All posts by Brian Leubitz

Steinberg says CEQA Reform Not Dead Yet

Environmental legislation is still in the works, according to Senate leader

by Brian Leubitz

In the wake of Gov. Brown’s earlier remarks that CEQA reform wasn’t going to happen this year, Sen. Steinberg is holding out hope:

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said his bill to streamline the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is moving forward and he looks forward to talking to Brown now that the governor has returned from a trade mission in China.

“The Legislature is hard at work on CEQA reform,” Steinberg told reporters. “As soon as the governor gets back, I’m going to sit down with him and go over specific provisions of the bill.” (Patrick McGreevy / LA Times)

Sen. Steinberg believes that environmental interests would prefer to deal with the issue rather than facing a nasty alternative that would gut CEQA at the ballot. Even if they believe they could win at the ballot, the price tag would certainly be high, not only in dollars but in focus on other issues. Pointing to Sen. Michael Rubio’s bill that would have fundamentally altered the role of environmental review, a bill that got a fair amount of support, Steinberg believes good, common sense CEQA reform is the best alternative for the environmental community as well as those who wish to see speedier development.  

PPIC Poll Looks At What We Know of Education

New PPIC poll show support for additional local control

by Brian Leubitz

The PPIC poll, besides taking the standard poll numbers for the governor and Legislature, focuses on an issue at each release. This month, they take a look at what we know of our education system, and what we can do to improve it. But first, you can see from the graph that Gov. Brown is down slightly from his 51% peak in January, but still hovering in a pretty solid position. Without any recognizable challenger on the horizon, these are numbers that should carry him to an easy re-election. However, the political types always prefer to see the approval number above 50%, but there just aren’t any California politicians that really have any numbers that are better now.

The legislature also peaked in January, when they almost reached parity with their disapproval numbers (41-42). They continue a dive back to their normal numbers, this time at 31-53. January’s highs are probably not all that surprising, given the freshly balanced budget that was emerging at the beginning of the year due to the passage of Prop 30. And then, as we tend to not trust our politicians in California, no news is bad news and numbers trend down. But without the major crises that we faced a few years back with our budget, perhaps the new normal on those numbers is higher now.

Moving on to education, we get something of a mixed bag. First of all, few Californians know just how much are schools are being starved of resources. Only 36% knew that we were near the bottom of the fifty states in per pupil spending. On the flip side, more survey respondents (47%) knew that California ranks below average for test results.

But what of those test results? How valuable are they really? Well, here is how Californians see the value of testing:

When asked how confident they are that standardized tests accurately indicate a student’s progress and abilities, about half of Californians say they are very (11%) or somewhat (42%) confident, while 44 percent are not too confident (27%) or not at all confident (17%). Californians were more confident about testing in April 2006 than they are today (63% vs. 53%). Californians are more likely to say that students in their communities get the right amount of testing in elementary and middle school schools (40%) and high school (39%) than they are to say that students get too much testing (24% elementary and middle school, 21% high school) or not enough (29% elementary and middle school, 31% high school).

To be completely honest, I’m not sure what you are supposed to make of those numbers. Apparently we do too much, but too little, but exactly the right amount of testing.

And that is not where the contradictions end. We like our local schools, but every other school isn’t so great. Perhaps that is a result of a real desire for additional local control. In fact, 78% of respondents said that they would support additional local control of the school districts.

Finally, and most importantly for the Governor, large majorities (71%) also favor his plan to increase funding more rapidly for schools with higher percentages of English language learners and low-income students, with 74% believing that system will improve the results.

Clearly there is a much larger discussion still to come about school funding over the next few months.

Sen. Feinstein Isn’t Giving Up on Assault Weapons Ban

Assault weapons ban only garnered 40 votes, but Sen. Feinstein will continue her work on the issue

by Brian Leubitz

Sen. Dianne Feinstein doesn’t always get a lot of love from the progressive community, and some of her good work tends to get lost. But on the issue of gun safety, there aren’t many leaders on par with our senior Senator.

Sen. Feinstein was the primary proponent of the assault weapons ban in 1994, and has been working on reinstating it since it lapsed in 2004. And, unfortunately, she just has not been able to muster up the votes, and even now, post-Newtown, the NRA proved too powerful.

A ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines fell well short of the votes needed to pass the Senate Wednesday, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., vowed to continue her long fight for such legislation.

“I’m disappointed by today’s vote, but I always knew this was an uphill battle,” Feinstein said in a statement after her amendment garnered only 40 votes. “I believe the American people are far ahead of their elected officials on this issue, and I will continue to fight for a renewed ban on assault weapons.”(SacBee)

While some senators were posting tasteless photos on facebook, Sen. Feinstein was continuing her work on gun safety. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, vast majorities of the nation want universal background checks and other provisions of the law. But few leaders have Sen. Feinstein’s tenacity on this issue, or any issue, and that alone is worthy of high praise.

California Labor Wants to “End the Gravy Train” of Corporate Tax Loopholes

Taxpayer money subsidizes huge corporations, while vital state services are slashed

by Brian Leubitz

You know about the cuts to services, especially if you are reading this. But, cuts to so-called “tax expenditures”? Well, let’s just say that it hasn’t been a focus. And now the California Labor Federation is trying to change that with their new End the Gravy Train campaign. You can also join the campaign at the End the Gravy Train facebook page. You can also sign the pledge today.

The campaign focuses on some of the tax loopholes that we have in California, particularly on the enterprise zone credit that has somehow been manipulated to subsidize some familiar names:

It’s no secret that corporate CEOs game the system to their favor. There’s a maze of loopholes, carve-outs, and tax dodges for big corporations like Walmart that the rest of us wouldn’t dream of getting. These big corporations are riding the corporate gravy train. And taxpayers like us are paying the fare.

In California, the poster child for the corporate gravy train is the so-called “enterprise zone” tax credit program. The program is supposed to encourage job creation in disadvantaged areas. But the only thing it actually encourages is more of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars flowing to richest of the rich.

Taxpayer money shouldn’t subsidize wealthy mega-corporations like Walmart that treat their workers poorly and pay their CEOs outrageous amounts.

Big corporations have had a free ride on our dime for too long. It’s time to End the Corporate Gravy Train, starting with reforming the wasteful enterprise zone program!

In order to make some of these big changes, where you are fighting a program supported by huge corporations with virtually limitless money, you have to start somewhere.  

Gun Safety Legislation Continues Progress as Senate Receives Thousands of Petition Signatures

darrell steinbergSupporters of safety to deliver thousands of signatures to support gun safety

by Brian Leubitz

This morning, groups from across the state delivered thousands of signatures in support of Sen. Darrell Steinberg’s gun safety legislation. The coalition is led by the progressive California-based CourageCampaign.org in conjunction with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE), Bend the Arc: A Jewish Alliance for Justice, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, California Church Impact, the California Federation of Teachers (CFT), Clergy and Laity for Economic Justice – California (CLUE CA), CREDO Action, Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and PICO.

This week also marks the anniversary of two horrific gun massacres in the United States:  Six years ago, on April 16, 2007 a gunman opened fire on the campus of Virginia Tech, killing 32 people and wounding an additional 17 people.  The Columbine High School shooting massacre in which two gunman killed 15 people and wounded another 21 happened 14 years ago on April 20, 1999. In light of these tragedies, and the movement of the legislation through the committee process, the timing is important.

The LIFE Act, as it has been dubbed, is actually a package of eight bills supported by Sen. Steinberg:

  • Senate Bill 140 (Leno/Steinberg) gives law enforcement the resources to confiscate the guns of Californians who are known to illegally possess them. Currently there is an 18,000 person backlog;
  • SB 53 (de León) requires a background check for all ammunition purchases;
  • SB 47 (Yee) closes a loophole in California’s assault weapons ban that allows guns with a “bullet button” to sneak through;
  • SB 396 (Hancock) outlaws “mega-magazines” that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition;
  • SB 755 (Wolk) expands the list of Californians who can’t legally own guns to include those convicted of multiple drug/alcohol convictions, carrying ammunition onto school grounds, active participation in street gangs, and others;
  • SB 374 (Steinberg) bans semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines and retroactively requires an ownership record for all guns;
  • SB 683 (Block) expands safety certificate requirements to long guns, rather than just handguns;
  • SB 567 (Jackson) closes a loophole in California’s definition of an illegal shotgun to include a shotgun with a revolving cylinder and a rifled bore.
  • There is at least one more bill that is relevant to the discussion that is not included. Asm. Roger Dickinson’s AB 760 would place a 5-cent tax on each bullett sold in California and the money would be used to increase mental health screenings for children. Because the legislation increases revenue, it was put on the suspense file and will be considered in another future hearing. However, expect there to be a lot more resistance on this kind of legislation, as it would require a 2/3 vote to raise that additional revenue. Although the roughly $45 million annually would be welcome for mental health community, manufacturers are sure to come out in force on this legislation.

    However, as gun safety legislation is making excruciatingly slow progress at the federal level, the states must be the ones to start. With Connecticut and New York already passing strong gun safety legislation, California must continue the fight.

    CEQA Reform Stalled?

    Brown questions support in the Legislature

    by Brian Leubitz

    Speaking to reporters in China, Gov. Brown made it clear that he didn’t think CEQA reform was going to happen this year:

    The California Environmental Quality Act, Brown told reporters here, “is supported by some key groups within the Democratic Party, and I think it would be difficult for the Legislature to move that process forward.”

    Brown said he remains committed relaxing provisions of the law but that he has a large agenda, including the state budget, water infrastructure and high-speed rail. He said “the appetite for CEQA reform is much stronger outside the state Capitol than it is inside.”

    Brown said, “This is not something you get done in a year, but I believe before I depart this stage we will see reform in CEQA.”(SacBee)

    Supporting his initial statement that Democrats support CEQA is the fact that the CDP passed a resolution supporting CEQA reform only so far as it maintains the basic environmental protections that are at its heart. Here is the relevant clause:

    THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the California Democratic Party stands with the labor and environmental community in affirming its support and commitment to CEQA’s original intent to ensure public participation and transparency in the planning process in order to protect California’s environment and calls on the state legislature and governor to oppose any efforts to weaken this law or reduce public participation (CDP PDF)

    Look, while Dan Walters thinks that it is just the liberals trying to stop Jerry’s vision of CEQA, there is a lot more to it. The resolution clearly does not say that CEQA shouldn’t be reformed. Even many environmentalists agree with the statement that some reform could make the law better. But the reforms need to be extremely careful to not toss out the very valuable protections that CEQA offers while dumping some of the excess red tape.

    Perhaps CEQA reform doesn’t get done this year, but with legislation that is as critical as CEQA, maybe we shouldn’t be rushing it. Let’s make sure we don’t look back at these changes with regret for our environment. We already have enough environmental challenges without creating more for ourselves.

    Republicans Join Resolution Calling for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

    Senate Republican Leader joins Democratic Senators in Support for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

    by Brian Leubitz

    In what has undoubtedly been a very tough day, a bit of interesting news from Senate Republican Leader Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar). He’s joining Senator Lou Correa’s (D-Santa Ana) SJR 8 supporting comprehensive immigration reform.

    “The United States has been enriched by the strength and culture of immigrants who’ve come here from all over the world, and there’s no reason to believe that’s changed,” said Senator Huff.  “At every level, be it economic, social, or entrepreneurial, America benefits from immigration.  The status quo is hurting our state. California cannot afford to condemn another generation to living their lives in the shadows or denying them an opportunity to be fully functioning members of our great state.”

    The resolution urges Congress and the President to take action that develops a path to legal status and recognizes that immigrants are a vital part of a variety of our nation’s industries including emerging technologies, medicine, agriculture, construction and hospitality.  The resolution also supports a reasonable and timely path to citizenship for immigrants already living and working in the United States, which should include comprehensive background checks, a demonstrated proficiency in English, payment of all current and back taxes, and creating an immigration policy that can respond to emerging domestic labor needs.

    Not only is the resolution co-authored by Sen. Huff. He’s joined by Republican Senators Berryhill, Emmerson, Fuller, and Gaines. The resolution doesn’t go into any specifics, of course, but maybe, just maybe, we are making real progress on this critical issue of social justice.

    Convention Wrap-up

    DarakaConvention closes out strong

    by Brian Leubitz

    After the parties and events closed up on Saturday night, some bleary eyed delegates strolled in on Sunday morning to see the completion of the efforts that the various committees and groups worked on over the week.

    But first, I want to congratulate all of the new regional directors, especially Hene Kelly who is replacing me as Regional Director of San Francisco and San Mateo. And a hearty congratulations go out to Daraka Larimore-Hall for his election to the position of Secretary of the Party.

    After a few more speeches from elected officials, labor and community leaders, and the regional director volunteer of the year awards, the party approved the slate of resolutions without much protest. Perhaps they got little fanfare at the convention, but these were some very impressive resolutions. See the full slate of this year’s resolutions here (PDF).

    The resolutions included a call for Prop 13 reform, resolutions supporting the heart of CEQA, a moratorium on fracking, and many more. Here’s the crucial clause of the fracking resolution.

    THEREFORE,*BE*IT*RESOLVED*that the California Democratic Party supports: 1) an immediate moratorium on fracking, with such a moratorium to remain in effect until legislation and regulations  are put in place that repeal the exception in the Safe Drinking Water Act, guarantee public health and safety, mitigate the effects on climate change, protect the environment and allow government access and testing of the chemicals used; 2) full disclosure and testing of all sites; and 3) substitution of conservation and renewable sources of energy where practical;

    Of course, the resolution calling for the Supreme Court to overturn prop 8 was close to my heart, and one calling for major reform of the UC and CSU boards and governance structure could have a big impact on an area that is gaining traction.

    All in all, while it may not have had the excitement of some of the conventions of the past few years, this year’s convention was a big success for the party.  

    A Smooth Convention

    Internal Party issues take center focus as speakers begin

    by Brian Leubitz

    It probably isn’t the most exciting news for those outside of the bubble here in Sacramento, but a few issues are getting some attention.

    Calitics regular RL Miller was in something of a brutal race for chair of the Environmental caucus, with robocalls flying back and forth. In the end, she won the race with a fairly wide margin, as progressive activists flooded the caucus.

    If you were following the Calitics twitter feed yesterday, you may have seen some photos from the very successful Take Back Red California annual dinner, including the picture at right with LA County Party Chair Eric Bauman with Former Labor Secretary Hilda Solis. Solis, who is looking at a run for LA County Supervisor, wrapped up the event with something of an inspiring speech.

    Today, a parade of elected officials will regale the crowd, and the party will decide on a new secretary and the last batch of regional directors.

    UPDATE: Check out the videos for some of the general session speakers.

    Democrats Ready to Party, Work

    Convention looks back, forward

    by Brian Leubitz

    By all accounts, 2012 was a fantastic year of electoral success for California Democrats. The president, legislative supermajorities, ballot measure success and much more. However, with a series of special elections and some possibly competitive races in 2014, there is much work to be done as California Democrats meet at the annual convention in Sacramento this weekend.

    As for the big decisions of the weekend, there is only one contested race. Chairman John Burton and the Vice chairs, Alex Rooker and Eric Bauman, are uncontested. The race for the open seat of Secretary is between Daraka Larimore-Hall of Santa Barbara County and Carolyn Fowler of Los Angeles County. I have endorsed Daraka, an amazing grassroots and netroots activist currently serving as Chair of the Santa Barbara County Democratic Party. However, that isn’t to say that I haven’t heard great things about Carolyn Fowler. Either way, I’m sure we’ll be in good hands.

    I’ll be at the convention, where in addition to tweeting up a storm, I’ll also be attending the always long and exciting Resolutions Committee, where I serve as a Co-Chair. If you have any thoughts, feel free to leave them here or tweet at me: @BrianLeubitz. I’ll also be using the hashtag #CADem13, and so should you!