CA-80 AD It’s Ad War Time

Republican Gary Jeandron’s gone negative on Manuel Perez again, airing a radio/TV ad that accuses Manuel of being for higher taxes, higher fees, we can’t afford Manuel Perez – primal scream, clutch the pearls, etc.  The usual GOP disingenuous hysteria.

The Perez campaign has responded:



Now, it’s not that Perez thinks that the Grover Norquist pledge is a good thing, he just notes that Jeandron is running on the usual GOP gimmick, while failing to meet the gimmick’s standards.

UPDATE – I had this diary all wrong before, I referred to the wrong attack ad. Now it makes sense.

ActBlue here.

CA Lawmakers On The Bailout

There are conflicting reports on a bipartisan deal on the Wall Street bailout, but I want to focus on a couple of our Democratic lawmakers who are doing a great job on this so far.

Brad Sherman, who has been a leading voice against the piece of crap Paulson plan, reports that phone calls are running 300 to 2 against the bailout.  His plan calls for a much smaller price tag, along with homeowner aid.  Sherman notes:

Interpreting the twisted political ways of Washington, Sherman said the plan is so unpopular that the only way it will pass is if Congress pushes it through this weekend — before members return to their districts and realize how hated the bailout is.

In addition, Pete Stark wrote one of the great Dear Colleague letters today, calling out the Treasury Secretary for his unnecessary fearmongering.  I’ll put it on the flip.

It is unacceptable for Democrats to carry this bill forward and be stuck with the political consequences.  It’s completely unclear whether or not it will work, and without serious changes it’s basically a gift to Wall Street executives with nothing for those who are struggling.  Keep the pressure on by letting your lawmakers know that they need to be showing leadership like Reps. Sherman and Stark.

…UPDATE: Asm. Ted Lieu has a good statement too, connecting this to the need for the Governor to sign AB 1830, the mortgage bill.  I’ll also put that on the flip.

Dear Colleague:

Many years ago, I was the Chief Executive Officer of a retail California bank, with assets approaching a billion dollars.  I feel compelled to comment on the part of our financial system upon which ninety percent of our business and individual constituents rely.

The independent community of savings banks and credit unions are safe, sound, and liquid.

Yes, they may be suffering from higher delinquencies due to local economic problems – unemployment, lower home prices, natural disasters, etc. – but that, for the majority, results in lower profits, slower growth, and higher credit standards for potential borrowers.

For those of us who believe in a market economy, those results should come as no surprise.  It should also come without question that the proposed bailout will only help reckless speculators who have been caught on the wrong side of the come line.

Yesterday, a colleague said that he was worried that banks had to pay close to six percent for “Fed funds” (day loans between banks, usually available at one to two percent, to adjust cash requirements.)  Well, dear colleague, Duh!  Whilst one bank paid six percent, another bank earned six percent.

Another colleague attributed to Secretary Paulson a comment to the effect that absent his bailout, folks wouldn’t be able to get cash at ATMs.  That is irresponsible rumor mongering hogwash.

Please, friends, whatever you decide about the “bailout,” (and I intend to ignore/oppose it in any of the forms suggested thus far) I ask you not to create fear and incite the public to unwarranted hysteria, which actually could hurt the economy.

Sincerely,

Pete Stark

Member of Congress

… here’s Ted Lieu’s statement:

For months now, California has been playing a leading role in finding solutions to the mortgage meltdown and credit crisis.  In the Assembly we know this is not a problem that happened overnight and we know that there won’t be any magic solutions that will happen overnight.  That is why my colleagues and I are urging that the Bush Administration’s Wall Street Bailout be done not just in a timely manner, but also done right.

Let’s set aside for now the chutzpah of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson for demanding the largest taxpayer bailout in the history of the free world, demanding that he should get unfettered discretion to spend this largesse, and demanding that all of this be done in less than a week.  The question we should ask is, why should we trust him?  Secretary Paulson saw this crisis coming, it is on his watch, and he has repeatedly failed to act in a timely manner.  Remember Paulson’s “Hope Now” solution to prevent foreclosures that he hyped at the beginning of this year?  I, consumer groups, and countless others repeatedly warned that Secretary Paulson’s plan did virtually nothing to resolve the problem of unsustainable lending and uncontrolled foreclosures.  He proceeded with window dressing when fundamental reform was needed.

Secretary Paulson is now demanding that his last-minute bailout plan be jammed through in less than one week with no conditions.  There is no logical reason why the bailout plan cannot both be done in a timely manner and include fundamental and much needed reforms, such as banning the predatory practices that led to this crisis, fixing executive compensation, and helping homeowners facing foreclosure.

The nation’s financial crisis has many moving parts and every level of government has a role to play.  For our part, the California legislature recently took a leadership role in developing solutions to this crisis by passing AB 1830 on a bipartisan basis to reform predatory practices and products in California’s mortgage industry.  I call on Governor Schwarzenegger to demonstrate leadership on the issue and sign AB 1830.  Maybe he can also send a copy to his friends in the Bush Administration. Language similar to AB 1830, incorporated into the Wall Street bailout plan, would greatly improve the plan.  

SSP downgrades some California races

Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Swing State Project doesn’t think some of our races are going anywhere.  And it’s with two candidates that are beloved by the netroots.

  • CA-26 (Dreier): Likely Republican to Safe Republican

    It’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak. We held out hope for quite a while that Democrat Russ Warner would be able to make a race in this R+4 district — one of the very few plausible targets for Democrats in California — but this contest has never really climbed that far up the heat index. Despite running his campaign for over a year and a half, Warner has only been able to cobble together $651K and ended the second quarter with just $150K in the bank.

  • Incumbent GOP Rep. David Dreier bucked the nationwide trend in 2006 by spending some serious cash ($2.5 million) and scoring a 57-38 win over his unknown opponent — a significant improvement over his 53-43 margin in 2004. Dreier had $1.9 million on hand at the end of July — well more than he’ll need in order to swamp out Warner’s message this fall. Based on the nationwide dynamics, it’s not hard to imagine Warner climbing to as high as the mid-40s on election day, but it’s pretty tough to imagine him hitting 50% on his budget, barring some fabulous divine intervention.

  • CA-46 (Rohrabacher): Likely Republican to Safe Republican

    I’m sorry to say it, but here’s the Swing State Project’s new Mendoza Line of the Swing: If you aren’t even listed on the DCCC’s Races to Watch list alongside the likes of Rob Hubler (IA-05) and Steve O’Donnell (PA-18), what chance do you really have? Many Dems started the cycle with high hopes for Huntington Beach Mayor Debbie Cook. Like they used to say in Brooklyn, wait ’till next year!

  • Sigh.  🙁  As Rachel Maddow says, someone needs to talk me down on this.

    Poll: 49 Percent Support 2/3 Repeal

    The Public Policy Institute will release polling data today revealing 49 percent of Californians would support a repeal of the 2/3 budget rule. While the question seems a little weighted (it appears they asked voters if it should be reduced from 2/3 to 55 percent, rather than just 50; it also looks like they just asked about the 2/3 rule regarding a yes or no on the budget, not on taxation), this is outstanding news.

    It’s striking that so many voters already have an opinion on this issue. The same polling data shows 29 percent of Californians still have no idea how they’ll come down on Prop. 11, the redistricting proposal. Folks are angry out there, tired of seeing services shut down every time its budget season, of obstructionist Republicans using the process as a political tool, and of real people being hurt in the process.

    If polling already shows 49 percent in favor of a 2/3 repeal, the rumblings from Assembly Speaker Karen Bass and Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg about placing 2/3 rule reform on the upcoming special election ballot may turn into reality. It should. This is an historic and vital reform that’s necessary for a functioning state government, and there’s no better time than now to take it on.

    As I’ve argued previously, by providing voters with a clear distinction between the Schwarzenegger/Republican method of budget-balancing – borrowing, shifting funds, and cutting transit and benefits for low-income people – and a more realistic and compassionate alternative should the majority party, i.e. the Democrats, actually be allowed to do their job, we can win this battle.

    It will take work, but the base for reform is out there.

    Prop. 8: The Relay Fast

    It’s hard to get a handle on the efforts of the Yes on 8 people because they’re so haphazard.  They vow to produce a million yard signs but then get delayed because the signs are “in route” from China.  They try to make their campaign seem to be about ordinary couples who want their traditional aw-shucks marriage, and then the virulence of their intolerance is revealed, over

    I am a Mormon High Priest.  My bishop is a long-time family friend, and he has come to see me a couple of times recently, but each time he has come by assignment of his church supervisor.  On the first visit, my bishop offered me a chance to resign my membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  When I declined, he told me a church disciplinary council would be held.  On the second visit, just a couple of days ago, he brought me a letter informing me that I am charged with conduct unbecoming a member of the Mormon Church, and being “in apostasy.”

    …and over again

    Turns out the aptly-named “Church of the Divide” in faraway Placerville had sent a group of hate-mongering protesters to the church where (Sacramento mayoral candidate Kevin Johnson) and his family worships, complete with signs blaring “SODOMY” (and worse), to protest Kevin’s decision to oppose Prop 8. They also flew in Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson from Los Angeles as their Rent-A-Hack.

    What has become cleear is this: the Yes on 8 movement is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the fundamentalist right, an alliance of various religious sects who are coming together to try and impose their will on the people of California.  They’ve certainly been successful financially, outraising the no side to this point.  To be sure, there are liberal religious leaders coming out against this measure, like the California Faith for Equality coalition.  But the level of participation by many groups, particularly the Church of Latter-Day Saints, is profoundly unsettling:

    Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have contributed more than a third of the approximately $15.4 million raised since June 1 to support Proposition 8. The ballot initiative, if passed, would reverse the current right of same-sex couples to marry […]

    The top leadership of the Mormon Church, known as the First Presidency, issued a letter in June calling on Mormons to “do all you can” to support Proposition 8.

    Mormon donors said they weren’t coerced. “Nobody twisted my arm,” said Richard Piquet, a Southern California accountant who gave $25,000 in support of Proposition 8. He said Mormon Church leaders called donating “a matter of personal conscience.” Some Mormons who declined to donate said their local church leaders had made highly charged appeals, such as saying that their souls would be in jeopardy if they didn’t give. Church spokesmen said any such incident wouldn’t reflect Mormon Church policy […]

    The prominence of Mormon donors in the Proposition 8 fight has also led to alliances with evangelical Protestant groups and other Christian religions, some of which have deep theological differences with Mormons.

    Jim Garlow, pastor of the evangelical Protestant Skyline Church near San Diego and a leading supporter of Proposition 8, said, “I would not, in all candor, have been meeting them or talking with them had it not been for” the marriage campaign. Rev. Garlow said he had developed a “friendship” with the Mormons he met, although he feels the theological differences remain “unbridgeable.”

    Certainly there is a broader movement among the religious spectrum beyond just the Mormons; the Family Research Council is heavily invested in the measure, and is spreading lies about the consequences of same-sex marriage to their members (Christians will be jailed!!!).  But what is going to be the focus of their efforts to get out the vote and pass the proposition?  Apparently, fasting and praying (I don’t buy the 100,000 figure below, by the way, it sounds like more bluster):

    Hundreds of pastors have called on their congregations to fast and pray for passage of a ballot measure in November that would put an end to gay marriage in California.

    The collective act of piety, starting Wednesday and culminating three days before the election in a revival for as many as 100,000 people at the San Diego Chargers’ stadium, comes as church leaders across California put people, money and powerful words behind Proposition 8.

    Some pastors around the state and nation are encouraging their flocks to forgo solid food for up to 40 days in the biblical tradition.

    Well, not quite.  In a remarkable catch by skippy, this 40-day fasting period, scheduled to begin today, would be somewhat unusual.

    the gathering, called the call, will conclude a 40-day fasting period for california that begins sept. 24. christians are being asked to fast in some way, either the entire 40 days or perhaps by using team relays to cover the entire 40 days. running parallel to the 40-day fast is a 100-day prayer effort, which was scheduled to start july 28.

    Um… team relays?

    Let me get this straight.  If I last from lunch to dinner without a morsel, then tag off to my partner in prayer, I can go ahead and eat dinner then?  Is that really a fast, or is it, I don’t know… just not snacking?

    Well, the religious right can’t be the only ones to get in on this fun.  That’s why, starting today, I am calling on every liberal and progressive to take part in a counter-fast for equality.  The goal is to get enough people involved that we only have to chip in about 15 minutes or so of fasting apiece.  I’m blocking out September 29, 4:30-4:45.  I’m not eating a thing.  We’re talking commitment!!!

    More on this tomorrow. For now, sign up in the comments with your fasting interval.  Together, we can show these guys what a fasting relay team is all about!

    Prop 10: The T Boone Bailout

    I will be on KRXA 540 AM at 8 this morning to discuss this and other California politics issues

    One of the defining features of capitalism in the 21st century has been the arrogance of its most wealthy practitioners, now manifested by their belief that they’ll be bailed out and not forced to suffer any consequence for their criminally reckless bad judgment.

    So it’s not just coincidence that as the financial robber barons of our time are demanding a massively unpopular bailout, another wealthy baron who made his money at the expense of Americans is seeking a bailout from California voters this November.

    T. Boone Pickens is worth about $3 billion, a fortune amassed from his years as a corporate raider during the 1980s and his large stake in oil companies like ExxonMobil and Occidental.

    Along the way he became a leading funder of right-wing causes, and was the primary backer of the notorious Swift Boat veterans, whose lie-filled ad against John Kerry helped swing the 2004 election to Bush. T. Boone promised he’d pay $1 million to anyone who could disprove the allegations, but reneged when John Kerry himself took him up on the offer.

    T. Boone is seeing the handwriting on the wall for the oil economy, and wants to build up his natural gas business. Problem is, he wants to build up that business at our expense. He put Proposition 10 on the ballot and is spending his own money to run ads for it. Essentially he wants California taxpayers to bail him out to the tune of $5 billion.

    The LA Times last week editorialized against Prop 10, explaining it and why it is such a bad idea. They call it a “reprehensible scam“:


    This measure asks taxpayers to fund $5 billion in bonds — at a time when the state is in desperate financial straits and may be approaching a dangerous level of indebtedness — for a scheme disguised as an effort to benefit the environment. Yet its true aim is to subsidize vehicles powered by natural gas, which would build a customer base for its sponsor: Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a company Pickens co-founded that operates natural gas filling stations throughout the U.S. and Canada.

    The measure generously doles out taxpayer money for a variety of green-sounding initiatives: $200 million for alternative energy demonstration projects at eight California cities, none of which are clamoring to perform them; $1.5 billion in grants and incentives for research and development of clean energy technologies and alternative fuel vehicles, a field that venture capitalists are already shoveling cash into; $250 million for renewable energy generation equipment. But the lion’s share of the bond money, $2.875 billion worth, goes for rebates on purchases of alternative fuel vehicles.

    The rebates are structured so that only a small amount of money goes to truly environmentally beneficial vehicles, while most would subsidize those that run on natural gas.

    The American public rightly opposes the Bush Bailout for Wall Street crooks. Why should Californians support a bailout for an already-wealthy oilman, one responsible for some of the most disgusting political lies of our time?

    CA-04 Oroville’s Mayor Jernigan & Charlie Brown Town Hall, photos

     Greetings from Oroville !

    *

    *

    680_2  Charlie Brown , Mayor Jernigan, Mrs Jernigan

    Charlie Brown*

    *

    Saturday, September 20, 2008, at the Veterans Hall in Oroville, CA.  Left to right, Mrs. Jernigan, Mayor Steve Jernigan of Oroville, Charlie Brown, candidate for Congress in CA’s 4th district, and a volunteer for the Town Hall and BBQ  event.  

    There’s lots more pictures and news of upcoming Charlie Brown events, if you’ll continue with me over the fold:

    *

    *

    650  Serving BBQ Lunch,

    Brown08

    Volunteers from Oroville and Charlie Brown serve Lunch at the Town Hall on Sept 20, 2008

    *

    *

    658_2   Mayor Jernigan of Oroville

    Jernigan

    Mayor Steve Jernigan of Oroville Speaks to the Town Hall, and Introduces Charlie Brown  

    *

    *

    669_2  Charlie Brown talks to Oroville

    Brown08

    Charlie Brown talks to citizens at the Oroville Town Hall on Sept 20  

    *

    *

    668  Crowd listens and asks

    9/20/8OroBrn

    Some of the attendees listening to questions being asked

    *

    *

    667  Man asking Q

    9/20/8OroBrn

    Asking about Presidential signing statements  

    *

    *

    0684  Friends & Vets

    Brown08

    Friends and Vets, Oroville, Sept 20  

    *

    *

    686_2  The Volunteer Cooks, @ Oroville, & Charlie Brown

    Charlie Brown

    The Volunteer Cooks & Charlie Brown  

    *

    *

    *

    This was a fun event, and I am looking forward to more of them and hoping to see more CA- 04 people at them!   There was a BBQ lunch, grilled  tri – tip,  potato salad, beans,  made and served by the great people in the last photo, and then Mayor Jernigan, “the most popular person in Oroville,” as one person called him, spoke for a bit and introduced congressional candidate Charlie Brown.   Charlie spoke and then took questions from the crowd.

     Oroville is a lakeside community about an hour and a half north of Sacramento, in Butte County, with a city population of about 14,000, and a combined city/suburban/summer area population of about 55,000.  There are a lot of retirees because it’s an easier pace than The Big City.  The most distinguishing feature of Oroville, besides the big Dam & Reservoir,  is the big Table Mountain Ridge which flanks the northern part of town and lets you know that you’re in foothills Gold Country, for Oroville was founded during the Gold Rush.  Oroville also does what has to be the the most spectacular Northern CA 4 of July fireworks show over the Lake every year that draws such a huge crowd, that they run shuttle buses from town to the lake, and it’s a big lake .  So Oroville, which also has Feather Falls Casino, depends on tourism for a lot of its revenues, and when the economy has a downturn, and people don’t travel as much, they are sensitive to that aspect of it.   The people attending the Town Hall  were also talking and asking a wide range of questions about the future course of our country and how do we encourage local jobs growth for the younger generation.  They can tell, that the things that happened in Washington DC over the course of the last 7+ years, and that the course the current administration had set the country on,  had not taken into account the long term effects upon their neighbors and friends’ everyday lives.

    One of the questions I didn’t expect but was really glad to hear was “How do we stop the other guy (McClintock)  from Swiftboating you?”

    You see how that works?  Open Democracy is Empowering.  It was “how do we” do something,  not  “which consultant do we send a check to  ?”

    There was such a contrast to the other candidate running for congress in the same district it was mind boggling.

    ___________

    NEXT UP:  41 DAYS TO CHANGE

    •Charlie Brown will be holding another Family BBQ and Town Hall Meeting in South Lake Tahoe next Saturday, September 27 th.

    WHO: Congressional candidate Charlie Brown

    WHAT: BBQ and Town Hall meeting

    WHERE: Bijou Park, 1099 Al Tahoe Blvd, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150

    WHEN: Saturday, September 27, 2008, time:   12pm-3pm  

    http://www.charliebrownforcong…

    •PLUS, NEXT SATURDAY IS ANOTHER DISTRICT WIDE, CA- 04   DAY OF ACTION !  

    DISTRICT WIDE DAY OF ACTION SATURDAY 9/27 08

    Time:    10 am to 2 pm    Place: Roseville , Grass Valley, Quincy, Placerville,  Truckee,  Auburn,   South Lake Tahoe,  all have district offices and will be doing canvassing and phone banking

    •EARLY OCTOBER,  MARK YOUR CALENDERS AND GET READY TO RUMBLE !  DEBATE !

      THE FIRST CA- 04 DEBATE:    CHARLIE BROWN DEBATES TOM MCCLINTOCK IN OROVILLE  THURSDAY OCT  2 , 2008 , 8:00pm   to 9:00pm  

    Charlie Brown Debates Tom McClintock in Oroville

    Thursday October 2, 2008 | 8:00 PM – 9:00 PM

    The League of Women Voters of Butte County, along with the Chico Enterprise-Record and the Oroville Mercury-Register, are co-sponsoring a televised voters forum at the Southside Community Center in Oroville. For more details, please visit ChicoER.com or OrovilleMR.com.

    I was hoping the League of Women Voters of Butte County would have this event listed on their calender page, but I would keep checking back until they update it:  

     http://www.lwvbuttecounty.org/      League of Women Voters of Butte County     1 530  895  VOTE

    NOTE TO PEOPLE USING MAPQUEST and GOOGLE TO FIND THINGS:  THERE ARE 2 COMMUNITY CENTERS LISTED FOR OROVILLE, and they’re NOT the same thing. One’s in the north part of town and the other is in the south part of town.   Please confirm location before attempting navigation.  (Don’t ask me how I know this, but the people at the south one are super about giving directions …..)    The Chico Enterprise Record does not have this listed on their events calender yet.

    _____

    and on a final note:

    It’s SEPTEMBER 24 !  Less than  one week to the Sept 30  FEC  3rd Quarter donation deadline ,    41 DAYS TO CHANGE , where we can  SEND  MC DOLITTLE DUCK – the real  – issues back to Ventura County !    

    Ya wanna see what he did recently?  click on my name and read those previous 2  diaries, he doesn’t rate any exposure here.  No Show Tom, Fake Schedule, Swiftboating, & Keystone Kops

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/…

    McClintock, Ron Rogers, Kevin Ring, and THAT swiftboat ad     http://www.dailykos.com/story/…

    Ya wanna see what it looked like the last time I saw a Republican congressional candidate in Oroville, during the pre- Primary?  Click here, scroll down to the middle, and enjoy the “bonus humor photos” of Doug Ose’s crew riding around on oil barrels in front of a moving van (Ose’s family is in the mini storage busines, so home foreclosures and people moving works out very well for them )

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/…

    By the way, Republican Doug Ose formally endorsed Tom McClintock.  thank you.  Doug Ose, on the night he lost the Republican Primary,  on teevee “well, I guess I’ll just go back to earning more money.”  You said it, Mr. Multimillionaire Self Funding Carpetbagger Candidate Developer who took Abramoff Money.

    Why does the 3rd Quarter FEC deadline matter? Because the candidates then have to file the reports online, and it’s possible to see the true financial support levels of each candidate.  And that influences financial supporters in the last quarter. They want to see the candidate can win.  Charlie Brown has thousands of supporters, and is getting individual donations from inside the district.    McClintock on the last filing had just around 800 individual donations.  Yes. ONLY 819 people, and many of these were duplicates from the same business entity using multiple names of family members, or from other Republican candidates that had already dropped out.   And the majority of them were from out of district. A great deal of them were from Southern CA.   I went thru the entire list  and I counted it.  McClintock has no money, going down the home stretch (shockingly little, around a hundred thousand)  unless he sells his soul at this point to some nefarious Bush administration supporter trying to curry future favors.  

    Charlie Brown lives, raised a family, and worked in the district, and wants to represent the people living here now in 4.   To McClintock, who resides in Lungren’s district 3 but represented yet another in the state senate legislature so as to collect the tax free per diem,  it’s just another mailing address.

    Charlie Brown’s contributions page link:       https://www.charliebrownforcon…

    Actblue link:    http://www.actblue.com/entity/…

    ______

    photos by diary author.  grateful for assistance provided by diary spouse that day

    cross post at dailykos and progressive blue  

    Wednesday Open Thread

    The SF Chronicle’s Carla Marinucci wants Sarah Palin to talk to the media already.

    • Some big landlords are thinking of going after SF Prop A, the bond measure to repair San Francisco General Hospital. Apparently they are mad at the Mayor over some sewar charge or something.

    Ads on the Amber Alert billboards on the highways? Really?

    • Some info on the Western states/provinces cap and trade program for carbon.

    UPDATE by Robert: What is up with Republicans who whine and throw a fit when things don’t go their way, insisting that the basic processes of government grind to a halt when they’re not happy? First it was Arnold Schwarzenegger who petulantly and pointlessly refused to sign any bills until the state budget was resolved, now it’s John McCain who is going to suspend his campaign to kibitz around Capitol Hill, likely an equally pointless move. You’d think Republicans don’t care about government or something.

    • Of course, McCain is still coming to Century City to raise money. The show must go on…

    UPDATE 2 by Robert: Ralph Nader and Matt Gonzales will be in Monterey on Monday to hold a press conference and rally about their exclusion from the presidential debates. It will be on the campus of Monterey Peninsula College. I’ll be there to provide full coverage. Over/under on attendance: 35. Depends on how many people make it down from Santa Cruz.