Mark Desaulnier vs ???

X-Posted @ BearFlagBlue

With Tauscher announcing she’ll be leaving Congress for the State Dept, the last few days have been filled with speculation over who will replace her in California’s 10th. The three major names that have been floated so far have been Tom Torlakson, Mark Desaulnier, and Joan Buchanan. Now while I’ve been around the blogging scene for years now, I’m actually fairly new to the local political scene, but I do live in the 10th CD and thought I would offer my perspective.

I’ve met Joan Buchanan on a few occasions, even shared a beer & a burger with her once, and while some claim that she may be the least progressive of the bunch, I actually really like her. I don’t know that it’s really fair to judge her progressive cred at this point, considering that she is still so new and hasn’t had the chance to offer up much legislation or cast many votes. I do know that from the few conversations that I have had with her that she seems to support overturning of the 2/3rds rule and I’ve also got the distinct impression from speaking with her that she is not down for the spending cap at all. As a former school board member, you can also be assured that education is at the top of her priorities. Like I said, I don’t know about her progressive cred, but I don’t think she’d be an awful choice.

As far as congress is concerned though, with Tom Torlakson announcing that he will be endorsing Mark DeSaulnier for Congress, I think that makes it pretty clear that Joan Buchanan will not be running and the Democratic establishment will be lining up behind DeSaulnier to take Tauscher vacant seat.

Although I hope to soon, I’ve never met Mark DeSaulnier personally, but I have met many progressives in the area who seem to think pretty highly of him . I’ve been getting involved with the Iron Horse Dems lately, which is a causal gathering of young dems from around Contra Costa, who meet at the Pyramid Brewery in Walnut Creek and BS about local politics. At the meeting before the first meeting I attended, Mark DeSaulnier had spoken to the group and I guess he left quite an impression. I think folks around here would be interested to know that he seemed to have a keen interest in blogging and their political and organizing potential. We have some local right wingers who have started up some Contra Costa focused news and political blogs lately, and DeSaulnier was impressing upon the group the importance of combating the right with frames with micro-targeted blogging from a more progressive perspective. He also went on to speak of the groups need to organize into a more action oriented body. Granted, this is all secondhand, but the guy seems fired up and he really stoked that fire under these young progressives.

I don’t personally have any problems with Mark DeSaulnier replacing Ellen Tauscher in Congress, but there has been some talk of a more progressive candidate waiting in the wings…a Dark Horse, if you will.

There has also been some chatter about the moderate leaning demographics of the area and some concern that a more progressive candidate couldn’t win the 10th. I’m not buying it.

Here are the latest numbers from the CA Sec of State:

Registered Voters:  524,106

Registered DEM: 263,987 (50.37%)

Registered GOP: 137,953 (26.32%)

California’s 10th is going to a Dem no matter who runs. If folks think they can find a better or more progressive candidate, then now is the time. Otherwise, Mark DeSaulnier will be the next congressman from California.

We All Need to Stand Up and Fight against Further Student Fee Increases

During the University of California Board of Regents meeting today in Riverside, I explained to the Board why I think it’s time all of us — students, community leaders, bloggers, and education advocates — reject further student fee increases. Simply put, I don’t think it’s appropriate to consistently shift the tax burden, year after year, to one of the segments of our society that are least capable of affording the costs.

Adjusted for inflation, student fees have more than doubled at the UC and CSU systems and more than tripled at the community colleges since 1990. When the state dissuades students from pursuing a higher education, we only rob ourselves of potential tax revenues in later years and increase the number of today’s youths who will be tomorrow’s prisoners or recipients of aid. To address our budget woes, we need to turn away from the easy fix of taxing students and begin the process to repeal the two-thirds legislative majority requirement to pass budgets and adjust taxes.

A transcript of my remarks to the board is below the fold, and you can also listen to audio here.

My statement at the UC Board of Regents meeting:

“The proposed budget that was signed basically requires that this group of regents approve a 9.3 percent increase in the fees, which amounts to something slightly less than $700. It’s interesting to note that the legislature decided to not increase other fees by some amount or another but instead decided to impose upon the students what could arguably – and I’ll make that argument – be called a tax of $700 additional tax on every student in the University of California system, and about half that amount in an additional tax increase for every student in the CSU system. That is a particularly stupid tax policy when there are further options available. I’ll just point out that the one percent increase in the sales tax of somebody who chooses to buy a $50,000 Mercedes would amount to some $500 increase in their tax burden. There are options out there, and what I would hope that this body would consider is to stand up and fight. And to push back. To push back really hard, because you are powerful, and the university is powerful. It has a voice, and it really ought to use its voice to stand up and fight and say, “Enough.” Enough already. Enough of stupid taxes on students. Enough of the starvation of the education system. We are starving this system, and in doing so, we are destroying the economic potential for the future. And I think we really have to stand up and fight. You got to push back. We just can’t say, “Well, there’s nothing we can do. We’re just going to have to accept it.” I’m all for a fight, and that’s a fight about the future, at least in my opinion.”

CA-10: Tom Torlakson Endorses Mark DeSaulnier

Conveniently answering two questions in one press release, Assemblymember Tom Torlakson is announcing that he will continue to run for State Superintendent of Public Education, and will endorse State Senator Mark DeSaulnier for Tauscher’s seat – which is the first clear indication that DeSaulnier will actually be running for that seat:

Assemblymember Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch, said today he will continue his campaign for state schools chief and not run for a congressional seat currently held by Rep. Ellen Tauscher….

In making the announcement, Torlakson, who has held elective office in Contra Costa County for 30 years, said he would endorse Senator Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, to succeed Tauscher….

“The East Bay has been fortunate to have been served by Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher the past 12 years, and I wish her well as she prepares for this important new position with the Obama Administration,” said Torlakson. “Mark DeSaulnier is the best person to continue her tradition of strong and effective leadership in Congress. He has the experience, intelligence, and character necessary to represent the residents of the district. I am pleased to endorse him and offer my full support for his upcoming campaign.”

There’s been some speculation that Asm. Joan Buchanan will run for the seat as well, which is possible, but it looks like the establishment is moving to unite behind DeSaulnier. Will that create an opening for a progressive candidate in the race? We shall see.

Rhetoric is not enough to protect farm workers from the heat

(Several people died in the fields last year, such a scenario should not be repeated. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

Gov. Schwarzenegger’s Cal-OSHA has announced today that they are kicking off a campaign to train employers to protect farm workers from the heat. Ironically, the same agency just proposed changes that actually undermine the current regulations aimed to protect workers from dying or becoming ill from extreme heat.

Teaching growers how to avoid illness and deaths among their workforce is important, but it’s not enough. At the same time, the governor must make sure the laws are enforced. Such a system surely includes giving farm workers the tools to protect themselves.  

For the past four years, the United Farm Workers has worked tirelessly to prevent heat deaths. In response to pressure from the UFW and their supporters, Gov. Schwarzenegger issued heat regulations. Despite these regulations, six farm workers died in the summer of 2008-as the rules went unenforced and ignored by employers.

The evidence points to neglect–not ignorance–as the cause of farm worker deaths. Also, the state’s consistent reduction of fines for violations has made these regulations ineffective.

Please take action today and help us tell the governor that more of the same will not prevent deaths.  Farm workers need a system that works. This requires a multi-faceted approach which would include: enforcing existing laws, giving farm workers the tools to protect themselves, and seeking serious criminal penalties for those whose gross negligence has caused the death of innocent people.

Go to:

http://www.ufwaction.org/campaign/heat309

Another Complaint Against the Mormon Church on Prop 8 Funding

The Mormon Church went to great lengths to hide their invovlement in the Prop 8 campaign.  Sure, we all know that they were deeply engaged, but Fred Karger, of Californians Against Hate, alleges that they deliberately obfuscated their activities, in violation of California’s Political Reform Act.  Karger previously filed a complaint alleging unreported contributions, which the Mormon church later admitted and filed an amended report.

This one takes a slightly different angle. Karger argues that the Mormon Church set up an organization, the National Organization for Marriage, with the express purpose of passing Prop 8, and then funded that without properly reporting. While complete records aren’t available, it is believed that over $2 Million passed through NOM, with little reporting on where that money came from.

The pattern follows, almost eerily, the pattern that the Mormons used to pass a marriage amendment in Hawaii in the late 90s.  If you are interested in the Mormon Church’s involvement in the Prop 8 campaign, I recommend you check out the full letter detailing the NOM organization at the Californians Against Hate blog.

Obama In LA

There’s a livestream of this town hall meeting at the Miguel Contreras Learning Center here.  It’s about to get underway.

It would be nice if somebody asked him about the guy introducing him, the Governor, and why he hasn’t taken a position on changing unemployment benefit law, and why his staff has talked about rejecting the stimulus funds, and why members of his party voted against it en masse.

…Arnold, introducing the President, touts all the money coming in to California from the stimulus package… but you know, not enough to hit the trigger and stop the worst cuts to health care for the needy.  There’s this weird tightrope that Arnold is walking, saying how much California is getting from the stimulus but not SO much that he isn’t forced to screw poor people.

Update by Robert: Obama simply doesn’t get it on education. 26,000 teachers are being fired in CA. Instead he rattles off an attack on teachers unions for wanting more money without reform, and on parents for not watching over their kids. This isn’t about reform or video games but staving off outright collapse. Obama doesn’t actually understand what is happening in CA.

Update by Dave I’m not sure why this second town hall was needed.  It’s almost a note-for-note replay of the first one, in the same region, which will generate the same news stories.  Obama’s opening remarks were almost verbatim, and the questions – which aren’t screened so this is not his fault – are treading pretty much the same territory.  Just doesn’t seem necessary.

The Great Hospital Organizing Campaign Begins

(Fabulous news.  The labor movement needs unity as much as its individual workplaces need it.  Steven Greenhouse of the NYT has a story about this. – promoted by David Dayen)

Today the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee (CNA/NNOC) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) announced an accord to work together to bring union representation to all non-union RNs and other healthcare employees in the US.

As Registered Nurses, we know all too well that working in a hospital these days means engaging in a daily struggle to provide care in an industry more concerned about it’s bottom-line than about providing patient care.

Registered Nurses struggle day in and day out to provide care without adequate staffing and resources. Non-RN hospital staff are struggling to fulfill essential hospital functions with ever decreasing numbers of staff, while worrying that they’ll be the next to be laid off.

Our patients, left to wonder if a nurse will be available to help if they ring their call-lights and whether their hospital bills will bankrupt their families are likely the most affected.

Under the pact, SEIU and CNA/NNOC, the largest unions in the nation representing healthcare workers and registered nurses, respectively, will work together to bring union representation to all non-union RNs and other healthcare employees and step up efforts to enact Employee Free Choice Act.

The resulting massive increase in unionization will improve the experience of providing and receiving care in US hospitals—and the resulting movement will change the whole nature of how health care is provided in the US.

READ THE PRESS RELEASE HERE

In the words of Rose Ann DeMoro, the Executive Director of CNA/NNOC, the nation's largest organization of direct care RNs with 85,000 members in all 50 states:

“This is an exciting new day for nurses and patients across the nation. This agreement provides a huge spark for the emergence of a more powerful, unified national movement that is needed to more effectively challenge healthcare industry layoffs and attacks on RN economic and professional standards and patient care conditions. It will also strengthen the ability of all direct-care RNs to fight for real healthcare reform and advocate for improved patient care conditions and stronger patient safety legislation from coast to coast.”

In the words of Andy Stern, President of SEIU, the nation’s largest healthcare union:

“This marks the beginning of a new future for nurses and other healthcare workers and their patients throughout this nation. We are lining up to make sweeping changes to this country’s broken healthcare system, and as we wait for the starting gun it is imperative that we put the past behind us and move forward by putting all healthcare workers in the strongest possible position to define reform, move legislation, and make the new healthcare system operational. Is this accord surprising? Perhaps, but those who recognize our shared value of making sure registered nurses and other healthcare workers have not only a say but a critical role in helping reshape a failed system into something that actually helps people know that this is the right step to help us meet the challenge and the call of this moment.”

 

Among key elements of the pact:

• The two unions will work together to organize non-union hospital workers throughout the country, with CNA/NNOC as the leading voice for RNs, and SEIU as the leading voice for all other hospital workers.

• The unions will launch an intensive national organizing campaign with an initial focus on the nation’s largest hospital systems. • In addition to organizing, SEIU and CNA/NNOC will coordinate on a broad range of other issues from bargaining with common employers to the campaign to enact the Employee Free Choice Act.

• SEIU and CNA/NNOC publicly endorse measures that allow states to adopt single-payer health care systems.

• Both parties will refrain from “raiding,” seeking to displace the existing members of the other's organization, or from interference in the other's internal affairs.

• The two unions will create a new joint RN organization in Florida to represent current and future RNs of both unions. In all other states, SEIU will continue to represent their current RN members in collective bargaining.

New Registration Numbers Show More Increases For Democrats

The latest report of registration, current up to February 2010, shows that voters have continued to register Democratic in higher numbers even since the general election.  There are now 17.3 million registered voters, 74.4% of all eligible adults, and Democrats have a 2.32 million vote advantage over Republicans.  By the percentages, the state consists of 44.52% Democrats, 31.14% Republicans, and 19.99% decline to state, with smaller parties rounding out the rest of the voters.

2010 is the last year before a new census and new district lines, so the district-level numbers only apply for the next election cycle.  Still, a close reading makes clear where Democrats should be focusing their registration efforts and resources for the next year.

In Congress, there are two Republican-held seats where Republicans hold less than 40% of the registration share, seen as a key dividing line.  Those are Dan Lungren’s CA-03 (39.7% Republican-37.7% Democratic) and, surprisingly, Buck McKeon’s CA-25 (39.7% Republican-39.2% Democratic), which has changed dramatically over the past few years and could be ripe for a well-funded, legitimate challenger.  Obama won that district 50-48 as well.  With only 351,421 registered voters in CA-25, there are additional non-voters waiting to be registered there to tighten up those numbers even further.  CA-19 also has a shortfall of voters which could lead to a tightening of the rolls.  

In the State Senate, the only even-numbered seat (the ones up for election in 2010) that deserves a focus is SD-12, where Jeff Denham is termed out.  There are 47.5% registered Democrats and 33.1% registered Republicans.  Democrats in that region are fairly conservative, and so there may not be a progressive coming out of that district, but there’s no reason on Earth why Democrats shouldn’t own that seat.  Especially since there may be 100,000 unregistered voters out there.

As for the Assembly, the numbers look good in AD-05, AD-26 (Dems have a 42-39 lead in registration), AD-30 and AD-36, with a few other marginal possibilities based solely on the voter reg. numbers (AD-38, AD-63, AD-64, and AD-65 come to mind).  There is absolutely a path to pick up three seats and a 2/3 majority in the Assembly, if the net is cast wide enough.

Of course, oftentimes Democratic officials focus too much, in my view, on voter registration statistics, and shoudl recruit good candidates and give them the resources they need to compete instead.  But in this off-year, registration stats offer an opportunity to determine where to target.  You can dig through them yourself at the Secretary of State’s page.

An Abuse Far More Important than “Waste, Fraud, & Abuse”

Like many of you, I have many friends that work for the state in one way or another.  Not just the political types, but also some teachers, social workers, that kind of thing.  The state after all provides most of these services.

You’ve probably read far more than you would possibly want to about teacher layoffs. Across the state, teachers, parents, and generally concerned people are protesting.  Take San Diego for example:

Educators from around San Diego County joined teachers statewide yesterday in protesting an estimated 26,000 tentative layoff notices being sent in school districts throughout California.

Dubbed Pink Friday – after pink slips that had to be delivered by this weekend – the protest focused on teachers carrying banners across freeway overpasses from Otay Mesa to Oceanside during rush-hour traffic after classes had ended. (SD U-T 3/14/09)

But while teacher layoffs are perhaps the most visible sign of the times, consider what is happening to our social services. As an example, the statewide system of regional centers has for many years been a service provider for the state’s mentally disabled citizens.  Each regional center based its services on a client model, where social workers would work with the disabled to provide them with necessary services. In many cases, this involved going out to visit non verbal clients, assessing the standard of care at group homes, and generally determining the needs of vulnerable clients.

Visiting these clients and checking up on them is how we avoid situations like the one at the Texas State School in Chorpus Christi:

Authorities on Thursday began arresting the six state workers accused of forcing mentally disabled Corpus Christi State School residents into “fight club”-style brawls, as advocates came to the Capitol to protest the state’s handling of the scandal.

By evening, Corpus Christi police had arrested one person and had confirmations that three more were turning themselves in. They were seeking the others, and said they had good leads.

* * *

The criminal charges stem from allegations this week that Corpus Christi state school employees forced disabled residents into orchestrated, late-night fights over the course of more than a year. They were caught after they captured at least 20 of the episodes on a cellphone camera, one turned over to police. (Dallas Morning News 3/12/09)

The fact is that these are our most vulnerable, subject to abuse and molestation.  The only way to combat such abuse is for committed, long-term social workers to develop relationships with the clientele. It’s a people-heavy business, yes, but it’s vitally important. How can we say that this is waste, fraud, and abuse? The only abuse would be to cut such funding.

And of course, that is what we have done.  The Regional Centers are laying of a large percentage of their professional staff. Those remaining are expected to carry an unmanageable workload, and only respond when clients contact them.  Of course the problem with that is that the mentally disabled frequently can’t speak for themselves, can’t stand up for their own rights.  In some cases, there are parents or other relatives there to help, but that is not universally true.

We are throwing the mentally disabled under the bus so that Jon Coupal and the HJTA can stand on their high horses about taxes.  What kind of America do we live in when we simply allow people to rot in warehousing institutions or abusive homes?

But this is what we have come to, where caring for Californians is subjugated to the almighty tax dollar.

San Diego’s Daily Fishwrap Changes Hands

Beverley Hills based private equity firm Platinum Equity has reached an agreement to purchase San Diego’s daily newspaper, the San Diego Union-Tribune for an estimated $15 million dollars.  The paper, once the flagship of the far-flung and politically conservative Copley media empire, has been a distressed property in recent years.  Last summer the heirs to the Copley fortune decided to cut their losses and put the paper on the market.

The family’s angst over the paper’s plight has been obvious over the past few years. Anxious for a solution, the Copley organization launched so many quick fixes, re-designs, re-launches, re-positions, cutbacks, flip-flops and fire sales that they began to resemble a losing political campaign more that the grand cartel with a license to print money that they once were.

The Union-Tribune has been losing circulation at an astonishing rate. Advertising dollars were disappearing faster than free food samples at Whole Foods. And, most importantly, the credibility and influence that the paper once wielded in the San Diego market had evaporated.  While it was all fine and wonderful that the Copley newspapers were once profitable, making profits was only part of the deal. The real reason for all this hand wringing had to do with influence.  If they could have found a way to maintain what they call their “market share” or “penetration”, they’d printed the paper on toilet paper, or switch to CB radio.  But those days are over.

San Diego is the eighth largest city in the United States.  It used to be a reliably Republican bastion, a Navy town, where dissent and dissenters simply weren’t tolerated.  Richard Nixon called it his lucky city.  The Union-Tribune was the face that the City showed the world.  Changing demographics and a shift in the regions’ economic base away from the military towards high tech industries have altered things.  Democratic majorities are emergent in most parts of the region, with the exception of the County Government. Given that the Union Tribune’s circulation was reaching just 8% of the households, the family wisely decided to trade their remaining hard assets for cold cash.

The San Diego newspaper was hardly alone in its troubles.  Three dailies have closed up shop since the first of the year, and the clock is ticking in a half-dozen more metropolitan areas.  What makes this sale noteworthy is that they found a willing buyer.  Why would a private equity firm invest in such an obviously doomed venture that had already shed its tenured employees?  The answer isn’t immediately obvious.

Private equity operators like Platinum Equity are often portrayed as slick, heartless financial manipulators that squeeze the remaining life from their acquisitions at the expense of the people unfortunate enough to be working there.  That doesn’t seem to be the case here.  In fact, it all seems too good to be true.

The U-T’s buyer says that its focus is operations, not financial manipulation, and it has a history of making long-term investments in the industries where it is active.  Platinum calls itself an M&A&O company-mergers, acquisitions and operations-and, in fact, it often acts more like a strategic buyer of its companies than a financial one. It invests, sometimes heavily, after the acquisition in additional businesses, equipment, people and facilities that give its holdings a stronger position for the long haul.

They certainly have been a buying streak.  Over the last 14 years, they’ve acquired nearly 100 companies with more than $27.5 billion in combined annual revenue at the time of acquisition.  What’s hard to believe are the rates of return.  Private Equity Intelligence Ltd., the British analyst of private equity fund performance, says investors in Platinum’s Equity Capital Partners Fund I of 2004, have seen a multiple of 2.68 (that’s $2.68 for every dollar invested) on their money, compared with 1.28 for all U.S.-based buyout funds originated in that year.  As the company is privately held, all such claims are completely unverifiable.

Platinum has an operating partner in their acquisition of the Union Tribune-Black Press Ltd., a Canadian company with extensive newspaper and internet holdings in North America.  Only two of their newspaper holdings are dailies: the Honolulu Star Bulletin and the Akron (Ohio) Beacon Journal.  Standard & Poor’s’ Rating Services downgraded Black’s Corporate credit rating into junk bond territory based on debt acquired in its last US purchase-the Akron paper-predicting that the company would remain fiscally challenged at least through 2010.  It would appear that, for the moment, Platinum has the money and Black is providing the muscle.

Black Press Ltd.’s track record with their holdings in Canada and the Northwestern States is pretty solid, and, if past performance is a reliable indicator, the San Diego daily won’t be the only paper changing hands in southern California.  The company has been able to deliver decent returns with their publishing concerns (most of which are weekly papers) via regional grouping of advertising and operational personnel.

For San Diegans, it’s wait and see time.  Will their daily paper shed its longstanding reputation as a reactionary mouthpiece with a particular distaste for anything associated with a trade union?  (Both of the Black Press’ dailies endorsed Obama last fall.) Or will this sale be just another boondoggle in a City seeking to shed its past reputation as Enron-by-the-Sea?  

other links about the sale: The family’s angst over the paper’s plight has been obvious over the past few years. Anxious for a solution, the Copley organization launched so many quick fixes, re-designs, re-launches, re-positions, cutbacks, flip-flops and fire sales that they began to resemble a losing political campaign more that the grand cartel with a license to print money that they once were.

The Union-Tribune has been losing circulation at an astonishing rate. Advertising dollars were disappearing faster than free food samples at Whole Foods. And, most importantly, the credibility and influence that the paper once wielded in the San Diego market had evaporated.  While it was all fine and wonderful that the Copley newspapers were once profitable, making profits was only part of the deal. The real reason for all this hand wringing had to do with influence.  If they could have found a way to maintain what they call their “market share” or “penetration”, they’d printed the paper on toilet paper, or switch to CB radio.  But those days are over.

San Diego is the eighth largest city in the United States.  It used to be a reliably Republican bastion, a Navy town, where dissent and dissenters simply weren’t tolerated.  Richard Nixon called it his lucky city.  The Union-Tribune was the face that the City showed the world.  Changing demographics and a shift in the regions’ economic base away from the military towards high tech industries have altered things.  Democratic majorities are emergent in most parts of the region, with the exception of the County Government. Given that the Union Tribune’s circulation was reaching just 8% of the households, the family wisely decided to trade their remaining hard assets for cold cash.

The San Diego newspaper was hardly alone in its troubles.  Three dailies have closed up shop since the first of the year, and the clock is ticking in a half-dozen more metropolitan areas.  What makes this sale noteworthy is that they found a willing buyer.  Why would a private equity firm invest in such an obviously doomed venture that had already shed its tenured employees?  The answer isn’t immediately obvious.

Private equity operators like Platinum Equity are often portrayed as slick, heartless financial manipulators that squeeze the remaining life from their acquisitions at the expense of the people unfortunate enough to be working there.  That doesn’t seem to be the case here.  In fact, it all seems too good to be true.

The U-T’s buyer says that its focus is operations, not financial manipulation, and it has a history of making long-term investments in the industries where it is active.  Platinum calls itself an M&A&O company-mergers, acquisitions and operations-and, in fact, it often acts more like a strategic buyer of its companies than a financial one. It invests, sometimes heavily, after the acquisition in additional businesses, equipment, people and facilities that give its holdings a stronger position for the long haul.

They certainly have been a buying streak.  Over the last 14 years, they’ve acquired nearly 100 companies with more than $27.5 billion in combined annual revenue at the time of acquisition.  What’s hard to believe are the rates of return.  Private Equity Intelligence Ltd., the British analyst of private equity fund performance, says investors in Platinum’s Equity Capital Partners Fund I of 2004, have seen a multiple of 2.68 (that’s $2.68 for every dollar invested) on their money, compared with 1.28 for all U.S.-based buyout funds originated in that year.  As the company is privately held, all such claims are completely unverifiable.

Platinum has an operating partner in their acquisition of the Union Tribune-Black Press Ltd., a Canadian company with extensive newspaper and internet holdings in North America.  Only two of their newspaper holdings are dailies: the Honolulu Star Bulletin and the Akron (Ohio) Beacon Journal.  Standard & Poor’s’ Rating Services downgraded Black’s Corporate credit rating into junk bond territory based on debt acquired in its last US purchase-the Akron paper-predicting that the company would remain fiscally challenged at least through 2010.  It would appear that, for the moment, Platinum has the money and Black is providing the muscle.

Black Press Ltd.’s track record with their holdings in Canada and the Northwestern States is pretty solid, and, if past performance is a reliable indicator, the San Diego daily won’t be the only paper changing hands in southern California.  The company has been able to deliver decent returns with their publishing concerns (most of which are weekly papers) via regional grouping of advertising and operational personnel.

For San Diegans, it’s wait and see time.  Will their daily paper shed its longstanding reputation as a reactionary mouthpiece with a particular distaste for anything associated with a trade union?  (Both of the Black Press’ dailies endorsed Obama last fall.) Or will this sale be just another boondoggle in a City seeking to shed its past reputation as Enron-by-the-Sea?  (cross posted at daily kos)

other links about the sale:

http://obrag.org/?p=1333   http://lastblogonearth.com/200…  http://www.voiceofsandiego.org…