirt- wilting heat. But a slipper-clad Rep. Gary Miller (R-Calif.) apparently took the summer casual look a little too far and he got a dressing down for, well, dressing down!

ROLL CALL reports: During a House vote at about 7:30 p.m. on Monday, Miller strode onto the floor wearing a look better suited to a backyard cookout than the House chamber: a loose-fitting Hawaiian shirt, linen pants and slippers.

The sartorial faux pas even prompted Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), who was presiding over the chamber at the time, to weigh in: “The chair must remind Members that the proper standard of dress in the chamber is business attire, which includes both coat and tie for gentlemen.”

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_12/hoh/19541-1.html

 

 

Feinstein To Endorse Hillary

I have to be blunt about one part of life in California since moving here. Election year 2006 was not a pleasant experience for me in the state. Before the June Gubernatorial Primary, I watch Dianne Feinstein among others campaign up and down the state for Phil Angelides. I voted for Steve Westley, but when the ticket was set for the November election, I was a good soldier and line up fore-square behind Phil. So where was Dianne?

 

I quickly reached the conclusion that her primary activities were nothing more than part of the CDP and labor making sure everyone knew who was in charge, November be damned. Because when it was time to put balls to the wall for the statewide ticket, Dianne, was nowhere to be found. I went to no less than three rallies in San Francisco and Oakland and never saw her. Now, she’s doing it again.

The San Francisco Chronicle is reporting that Feinstein will endorse Hillary for President.

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, bolstering what appears to be an increasingly formidable campaign operation in delegate-rich California, will announce her endorsement by Democratic U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California’s senior senator, today, sources close to the campaign have said.

The endorsement of the New York senator’s presidential bid by Feinstein — one of the state’s most popular politicians — swells what is now a growing list of recent Clinton supporters among key Democratic political figures in the nation’s most populous state. They include Rep. Ellen Tauscher of Walnut Creek and Assemblyman Sandré Swanson of Alameda, who announced his support for Clinton this week.

Feinstein told Clinton supporters and friends at a private fundraiser in Colorado earlier this month that she would back the New York senator in her presidential bid, but she has yet to make it official.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Hillary and will be there for her if she is the nominee. I also expect her to carry California on November, 2008. However, the California establishment should at least once in their lifetimes take theirs heads out of the sand and look at the big picture.

Charlie Brown will be running for Congress, Jerry McNerney will be running for reelection and we have a shot at picking up to other seats downstate. Why make the hill steeper by nominating someone who will motivate Republicans to turn out? We do not need to see who is “boss”, you’ve shown us plenty of times. For once, look beyong your own interests.

The Calitics Show, now available online.

If you click that play button right above, you’ll get the first episode of the podcast. It seems that I’m louder than everybody else. I’ll see if I can work on that. I want to really thank Asm. Mark Leno for joining us. It appears that the end of the show was cut off, so I’ll put in the Assemblyman’s plug that he tried to make for his website. I think our discussion of Prop 89/public financing of campaigns was cut off. For that I apologize, but I suppose I know these things for next time. And if you’d like to hear Asm. Leno’s opinion on public campaign financing, check the flip.

Republicans Set Their Budget Priorities

And those priorities are…

Leaving poor people on their own to die:

After holding up the state budget nearly a month past deadline, Senate Republicans offered Tuesday to end the impasse if Democrats would move tens of thousands of poor families off welfare and make dozens of additional program cuts.

The linchpin of the plan, Ackerman said, is a $324-million cut in the state’s welfare program. The cut was initially proposed by the governor in January, but Schwarzenegger had not been aggressively pushing for its inclusion in the spending plan adopted by the Legislature […]

Advocates for the poor were alarmed to see the governor’s January proposal revived. They said it would result in as many as 40,000 families losing state assistance.

… and ensuring that the planet continued to be destroyed by man-made causes:

Several Republican Party Senators have threatened to block the entire state budget unless the California Legislature accepts a recent polluters’ plea to ignore global warming pollution when assessing a project’s environmental impacts under CEQA. This “ostrich exemption” would allow polluters to continue sticking their heads in the sand, pretending that projects like oil refineries, freeways, and suburban sprawl simply don’t create greenhouse gases. It’s dangerously loopy logic, but if they can convince the Senate to play along, we could see California’s bourgeoning fight against global warming come to a skidding halt.

Hey, at least we know where they stand…

Blog Roundup 7/25/07 & Podcast Reminder

(3 minutes until showtime. Check out our hostpage. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

Over the flip, you’ll find my best impersonation of jsw with a blog roundup. Boy, does he have this setup going smoothly.

Listen LiveAlso, don’t forget that we have our little chat show, tentatively titled “The Calitics Show” at 10AM. We’ll get started at 10. We hope to get Asm. Leno on the line shortly thereafter.  The call-in number is (718) 664-9561. Also, if you have broadband where you are at 10 or so, you can use BlogTalkRadio’s “ClickToTalk” VoIP phone service with your computer’s microphone in lieu of the phone. You’ll find that at our hostpage. You can also set a reminder to listen, if you are forgetful like me. 

[UPDATE: by Julia 9:55am] I added the Working Californians posts Brian missed and moved one post that was improperly categorized.

Yes, We’re Still Here… The Draft Gore Movement – CA Primary Ballot Project

From The Santa Barbara Independent
“The People’s President”
The Draft Al Gore For President Movement
By Marta Jorgensen, co-regional director of AlGore.org (AGO), Southwest chapter.
Thursday, July 19, 2007
“In my heart, I do believe that democracy was harmed by my network and others on November 7, 2000.”
—?Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of Fox News Network, February 14, 2001. (How to Steal an Election, David W. Moore)
Most of us remember painfully well the 2000 election. But some of us aren’t content to let it be simply a painful memory.
In 2002, a dedicated group of individuals who had been involved with Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign set up a Web site called gore04.org and organized a rally in Nashville, Tennessee. Gore told them to stop. He wasn’t into it. In the middle of 2006, the group got it rolling again, teaming up with AlGore.org (AGO) and working with other sites such as draftgore.com, meetup.com, and algoresupportcenter.com. To date, the combined Draft Gore Movement has collected 120,000-plus signatures urging Gore to run. And this time Gore hasn’t told us to cut it out.
The Draft Gore Movement is a labor of love on the part of its rapidly growing membership. Members and organizers do not have deep pockets, but use their own resources and intelligence to try to accomplish what mainstream political parties accomplish with their special-interest money and media spin doctors. They intend to place his name on the primary state ballots and put in place a voting base. Just in case …
Why all this effort? Why not support one of the Democratic candidates who has officially thrown his or her hat in the ring? To put it bluntly, none of them come close to Gore. He has established relationships with numerous world leaders, is well-liked internationally, and is not in anyone’s pocket.
Given the Bush administration’s unprecedented expansion of the unitary executive and sweeping constitutional changes, our next presidency may mean the difference between preserving our constitution and the principles upon which this country was founded, and losing them forever. Gore put it best himself in his 2006 speech, “Restoring the Rule of Law”: “If the pattern of practice begun by this administration is not challenged, it may well become a permanent part of the American system. Many conservatives have pointed out that granting unchecked power to this president means that the next president will have unchecked power as well. And the next president may be someone whose values and belief you do not trust.” The Clintons were involved in various breaches of constitutional law while in office, including allegations that Hillary’s brothers received large sums of money in exchange for requesting (and obtaining) presidential pardons. Both John Edwards and Barack Obama are too inexperienced to adeptly lead America out of its current constitutional and diplomatic crisis.
Gore would make the climate crisis the number one issue for 2008, a necessary agenda no candidate from either party has adopted. By unifying world powers in pursuit of the goal to save our planet, Gore would restore America’s standing in the world, thereby changing the global dialogue on other geopolitical crises as well. If elected president, Gore would: eliminate all payroll taxes and replace that revenue with pollution taxes, principally on CO2; help negotiate a stronger second-generation Kyoto Treaty; create an “Electranet,” a smart electricity grid that would allow individuals and businesses to buy and sell electricity, forcing them to monitor their own consumption; and promote profitable alternative energy business models. Gore is also committed to ending the war in Iraq, which goes hand in hand with reducing our dependence on oil.
In The Assault on Reason, Gore stated, “Many Americans now feel that our government is unresponsive and that no one in a position of power listens to or cares what they think. They feel disconnected from democracy. They feel that one vote makes no difference, and that they, as individuals, now have no practical means of participating in America’s self-government.” Gore is well connected with the citizenry, even engaging in citizens’ Web blog discussions from time to time. As president, he would restore public participation in politics.
Gore has stated that he can accomplish his goals as a private citizen, without getting caught up in the political game. But that can only go so far. Real change in governance must come from the executive. The goal of the Draft Gore Movement is to show him that the people want him to run, and that he has enough popular support to win. According to a recent 7NEWS / Suffolk University poll, 32 percent of Democratic voters would support Gore over the candidate toward which they are currently leaning.
That’s why the Draft Gore effort is becoming so insistent and vocal. Members have shown up at all of The Assault on Reason book-signings. In Los Angeles recently, the “Gore People” were in full force, handing out Gore ’08 buttons, signs, and gear to the 2,000 attendees. Gore said he was “flabbergasted” by the level of organization.
This is real democracy in action. Since 2000, a sizable part of the nation has grown from its pain, is less naïve, and more politically active and vocal, thanks to the Internet. Gore has also grown from his pain, as a man and as a leader. He would be the People’s President. It’s high time the nation and the leader shook hands.
Visit AlGore.org to get involved.

Our latest project: Getting his name on the CA
Primary Ballot.

Budget Gimmickry

“Only” out of balance by about $700 million?! (to be fair, $699 million) Yeah, right. Let’s take a look at the gimmicks

Add on $330 million for the prison guard contract offer (the LOWEST estimate available for their salary increase)

Add on $190 million for the overstatement of property tax revenues (per the LAO warning)

Add on $184 million for the overstatement of tribal gaming revenues (ditto)

Add on $603 million for the failure to account for the May-June shortfall (yes, we were $603 million short, but this budget still assumes it was accounted for)

Add on $300 million for the postponement of reimbursements to local governments for mandates (we owe the money, the current budget just pushes them into next year’s budget in order to avoid paying it this year)

Add on $357 million for the acceleration of tobacco securitization funds (the tobacco securitization funds are supposed to pay for the 2008-9 CTA settlement costs, but instead are being accelerated into this budget to pay for general fund spending)

Add on $250 million for the theft of the Williams School Facility Repair funds (we’ll need to repay the ‘loan’ in future years)

Add on $260 million for the EPSDT prior year deficiency deferral

That comes to a $3.173 billion deficit

As if that wasn’t bad enough. We have $2.865 billion  on very shaky ground:

$709 million from escheated property DEFYING A COURT’S ORDER

$200 million for the “limited liability” court case  (state lost the case, will likely lose the apppeal, and LOWEST estimate is $200 million)

$176 million in unallocated reductions (assuming Arnold will make $176 million in unallocated reductions when he’s ignored most unallocated reductions in past budgets)

$300 million for the Medi-Cal FPACT waiver (likely NOT to be renewed this year, so the state will have to make it up)

$980 for the EdFund sale (has not gotten the federal approval it needs, has never been appraised, and real value is likely 1/5 of that)

$500 million for the CalSTRS court order (court order says state has to pay $500 million of $558 million adverse judgment due to its failure to fund CalSTRS. Likely to lose the appeal and will have to make this payment during the budget year)

That is about $2.865 billion, making a MINIMUM of a $6.038 billion deficit

We have a current reserve of about $3.4 billion. We need a LOT more than $700 million in cuts. We should do about $2.9 billion more in cuts, in order to have more than the bare minimum

Arnold’s cronyism Leads to San Bernadino’s Bagel Lady

So, do you remember the Bagel Lady? She was the woman who was elected to the Superior Court of LA, even though she was rated as “Not Qualified” by the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation (JNE).

Well, Arnold has decided that we don’t have enough unqualified judges in California, so he appointed another one in May, Elia V. Pirozzi. Mr. Pirozzi was rated as unqualified by the JNE Commission and has spent most of his professional career as a real estate agent and developer, where he practiced law only incidental to his profession.

So, why, you ask, would Arnold appoint an unqualified judge? Well, did I mention that Mr. Pirozzi also was a oft-defeated Congressional candidate, Chair of the San Bernadino Cty. GOP, and All-Around Arnold Supporter. While it is legal to appoint a non JNE approved judge, it is rare. Given his lack of legal experience, why make the exception for this guy?

One word: Political Payback. This is unacceptable and unethical. Arnold should not be using the Judiciary as some sort of favors piggy bank.

CA-42: “I Know His Heart”

(What a way to get to know the candidate! : ) – promoted by Andrew Davey (atdleft))

Major Danby asked me to write a diary for Ron Shepston, Congressional candidate for CA-42, ages ago. I’ve been stalling and stalling, since I didn’t know what I could possibly write about. Do I know CA-42, or the dirt on Gary Miller? Not even slightly. I first visited CA-42 only two weeks ago.

Do I know every single one of Ron’s positions on all the issues? Nope. He’s a true blue progressive, same as the rest of us. I’ve got a hunch once we start going down an exhaustive list of issues, we’d agree on 99% of things – but as Ron reminded me the other day, the issues that are big now will all have changed by the time he gets to DC.

But, then I realized what I can contribute. I know Ron. As Bush would say “I know his heart.”

Previous diaries in the CA-42 campaign rollout series:
7/15: thereisnospoon’s CA-42: A Kossack is running for Congress
7/16: atdnext’s CA-42: The Case Against Dirty Gary Miller
7/17: Major Danby’s CA-42: I’m managing a netroots U.S. House campaign
7/18: CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream’s CA-42: Hi, I’m Ron Shepston and I’m running for Congress
7/19: hekebolos’s CA-42: A Netroots campaign– politics the way it should be.
7/20: dday’s CA-42: The Lay of the Land

When Bush told the nation he knew Harriet Miers’ heart, I laughed. Knowing someone’s “heart” doesn’t make them qualified for jack squat. But you can also have a person who is smart as a whip with every qualification under the sun, and if they aren’t a good person deep down, you probably shouldn’t vote them into Congress.

Throughout my life, I’ve known several people who had political aspirations early on. These are the people who managed their images meticulously, making sure that no one would ever see them making a mistake, answering a question with “I don’t know,” or doing one of those stupid things that most humans do like leaving the house with one black sock and one blue one. They were masters of networking. They ran for student councils, applied for prestigious universities – some avoided smoking pot so they could answer honestly later on that they never tried it.

These people also acted sincerely interested in me when we first met – encouraging me to join them in whatever they were doing, be it canvassing in a local neighborhood or attending a meeting of the College Dems. Friends are something you can’t have too many of, and I found their enthusiasm extremely flattering – but I found out later it was insincere.

Since then, I’ve learned to recognize these people quicker than I did at first. They like to promise you everything and then drop you until you’re useful to them for some reason. (In fact, one got in touch this week when he found out I was moderating a panel for YearlyKos – he wants the coordinators to do him a favor and he thought perhaps I’d have some influence. This is someone who had no problem going years without so much as emailing me hello.)

That is the kind of person that Ron is not.

I met Ron and his wife at that LA meetup that gave birth to this campaign, last Jan 4 or so. I drove up because I was new to California and eager to see a few friendly faces. No one suspected anything would come out of it. We were just going to a deli for sandwiches, then to a bar for beers. Trashablanca was there wearing a shirt that said “Give Impeachment a Chance.” Hekebolos was there, showing off his pet spider Emily (back at his place, not at the bar). Nothing seemed unusual.

One thing I love about DailyKos is our ability to transcend differences in age. As a young person, it’s amazing to meet so many “grown-ups” who treat me as an equal and as a friend. Ron falls into this category – there’s a few decades of age and experience between us, but you’d never know it from our conversations.

Here we are together, a couple weeks ago:
 

Major Danby wanted an action photo, so he told us to talk while he got the picture. Neither of us could stop giggling.

One of my mom’s pet phrases while I was growing up was “actions speak louder than words.” It’s true. The people I’ve met who knew from age 3 they wanted to be politicians only have time for me when I can do something for them. Even during this first whirlwind week of his campaign, Ron has time to chat with me. He’s not doing so to angle for a favorable diary to be written about him either – it’s all same as usual, jumping from topics like YearlyKos to George Lakoff’s books to why I think my boss is a jerk (too much testosterone, but that’s beside the point). He’s a friend.

The other day, we arranged to talk (on the phone instead of online chat for a change!) so he could give me any info I needed in order to write a diary. Writing a diary about Ron’s character doesn’t require anything I haven’t learned in half a year of friendship, but I still wanted to hear more specifics about him in case there was something significant I didn’t know yet.

It was strange trying to have a structured conversation instead of our usual banter, but I asked him to give me his life story. Ron walked me through his past as a promising baseball player who nearly went pro before joining the Air Force during Vietnam, and then entering a career as an engineer after leaving the military. Then I busted out several questions I’d heard Air America hosts ask candidates last election cycle.

Ron obviously hasn’t mastered Tony Snow’s skill of answering the question he wishes you asked instead of the one you really asked yet (You know… a reporter asks if Bush lied… Tony replies that Bush supports the troops). Ron’s extremely straightforward, and very thoughtful, always taking a moment to digest the question before answering.

Instead of avoiding saying “I don’t know” at all costs (which I’ve even seen Democratic candidates who I like very much do – and not always very artfully), Ron really thought about each question I asked and told me the truth when he didn’t know. (For the record, he doesn’t know yet which committees he wants to be on… little premature to ask that I guess.)

In the end, our “interview” devolved into a conversation. We started talking about our philosophy on working with others and on solving problems. In Ron’s job as an engineer, often he has to go on site in an unfamiliar place with people he’s never met before to solve a problem, and my last job often put me in a similar situation.

He told me how he likes to start by meeting everyone and having them show him around. We agreed that you need to treat the people with respect and listen to everyone. It doesn’t matter if someone has a high school education or a PhD – if they work in a job every single day, they are most likely the #1 expert on the area they work with and by ignoring them, one can only hurt him or herself.

Obviously, if Ron is there because he has special skills to solve the problem, he probably knows a lot more about what he’s doing than the people who are describing the problem to him, but the best way to accomplish his goals are to treat them with respect as equals, and after listening to everyone he can synthesize all of the information and get to work solving the problem.

That’s exactly the sort of attitude I want to hear from someone who we in the netroots send to Washington. I don’t want to support someone who thinks they can address homelessness by only speaking to academic scholars about the issue. Academic scholars play a role, but Ron’s the type who would visit shelters and speak to the director, the staff, and the homeless themselves if he were trying to tackle the issues that are important to helping people get off the street.

I hope you can all get to know Ron as a friend (in addition to as a candidate) when you meet him in Chicago next month. I don’t want to write too much more since I realize I’m competing with Gonzogate today, so I’ll leave you with what Major Danby told me should be a “gentle reminder” that Ron has a ActBlue fundraising page and he welcomes all contributions, both large and small.