Tag Archives: redistricting commission

Redistricting + Top Two Means An Uncertain 8 Days for the Budget

Jim Sanders and Kevin Yamamura of the Bee take on the theory that redistricting maps due out Friday could shake free a few votes:

To secure Republican votes for the state budget, Democrats have enlisted business leaders, police officers and teachers.

Now they’re hoping for a boost from cartographers.

An independent mapping panel will release its first draft of new legislative boundaries Friday, shuffling incumbents into new districts and threatening some members’ best-laid political plans.

Democrats hope the redistricting maps will help shake free the necessary Republican votes for a budget that relies on taxes to bridge the remaining $9.6 billion deficit. (SacBee)

This isn’t an altogether unreasonable hypothesis.  But, that’s all it is right now, an untested guess.  And as Tony Quinn points out, it is just too hard to game out right now.

However, all that being said, I think a critical point might have been missed here: Top 2 is going to change pretty much everything from the last time around.  Beyond the citizens redistricting commission, which might be more likely to lump two (or even three) legislators into one new district, the element of this new voting system makes next year even more of a wild card.

Just from numbers, this is more likely to be of some import in a district with two Republican legislators, but it could make a difference in a race of two Democrats in the opposite fashion.  So, say you have two somewhat strong legislators of one party as well as a no-name or two of the other party.  While it is far from clear that you will have two Rs or Ds in that general election (see Bowen, D), a sizeable chunk of the smaller party could shift allegiance to a partisan of the other, more powerful party in the region. So, if a bunch of Democrats decide to back one of the Republicans over the other, that could make a difference in creating the Craig Huey situation.  In other words, the weaker party will still get one of its nominees into the general election.

Basically, at this point this is all speculation, but come next June, we could have some very interesting contests on our hands.  And over the next 8 days until the June 15 budget deadline, there will be some squirming legislators.

Redistricting Commission Update: If Reps don’t want to answer the question…

Earlier this week, the Citizens Redistricting Commission held a hearing in Oakland for organized groups to submit their maps for consideration.  One of the last groups to present was the California Institute on Jobs, Economy and Education.  Commissioners were rightfully curious who that really meant.  They repeatedly asked for more information about the organization, who were their members and what was their policy interest was in redistricting.  The presenters did everything they could to skirt, dodge and avoid answering the questions.  

Well, since the Institute did not want to help, I can.  The gentleman who began the group’s presentation was Thomas Hiltacht.  Hiltacht is a well-known Republican attorney.  He’s worked for everyone from Arnold Schwarzenegger to the nefarious initiative to divide the state’s electoral college votes by Congressional District.  

The man who drew the lines was Matt Rexroad.  Rexroad admitted he is a County Supervisor in Yolo County.  He left out the fact he is also a highly-partisan Republican political consultant who frequently posts on redistricting for the FlashReport describing lines that may advantage or disadvantage his party.  Guess which ones made it into the Institute’s plan?

The good news is that Commissioners quickly realized their plan was a hot mess.  The Senate plan includes a district that runs from El Dorado to Tulare.  That’s more than 250 miles and a 4 and a half hour drive.  The Assembly plan splits 85 cities.  That’s about 30 more than the Legislature did 10 years ago.  The Congressional plan drops African-Americans from three districts to one in Los Angeles County.  That understandably irritated the African-American Commissioner from Los Angeles.  

The bad news is that we have to continue to be vigilant.  Tomorrow the Commission is scheduled to hear more group presentations.  The last group to present is Citizens for California Reform.  Another independent organization that just wants fair redistricting right?  Wrong.  Citizens for California Reform is a front group for Gabriella Holt, failed Republican candidate for Assembly District 54 in 2008 and the main force behind the 2010 failed effort to use a part-time Legislature initiative to threaten Democrats into giving into Republican budget demands.  

Hopefully we can count on Commissioners to see through their act just like they saw through the Institute’s today.  

Apply Now for the Prop 11 Commission

One of the reasons that many minority groups opposed Prop 11 in 2008 was because they worried that minority voices would not be heard. The Prop 11 folks offered many reasons why that wouldn’t be the case, yet when you peruse the numbers, there’s not much to be encouraged about there.  Some things that jump out:

* White men are vastly over-represented. Despite the fact that white men represent less than 25% of California, they are over 50% of the pool of qualified applicants. 52.3% to be precise.

* Republicans are also over-represented. They’re nearly 40% of the qualified applicants. Far more than Democrats, despite the registration advantage for Democrats

* Asians, Latinos and African-Americans are also under represented.

This panel is going to end up to be very expensive and be unrepresentative of the state as a whole. Yet, we are stuck with this system until we can repeal it. So, for the time being we need to make sure that we bring a robust and diverse mix of progressives into the application pool. The process for applying is relatively simple, but many activists will find they are disqualified. So, find some progressive friends, and make them apply.

The Deadline has been extended to February 16. That’s ONE WEEK from today!



Here’s the application site. Go there now, and tell all of your friends to go there.  We desperately need more progressives on this panel. And hey Greens, how about it? Apply, it’ll be a blast!

Who’s shaping California’s political landscape for the next 10 years?

(While I was no fan of Prop 11, it is exceedingly important that we get a diverse group on the commission.  The deadline is Feb. 12, so if you are eligible, apply now! Find More information and apply here. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

By Stewart Kwoh and Arturo Vargas

California’s diversity is everywhere.

You can see diverse faces on our streets, in our schools and where we work. And you can see the diversity of our state’s various regions reflected in the breadth of industries, climates, and lifestyles across California. Our diverse population and geography is what gives California its creative spark, that special energy you can’t find anywhere else.

Our state’s diversity has become part of our politics as well. We’ve all learned that we make better decisions when every community has a seat at the table. But that doesn’t just happen automatically. It takes time and effort – and people willing to step up and take advantage of opportunities when they arise.

A case in point: California’s new Citizens Redistricting Commission.

Never heard of it? You’re not alone. But this new commission is poised to play a key role in shaping politics in California for the next decade – and they’re looking to citizens to sign up to take part. That’s the good news.  The not-so-good news is that the applications received so far don’t reflect California’s diversity. Of the more than 7,000 individuals who have already applied:

” Only a quarter are people of color even though people of color make up over half of the state’s population

” Only 3 out of 10 applicants are women

” And only 36 percent reside in Southern California, home to over 6 out of 10 Californians

At the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) and the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund, we’re working hard to change those numbers before the February 12 deadline to apply for membership on the commission. Working with a number of partner organizations, we’re holding workshops across the state to inform people about the commission and assist them with the application process. We are joined by other organizations who are also outreaching to their constituencies.

What’s so important about this new commission? The commission will oversee California’s redistricting process – the once-a-decade redrawing of district boundaries for state Senate, Assembly and Board of Equalization seats to make the population of each district equal.

It may sound like an arcane job – but it’s critically important. Every person in California should have a chance to have his or her voice heard, and redistricting is how we turn that idea into reality. That requires some difficult decisions about which communities belong together within a political district – and these decisions will be made by the commission.

Until voters approved Proposition 11 last year, state redistricting was controlled by the Governor and the Legislature. Proposition 11 changes things by giving state redistricting power to the commission, with the hope of making the process more transparent. Whether this change is for the better remains to be seen. What’s for sure is that the commission holds the political future of the state’s communities in its hands.

So, exactly who can serve on this new 14-member commission?

To qualify, you need to be a registered voter, with consistent registration over the last five years, and have voted in at least two of the last three general elections.

There are conflict-of-interest provisions – neither you nor any close relative can have been a federal or state political candidate, a lobbyist, or have donated $2,000 or more to a California candidate in the last 10 years.

You can find out more at our organizations’ websites. For a schedule of workshops coordinated by APALC and its redistricting coalition, visit www.facebook.com/capafr2011. The NALEO Educational Fund is providing information about the commission at www.LatinosDrawtheLines.org. You can also see other organizations’ events and workshops at www.redistrictingCA.org.

This new commission is something of an experiment. We won’t know exactly what the commission will come up with until it’s actually formed and gets to work in 2011.

But this much is clear from the outset. The commission needs to reflect the diversity of our state -for the commission to do its job well, it will need people of diverse backgrounds and perspectives at the table. Just as importantly, we need a commission that is inclusive of all of our population and geography if its decisions are to have credibility and public trust.

Thankfully, we’re long past the day when we had to settle for just one kind of anything in California. We want choices and alternatives. We expect to hear every side of the argument – and every point of view.

It’s what makes California special – as long as we all stand up, speak up – and in this case, sign up. You can apply directly for membership at the commission’s website www.WeDrawTheLines.ca.gov. The deadline for applications is February 12, so it’s important to step forward now.

Stewart Kwoh is the President and Executive Director of the Asian Pacific American Legal Center. Arturo Vargas is the Executive Director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund.