Tag Archives: CDP

Today It Gets Personal For 3.2 Million California Students

Today, for 3.2 million college students, California’s budget problems just got personal.  Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Republicans in the legislature have demanded across-the-board 10% cuts from every state program.  That’s about $1.1 billion that will be taken from higher education. So how will the schools make up for the loss of $1.1 billion? Easy. Raise student fees. And that’s exactly what they’re doing today.

Democrats have tried to stop the carnage. At today’s meeting of the CSU Board of Trustees, Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, noting that CSU student fees have risen 94% over the last five years, submitted a resolution to stop the fee hikes being proposed. But the Board ultimately voted to oppose Garamendi’s proposal, which would have capped student fees at 2007-08 levels and limited future fee increases to the rate of inflation. Instead, they voted to raise fees by 10%.

This afternoon the Lt. Gov. will make the same proposal at a meeting of the UC Board of Regents. Garamendi is a member of both boards by virtue of his office. The Regents will be considering a 7.4% fee hike.  UC fees have risen 84% since 2002. Students at California universities will now confront an estimated cost (including room, board, books, tuition and fees) of up to $24,000 per year at UC and $20,000 at CSU.

John Garamendi has made the cuts against higher education into a personal cause, working with the Students for California’s Future (a coalition including the Student Senate for California Community Colleges, the California State Student Association, and the University of California Student Association) to fight back against the budget cuts and proposed fee hikes. Here’s how John Garamendi framed the battle today:

“Twenty years from now, the social and economic landscape of California will look very different than it is today. There is virtually no question that our population will be bigger, more diverse, the elderly will make up a greater proportion of the population, and we will be likely grappling with the effects of climate change. To meet these challenges, we will undoubtedly need more teachers, more scientists, more engineers, and more workers trained in health care and advanced technology fields.

“Hiking taxes on our young people takes us in the opposite direction. Rather than making college available to more young people, fee hikes take California a step backward. The question before us, then, is whether we will continue to offer the California dream – to all our people — good jobs, good opportunities – or whether we will become increasingly stratified economically.

“Yes, our state is in a budget mess. But I believe that if our state can protect yacht owners and oil companies from tax hikes, we can certainly find a way to protect our young people from tax hikes. If we fail, who among us will tell a young person, who may be the first in their family to go to college, that they must be taxed more because yacht owners don’t want to pay more? Who will tell a family — struggling to put their child through college, while gas prices and food prices are out of sight — that they should be taxed more because the oil companies won’t pay more?”

The California Democratic Party has initiated the Summer of Change video contest to give Californians a chance to stand up and speak out for their interests in the budget discussions.  I’m attaching one of the video entries in our contest that was filmed at a recent rally that students organized in Sacramento. Check out the Students for California’s Future website — they have another day of action planned for this Monday, May 19.

Penny

Online Organizing Director

California Democratic Party

Taking the Fight for Equality to Sacramento

(Good work, Larry! – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

Larry Handerhan is an employee of the California Democratic Party who runs Chairman Art Torres’s San Francisco office. This weekend, he and some friends decided that it was time to take the fight for equality to Sacramento. Larry wanted to share his experiences from the weekend, and we thought the folks at Calitics would be interested.

Photobucket

By Monday, April 21st, organizers of a discriminatory anti-marriage initiative must submit enough valid signatures to qualify for the November ballot. By most reports, they are within reach of that goal.

That was sufficient motivation for me and three fellow members of the San Francisco based Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club to brave I-80 early Saturday morning and join Equality for All’s “Decline to Sign” Campaign in Sacramento.

L to R: Larry and his friends, David, Jason and Cecilia

Upon arrival at the SEIU-UHW Union Hall in Midtown, we were greeted by strong coffee and enthusiastic organizers. As volunteers filled up the seats in advance our 10 AM training, an Equality for All Staffer proudly acknowledged that this was their first “standing room only” training session.

Introductions established that our group – 40 strong – hailed from all across Northern California. They included GLBT parents, straight allies, Sacramento activists, a young couple ready for marriage, and the President of a South Bay PFLAG Chapter and her husband – “the other half of a lesbian parent.”  

Most impressively, nearly half of the group was affiliated with a church congregation – highlighting the deep GLBT support in California religious communities that is often underappreciated.

Each volunteer cited different personal and political motivations for their attendance, but everyone agreed stopping the ballot initiative now would allow activists and community leaders to focus on the myriad of other challenges facing California in the upcoming months.

Our Trainer Kelly – an eight-year field organizing veteran – explained our plan: stop paid signature gatherers from collecting names and identify supporters by having them sign an equality pledge. She emphasized the importance of working as a team and not engaging our opponents. The 45 minute training was one of the most organized I have attended, and I felt very prepared to tackle my turf: the Wal-Mart in Roseville, CA.

My group of six had only positive experiences with community members despite the conservative slant of Roseville’s Saturday afternoon Wal-Mart patrons. One woman explained her son was gay, while another signed our pledge despite disapproving looks from her husband. About fifty percent of those who stopped signed, and many others alluded to their support even if they were hesitant to put their name on it. It was a successful exercise in grassroots field work, hampered only by a disapproving Republican registering voters at the same location.

At the afternoon Debrief, we learned that our shift secured 863 “decline to sign” pledges, recruited 21 new volunteers, and ran off 4 paid-signature gatherers. Those numbers – coupled with the hundreds of additional people we engaged in dialogue and the camaraderie facilitated between volunteers – make me confident in our chances come Monday.

There are 6 days left; what are you waiting for?

Penny

Online Organizing Director

California Democratic Party

GO VOTE! Choose Delegates for Denver

Today is the day to choose the delegates for this year’s DNC Convention in Denver. Since the Clinton team refuses to acknowledge the math, it could be the first convention floor fight in a generation so choose well. Here’s what you need to know:

  • Get there early, registration is from 2PM – 3PM followed by the caucuses. So get there early (I’m aiming for 1:45).
  • Find out your caucus location. It is by congressional district. Obama sitesClinton sites
  • Check out the candidate list. There are a ton of candidates with many running like actual campaigns and such.
  • Any other questions? Check out the FAQ

And let us know how things worked. I’m predicting record turnout with logistical problems because of record interest. Speaking of which, bring your friends!

P.S. You MUST be in line by 3PM to vote. Did I mention to get there early?

Obama Slashes and Burns through the Delegate List

(This story is developing as we speak, I think we’re getting closer to the Obama campaign’s process on this. Check out the Bee story and keep an eye out for more stories in print tomorrow. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

On Monday, juls wrote about how the campaigns could “prune” their delegate lists.  I didn’t pay much attention, but perhaps I should have.  Here is the new list.

Today, I learned that I have been pruned out of my delegate race. I will say that I didn’t really expect to win. There were people in my district that were better organized and better known (Chris Daly). And they both made the cut. However, I didn’t figure the campaign to whom I donated money, and to whom I traveled to two different states for, would decide that I wasn’t loyal enough. Heck, I spent March 4 working for Buffy Wicks (the CA field director) in Texas at the Election Hotline.

I understand that the Obama campaign is wary of the Clinton campaign picking off some of their pledged delegates, but you would figure that the least they could do would be to cross reference their donation rolls and their volunteer lists.

I understand that Obama cut about 1000 of his delegate candidates, compared to about 20 for Clinton. If Barack Obama wanted to increase participation and activism amongst youth leaders, cutting leaders in the  California Young Dems and other youth leaders wasn’t the best way to start.  

So, if you were “pruned”, I feel your pain.

UPDATE: I want to add one thing about this process. Specifically, this is a function of the Obama campaign, and if they expect to get any more time or money from me, I need to hear some sort of reasonable answer from the campaign.

I want to thank some folks from the CDP for letting me know and talking about the issue. The CDP has no power over this, but they will get some of the blame for being the messenger. The party deserves blame for many things, but this isn’t one of them.

UPDATE 2: I did some more research on the party’s website, and I think I had the numbers a bit off.  Clinton cut around 40-50 of her approximately 950 delegate candidates.  Obama cut about 950 of about 1700 candidates. Somebody was getting paranoid…is that you Axelrod?

UPDATE 3: The SacBee now has a story about the delegate pruning. I sound very heartbroken, perhaps a little more than I actually am, but, ah well, dramatic license and all.

I also got an email from somebody familiar with the process. Essentially they said that the Chicago folks had the California Obama team ask the volunteers running the caucus to cut down for logistical and convention reasons. The results were less than exceptional, but better than the initial plan: trimming it to the minimum three people per slot.

UPDATE 4: k/o is right in the comments. Who am I kidding, I’ll still give Obama money and my time. And perhaps I was a bit out of line when I said otherwise. However, as Lucas points out, it’s a pretty top-down move from a campaign that is supposed to be bottom-up. I can forgive mistakes and move on, but I still think the campaign needs to send out a message to its grassroots supporters that it values and respects them.

What will Nunez do with that money now?

CapWeekly broke the news that the California Labor Federation passed a resolution demanding that Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez give back the $4 millions the CDP transfered to his account back in November 2006.  Those funds have been the source of my derision by myself and other front pagers here at Calitics.  It was a symbol of what was wrong with the current political structure in the Democratic party, giving large chunks of money to one politician, rather than investing in campaigns and or building up the party infrastructure itself.  The Speaker currently has $5.1 million in his personal campaign account.  

The question is now, what will Nunez do with all of that cash?  The Labor Fed is concerned that it will be used to Nunez’s own benefit, perhaps a future political race, rather than benefiting the Assembly Democratic Caucus, which was the stated goal when the CDP transfered the funds in the first place.

“When the speaker asked for the money, it was for one purpose — to help elect Assembly Democratic candidates. It was not for a slush fund for the speaker. If he does the moral thing, he will return the money,” said Robert Balgenorth, president of the State Building and Construction Trades Council, and a member of the Federation’s executive committee.

But haggling over the details of the resolution continued Tuesday. A Nunez spokesman said the language of the resolution directed the speaker to spend the money on behalf of Democratic candidates, and not necessarily return the funds to the party.  But sources at the labor convention said Nunez, subect to campaign restrictions, could not spend the $4 milion as originally promised because of the $3,600 limit per candidate.

This is something that Nunez should have known at the time, same goes for the CDP.  However, these campaign finance restrictions should not have prevented him from making independent expenditures.  That did not happen and the Speaker has only spent $1.4 million out of his account since 2005.  He has been hoarding it, but for for what.

Joe Matthews, formerly of the LAT, now at the New America Foundation has a post defending Nunez.  Matthews’ defense is fatally flawed.  The reasons he lists for Nunez retaining the cash are no longer an issue and in one way or another have been resolved. (check the flip)

Matthews argues that Nunez needs the cash on hand to govern, but forgets one inconvenient fact: Nunez is about to give up both his seat and his Speakership.

Labor is really angry at Nunez because they don’t like the way he’s governed recently — particularly in two policy areas. But the story of those policy areas shows precisely why he needs the cash.

1. Health care. Most of California labor opposed Nunez’s compromise on health care legislation with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The legislation passed the Assembly but died in Senate committee. But if it had survived, the financing provisions could not have passed the legislature, which requires 2/3 for tax increases, because of the opposition of Republicans. So Nunez would have had to sponsor and campaign for a ballot initiative to establish the financing. That would have required campaign cash.

2. Indian gaming. Nunez supported new compacts for Indian tribes that labor unsuccessfully opposed — via four referenda on the February ballot — because the agreements didn’t include promised protections for union organizing. The Indian tribes took care of supporting Nunez’s position in that case, but it shows again how a speaker needs campaign money to support his governmental decisions. And this year, even the budget may be on the ballot. With Schwarzenegger seeking budget and redistricting reform that will require voter approval as part of his budget push, it’s quite possible that the state budget will be negotiated as part of a legislative package that includes ballot measures that will go to voters in November. Nunez will need campaign money not only for Democratic Assembly candidates but also to defend whatever budget lawmakers negotiate.

The health care proposal is dead and gone.  Nobody is going to run a ballot campaign this year to raise funds and put a new system into place, not when we have a huge budget deficit, teachers are being laid off, and people can’t go to the beach because there aren’t enough lifeguards to keep them safe.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn’t Californians already vote on the new gaming compacts?  The casinos are already installing their new machines.  This is no longer an issue for Nunez, other than labor has a long memory and they are still smarting from his part in the compacts’ passage.

So what is the Speaker going to spend the cash on?  This is an election year and every legislator in a competitive race should get the maximum he can transfer, same goes for all of the Democratic primary victors in the districts currently held by Republicans.  Then there are always the 2/3rds rules, for both budget passage and tax increases.  That would necessitate large amounts of cash for an initiative battle.  What about going after the corporate half of Prop. 13?  That would bring in some serious revenue.

You get my point.  There are plenty of ways that the Speaker can spend the $5 million sitting in his account.  It was never the CDP’s stated intention to give the Speaker cash to run for another office.  The money should go to bolstering Democratic party interests at large.

Save Some Time: Pre-Register for Sunday’s Caucuses Online

(And get there early. Props to our CDP – promoted by Bob Brigham)

This Sunday, April 13, you get to pick the delegates who will be sent from California to the Democratic National Convention in Denver next August. Whether you support Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Barack Obama, you’ll have a chance to determine who goes to Denver and who watches on TV.

The caucuses to elect the delegates will take place on April 13th everywhere in the state at 3:00 p.m., with sign-in and voting starting at 2:00 p.m. You must be in line by 3 p.m. to receive a ballot.

Every aspect of the 2008 Democratic presidential race has generated lots of enthusiasm and excitement, so we expect that these caucuses will be very well attended. This raises the likelihood of long lines as people sign in to get their ballots.

In order to cut down on the waiting time, the California Democratic Party has developed the widget below to allow attendees to pre-register online.

The deadline for pre-registration is Thursday, April 10th at 12:00 Noon.

Just fill in the blanks and follow the prompts. You can cut down on the long lines and help out the campaign volunteers who are staging these events by taking this simple step ahead of time.

SIGN UP ONLINE TO ATTEND A DNC DELGATE SELECTION CAUCUS.

More info on the caucuses on the flip.

You can only vote in one caucus and you MUST vote in the Congressional district where you are registered as a Democrat. Please plan to get to your caucus early so you have plenty of time to park and sign in. You must be in line by 3:00 p.m. in order to receive a ballot.

We hope you take this opportunity to come out and participate in the next step of the historic 2008 presidential election and help choose the delegates who will represent you at this summer’s Democratic convention.

For more information about the caucuses, please check our website.  Here are some links.

To find the locations for your Hillary Clinton caucus, visit:

www.cadem.org/clintoncaucus

To find the locations for your Barack Obama caucus, visit:

www.cadem.org/obamacaucus

If you have any other questions, you can check out our handy FAQ at:

www.cadem.org/delegateselectionfaq

Penny

Online Organizing Director

California Democratic Party

Campaigns Can Prune DNC Delegate Candidates

When you show up to the district level caucuses this weekend, you may be in for a surprise.  Under the rules listed in the Delegate Selection Plan (pdf) the campaigns must file with the CDP chair by today at 5 pm a list of candidates for delegate that number at least three times the number of slots that they approve.  This is Rule 12. E(1) Reg 4.23.

There are 241 district level slots (121 females, 120 males) and there are over 2,350 candidates running.  Assuming that both campaigns take the time to go through the names and pick out only three per slot that means that there will only be 723 viable candidates this weekend.  The deadline to submit the approved names just passed, so we should know the deal some time soon.

This is all part of the process and it makes total sense for the campaigns to spend the time going through the names and double checking that they have strong candidates for their delegate slots.  While it seems unlikely that we will head to the convention not having a single candidates, the campaigns need to work hard now just in case.

Are you a delegate candidate that has been contacted by the campaign?  Any CDP staffers who want to weigh in here?  Don’t forget to go to the CDP website and see where your caucus is located this weekend.  I know they have been firming up locations.

[UPDATE] I have transcribed the relevant rule.

Each presidential candidate, or that candidate’s authorized representative(s), must then file with the California Democratic Party Chair by Monday, April 7, 2008, at 5 pm, a list of such candidates he or she has approved, provided that approval be given to at least three (3) times the number of candidates for delegate men and three (3) times the number of candidates for delegate women, and three (3) times the number of candidates for alternate men and three (3) times the number of alternate women to which the presidential candidate is entitled.

I read this to mean that candidates are required to hand in lists, but they could be all of the candidates who have filled out their forms.  They have a minimum, but not a maximum that they must submit to the CDP.

Perez Parliamentary Maneuver May Cost Dems the 80th AD: State Sanctions Against CVUSD & PSUSD

In a brilliant parliamentary maneuver, the Victor Manuel Perez for CA 80th Assembly District campaign to replace the termed out, thank God, Bonnie Garcia (R-CA), the Perez forces by one vote were able to keep Greg Pettis, Mayor Pro-Tem of Cathedral City, from retaining the California Democratic Party endorsement for Assembly.  (Perez is Vice-President of the failed school board in the Coachella Valley Unified School District.)  However, the short-term battle victory may possibly cost the Democrats not only the 80th in the November general election, but also cost them the majority that they need to ignore the demands of the recalictrant minority Republicans in the Assembly.

A major factor developing in the campaign and one of which I have been consistently blogging on mydesert.com, the online edition of The Desert Sun, is the fact that Gary Jeandron, presumptive Republican candidate for the 80th AD is a boardmember of the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD).  Recently, the State of California Board of Education threatened actions and/or sanctions against 97 school boards across the state that failed to meet state academic goals and the requirements of the Federally unfunded ‘No Child Left Behind.’  As a result, California threatened sanctions against the PSUSD and the board for the academic failures in the District.  Jeandron, as boardmember, and running for the 80th cites his education background and experience as instrumental to his qualifications for the office.  However, the threatened sanctions are a major demerit and campaign issue.

This is relevant to Perez as he is Vice-President of the failed CVUSD board which according to the State, had more problems than any other school district in California this year.

More below the flip…

The state actions against the CVUSD and its board are much more severe as their failures were more significant.  The CVUSD District was threatened with state takeover but the state action only involved installation of a trustee to oversee and possibly veto any District and/or board action (State assigns trustee to CVUSD to improve test scores):

“Coachella Valley Unified School District will get a trustee and a state-approved team of independent experts to help improve student test scores, state board members decided this afternoon.

The state board named Riverside County Superintendent Kenneth Young as the district’s trustee, which will give him veto powers over superintendent and board decisions.

But Young said he will work collaboratively with the district.”

The CVUSD was the ONLY district to receive trustee oversight.  Perez as V-P and long-term boardmember bears major responsibility for the failures of the District, its teachers, and its students.  That the CVUSD is suffering such consequences for the academic failures not only raises the question of Perez’ qualifications for Assembly, especially in the area of education, but also blunts the criticism of Jeandron.

If Democrats in the 80th Assembly District choose Perez as the candidate, one of the major issues in the campaign against Jeandron is either removed from the table due to mutual assured destruction on this issue or becomes even more of an issue given the CVUSD is the only District in the state that was assigned a trustee.

Having a ‘well-spoken’ or ‘charismatic’ candidate will not soften the damage to the local Democratic campaign to re-take this seat in November 2008.  Style will not win where substance can win.  Greg Pettis, Mayor Pro-tem of Cathedral City, unlike Perez and Jeandron, is untainted by the failures of the CVUSD and PSUSD school boards and Districts.  In addition, Pettis has the endorsements of State Assemblyman Mike Eng (D-49), Member California State Assembly Committee on Education, El Centro School Board Trustee Diana Newton, and Palm Springs Unified School Board Trustee Meredy Schoenberger.

Art Torres is “the super of the supers!”

CDP Chair Art Torres has not one superdelegate vote, but 6. That’s because he gets to choose five unpledged delegates for the DNC Convention in August. From the Chronicle:

Consider Art Torres, chairman of the California Democratic Party. He remains uncommitted, yet he could be the most powerful superdelegate of all. Torres gets to name five additional superdelegates, giving him control over six votes at the national convention this summer.

“I am the super of supers!” Torres proclaims with a laugh.

He and other state party chairmen will appoint most of the additional 76, known in Democratic ranks as “unpledged add-ons.”

[UPDATE] by Julia: Anybody have any suggestions of who would make a great super delegate?  What about qualities in the people you would like Torres to pick?  Personally I think he should shoot for young and of color to better reflect California than your average super delegate.

Whoops had I bothered to read the full article before I posted I would have seen this from Torres, which is great.

In California, Torres has come up with a diplomatic way to select his five delegates. He said he plans to award them in proportion to the vote in California’s Democratic primary. Clinton received about 52 percent of the vote, so she gets three; Obama got 43 percent of the vote, so he gets two.

Torres said he will also use the slots to help meet the state’s affirmative action goals.

“I want to take a delegation to the convention that reflects the diversity of California,” Torres said.

CDP Convention Blog Round-Up, Pt. 2

First off, video from Friday and Saturday at the convention has been posted by the California Democratic Party.  Check it out!

Meanwhile, we’re updating our First blog round-up with more links. Let us know if we’ve missed yours.

From California Progress Report

Award to Gavin Newsom at Convention: Mentor of the Year to the California Young Democrats

The California Democratic Party Convention Video on Demand is our site of the day

Jerry Brown’s Speech, the 2010 Governor’s Race, and Reflections on the California Democratic Convention

Photobucket

California Democratic Party Convention for 2008 Ends with No Endorsement in Migden-Leno Race–And a lot more

And here’s a great quote from Frank’s post:

The convention had an unusually high attendance of 2118 registered delegates, surpassed only by last year’s convention in San Diego where the major Democratic Presidential candidates, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Dodd, and Richardson appeared.  […]

We’ll have more wrap up articles on the convention, which saw more bloggers and journalists writing on line credentialed as media than the traditional print, television, and radio journalists.

Bottom line: The party adopted a new platform, grassroots Democrats were pumped up for the year’s elections with enthusiasm to turn blue seats in red territory, have over $6 million in the bank and have had a very good first quarter in raising money (in contradistinction to the bankrupt California Republican Party) and are in a great position for the November Presidential Election.  (Emphasis added)

Migden-Leno Endorsement Fight May Overshadow Bill Clinton Speech at California Democratic Party Convention Today

John Garamendi’s Address to the California Democratic Convention

From Daily Kos:

leekfink: California Democratic Convention

hekebolos: This is what happens when bloggers write the Platform!

kid oakland: a report from the convention

dsharma23: Clinton’s Attempt to Strong-Arm CA Superdels

dday: Bill Clinton about to speak at the California Democratic Party convention

Ron Shepston for Congress: CA 42: Me, Bill Clinton & Obama

From MyDD:

Todd Beeton: CDP Convention: Bill Clinton

kid oakland: California Democratic Party Convention: San Jose

Todd Beeton: CDP Convention: Kamala Harris

From the Courage Campaign

“More and Better Democrats”: From the 2008 California Democratic Party Convention

From The Liberal OC:

From the Floor of the CA Dem Convention

CA Dem Convention Webcast

From Calitics:

Meet The Candidates: Charlie Brown and Russ Warner

Post-Convention Thoughts

Devine Musings on Senate District 3

Endorsements are now being considered

Bill Clinton speech

“Just Chill Out”

What a difference a DAY makes

Thoughts about last night, with pictures

Day 3 thoughts

2008 CDP Platform Final Report

SD-03: Going to the floor

Busby for CDP Chair?

Liveblogging SD-3 Regional Endorsement Meeting

McNerney an initial no-show/Newsom’s speech

Day 2 quick thoughts

Some more CDP photos

Migden’s meltdown

From Kid Oakland:

Sunday Morning at the California Democratic Party Convention

California Democratic Party Convention: San Jose

From d-day:

Debra Bowen Floor Speech

Liveblogging Convention Sunday

From Sweet Melissa:

Live from The Donkey Show: Nerd Wars

Live from The Donkey Show: Presidential Bitchfight

Live from The Donkey Show: Kamala and me

From The People’s Vanguard of Davis:

Photos from the Democratic Convention

Live From San Jose Democrats: A Party United

Who are the People in Orange Shirts?

Cabaldon wins Next Stage with 69% of Vote

Cabaldon’s Campaign Breakfast

Live From San Jose… The Vanguard Follows the 8th AD and More

From MOMocrats:

California Democratic Convention: Who Wants to Be Governor of California?

Go Read It: California Democratic Convention Thoughts and Photos

and it feels like hope

Future Governor of California San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom?

MOMocrats arrive at the California Democratic Convention

Where are the MOMocrats this Weekend?

And there are more photos at Flickr from Glennia of MOMocrats.

From Xiaolin Mama:

Phil Donohue and the “Body of War”

CA Democratic Convention Day 2

CA Democratic Convention: Asian Pacific Americans impacting the politcal landscape

Nancy Pelosi up close

Momocrats in da house

From SoCal Mom:

Conventional Wisdom

Do You Know the Way to San Jose?

From CityMama:

I’m at the California Democratic Convention this weekend

California Democratic Convention: some photos

From The Politics of Kethryvis:

Adjournment

Floor fights are rad

FLOOR FIGHT! FLOOR FIGHT!

The best unity statement of the whole convention

Bill speaks

Bowen learns from others

Obama supporter takes the stage

Support out in force

The fight is on

Less Security than the Airport

plugging

Proud to be a Democrat, pt. 2

Unity

The next generation

Interesting sights

And this may be my favorite quote from the convention…

I’ve also noticed you can really tell the Internet Media types from the rest of the media. We’re the ones with jeans, tshirts, and a much more casual air about us. We don’t need that little white “Internet Media” sticker on our credentials. We stand out anyways. But that’s not necessarily bad. It’s been interesting though. Sitting in the press area today, people kept asking me who I wrote for, what my blog was. I felt a bit uneasy telling them I write on my own blog on LiveJournal. Nothing wrong with it of course, but it did make me feel a bit like I don’t belong. But I do, and the CDP thinks I do. So that’s all that matters.

It takes a lot of voices to get a story out. I’m proud to be among them.  (Emphasis added)

From the California Majority Report:

BREAKING DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION: 289-742 Against Endorsing Migden

DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION: SF District Attorney Harris Urges Convention-goers to Unite Behind Obama

DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION: Leno Signature Gatherers Pushed Out of Convention Center Hotel

DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION: Leno, Migden, and Nation Supporters Duel at Convention

DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION: Let the Gubernatorial Pre-Primary Begin — Westly, Brown, and Newsom Rumblings

From Steve Sloan, SJSU Tech on a Mission:

End of the CA Demo Convention Day Two

Sunday morning at the CA demo convention

Reflections of a tech geek on the convention

End of the CA Demo Convention Day Two

From the California Democratic Convention Floor

Going to the Democratic convention

More photos at Flickr from Steve Sloan  along with coverage from his Twitter feed

From ImTedGreen:

I’m of two minds on President Clinton’s speech

State Senator Carole Migden and Assemblymember Mark Leno

A shout out to Bloggers Row at the CDP convention

The Write Wing

From The Watchtower:

Hospitality Suites at the CDP Convention-Why Bother?

From Mike’s Daily Lockup:

Live from San Jose

From Bang the Drum:

County Conventions Liveblogged on Twitter

From A Progressive Alamedan:

My Report on the California Democratic Convention

From Greg Dewar:

Blogger Coverage of the California Democratic Convention This Weekend

From Inland Valley Daily Bulletin:

Blog: California State Democratic Convention in San Jose – Day 2

Blog: California State Democratic Convention in San Jose – Day 3

From California High Speed Rail:

HSR at the Democratic Convention

From California Notes:

AD-08: Cabaldon’s endorsement being challenged.

Yamada remains confident as party endorsement goes to Cabaldon

Flickr pix from Randy Bayne

From Miss Wild Thing:

Democratic convention Calif style

Penny

Online Organizing Director

California Democratic Party