Tag Archives: occupation

Bush, McCain, Bono Baxely Mack 100 Years War and Occupation: Devastating U.S. Troops’ Mental Health

So-called Pres. George W. Bush initiated a war of aggression and limitless occupation against the sovereign nation of Iraq in order to exact revenge on Sadaam Hussein over Hussein’s assassination attempt on former Pres. George H.W. Bush and to secure Iraqi oil for Bush’s Texas oil cronies.  Sen. John McCain and Rep. Mary Bono Baxely Mack, absentee Congresswoman, have supported every Bush war policy without reservation.  In fact, McCain is prepared for the U.S. to continue the occupation of Iraq ‘for 100 years.’

The U.S. Army recently released a study on the impact of the Bush war of aggression on the mental health of U.S. troops (The Associated Press, by Pauline Jelinek, dated March 7, 2008).  The findings of the report are devastating to the Bush occupation efforts and reveal the harmful impact on a significant percentage of U.S. troops.

More below the flip…

More than 27% of U.S. troops on their third or fourth combat tour suffered anxiety, depression, post-combat stress and other problems.  More than 12% of U.S. troops on their first tour suffered similar mental health problems

Suicide rates “remained elevated” in both Iraq and in Afghanistan.  Four suicides occurred last year in Afghanistan and 34 either confirmed or suspected suicides in Iraq.  If all suicides are confirmed, this would be the highest suicide rate since the Bush war of aggression began

The percentage of soldiers reporting depression in Afghanistan was higher than that in Iraq, and mental health problems in general were higher than they had previously been in Afghanistan.  The adjusted rate in 2007 for depression in Afghanistan was 11.4% compared with 7.6% in Iraq

83% of U.S. troops in Afghanistan reported exposure to traumatic combat events, a key risk factor for poor mental health among the troops

Spreading U.S. troops out in Afghanistan tended to isolate troops and made it more difficult for them to obtain mental health services in Afghanistan

About 29% of U.S. troops in combat outposts in Iraq reported that it was difficult to obtain mental health services in Iraq.  About 13% of U.S. troops not at outposts reported similar difficulty

U.S. troops receiving “Battlemind” training reported fewer mental health problems than those who did not.  The training teaches U.S. troops and families what to expect before troops depart for the Bush occupation of Iraq and what common problems to look out for when troops readjust to Stateside life following deployment

29% of U.S. troops feared seeking mental health services would harm their careers, down from 34% in 2006.  Fears of seeking mental health services would prevent many from getting help for anxiety, depression, and post-combat stress and would exacerbate the symptoms

89% of U.S. troops reported that their unit’s morale was neither high nor very high, down from 93% in 2006.  79.4% reported neither high nor very high individual morale, down from 81.7% in 2006.

In Iraq, 72% of soldiers reported knowing someone seriously injured or killed

U.S. troops reported an average of only 5.6 hours of sleep nightly in Iraq, significantly less than that needed to maintain optimal level of performance.  This puts U.S. troops at greater risk for harm.  Officers appear to significantly underestimate the impact of sleep deprivation.

Almost 33% of U.S. troops in Afghanistan were highly concerned that they were not getting sufficient sleep, and about 25% reported falling asleep during convoys last year thereby increasing their risk for harm.  16% of U.S. troops reported taking psychiatric medications during 2007 (there was no figure for the percentage of troops who were prescribed psychiatric medications and who were not taking them), and about half of those were sleep medications

Citizens to Schiff/Dreier: STOP funding the WAR! (+ pics)

(great recap of the event. – promoted by dday)

Yesterday citizens took to the streets in front of Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff’s Pasadena, California offices to send him a clear message. STOP funding the WAR.  This afternoon, the anti-war protest briefly became a two-front effort, (see update below) at the offices of Schiff and Republican David Drier. Why Adam Schiff, and why now?  Schiff sits on the powerful House Appropriations Committee soon to decide on legislation that could result in Bush being allocated another 200 billion US taxpayer dollars to pursue the illegal occupation and war in Iraq.  Schiff states that he is opposed to Bush’s escalation – but is that enough? Schiff voted for the Iraq War resolution, and year after year he voted to give Bush billions upon hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to keep our soldiers in Iraq to kill and be killed in an illegal war. Schiff now says that he opposes Bush’s policy, but rhetoric does not equal action.  Congress can bring the war to end by cutting off the flow of cash.  There are lives in the balance, and there is already enough money in the pipeline to bring our troops home safely.


[Please follow me below the jump for updates, photos and video]

Update: Marcy Winograd, Linda Milazzo and other protestors, briefly expanded to two fronts,  they moved east to Congressman David Dreier‘s district office – 2220 E. Route 66, in Glendora – where they planned to issue a citizen’s arrest for funding an illegal war and committing taxpayer fraud. Earlier today, Rep. Dreier championed escalation on the floor of the House. He consistently refuses to meet with constituents who oppose the occupation of Iraq, and today was no exception.  The delegation was phsically evicted from Dreier’s office – luckily a videoagrapher from Free Speech TV was there to document the assault – let’s hear it for responsiveness to constituents – the delegation returned to  Schiff’s office and joined forces with those who had stayed behind. Further details in CalifSherry’s comment, below.

Mimi Kennedy
Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles

The protest will continue until 6PM today, and is scheduled again for tomorrow between the hours of 11AM and 6PM.  Southern Califonian are cordially invited to join the ranks:

Adam Schiff’s office is located at 87 North Raymond, Pasadena, California 91103

If you can’t make it to Pasadena, here’s contact info for  Adam Schiff:

  * call his office at 626-304-2727 or 202-225-4176 

or

  * send a fax to 626-304-0572  or 202-225-5828



Thanks to oracleoflosangeles for this short, rough video taken at yesterday’s protest:



In it you get a feel for yestday’s citzen action.  It contains a heartfelt statement from Marcy Winograd, and others answering the question: Why Schiff, and why now?

Some Democrats already get it – many opposed the war from the beginning.  Today in Washington, Democrats from California to Vermont are speaking out for against the war:

“Our military is already stretched to a breaking point…Bring this war to a close”

Representative Doris Matsui

“We must end this war”

Representative Peter Welch

Yesterday a delegation of activists went upstairs to Adam Schiff’s offices.  Tim Goodrich from Iraq Veterans for Progress and Iraq Veterans Against the War put it convincingly:

“Cutting off funding will not imperil our troops”

Here are some more photos from yesterday’s action:





Sandra Williams, Frances Westerfield and Lupe Lujan

All three of thses women work with the Coalition Against Militarism in Our Schools (CAMS) and are actively involved in providing counter recruitment information to high school students through out the greater Los Angeles Area





Maureen Cruise
Coalition Against Militarism in Our Schools (CAMS)








The sign reads: “Our House will be a very, very fine house when you bring the troops home.”

I hope to return later with updates from today’s action – will protestests occupy Adam Schiff office and show him what it feels like to be occupied?  That is the question.

Crossposted from Daily Kos, mydd, and My Left Wing  – stay tuned.


““`
peace

An August Recess for our troops in Iraq?

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

A short time from now the House will adjourn for several weeks, as we put unfinished legislative business aside and head home for the rest of the summer. 

Tragically, but not surprisingly, we’re leaving Washington today without taking any meaningful steps toward reversing the Bush Administration’s disastrous Iraq policy.

There is no August recess for the young men and women who are deployed in Iraq, risking their lives for an ideological pipe dream hatched by people who haven’t sacrificed a single thing. 

Our soldiers will continue to do their jobs valiantly — even though they have been failed by their civilian superiors…even though they have been asked to occupy a nation that doesn’t want them there…even though they haven’t been properly trained or outfitted for their mission…even though they are caught in the crossfire of a brutal civil war that they are virtually powerless to stop. 

To date, 2,571 Americans have died in Iraq.  Thousands more have been wounded, physically or psychologically, such that their lives will never be the same.  And then there is the collateral damage — thousands upon thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians, who have given their lives for their own so-called liberation.

This November, American troops will have been in Iraq for as long as their grandfathers fought the Axis powers in World War II.  And there’s no end in sight.  The President has made it perfectly clear that he intends to occupy Iraq until the day he leaves the White House.  And now comes the announcement that we’re sending thousands more troops into Baghdad, many of whom were scheduled to go home.  But there’s little evidence that an increased military presence will quell the violence in the capital.  If anything, it will make it worse, like pouring gasoline on a fire.

I have been an outspoken opponent of the President’s Iraq policy from day one.  I voted against the war resolution.  A year and a half ago, I was one of the first to say it was time for the troops to come home, and I forced the first House vote to that effect.  When the oversight committees wouldn’t shine a spotlight on Iraq…I did, convening forums that explored exit strategies and highlighted the living conditions on the ground in Iraq.  When I first spoke up, mine was not a popular position.  But gradually, the American people and their elected representatives in this body have come to realize the folly of this war – the immorality of the doctrine that supports it…the lies that were told to sell it…and the incompetence that has characterized it. 

Polls consistently show that Americans want a timetable for withdrawal; don’t think the war was worth the cost; don’t think it’s stabilized the Middle East; and don’t think it’s made us safer from terrorism. 

But the President continues to hunker down, staying his own course of ignoring the writing on the wall and hiding behind platitudes and talking points.

I hesitate to even call Iraq a war.  The “war” — the effort to depose Saddam Hussein — ended in the spring of 2003 with the President’s showy announcement of “Mission Accomplished.” 

Everything since then has been an occupation, an occupation that we can’t win, an occupation that the American people never would have approved of and the Congress never voted on.

Given the false pretenses under which this body authorized force in Iraq, I believe it’s time to turn back the clock.  I think we deserve, with the benefit of hindsight, another crack at that vote. 

So, along with 20 of my colleagues, I have introduced legislation, H.R. 5875, called “The Iraq War Powers Repeal Act of 2006.”

It would reverse the fateful decision of nearly four years ago and allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority on matters of war and peace.  It would strip from the President the powers he has so shamelessly abused.

Passage of my bill would be the initial step toward ending the occupation. 

I don’t believe we should abandon Iraq, but the military option has failed spectacularly. 

We can and we should use diplomacy, humanitarian aid and peacekeeping tools to help Iraq on the road to long-term security and stability.  It’s time for us to be a reconstruction partner and not an occupying power. 

For the benefit of Iraqis and Americans…in the name of moral decency and national security…it’s time to bring our troops home.