All posts by Brian Leubitz

Prison System Preparing to Move Prisoners Out of State, With or Without Legislature

Corcoran State PrisonI’ll was on KPFK today at 8:40 to discuss the prison situation

by Brian Leubitz

Well, this is interesting, the Brown administration is allegedly planning to move prisoners to out of state prisons with or without the Legislature’s permission.  The LA Times got a memo sent out on Tuesday showing that the state was going to start preparations to move prisoners to private (mostly out of state) prisons:

“Every potentially eligible offender will be screened for transfer…. While a transfer may cause a hardship to you or your families, it is an action the state must pursue in order to comply with a court order,” reads a memo distributed Tuesday throughout the state prison system, signed by corrections secretary Jeffrey Beard.

In addition, the corrections department is reducing the time prisoners have to challenge such moves, a separate internal memo distributed Tuesday shows. Previously, inmates identified for transfer out of state were given the chance to consult a lawyer before the classification became official. Now, to expedite moves, legal consultations will not be offered until after a prisoner’s move has been approved. (LA Times)

Moving close to 10,000 prisoners is a very difficult logistical process, so no matter what happens in the Legislature, it shouldn’t surprise anybody that these preparations have begun. Yet, the optics are still not good, especially in the executive branch’s relationship to the Legislature. However, one hopes that this doesn’t stall any real progress towards a solution that everybody can live with.

That being said, the Senate’s plan is clearly the best situated at this point to press for long term reform of the system. Whether this case is the beginning of that overdue process is still in the air.

Leno’s SB 649 Drug Sentencing Reform Passes Assembly

Measure would bring discretion back to sentencing

by Brian Leubitz

At the height of the war on drugs, while Nancy Reagan was leading the charge to “Just Say No”, the federal government and most states passed some harsh legislation punishing drug offenses. That worked to crowd our prisons, but hasn’t really changed much in the fight against illegal narcotics. Some of the laws were blatantly racist, and have already been removed. Other reforms are pending, with the notable example of the Attorney General’s strongly symbolic speech in San Francisco.

Three weeks after AG Holder announced the nation’s plan to scale back prison sentences for low-level drug crimes, the California Assembly has passed legislation authored by Senator Mark Leno that reforms California’s drug sentencing laws for simple possession. SB 649 allows counties to significantly reduce incarceration costs by giving prosecutors the flexibility to charge low-level, non-violent drug offenses as misdemeanors or felonies (known as a wobbler). The bill, which passed the Assembly with a bipartisan vote, also gives judges discretion to deem a non-violent drug possession offense to be either a misdemeanor or felony after consideration of the offense and the defendant’s record.

“We know we can reduce crime by offering low-level offenders rehabilitation and the opportunity to successfully reenter their communities, but we are currently doing the opposite,” said Senator Leno, D-San Francisco. “We give non-violent drug offenders long terms, offer them no treatment while they’re incarcerated, and then release them back into the community with few job prospects or options to receive an education. SB 649 gives local governments the flexibility to choose reduced penalties so that they can reinvest in proven alternatives that benefit minor offenders and reserve limited jail space for serious criminals.”

If signed by the governor, SB 649, the Local Control in Sentencing Act, will significantly reduce jail spending and allow local governments to dedicate resources to probation, drug treatment and mental health services that have proven most effective in reducing crime. It will also help law enforcement rededicate resources to more serious offenders. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates reducing penalties for drug possession will save counties about $159 million annually.

This legislation is a good, common sense start to drug sentencing. It gives both prosecutors and judges some discretion over sentencing, and allows them to take in context for those decisions. And when you add in the context of the prison overcrowding crisis, some common sense is very helpful.

Prison Proposals Get a Senate Hearing

I will be on KPFK’s Uprising tomorrow at 8:20 to discuss the prison mess, as the legislative session draws to a close with no clear plans to comply with the court order.

by Brian Leubitz

Right now, the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee is holding a hearing on the prison proposals. Suffice it to say there is a lot of political posturing going on right now. You can watch now on the CalChannel.

The committee will hear testimony on AB 84, the Senate Democrats’ Safe, Sustainable and Fiscally Responsible Plan to Reduce Crime and Settle the Prison Overcrowding Crisis. The plan, which avoids any early releases of inmates, offers settlement of a federal court order to reduce California’s prison population by approximately 9,600 inmates by December 31, 2013. The committee will also review the Governor’s proposal – which is in included in SB 105 in the Assembly – which relies solely on temporary expanded prison capacity. More details of the plan are available in this post.

However, here are a few numbers from a recent David Binder poll that should probably factor into the decision:

Proposal Sacramento and Northern CA Bay Area Central Valley Los Angeles Area San Diego and Inland Empire
Support Oppose Support Oppose Support Oppose Support Oppose Support Oppose
Public safety commission 70 16 75 13 76 12 73 14 81 11
Provide treatment for mentally ill 78 17 83 10 80 14 80 12 79 12
Incentives for Evidence Based Programs 60 29 60 25 61 25 58 30 60 23

These goals are the heart of the Senate plan, and they are nothing but laudable. However, as the Governor and supporters of his plan are quick to point out, the Senate plan requires a quick settlement with the plaintiffs as well as approval from the courts for a three year delay. And that’s where you get much of the tussling in today’s hearing.

There is no question that our prisons are overcrowded. We are locking up unheard of percentages of our population, and not coming up with any good solutions on how to reduce these numbers. Perhaps the Senate’s plan is a bit of wishful thinking, but our previous attempts have been simplistic and led directly to our current crisis.

But hey, on the bright side, the prisons are going to allow same sex marriages. So, that’s something…

Our New $6.4B Bridge

Bay Bridge opens early, pleases crowds

by Brian Leubitz

By yesterday afternoon, my Facebook feed was dominated by questions of when the Bay Bridge would reopen. And when it finally did, around 10pm last night, it was full of videos showing the new span as cars started rolling on.

At 10:15 p.m. Monday, Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol took down barricades at on-ramps and interchanges and let traffic flow to the bridge for the first time since Wednesday night, when it was closed to allow construction crews to make the transition from the old east span to the $6.4 billion new span.

The bridge had been scheduled to open at 5 a.m. Tuesday. But construction went smoothly, and Caltrans Director Malcolm Dougherty announced at the dedication ceremony that it would open Monday night. (SF Chronicle)

It has been about 24 years since the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake that pushed the need for this new structure, and the design process took much of that time. Since the actual structure has gone up, the work has been fairly quick. While delays were expected because of faulty bolts, some on-the-fly engineering work was able to speed the process up. The fact remains that even with the awkward “shims” supporting the questionable bolts, the new bridge is still safer than most of the other major bridges in the nation.

From a broader perspective, it is truly a beautiful structure. The massive tower stands as a signal that we can still accomplish big things as a state.

Steinberg’s Prison Plan

PhotobucketPlan calls for settlement with prison plaintiffs, sentencing reform

by Brian Leubitz

As I mentioned yesterday, the prisons are a mess. However, things can get worse. My friend, and SF School Board member, Matt Haney co-authored an op-ed in the SF Chronicle with Van Jones about the governor’s position on the issue:

Gov. Jerry Brown confirmed this week that he is pulling his prison policies out of a 1980s playbook. It is heartbreaking to watch our nation’s most famous Democratic governor cling to outdated, lock ’em up notions that even conservatives are abandoning in droves. …

Tuesday, he made his most shocking step yet by proposing to send inmates to for-profit prisons. This boondoggle will cost an additional $315 million and more than $1 billion over three years to house thousands of people in private prisons leased by the state. Even our most extreme, fear-mongering politicians of decades past would have been reluctant to put forward such a scheme.

Brown appears hell bent on being on the wrong side of history. Across the political spectrum, leaders are beginning to understand that we need to invest in rehabilitation, re-entry programs, and evidence-based alternatives, rather than continuing our failed policies of mass incarceration. (Matt Haney and Van Jones / SF Chronicle)

So, while the Governor is working hard to come to some sort of immediate solution, there is not much optimism for a progressive in the plan. Meanwhile, Sen. Steinberg has a plan, but it relies on one very crucial assumption: he can get the plaintiffs in the suit to settle and have the judges agree to a three year delay on implementation.  As I mentioned yesterday, it is a big risk and not entirely clear how the judges would rule even with a settlement.

But there is reason to believe that a settlement would be possible. And perhaps Gov. Brown is playing a game to force the plaintiffs hand in some really tricky three dimensional chess strategy. Brown’s plan is pretty much everything the plaintiffs don’t want. Under all this, they would like to see some sentencing and other reforms in the prison system. The governor’s plan pretty much goes in the entirely opposite direction. It is also worthwhile to note that the ACLU crunched some numbers to show that the state could meet the court order only using the techniques Brown has previously supported.

Now here is where Steinberg comes in. If he can get the plaintiffs to settle, and the court agrees to a delay, perhaps we have created the real opportunity that we need to follow the lead of other states like Kansas (!) that have already done much to decrease the mass incarcerations that have been building in our country over the past fifty years. In fact, the ACLU has a very interesting report on the subject. While three years may not be the time frame everybody would ideally target, it is realistic. And maybe Steinberg’s plan is a good start on how we get there.

Now, as for that plan, you can see an outline here or over the flip. It is far from perfect. It calls for an advisory commission to review our public safety system, but doesn’t really provide the specifics of how we really get to the important reductions we need in our prison system. However, maybe that lack of specificity is for the best now. Maybe it could set up the conditions of real reform that we need. But if we don’t meet that court order, we’ll be back to square one in three years. And maybe those three years could make a big difference.

Durable Solutions – Senate Democratic Caucus – Aug2813

The Prison Mess Continues

Senate rejects Gov. Brown’s private prison option

by Brian Leubitz

In case there wasn’t enough drama in the prison system, now there appears to be a standoff between the Governor and the Senate Democrats.

In a direct slap to Gov. Jerry Brown, his fellow Democrats in the state Senate on Wednesday rejected his plan for dealing with California’s prison crisis, throwing the state’s response to a federal court order into chaos. …

“We oppose the governor’s plan,” Steinberg told a Capitol news conference. “We think it is, as the governor himself said … It’s throwing money down a rat hole.” (AP)

The Governor’s plan was basically to lease space in private prisons in Arizona and a few other states, and send enough prisoners there to get us into compliance with the court order that’s currently pending. However, without approval of the Legislature, that’s not going to happen. Steinberg wants to seek an extensions, but that seems a big question mark. Given how hard the administration has fought the orders, it seems unlikely that the court will allow much additional time to comply. It should be done in a thoughtful process, but it must be done. Rushing to comply with a court order probably isn’t best for that important work.

Now, some sort of compromise will have to be found to meet the year end deadline in fairly short order. Moving that many people takes a fair amount of time for the logistics alone.

The Prison Mess Continues

Senate rejects Gov. Brown’s private prison option

by Brian Leubitz

In case there wasn’t enough drama in the prison system, now there appears to be a standoff between the Governor and the Senate Democrats.

In a direct slap to Gov. Jerry Brown, his fellow Democrats in the state Senate on Wednesday rejected his plan for dealing with California’s prison crisis, throwing the state’s response to a federal court order into chaos. …

“We oppose the governor’s plan,” Steinberg told a Capitol news conference. “We think it is, as the governor himself said … It’s throwing money down a rat hole.” (AP)

The Governor’s plan was basically to lease space in private prisons in Arizona and a few other states, and send enough prisoners there to get us into compliance with the court order that’s currently pending. However, without approval of the Legislature, that’s not going to happen. Steinberg wants to seek an extensions, but that seems a big question mark. Given how hard the administration has fought the orders, it seems unlikely that the court will allow much additional time to comply. It should be done in a thoughtful process, but it must be done. Rushing to comply with a court order probably isn’t best for that important work.

Now, some sort of compromise will have to be found to meet the year end deadline in fairly short order. Moving that many people takes a fair amount of time for the logistics alone.

Will Covered California Be Ready for October Online Enrollments?

Website may not be ready to go at beginning of enrollment period

by Brian Leubitz

The California individual health care exchange comes online on October 1, whether the website is ready or not. But it looks like “not” may be more likely:

“We have not made that call yet,” said Peter Lee, executive director of Covered California, which is implementing the federal health law in the state. If online enrollment isn’t immediately available, Lee said, there would be other ways to sign up through call centers, enrollment counselors and agents before coverage kicks in Jan. 1. “The date we care about is Jan. 1 when coverage takes effect.” (LA Times)

You can actually buy these exchange policies in a number of ways, including directly through the insurance provider. However, given how web-centric we are these days, that is obviously the easiest option. While other states are also having problems, you would have hoped we could have been the model state to get everything ready to go.

However, minor annoyances aside, and despite this not being a long-term solution like single payer, Covered California is still a step in the right direction.

Leno’s SR 18 Condemns Russia’s Anti-LGBT Policies

Mark Leno, San Francisco Pride 2013Resolution calls for avoiding investments in Russia until LGBT policy is changed

by Brian Leubitz

In case you’ve been living under a rock, the government of Russia is pushing to scapegoat the LGBT community, as President Putin is losing credibility.  The move combines with a very homophobic attitude from the Russian Orthodox Church to create a toxic environment and causing [increasing violence against the community. Yesterday, a resolution introduced by Senator Mark Leno that urges CalPERS and CalSTRS not to invest future resources from their pension plans in Russia passed the Senate Public Employment and Retirement Committee today with a 4-1 bipartisan vote.

Senate Resolution 18 was introduced in response to Russia’s new laws that discriminate against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. In addition to asking the state’s two largest pension funds to stop making direct future investments in Russia, SR 18 calls on the International Olympic Committee to withdraw its position that expressing support for LGBT people and their rights is a violation of its rules and seek a written guarantee from the Russian government that athletes and other visitors to the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi will not be prosecuted under the anti-gay laws. SR 18 also urges other organizations holding large internationally televised events in Russia, including the Miss Universe Organization and its owner Donald Trump, to move their events to countries without such virulently anti-gay laws.

“Russia’s new anti-gay laws are designed to promote the ongoing persecution of LGBT people in that country, and they are an unconscionable affront to LGBT people around the globe,” said Senator Leno, D-San Francisco. “As the host of international events, including the Winter Olympics and the Miss Universe Pageant, it is unacceptable that Russia promote discrimination against people based solely on sexual orientation or gender identity. California joins the worldwide outrage against these new laws and is in a unique position as one of the largest economies to make a strong statement that we will not tolerate nor invest in blatant violations of human rights.”

The measure goes to the full Senate floor, where it will hopefully be quickly sped upon its way.

Rim Fire Roars through Yosemite and Beyond

Rim Fire Expands into Yosemite National ParkFire threatens giant sequoia groves

by Brian Leubitz

The Yosemite area Rim fire is huge, and doesn’t show many indications of slowing down anytime soon:

Firefighters on Monday dealt with fierce winds that were pushing the giant Rim Fire north toward the communities of Tuolumne City, Twain Harte and Ponderosa Pines.

Overall, fire crews reported progress slowing the advance of the blaze, which had grown to more 235 square miles on the western edge of Yosemite and was threatening thousands of homes, many in the hills above the Gold Rush-era city of Sonora.

Beyond the concerns that this will scare away tourists (myself included…I was planning a trip soon), the fire is now endangering some of the oldest and largest trees in the world. Two of the three largest Sequoia groves are at risk, and firefighters are working to protect them.

It turns out how we think about fire fighting has changed a lot in the last 30 years. Simply putting out every fire isn’t wise, but we also can’t be setting controlled burns every few years. Nature has evolved with a very delicate balance, and we’ve been failing that for over 100 years in the American West. The combination of our fire management strategies with climate changed has made our forests a disaster waiting to happen.

Best of luck to our firefighters. Stay safe.

Photo credit: NASA Goddard Space center on Flickr. The Rim Fire can be seen as a bright blob directly south of Lake Tahoe. The fire is now bigger than Lake Tahoe.