CA-04: Charlie Brown and Wesley Clark show the true meaning of patriotism (photoblog)

Charlie Brown was joined by retired General Wesley Clark recently in a special volunteer project to serve our troops overseas. In conjunction with Democrats Work, a national organization geared to get people involved in community-building volunteering, folks gathered to create care packages to send to troops currently deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Photobucket

The sweltering Northern California summer couldn’t stop people from across the district from making their way to the Roseville Opera House. Over 100 men and women of all ages and political affiliations joined Charlie and General Clark in this project.

Photobucket

Photobucket

College students, veterans, mothers and businessmen alike joined together to show their support for the troops. Democrats, Republicans and Independents didn’t care about presidential choice or their stance on the war itself. Everyone gathered had one goal in mind: to send a small piece of comfort to the men & women doing their duty to protect our freedom.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Words and talking points from a political campaign seemed crass to Charlie, so our approach was non-partisan. This wasn’t about parties and their ideologies. It was about our soldiers and putting a smile on their faces, even if only for a brief moment.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

After each package was personally created, our volunteers sat down and wrote personal letters for each box. General Clark and Charlie also wrote their own personal messages. One note, from a Republican, has been transcribed:

Dear Soldier,

I want to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation for your sacrifice and service to our country. Without your service we would not be able to enjoy the freedoms that we hold…I sincerely hope that you enjoy this care package and that it provides you some comfort & entertainment in what we all know is a harsh environment.

Take care and thank you once again.

Photobucket

Another note, signed by a college student:

Dear Patriot-

We thank you for your courage, professionalism, and dedication to duty. You go in harm’s way every day to serve our country, and we are proud of your commitment. Please return safely as soon as possible.

Photobucket

Finally, a veteran of the Korean War wrote this note:

Dear Guys-

There aren’t enough words to describe my appreciation for the job you are doing four us & this great country. Saying thank you is only a starter.

I’m a Korean War vet-put in time in New Foundland, Battin Island (Goose Bay Labrador as well) as part of a joint services job building radar sites.

Stay safe & well…

With My Very Best Wishes

Photobucket

Thank you for helping us bring so many people together to do some good. Thank you Wes Clark, for your service to this nation and your willingness to roll up your sleeves & continue serving. And thank you Charlie, for taking leadership and proving that all political stripes can come together for our men & women in uniform.

Alaska Congressional Candidate Ethan Berkowitz Coming to LA for Fundraiser, to Dish on Palin

(Sounds like fun! – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

4 Star Democratic Club, Dems for Israel, bloggers such as Dante Atkins (Hekebolos), Todd Beeton and California’s new Democratic National Committeeman Andrew Lachman have come together to organize a grassroots fundraiser for Alaska’s Democratic Congressional nominee Ethan Berkowitz in Los Angeles on Friday, September 19th at 6:30pm at 3077 Earlmar Ave., Los Angeles 90064.  You can RSVP via Act Blue, on Facebook or by calling Anna at (907)947-1628.

Berkowitz, a San Francisco native, worked as a fisherman, Alaska state prosecutor, and minority leader of the Alaska House of Representatives.  The Alaksa At-Large House race is part of the “Red to Blue” program of the most watched races in the country as his opponent, Representative Don Young, barely survived the Republican primary, winning by less than 300 votes.  Young is also under investigation by the FBI for his dealings with the same oil company involved in the indictment of Alaska’s Senator Ted Stevens.  

While Steven’s opponent, Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich is in a very close race, Berkowitz has pulled ahead to a 14 point lead in the recent Anchorage Press/Ivan Moore poll.  This looks like it could be a Democratic pickup.  Also, Berkowitz has debated Sarah Palin before, so he should have some great stories!

Yacht Party No More? I Wouldn’t Go That Far

A lot of rider bills worked their way into last night’s marathon budget session, some of them pernicious (high-tech workers will be happy to know that the Legislature just cancelled their overtime).  But one of them should at least cause the state to take a minute to rejoice.  The yacht tax loophole is dead and buried.  Well, partially.

In one of the symbolic gestures of Monday night’s budget debate, lawmakers agreed to close the so-called “yacht tax” loophole.

Under current law, owners of luxury vehicles, like yachts or private aircraft, only had to keep their purchases out of California for 90 days after buying them to avoid state taxes.

That has allowed owners of such crafts to escape taxes to the tune of $21 million annually, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office.

The new proposal, included in a budget trailer bill, would increase to one year the time that a purchase would have to remain out of state lines to escape taxation.

That’s not nearly good enough, actually, there shouldn’t be any amount of time that you could leave a product out of state to avoid sales tax.  If I can’t do it with toothpaste, rich people shouldn’t be able to do it with yachts.

Anyway, they’re still the Yacht Party, as evidenced by their budget vision, which is cruel and unyielding.  And, we will soon have a chance to make this extremely clear by putting the options before the voters.

Proposition 4: From Juno to Juneau

Why are we all in shock that a woman whose current residence is the Governor’s mansion in Juneau would be chosen as the GOP vice presidential nominee?  Perhaps it is because she is so cold to our view of democracy and women’s rights that her ideals could have a terrifying effect here in California. She is the poster mom for the film Juno whose storybook tale of a teenage pregnancy has become incarnate in Bristol Palin.  While her story is certainly played out in thousands of households across America, we all know the sugar-coated tale that winds from Hollywood to Alaska isn’t the norm for teenagers facing this monumental issue.

Teenage pregnancy is an issue that we Californians will be facing once again on our November ballot. Like a bad movie sequel, it’s a three time re-run for us in California.  Proposition 4 will force voters to assess the idea of promoting parental notification for underage abortions.  Twice before voters have rallied against this because they know it doesn’t really work.  Yet again we have to fight the fight for reproductive choice.

But never before has this ballot proposition had a limelight example like we do today.

Unlike the previous propositions, the opposition now has a teen pregnancy, pro-life family bursting across every media outlet courtesy of the McCain camp.  An atypical example readily available for the opposition to hold up for voters as a typical prototype.

While we can all dislike Palin’s ideology, we also must realize, like or not; that she represents a large population of women.  Palin represents my sister-in-law, who is anti-choice and staffs a teenage pregnancy hotline encouraging girls to not get abortions. My sister-in-law and women like her can neither be ignored nor should they be disrespected.  They vote too and they hold their ideals as dear as we Democrats do.  And, for us as Californians, this is particularly challenging because teenage pregnancy is an issue that Prop 4 will force Californians to face once again on the November ballot.  As critical as we are of her as a candidate, we should not overlook the fact ruthless forces behind this attempt to chip away at the Roe v. Wade stone will surely hold up the Palins as an example of how “easy” it is for a pregnant teenager to tell her parents about her predicament. Previous parental notification initiatives failed narrowly; Prop 85 in 2006 failed 46/54, and Prop 73 in the 2005 special election failed 47/53. A nationally recognized poster family can make this margin far narrower or tip the scales.

Who’s behind Proposition 4, anyway? It is funded almost entirely by two men, James Holman (publisher of the San Diego Reader) and Don Sebastiani (a winemaker and former assemblyman). Together they gave over 2 million of the 2.4 that funded the entire movement for it. The fact that this is the project of two guys is story enough, and surely if they are willing to throw two million of their own dollars at this initiative, they will have no problem making an example out of Bristol Palin.

(Note: Planned Parenthood has provided the most funding in the movement against these types of propositions and it is time that we help Planned Parenthood defeat this proposition. Donate visit the Campaign for Teen Safety website at http://www.noonprop4.org. ) The fact that this is the project of two guys is story enough.

This initiative continues to have the boomerang effect on the ballot circling back around for a third time. However, Proposition 4 is more precarious than the first two because it damages families as well as teens. Proposition 4 calls itself “family notification,” but in reality it’s a cruel process that would force scared pregnant teens who wanted to notify an alternate family member to report their parents to law enforcement.

In Juneau, Palin, though adamantly pro-life, said this about her daughter: “Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.”   The key word is decision.  If all teenage girls were lucky enough to have forgiving and supportive parents like Sarah and Todd Palin they might all consider notifying their parents, but statistics show that’s not the case.

This is one reason why I think that Sarah Palin’s unyielding pro-life stance is so dangerous. Will her daughter’s pregnancy validate teens having babies? Can her actions be construed as a role model for young girls?

Teen pregnancy is a complex bipartisan issue that requires multi-faceted answers.  Blanket, one-dimensional thinking cannot solve this problem — And don’t get me started on Palin’s even more narrow views on gun control or even global warming.  Palin doesn’t think outside the box and therefore she isn’t the right leader for America in the 21st century. Palin’s rigid worldview makes her to archaic a leader for the 20th century, let alone the 21st.

Right now, as we are all focused on the national debate, serious challenges face us at home here in California. We must stay focused on the issues, not the personalities to make sure that our rights for teenagers, women, and as citizens remain our choice.

Vote NO on Proposition 4. If you would like to help, please visit The Campaign for Teen Safety for more information.

Bettina Duval is the founder of CALIFORNIA LIST, a network to elect Democratic women to California state government.

The Legislature’s Big Gamble


























Arnold approve 38%
Arnold disapprove 52
Leg approve 15
Leg disapprove 73
Support Recall 29
Oppose Recall 63
Californians hate their politicians these days, but they hate the Legislature more strongly than they do the governor. Today’s Field Poll showed Arnold has record high disapproval ratings but still fares much better than the Legislature, as the table at right suggests.

The poll also shows little appetite for the prison guards’ proposed total recall. Whereas at this stage in the process in 2003 46% of voters backed a Davis recall, only 29% do today. Even Democrats oppose a recall, 40-52.

What this means is that the Legislature and the Legislature alone is on the hook for this budget. And as the budget is getting panned by virtually every stakeholder in the state, it’s likely that the Legislature’s standing is only going to be damaged further by this budget, to the point where one has to wonder from a purely political standpoint whether the Dems were better off prolonging the fight.

This budget, then, represents a BIG political gamble on the part of the Legislature – that the public will hate them less for this deal than they would a further budget delay. A spring 2009 special election on the budget is almost certain, and it may include SEIU’s effort to repeal much of this current deal alongside fundamental budget reforms from eliminating the 2/3 rule to the GOP’s long-sought spending cap, perhaps even a constitutional convention.

For Democrats to prevail in those struggles they need public support, and ultimately, some level of trust that if the Legislature is given new powers or an easier time of making a budget they will use those powers wisely. This budget deal may make that more difficult.

Dems can still win the 2009 budget war – but to do so they’re going to have to be smarter than they were this year. Perata in particular seemed to have no plan or strategy at all, and wound up cutting and running just as he did with the Denham recall. With new Senate leadership we can hope and we will expect better. The state’s future hangs in the balance.

UPDATE by Dave: It’s worth noting that this budget will require the voters to weigh in just to get it enacted.  The provisions on the rainy-day fund and the borrowing against future lottery revenue (which is dumb, dumb, dumb) need voter sign-off.  So we could see a special election as early as January.  I don’t know if there would be time to piggy-back 2/3 or the SEIU proposal or anything else to that election.

Arnold Says Whoa

Not content to see a crappy, kick-the-can budget get enacted without tacking on some pernicious elements of his own, Arnold Schwarzenegger wants additional budget reform in the budget before he’ll sign it.

All three of his demands relate to beefing up the “rainy day” account, known in budget terms as the “budget stabilization fund.”

In their tentative agreement, Democratic and Republican lawmakers had pledged to increase the size of that fund from 5 percent of the state’s General Fund to 10 percent.

But Schwarzenegger demanded the fund be increased to 12.5 percent.

That request appears to have been met. The Senate has distributed a document with highlights of the compromise, which included the 12.5 percent figure.

Schwarzenegger also insisted any transfers out of the rainy day fund could occur when the state’s revenues fall below projected spending. (The governor defines that as “prior year spending with Gann Factor adjustments.”) […]

The last demand is that the Legislature’s 3 percent deposit into the rainy day fund can only be suspended when money is being transferred out of the fund, or when the fund reaches its 12.5 percent cap.

The rainy day fund is one of those ideas that is catnip to reporters and pundits, but in practice just another strain on the overall budget.  It’s another bucket that lawmakers have to fill, without the revenues to fill it.  If we keep going down this road, there will be 0% of the budget that the legislature can actually effect, and then they can all go home and raise money year-round instead of having to head up to Sacramento every week or so.

CA-04: Republican Candidate Is Seen in Public Again This Weekend

September 14, 2008.  Nevada City, Northern CA.  

  Southern Californian career politician Tom McClintock, fresh from a 2 month gridlock in the CA State Senate, where he has led the Republican effort to bankrupt the state during the fiscal crisis by refusing to sign  any budget (entire career ) , and still advocating Republican style tax cuts for the wealthiest during a 17 Billion dollar shortfall,   was spotted at the Constitution Day Parade in the California Sierra this Sunday.    McClintock, who is terming out of the CA State legislative offices,  and is in between runs for Lt Gov and Gov,  is searching for another job in the public sector he has made a career out of disparaging.  Lucky us. The consultants picked our district.

Meanwhile, thousands of state workers and vendors cannot pay their bills because of layoffs and the state stiffing them.  (edited update from this morning’s original post)  Now Mr. “family values” has gone back to “work” to try to throw nearly a quarter of a million children off the Medi- cal rolls.

(more below the fold)

McClintock was last seen on the steps of the State Capitol in Sacramento, with a group of ersatz border vigilantes who run email scams, calling for the resignation of the mayor of one of California’s largest cities and saying the Federal Government should cut funding off to San Francisco and Los Angeles.    Way to balance that budget, Tom.

On to the parade appearance.  Shame how campaigning gets in the way of collecting funds for his next run for office.

631

McClintock

*

September 14, 2008. Nevada City,CA. The Constitution Parade.     Waiting for Godot.  Can you find the Republican Candidate in this photogragh?                  Yes, Tom McClintock.  This is a parade about the Constitution, with much historical content re the Civil War,  so we’re going to remind you that the Constitution  of the United States applies to all peoples of all races, all creeds, all beliefs, and all colors, and that Congress shall establish no religious test for office.   You don’t get to pick and choose.

*

*

631 2 2

McClintock

       Somewhere in Ventura, a village is missing its Umbrella.  We found it.  

*

*

632 2

McClintock

*

What, no Swiftboat?  No effigies?  Where’s Steven?  Where’s John?       Note.  That’s my caption, not a quote.  And that’s Charlie Brown (D, Roseville)  on the left side of the photo, watching the McClintock (R, Anywhere I Get a Per Diem ) entry come down the street .  Tom’s clutching the straw hat instead of the straw man here.  

*

*

633 2

McClintock

Walk on by.  

Surrounded by at least 6 supporters, Southern Californian Republican Tom McClintock is safely escorted past Democratic Candidate for Congress Charlie Brown, (USAF Lt. Col, retired,) at the Nevada City Constitution Parade on September 14, 2008.  Duty, Honor, Country.  Real Person vs. demogogue trying to scare people.  

*

*

633 23

McClintock

*

Peek- A – Boo !  I won’t debate You !

*

*

633 24

McClintock

*

Can we load him back into the moving van yet ?  

*

*

0635

McClintock

*

What about the cut – out doll ? Will that fit in the bus ?

*

*

634 222

McClintock

Return to Sender. Address Unknown.  No Such Number.  No Such Home.

*

*

And that’s what happened.  And now you know.   When I checked the Republican blog last night, the blogger was still insisting that people in Florida could see Chinese oil drilling rigs off the coast stealing all of our oil.  Along with the hanging effigy garbage.  You know who’s running for President.  You know what that implies.  Does this not make you sick ?  You know from my last diary who’s paying for Tom McClintock to try to take over our district.   Please help us send McClintock back to wherever it is he exists in his alternate reality universe.  Get the word out.  We need the truth.  

http://www.charliebrownforcong…

__________

photos by diary author.  

AIG: Now I have to shop for car insurance. Bleah!

Like everyone, I’ve been watching the bloodbath on Wall Street unfold, but I had figured that so far, I’m relatively unaffected by it all, since I haven’t involved myself in any of the investments (and losses) that such outfits as Bear Stearns, Countrywide, or AIG made.  I have been pretty prudent with my money, and I thought I would stay clear of the damage.  Now I’m not so sure.

On Saturday, I got a new policy declaration from my auto insurer, 21st Century.  I’ve been pretty happy with thim, and it was nice to be going with a California company.  But now, even though the declaration does list 21st Century at the bottom, up on the top, prominently displayed is the “AIG” logo.

I admit I knew this was coming, and up until recently, I wasn’t particularly concerned since AIG is (was) a really big, solid insurance company with a good conservative reputation (and I like that in an insurance company).  But in light of the news about the company, this change is no longer comforting.

Things have been further complicated by Governor Paterson’s statement today that AIG would be able to “tap its subsidiaries” for up to $20 billion in “liquidity” to help it through a rough patch.  Just which “subsidiaries” does the Governor mean?

If it’s 21st Century, I am not pleased.  It doesn’t happen that often, but insurance companies do default on their obligations from time to time.  It happened to me about 20 years ago with another car insurance company, and I ended up in the “assigned risk” pool while I undertook the always pleasant task of shopping for car insurance.  That’s how and when I ended up with 21st Century (back when it was only 20th Century).

I don’t want to go auto insurance shopping, and I don’t want to have to do it more than once either.  I am left with the uneasy feeling that if AIG sucks the reserves out of Century 21, I’ll be in the assigned risk pool again.

Also, if I do find another company, I am really not all that assured that it won’t be at risk as well.  This whole financial mess is much more complex than just the parts we know about, and probably all the insurers are hooked into crazy investments like Credit Default Swaps and Collateralized Dept Obligations.  SO, while I shop, I have to wonder if I’m simply trading one problem for another.

I called the Department of Insurance today to find out it anyone there knew what was going on and what might happen if AIG does drag 21st Century down.  I should have spent my time on something else, because they either don’t know anything or aren’t going to tell anyone anything until there really is a problem.

Tomorrow, I think I will be calling 21st Century just to see if they can give me any assurances.  If they can’t, I guess I will be spending my free time in the next couple of weeks evaluating auto policies and insurance company balance sheets.  WooHoo!

More Secrets Of The Mystery Budget

Well, Sacramento lawmakers miss their homes and they have a couple months of campaigning to do.  So they got together and hammered out a no-taxes, no-borrowing, cuts-and-gimmicks budget that delays for at least a year the great reckoning that California desperately needs if it wants to have a functioning government.  Of course, there are new taxes in the deal, in the form of gimmicks that will eventually force the state to raise taxes higher in the future.  For example, the budget apparently borrows from taxpayers:

A key element of the deal would increase by 10 percent the amount of income taxes withheld from working Californians, and from taxpayers who earn income from investments.

The maneuver would generate about $3.8 billion to ease the budget crunch, but the plan calls for providing future refunds to affected taxpayers.

In other words, we’ll all be giving California immediate cash they then will have to hand back to us later, increasing the need for future revenue adjustments.  In the short term, this literally cuts the wages of workers in the state across the board, particularly those who can least afford it.

In addition, there are new truck-sized loopholes that will be shepherded in here.  This is from the California Tax Reform Association, and if true, it’s a bombshell:

In exchange for a small amount of temporary short-term revenues, the Legislature is poised to open two vast new loopholes in the corporation tax, loopholes which will continue indefinitely.  The impact will be to greatly diminish the corporation tax at future costs to education, health care, and public safety. This is a huge giveaway to multinational corporations.

Those loopholes are:

Net Operating Loss Carrybacks.  In exchange for suspending the ability of corporations to take losses going forward for two years, the budget deal would permit loss carrybacks-the ability to get refunds against prior taxes based on a year’s losses.  

This is nothing but a tax shelter which destabilizes the general fund.  It gives a refund for taxes already paid, with such refunds coming most likely when the economy is in recession. As a result, when we’re making cuts, the state will be cutting refund checks to large corporations. The ability to take losses into the future has been part of tax policy for 20 years, but the legislature has rejected carry-backs for 20 years, because it is nothing but tax manipulation.

Cost:  at least _ billion per year, but likely more because of the second loophole.

Exchanging credits among affiliated corporations.  For state tax credits, the state has always insisted that the credits be taken by the corporation that engaged in the activity which is eligible for a credit.  In exchange for limiting corporation tax credits for two years to get short-term revenue, the budget deal opens up the ability of affiliated corporations or subsidiaries to transfer their credits among other corporations-forever!  

There are many billions in unused credits from companies that have not earned sufficient profit to use them.  This proposal will open the ability of companies to effectively sell these credits-e.g. by allowing ownership by another company-so that the billions in unused credits can now be used by profitable corporations.  

Cost:  this could be billions per year and will total many billions over the years. In combination with loss carry-backs it will open the corporation tax to endless manipulation.

If you’re the state controller, you can say goodbye to collecting one dime of tax revenue from corporations in the foreseeable future.  I guess we’ve finally become a business-friendly state after all.  Thank you, shock doctrine!

And in addition, there will be very real pain from this budget, not just in the future, but right now.  Just in the area of health care, the costs are tremendous.

The immediate cuts in the budget deal are expected to include:

• increased reporting (every six months in Medi-Cal) with the purpose of having over 250,000 children lose coverage.

• increased Healthy Families premiums.

• delayed restoration of the 10 percent Medi-Cal provder rate, leading to a loss of hundreds of millions of federal matching funds.

These are severe cuts that will hurt not just hundreds of thousands of patients, but our state’s health system and our economy.

You read the first one right, the goal is to use “death by paperwork” to kick a quarter of a million children off of Medi-Cal.  This is the honorable, do-no-harm budget our legislative leaders have constructed.

There was no reason to believe that any persuasion would have worked on the Yacht Party from the beginning of this session.  Dragging this out 77 days so we could provide a big ol’ giveaway to corporations while doing nothing to address the long-term structural deficit doesn’t make a lot of sense.  It would have been better to force the issue through ballot initiative right now, and end this madness of a 2/3 requirement for budget and tax matters.  The state is poorly run because so much energy is put into overcoming intractable structural hurdles rather than trying to streamline a bureaucracy that must serve 38 million people.  This starts with injecting minimum accountability for the party in power and allowing lawmakers to do their jobs.  I believe that Karen Bass and Darrell Steinberg know this, and they will be more reluctant to go along with drilling a giant financial hole for future generations.  The question is whether or not they’re too late.

Some Things to Consider in Beyond Chron Analysis of Measure H

Disclaimer: I do some work for Measure H, but my opinion on this issue was decided before I took the job.

In today’s Beyond Chron, author and activist Randy Shaw talks about Measure H. While I totally respect that there are opposing points of view on Measure H, and respect Randy personally, as you read the article it’s important to make note of a few things that Mr. Shaw missed that are important when talking about the true impact of Measure H.

For example, when discussing the Board of Supervisors’ new ability to issue revenue bonds, without a vote of the people, the provision is referred to as innocuous, when in fact the measure, as written, allows the board to issue revenue bonds to take over any utility, not just a power utility.

That means that without any oversight by citizens, the Board could vote to issue bonds to seize Comcast cable television, build a wifi network, etc. None of this has anything to do with the goals of clean energy – but it’s all legal under Measure H.

More importantly, at a time when San Francisco’s affordable housing stock is in short supply, we need to ask ourselves if San Francisco needs to be getting into the power, cable television, and WiFi business. Surely affordable housing (which is also on the ballot) is of more immediate concern to San Francisco’s residents at this time.

Also, while the article gives one account of past public power initiatives, it does not mention Sup. Mirkarimi’s role as campaign manager for the last public power measure before voters in 2001. This is a significant point to remember when reading Mirkarimi’s analysis and motivations to put Measure H before the voters.

As a past manager of the 2001 public power measure, he’s got plenty of reasons to want a re-match years later on behalf of public power. And as a potential mayoral candidate running on the left side of the San Francisco political spectrum, he needs to once again prove his bona fides vis a vis public power in order to secure a Guardian endorsement.

None of these reasons match up with the urgent priorities for San Francisco at this time. Measure H wraps an old idea in a new, misleading wrapper, and it’s important to keep this in mind as one reads the Beyond Chron article.