Category Archives: Diaries & Misc.

Health Care: What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

My day on Wednesday started out in the emergency room at O’Connor Hospital in San Jose.  My wife was awakened at 3:00 A.M. by a severe pain in her right side. At 5:30 she finally woke me and we decided she needed to go to the emergency room. We were in San Jose on business, staying in a hotel and had no idea about hospitals in the area. I picked O’Connor because it was the closest one according to the hotel binder, and I knew our insurance would cover it. My wife was in severe distress. The last thing I wanted or needed to think about was; is this hospital covered, how far away is one that is, how do I find one that is, what if I just go and find out it isn’t. Here’s what I did think about; “What if we didn’t have great insurance, and what about the people who don’t?”

I was surprised to walk into an empty ER. I’m used to the horror stories of people waiting in pain for hours unless they are spurting blood across the room. We found out later that O’Connor is not a trauma center. It is an outstanding private hospital that I’m guessing most uninsured can’t get near. Flashing our insurance card, we quickly got through the paper work and in to be seen by a doctor. My first thought was for my wife, my second was, “I’m glad we have good insurance and don’t have to worry about how much this is gonna cost.” My third thought is what lead to this article, “What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?”

After a few questions, giving up a couple vials of blood, and a dose of pain medication my wife was whisked off to radiology for a sonogram. The sonogram confirmed that she had gall stones and would need to have surgery that afternoon. Without hesitation we agreed to the surgery. We could agree, without hesitation, because we knew we wouldn’t have to face a large surgery bill afterward. In fact there would be no bill at all, not for us anyway, because we have good insurance. My next thought was, “What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?”

During our consultation with the highly regarded, Stanford educated surgeon who would be operating on my wife later in the day, we were told an option to expensive surgery, a painful option, but an option nonetheless. It was to wait and hope that the pain would go away which he said sometimes happens. He didn’t recommend it, but it was an option. Maybe that’s what people without health insurance do; painfully endure while they get sicker and sicker until finally they have no options. I was glad we didn’t have to think about that, but I did because, “What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?”

The surgery went very well. The surgeon told me afterward that we made a good choice. My wife’s gall bladder was worse than the sonogram had shown and really did need to come out. It turned out we didn’t have an option. She would need to rest for awhile and recover from the surgery. That meant an overnight stay in the hospital. That was okay, we have good insurance and once again I catch myself thinking, “What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?”

We’re back home now, but will have to go back to San Jose to see the doctor for follow up. We could probably skip the follow up. I’m sure everything will be okay, and I might take that chance to avoid more cost, but I don’t have to think about that. We have good insurance but, “What if we didn’t, and what about the people who don’t?”

So maybe I beat this drum one too many times, but I’m deadly serious, and yes, the pun is intended. I do think about the people who don’t have health insurance and the people who have poor health insurance with exorbitant co-payments and deductibles. The sad truth is they either don’t get the care they need, even in an emergency, or they just don’t pay, leaving the tab for others to pick up. Bankruptcy is no longer an option, but that’s another article. In the end, we all pay, and it cost us dearly.

What I think about mostly is how unfair our system of health care is, and it makes me angry. It makes me angry that I can walk into any health care provider anywhere in this country, flash my insurance card, and get the care I need without any concern over whether or not I’ll be stuck with an enormous bill that I can’t possibly pay. Everyone should be able to do what we did without financial concern. That would be fair. What really makes me angry is that there aren’t enough people angry enough about the unfairness of our current health care system pushing hard enough to force something to be done about it. There are a few, but all to often I hear the deep sign of resignation, “It will never happen.” But it has to happen, it can happen and it can happen now.

Universal health care is within our reach. The question isn’t can we, but will we. Do we have the will to insure every citizen in this state and this country and provide universal health care as every other industrialized nation in the world has? Do we have the will to recognize health care as a right to be protected, rather than a privilege to be hoarded. Unfortunately, I don’t have confidence in a positive answer to either question, but I do know this; together, we can do better.

This short episode in my life won’t be soon forgotten. It has given me pause to count my blessings. Yes, I count myself among the blessed in this nation, but the next time I go to the hospital I really would rather not catch myself thinking, “What if we weren’t so blessed, and what about the people who aren’t?”

On health care, together, we can do better.

McNerney Urges Senate to Stop Offshore Drilling

(Pombo was not pleased when Arnold announced his opposition to this bill, even going so far as to say that arnold didn’t read the bill and questioning the Governator’s intelligence. Pot: “Kettle, you’re black” – promoted by SFBrianCL)

Renewable energy expert, Jerry McNerney, has called on the US Senate to defeat any bill that would repeal the moratorium on offshore oil and gas drilling.

McNerney is the Democratic challenger in CA-11, where the infamous Republican Richard Pombo currently rules the district. Pombo spearheaded the House bill that will open our coasts to drilling. When moderate Republican Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) tried to add higher fuel efficiency to the bill, Pombo helped defeat the measure. Pombo is not interested in a sustainable and responsible energy plan — he is interested in serving his favorite industry, Big Oil.

In a February 2006 poll by the Public Policy Institute of California, 2 out of 3 Californians stated that they oppose any offshore drilling, including 46% of the state’s Republicans. Arnold Schwarzenegger also opposed the Pombo bill, but that didn’t stop Pombo from serving the industries that support his political career.

After the bill passed, McNerney issues a detailed press release calling on the US Senate to not pass a similar bill opening our coastlines to drilling:

“The bottom line is that we cannot drill our way to energy independence, and we can not continue to ignore the very real problem of global warming,” said McNerney. “As sea levels rise, the risk of levee failure and catastrophic flooding in the Delta increases greatly, and salt water intrusion promises to wreak havoc with local farmers and land values in the district. Pombo’s plan is not a sensible energy plan for our nation or this district.”

“Once again, you have to wonder just who it is that Mr. Pombo is representing in Congress. While gas prices were soaring in the spring, he was jetting down to Houston to attend a posh fundraiser held by oil industry lobbyists. And now, with gas prices still over $3 per gallon and district families and commuters still hurting, we have Pombo recklessly disregarding the opinions of the vast majority of the citizens of this state as he tries to pay back his big money contributors.”

In addition to being environmentally reckless, Pombo has also proven that he is willing to be financially reckless to get what he wants.

McNerney also noted that the Pombo-supported bill changes the formula for sharing oil and gas royalties between the federal government and the states, such that four states – Texas among them – would receive a windfall while the US Treasury would lose as much as $69 billion over a 15 year period, according to figures supplied by the US Department of the Interior. The Associated Press reported that the White House issued a statement strongly opposing this provision in the Pombo-backed bill, as it “would have a long-term impact on the federal deficit.”

McNerney stated that “Stripping out $69 billion of federal revenue without stating how this revenue will be made up is fiscal irresponsibility at its worst. Who will Mr. Pombo put a tax increase on to make up for this shortfall? What spending programs will he cut? Or is he proposing to simply just add this amount as a further debt burden on our children and grandchildren, in addition to leaving them with an overheated planet?”

“Our nation needs a real energy plan, of the kind I envision based on new energy technology and an emphasis on conservation, that will create real jobs in our district while reducing the burning of fossil fuels. This will mean less time wasted driving in our cars to far away jobs, and more time to spend with our families. It will mean cleaner air and our kids having less asthma and other associated health problems. And frankly, we need to begin now to reduce the threat of global warming and the devastating scenarios envisioned by reputable scientists who are concerned about the Delta and a substantial part of this district that sits just above sea level.”

You can take action in two ways:

First, you can email, fax, or call your senators and make it clear that you do not support any type of offshore drilling — regardless of how much Republicans attempt to bribe other members of Congress with promises of money. The US Senate could vote on this issue as soon as this week.

Second, go to Mark Warner’s MapChangers website and vote for Jerry McNerney. If you voted in previous rounds, you can vote again in this final round which ends at 12:00 AM EDT on Tuesday, July 11. If Jerry wins, Warner will host a fundraiser for him — and Jerry needs all the help he can get to compete with Pombo’s industry money. (Note: when you vote at MapChangers, be sure to click the Submit button to have your vote count).

Thanks for supporting people like Jerry McNerney — one of the innovative Democrats who can actually set us on a path to sustainability.

(Cross posted at Daily Kos)

Contact Calitics

Please contact us!  We can be reached best via email.

To contact the entirety of the editorial board, please email: calitics AT calitics DOT com

To reach publisher and managing editor Brian Leubitz, email: brian AT calitics DOT com.

The Calitics Editorial Board

jsw: jswATcaliticsDOTcom

Brian Leubitz: brianATcaliticsDOTcom

Julia Rosen: julsATcaliticsDOTcom

David Dayen: ddayATcaliticsDOTcom

Lucas O’Connor : lucasATcaliticsDOTcom

Robert Cruickshank: robertATcaliticsDOTcom

Dante Atkins: danteATcaliticsDOTcom

Want to Call Brian?  Well, here you go:


 

A gas cap? Clever Electioneering, but is it a good idea?

Fabian Nunez and Bill Lockyer have proposed AB 457, a bill that introduces a price cap:

Frustrated by soaring gasoline prices, two of California’s top elected officials proposed legislation Thursday designed to crack down on consumer gouging by allowing a temporary price cap in times of “abnormal market disruption.”

Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez jointly proposed the measure, Assembly Bill 457, in response to pump prices that have jumped by more than $1 per gallon since January.

“We need to make sure that California is not the victim of any type of market manipulation or Enron-type scheme to artificially inflate the price of gasoline at the pump,” Núñez said.
***
“It’s a publicity stunt,” said Assemblyman Russ Bogh, R-Cherry Valley. “It will do nothing to solve the gas problem, because they’re not addressing the real issues.”

Rather than demonize oil companies, lawmakers ought to be pushing to fast-track refineries and increase oil supply, Bogh said.(SacBee 6/9/06)

Personally, I don’t think that the way to deal with this is to extend temporary price caps and interfere with the market.  The market has a way (Adam Smith’s invisible hand) of making sure that gas gets to the people who value it most highly. 

However, Bogh has it even more wrong than the bill.  The way to solve the problems is not to increase refinery capacity for many reasonsts.  Of course, the most glaring reason is that nobody really wants to build any more refinery capacity.  The other major reason is that there just isn’t the oil to keep building refineries and expect the oil just to keep rolling in. 

So, the obvious suggestions would be to increase public transport capacity and alternative fuel production.  But, those don’t sound as immediate as gas caps, so gas caps it is I suppose.

New poster–anyone from OC out there?

Hey all,

Just discovered this blog from a link on MyDD. Seems there’s little if any activity from OC. I’ll try to post here occasionally to let you know what I see going on around me, though I definitely don’t see it all. A little about myself: I’m an alternate on the DPOC Central Committee (former delegate), CDP delegate, active in DFA-OC, communications person for a Congressional candidate, and precinct organizer for my city of residence through OC’s incipient involvement with precinctcaptains.org.

More after the jump…

We have some interesting races here, with our only Democrat-held seats (AD-69, SD-34) the only significantly contested primaries. Otherwise, I believe we actually have a great set of candidates this cycle. Most of the state Assembly and Senate candidates came out to DFA-OC’s candidate forum in April. They really surprised me. We also have some great candidates for local office and are finally working on building a farm team for the next decade, when–I firmly believe–Democrats will overtake Repubs as the plurality party in the county. Just you watch!

Please post with questions comments, as well as suggestions for my Congressional candidate.

Net Neutrality

(I know, not strictly Califorinia politics, but please consider this. – promoted by SFBrianCL)

Congress is currently considering a bill allowing ISPs to favor certain uses of bandwidth over others.  In otherwords, the ISPs want to end Net Neutrality.
Net Neutrality is vital to a free Internet and the growing use of the Internet as a political organizing tool.  Please go to Moveon.org’s Net Neutrality Site, and consider signing their petition.

Absolute Bullshit: Smoking Ban in Calabasas, CA

Until they outlaw motherfucking CARS, this kind of bullshit law has no place in the United States of America.

Can I smoke in my house or apartment? Can I smoke on my balcony?

Yes. The only exception is if your apartment, backyard, or balcony is directly adjacent to a common area, such as a laundry room or pool.

I’m a smoker. I quit smoking on September 7th, 2005; I resumed smoking 5 months later. After a month, I quit again, for a grand total of 8 days. I’ve been smoking for the past 3 days, but will probably quit AGAIN tomorrow.

Suffice to say, I am in no way unaware of the evils of tobaccy. It runs my life, it ruins my life. I hate cigarettes. I loathe smoking. I am addicted to nicotine, to such an extent that it dominates my life; when I’m smoking, I want nothing more than to be rid of it. When I’m not smoking, I want nothing more than a cigarette. Cigarettes are an insidious, wretched, horrible thing, and I wish I had never picked up the first one, let alone the last one, which must be Number Nine Thousand…

But this is BULLSHIT. I was FINE with the indoor bans, truly. There are few experiences more distasteful than being a non-smoker in a room full of smoke. I can’t believe people were smoking in airplanes as long as they were, let alone in hospital waiting rooms.

But OUTSIDE? On the motherfucking SIDEWALK? Dude, I’m SO tempted to head over to Calabasas and rack up as many fucking tickets as I can before I quit again, just so I can take it to fucking court.

From AP

Calif. City Bans Smoking in Public Places

CALABASAS, Calif. – . . .

One of the strictest tobacco bans in the nation went into effect in the Los Angeles suburb of Calabasas last week, making smoking off limits in public places where someone else might be exposed to secondhand smoke: indoor businesses, outdoor businesses, parks, outdoor cafes, even apartment building common areas.

“We just don’t want anyone blowing smoke in someone’s face. Unfortunately, what smokers do is harmful to everybody else. People should have the right to breathe clean air,” said Mayor Pro Tem Dennis Washburn.

California air-quality regulators declared secondhand smoke a toxic air pollutant earlier this year.

The city took it a step farther, declaring secondhand smoke to be a public nuisance and approving an ordinance banning smoking in all public places — indoors and out — where people might congregate.

. . .

But if a nonsmoker asks a smoker to stop, the smoker must snuff it or face a possible fine in the hundreds of dollars or even a lawsuit.

“We salute Calabasas for raising the bar,” said Jim Knox, a legislative advocate for the American Cancer Society in Sacramento. “Smoke regulations can play a very important role in reducing public exposure to harmful secondhand smoke.”

Nationally, hundreds of U.S. cities and several states restrict smoking. In California, where communities have been at the forefront of smoking bans, San Francisco last year banned smoking in parks and stadiums, and oceanfront communities’ smoking bans have inspired others in Florida and Delaware to designate smoke-free beaches.

. . .

I won’t go to Calabasas. It’s tempting, but there are way too many more important issues facing us for me to make a federal case of this. But I sure as hell hope SOMEONE does.

This is one of those cases where the motive is unimpeachable, I think. They’re doing it “for our own good,” that much we can all agree on, hopefully.

Doesn’t make it any the less fascist. Under this law, I can be walking down a sidewalk and ORDERED TO PUT OUT A CIGARETTE by ANY PASSER-BY. And I am LEGALLY REQUIRED to do so, even though I’m WALKING PAST that person, even though that person will be long gone by the time the cigarette goes out.

Can ANYONE tell me this kind of law isn’t a slippery motherfucking slope? How long before there are laws enacted with less sound motives, but dressed up to look reasonable, regulating behaviour that has nothing to do with public health in any reasonable way?

Everytime I see a Bush bumper sticker, I seethe. Sometimes I think I might have a stroke, it makes me so angry.

Shall we outlaw bumper stickers?

Why Does Arnold Hate Fruit?

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

No, I mean actual fruit.  Particularly fresh fruit.  It turns out that he found yet one more special interest that he does like.  From the LA Weekly:

[Arnold]insisted, too, on a third bill, which appropriated $18.2 million for a fresh-fruit breakfast program for low-income students. This was “very important legislation,” in the assessment of Ken Hecht, executive director of the San Francisco–based nonprofit nutrition group California Food Policy Advocates. “The program would introduce a large number of kids to fresh fruit,” Hecht said, “and if they eat that, they’ll eat much less of the junk food that’s putting so much weight on young people.”

But on the evening of September 7 — the night before the Assembly adjourned — Los Angeles Democrat Jackie Goldberg, who chaired the Assembly Education Committee, to which the bill had been assigned, was stunned to see that the bill, unceremoniously re-referred to the Agriculture Committee, had reached the floor with its 12 references to “fresh” fruit and vegetables eliminated and replaced by a dozen references to “nutritious” fruit and vegetables. Goldberg asked Republican Assembly leader Kevin McCarthy, who’d become the rewritten bill’s chief sponsor, to explain the changes.

“First, he said it referred to raisins and nuts, and I said, ‘Fine,’ ” Goldberg recalled. “Then, the word was there were some seasons when they couldn’t find fresh fruit.” Goldberg then proposed that the bill refer to “fresh and minimally processed” fruit that was freeze-dried but devoid of additional sugar or salt preservatives. “Peaches in their own juices,” Goldberg said. “But the Governor’s Office said no to that.” Lobbyists for the canning industry and the governor’s people, working discreetly behind the scenes, insisted on including canned fruit under the scope of the bill. It was in that form, over Goldberg’s and other progressives’ objections, that the bill passed and was signed by Schwarzenegger last week.

And what, pray, could have influenced Arnold to muck up his anti-obesity, healthy-food breakfasts for California kids with countless cans of processed food? Adducing causality in these matters is always an imperfect science, but we do know that as of September 12, the campaign committees that Arnold controls had received $421,000 from the Dole Food/Castle & Cook group of processed-fruit companies, and another $319,000 from Dean Cortopassi, CEO of San Tomo, a San Joaquin Valley food canner and processor. That’s a total of $740,000 in canned-fruit moola from just two large contributors. If that kind of money couldn’t buy a decent legislative outcome now and then, the damage to the lobbyist’s faith in the system would be beyond calculation.

So, he says he hates special interests, but as we all know, it’s only special interests that don’t give him money that he hates.

CA-48th: Steve Young Building Staff for General Election

I’ve had some private email wondering what we were doing to get ready for the General Election. Since Steve Young, the presumptive Democratic nominee and Democratic Party of California endorsed Candidate for the CA-48th, will be facing John Campbell, the presumptive Republican nominee, a millionaire and the entire Republican machine, I thought just this one little press release might give you some of the flavor of the quality of people jumping on board our campaign. (Our Open Primary, all candidates on one ballot, is Tuesday Oct. 4. We fully expect to be the Democratic Nominee.)

I was not aware of this Blog until Mary Scott O’Conner did me the favor of informing me today. I will make sure you are kept up to speed on the very important race. The CA-48th in Newport Beach is the Republicans Crown Jewel in California. And we have a very, very good chance of taking it away from them.

Visit our very advanced and unusual website, Steve Young for Congress to literally meet the Candidate for yourself.

This press item was released to the MSM yesterday:

Steve Young Gears Up for Special Election
 Campaign Rides Momentum into Oct. 4 Primary with Additional Advisors Joining the Campaign

more on the flip

(IRVINE — Sept. 30, 2005) — The Steve Young for Congress campaign entered the final week before the October 4th special election with the announcement of Lori Kreloff and Brad Chase joining the campaign as senior staff members.  Kreloff, formerly a major donor fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee, will lead the campaign’s Washington DC based Political Action Committee fundraising efforts while Chase will serve as press secretary.  

“The competition is heating up in advance of the primary and we’re bringing aboard the big guns to add depth to our campaign,” said Steve Young, Democratic candidate for California’s 48th Congressional District.  “John Campbell may be telling the media that he has the election in hand, but the race is far from over and my campaign is adding seasoned veterans such as Lori and Brad to add depth and expertise to our staff that will take the campaign to the next level and to Washington.”

Kreloff’s primary responsibility will be to create and foster relationships with Mid-Atlantic and National Political Action Committee donors and raise funds for the campaign.  She previously worked at the DNC as California Finance Director and Mid-Atlantic Finance Director and is involved at a senior level for several major campaigns.  She graduated from the University of Illinois.

Chase will lead the campaign’s public relations efforts and serve as Young’s primary spokesperson.  Previously, he was employed by Hill & Knowlton, a global public relations consultancy, in its Los Angeles office.  He received bachelor’s degrees in government and philosophy from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree in strategic public relations from the University of Southern California.

Since we are going up against the best the Republicans have to offer we will answer with the same. Just thought you’d want to know your dollars, (and thank you for the ActBlue support of the last few days…keep up the good work), are being spent on essential tasks.

The Unions have promised substantial support to the Nominee so Wednesday we begin that process with our Washington DC person being the leader in that cause.

Since we support The Apollo Alliance that opens a very unlikely series of PAC alliances as well. We will explore every financial avenue….likely and unlikely.

Steve Young is a Dynamic speaker and we hope to capture a speech to a crowd soon and place it on site so you can see his ability to move a crowd. He isn’t a normal Candidate.

Thanks for the support and please keep it coming at Steve Young for Congress.

PS:If  The John and Ken Show on KFI audiostream on the Net, Steve is walking into the Lions Den Monday afternoon and facing down, again, the major candidates. He loves that sort of thing. It might be worth a listen. He generally thrives on that sort of combative atmosphire. John and Ken don’t play fair. And I think he’s looking forward to it.

[PPS: Just realized that if you use Firefox and have had the browser open over night or for days, like I have, you may need to open a new Browser, or new TAB to get the site. Why? Not sure and have our techs investigating…but I’m passing it along.And we have had intermittment server problems today. Please be patient.]