Pressure Points on Budget Passage

(And check out KQED’s forum (MP3) with Sens. Perata and Ackerman. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

No matter what, it does not appear likely that we are going to get a budget (leaving aside the tax breaks for a moment) that is any better than what the Assembly agreed to.  Everybody is now maneuvering to put pressure on the Republicans in the Senate to pass it.  So what are the pressure points?

1) Get Arnold engaged in a productive way.  The man has barely been in town let alone meeting with legislators to speed up the process.  And the last time he actually showed up he set things backwards.  Arnold needs to find a way that he can actually communicate with his fellow Republicans.  Sweet talk them, promise them goodies.  Whatever.  It is his responsibility to get them to play ball and the press needs to hold him accountable.  Matt Jones:

Where’s Gov. Schwarzenegger been during the last two days as lawmakers sweat it out in Sacramento over the state budget impasse? Arnold has been in southern California, not talking about the state budget, but pimping a dead in the water (excuse the pun) plan to build expensive new dams and water systems around the state. (Note: the Governor’s water plan has been rejected in the State Senate).

In fact, yesterday the Governor didn’t even talk about the budget yesterday. And what’s worse, the mainstream press is letting him get away with it. Only one question was asked yesterday by a reporter after the Governor concluded his remarks.

2) Start pressuring individual Republican Senators.  The first target by the Education Coalition is Senator Jeff Denham.  The are holding two press conferences today, one of which is at his district office.

Local education leaders, parents, school board members, and school employees will be joined by Superintendent Jack O’Connell at a news conference today to urge Denham and other Republican state senators to pass the budget. According to a press release from the education coalition, “schools are struggling to plan their budgets … The Senate should make passing a state budget a priority so that our schools and students have the resources they need.”

Denham is considered one of the more moderate members of the Senate Republican Caucus. He also harbors statewide office ambitions (he has opened a campaign account for LG). Being on the wrong side of education groups — as well as law enforcement — could potentially doom his chances of moving up the political ladder.

Is Denham your Senator?  Here is his contact info, should you feel inclined to give him a call and encourage him to stop his obstructionist behavior.  Sacramento 916-651-4012 email form on his Senate website.

Law enforcement groups are gearing up too.  They know that their funding will be on the chopping block, if Republicans get their way.

Anyone else know of any targeting going on? There needs to be two Republicans voting for the budget in order for it to pass.  Tomorrow the Senate takes up the budget again.  Soon the state is going to have a hard time paying its bills and employees will have to get loans instead of paychecks. 

The latest out of the Republicans is that they want to cut a bunch of smaller programs to try and reach their goals.  They still haven’t laid out exactly what they would be.

CA-42: The DCCC knows us, reads us, and likes us

This is part of a series of diaries rolling out the Congressional campaign of Ron Shepston — the veteran, aerospace engineer, athlete, and grandfather whom you may know as CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream.  For anyone who doesn’t yet know, Ron is running against the ethically-challenged Rep. Gary Miller, who apparently believes that his role in Congress is to make money for his out-of-district friends, in CA-42.  I’m running his campaign full-time.

Something significant to our campaign happened yesterday.  We met with a representative of the DCCC.  More below.

Previous diaries in the CA-42 campaign rollout series (links are to DKos diaries, many of which have been cross-posted here):

7/15: thereisnospoon’s CA-42: A Kossack is running for Congress
7/16: atdnext’s CA-42: The Case Against Dirty Gary Miller
7/17: Major Danby’s CA-42: I’m managing a netroots U.S. House campaign
7/18: CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream’s CA-42: CA-42: Hi, I’m Ron Shepston and I’m running for Congress
7/19: hekebolos’s CA-42: A Netroots campaign– politics the way it should be.
7/20: dday’s CA-42: The Lay of the Land
7/21: OrangeClouds115 CA-42: “I Know His Heart”
7/22: Shockwave’s CA-42 Ron Shepston rides into a Republican stronghold

I /almost/ wish that I didn’t feel the need to post a headline that gives away the end of the story of our meeting this afternoon so that I could build up some dramatic tension before giving you the happy news.  But some people read headlines without clicking on diaries, and I want them to have seen this too.  Speaking of which, there is an eight-pack of wonderful diaries in the text box above — with more to come — and I urge you to read anything we’ve missed.  We are so very blessed in our supporters.

Here’s the story: we received a call late last week telling us that the DCCC’s representative for the western U.S. — Montana down to New Mexico and westward — would be in Southern California today and wanted to meet with us in the afternoon.  We didn’t even tell our supporters about this, including the five great bloggers we met with on Sunday night after the DFA training in Irvine.

We had two reasons for keeping it quiet: (1) we wanted to respect the privacy of the people initiating this contact, and (2) so as not to build up expectations given the possibility that things could have gone wrong.

And we knew very well that things could have gone wrong.

First of all, I hear you say: /the DCCC/?  Rahm Emanuel’s group?  The bete noir of so many bloggers?  Well, yes.  Same group.  Different personnel.  The person with whom we met was running Francine Busby’s campaign prior to being hired to go to Washington; he’s seen things from both sides of the fence and respects the power and role of the netroots.  And, as Markos has reminded us, the D-Trip is now under the leadership of Rep. Chris van Hollen, not Rahm.  (But give Rahm some respect — he knows how to land a punch and it’s great when he aims at the right chin.)

What could have gone wrong?  The DCCC could have tried to muscle us out or tried to take us over.

We’ve been aware for some time that, while there have been no prospects of a current officeholder or wealthy constituent deciding to run, that could change at any time.  We don’t want a primary challenge, but we are prepared for one should it come.  What we don’t want, most of all, is to be told “sorry, but some rich Republican-until-last-April political neophyte wants to run, so out you go.”  The odds are strong that we wouldn’t leave in such a situation anyway, but we want our focus to be on Gary Miller.

So, Ron and I were steeled for that prospect.  It didn’t happen.  The pleasant, personable guy from the DCCC instead told us that the DCCC is targeting this district, among others, and is quite /happy/ that we are running.  They’re relieved to have a viable candidate where they couldn’t recruit one.  They think they can work with us; they think that with a few breaks — which Miller seems intent on providing us — we can win.

Not only that: they know us.  They read us.  Including people here in Southern California.  “Everyone at the DCCC reads Daily Kos,” is my memory of the quote, and we found that they pay attention to Calitics as well.  (In fact, they found out about us here.)

They not only read us; they like us.

As for muscling in: no sign of it.  They want us to show our competence by raising money, among other things, but they’ve been impressed with the netroots rollout.  Our contact outlined the areas that they could help us — many of which are areas where we could use the help and expertise — but not even a gesture towards trying to squelch the netroots spirit of this campaign.  They understand what we want to do and they will help us do it.  (Most of all, they are going to help us figure out how to raise money, and they stressed that the seriousness we’ve already shown helps them take us seriously.)  If the time comes to bring in someone with 20 years experience to handle some part of the campaign for three times what I’m making, it will be because Ron and I make that decision.  (And we might someday.  What matters is winning while staying true to our convictions — our roots.  Precisely how is happens doesn’t much matter.)

Ron and I walked back to his pickup afterwards and he said: “that really couldn’t have gone much better, could it?”  The answer I wish I’d given was “sure it could — gold coins could have shot out of the guy’s nose.”  But instead I just grinned.

This is a real campaign.  It’s real enough for the DCCC and it should be real enough for all of you.  Ron and I are giving the next 15 months of our lives to it at substantial losses in income because we think that this /has to be done/.  That the DCCC agrees — well, that’s just more evidence for us that we are on the right path.

We need your help, because potential contributors are watching to see how well we are doing, and the thing they best know how to measure is money.  Please contribute what you can — /anything/ you can, but the more the merrier — to us through our ActBlue page.  As an alternative, you can mail contributions to *Ron Shepston for Congress, PO Box 97, Silverado, Ca 92676* if you prefer, but we prefer ActBlue.  If you mail it in, please see the ActBlue page so you know what information (as to employer, etc.) we need and what restrictions (not a government contractor, etc.) exist on who can donate.  You’ll save us the need to contact you for this information.

We also need the names of volunteers; I will be making initial contacts this week with those who have already spoken up.  (The cardinal rule of dealing with volunteers is that I must not waste your time, and the delay has been for me to be able to make sure I can follow that rule.)  If you live in or near the district, I really want to hear from you.  If you know of fundraising prospects, I’d like that as well.

We are going to give you a hell of a show these next 15 and here at Calitics you will have a front-row seat.  Now please help us convince other people that they should take this campaign seriously — like the DCCC does — by helping to fuel our campaign.  Many thanks to those who have already given, to those who will give now — and to the many people here who inspire us to fight this good fight.

Federal Judges Heading Up Department Of The Obvious

Let me build on Brian’s post regarding the decision by two separate US District Court judges to convene three-judge panels to consider capping the California prison population.  This should have been completely expected to everyone in the state government.

There is a near-term and a long-term crisis in our state prisons.  So the Governor predictably offered a medium-term solution.  Prisons don’t build themselves overnight, so “adding 53,000 beds” which can only phase in over the course of a couple years does absolutely nothing to address the current situation.  Furthermore, the continued overcrowding, which impacts rehabilitation and treatment and the high recidivism rate, means that by the time those new beds are constructed, the problem will be bigger, and any additional capacity (which doesn’t even cover the CURRENT overcrowding numbers) will be only a temporary solution.  So with root causes unaddressed, there was no way any judge with any sort of conscience could sit idly by and watch as the prison system continues to spiral out of control.  A state government that has COMPLETELY FAILED TO LEAD forced his hand.

over…

This is the first time since the law was established in 1996 offering for this kind of option for federal judges that it has been invoked.  No other system in America is as out of control as the prison system in our state.  And so the judges stepped in because we are violating the Constitution:

First of all, this is not just one judge making findings and a ruling. There are two cases, one before Judge Henderson (Plata) on the prison medical system in which orders were stipulated to (agreed upon) by the parties which included the state of California in 2002 and 2004. The judge has found that those orders have not been complied with. He has based his ruling on the evidence presented, including reports of the Receiver he appointed, last year, Robert Sillen, that document in great detail the problems in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation system.

The other case (Coleman) before Judge Karlton, concerns the medical treatment received by state prisoners with “serious mental disorders,” and has been going on since 1995. In that case, a Special Master, John Hagar, has been appointed by the Judge to investigate and report back to him on how the needs of these mentally ill prisoners have been met. After almost 12 years and 77 orders, the Special Master and the Judge have found the prisons to not be in compliance with the United States Constitution.

Gov. Schwarzenegger is talking about appeal, but there is a voluminous public record documenting this total failure in leadership that has brought our prisons to the crisis point.  But such an appeal will likely take close to a year.  That’s another year where root causes will not be addressed as everyone awaits this decision.

But there’s another way.  The judges have rejected that AB 900, which authorized the construction of the prisons, will be insufficient to deal with the problem.  But if Gloria Romero’s sentencing reform bill, SB 110, can offer a real sea change in empowering an independent commission to recommend and review changes to sentencing law, perhaps the judges can be persuaded that the state is finally moving in the right direction on understanding what needs to be done.  Romero is a lonely voice for sanity on this issue, and with her bill now in the Assembly, she needs to be joined by we the people.  The California Democratic Party has come out in support of sentencing and parole reform.  Every Democratic member of the Assembly needs to be made aware of that fact, and the fact that SB 110 is the ONLY vehicle to get a handle on this unconscionable state prison crisis.  It’s worth a call today.

The Judicial Prisons Decisions: Going where the Legislature Dare not Tread

Two Federal Judges have determined that AB 900, the prison construction package, was insufficient and would take too long.  So, finally, perhaps somebody can shake some sense into the prison system. I’m sure you’ll hear more about this here, but here’s the 411 from the SacBee:

Two federal judges Monday ordered the creation of a rare three-judge panel to consider a cap on California’s inmate population, rejecting assertions that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and lawmakers have done enough to resolve the state’s prison overcrowding crisis.

A prison cap could lead to the early release of thousands of inmates, a move legislative Republicans and the GOP governor vow to fight.

In an attempt to avoid Monday’s impaneling of judges, Schwarzenegger and state lawmakers from both parties approved a $7.9 billion bond in April for 53,000 new prison and jail beds. The plan, Assembly Bill 900, also requires the state to enhance its prison rehabilitation programs and allows an out-of-state transfer of up to 8,000 inmates.

The California Politics Chat Show, Wed 7/25, 10AM

First of all, we clearly need a better name. Tomorrow, Frank Russo, of California Progress Report, and I will host the premiere edition of what, for ease, we’ll temporarily call the Calitics Radio show. We are very, very pleased to announce that we will have Calitics endorsee  Asm. Mark Leno, (D-SF), on the show.  We’ll talk about the budget, the 2/3 Requirement (otherwise known as the Republican anti-democracy movement), and prisons. Oh, and I’ve heard he’s running for something.

So, the show is hosted by blog talk radio, and here is our show’s page. It says 9:30, but that’s just to let me prepare. From there, you can listen in. And you can call in to chat with us at (718) 664-9561. I’ll post links tomorrow morning too.

July 23, 2007 Blog Roundup

Today’s Blog Roundup is on the flip. More budget stuff, some prison stuff, some interesting local stuff, some just stuff stuff.

If you want this in email format, you can sign up here.

As always, let me know if I missed something.

Budgets are Moral
Documents

Prisons

Environment

Local

All the Rest

What Do the Republicans Want?

Other than a fight for the sake of a fight…  There is no fat on the budget.  Any further cuts will be to programs.  Services to the poor, elderly or children?  Funding for our already underfunded education system?  More cuts to our transportation programs?  What about public safety?  Shall we just prolong this thing so that we have to shut down the entire government?  Actually, I kind of think they would like that.  Drown it in a bathtub right?

What they are asking for is not reasonable.  Heck, I don’t even know what they are asking for, because they are too scared to lay it out.  They are not negotiating on the level.  The goal posts have changed so often that it isn’t worth looking up the latest word out of the Republican’s mouth, because by the time I would write it up, it probably would change again.  But still, it is not reasonable.  If you can get the Democrats to try and out conservative the Republican governor, in arguably the most liberal state in the country, you know you have gotten all that you can get.

I understand that the Republicans want to be relevant.  Ok, you proved your point.  You managed to cut aid to the poor and elderly.  You even got the Democrats to cut taxes.  They paid down debt that we didn’t need to pay.  Go take that to your supports and try and argue that you deserve to be elected again.  But, now it is time to do the right thing.  Finish this thing off.  Go enjoy your recess.

George Skelton Is Shrill

The Royal and Ancient Hermetic Order of the Shrill has a new member, and he’s particularly amped up about some of the little goodies tucked away in the state budget, which is once again too heavily constructed on the backs of the poor:

Anyway, it was about the time of the wine-tasting that the legislative leaders hatched their plan to roll California’s most vulnerable.OK, maybe I’m guilty of a cheap shot. But it’s no more a cheap shot than picking the pockets of the poor in order to bring spending and taxes closer into balance.

The victims list includes 1.2 million impoverished aged, blind and disabled, plus 500,000 welfare families, mostly single moms with two kids.

Skelton is particularly shrill about the delay in the cost of living adjustment (COLA) for seniors on state and federal assistance, and the cuts to public transit, which for many who can’t afford cars is the only recourse to get around (although we need to sever that link between class and public transit, and soon).  Skelton is particularly disappointed in some so-called progressive leaders:

It was a sign of scandalized Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s loss of political clout that he didn’t personally fight for the transit funds, as he has for other L.A. causes in the past. “He has been AWOL,” says one leading Democrat. “He’s been wounded.”

Democrats, however, haven’t exactly been fighting for the aged, poor and disabled either. Republicans wouldn’t be expected to. But Democrats are supposed to be the defenders of the destitute. Instead, they suddenly surrendered to Republicans last week after vowing to hold their ground.

Any budget is going to be a mixed bag under the 2/3 requirement.  But it does appear to me that winners and losers were very clearly chosen based on their political clout.  The blind, the elderly, the poor, they all don’t donate to campaigns the way that teachers do (no slam on teachers, just reality).  Drug offenders who saw a cut in Prop. 36 treatment funds don’t host fundraisers at the halfway house.  Where you stood in this budget depended upon where you sat, and if you didn’t have a place at the table, forget it.

Maybe that has to do with the donations rolling in for the term limits initiative.  Or maybe it’s just easier to dismiss those who have little voice and little chance to mobilize.